Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
If Pfizer admitted in 2010 that it was paying kickbacks to 4,500 doctors, scientists, and medical professionals...
How many do you think Pfizer owns today❓
How many of these television doctors and twitter scientists are paid by Pfizer❓
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/business/01payments.html
@KanekoaTheGreat
How many do you think Pfizer owns today❓
How many of these television doctors and twitter scientists are paid by Pfizer❓
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/01/business/01payments.html
@KanekoaTheGreat
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Wisconsin Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections 11/10 Hearing
Wisconsin Election Integrity SITREP: Senate Issues First Subpoena, ‘A Lot More Is Coming Next Week’
Senate Subpoena
On Tuesday, the Joint Legislative Committee held a hearing to review the results of the Legislative Audit Bureau’s (LAB) 8-month investigation of the 2020 election, which revealed numerous election law violations by the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) and lack of cooperation from the city of Madison, Milwaukee County, and four of the six Election Commissioners.
The following day, the WI Senate subpoenaed election records from the city of Madison. Uncover DC reports: “The Senate’s subpoena allows 14 days for Madison to turn over records in person or to the Senate Sergeant at Arms, with the consequence of potential “arrest, imprisonment, and criminal prosecution” per Wisconsin Statutes §13.26 and §13.27… The subpoena for those records is signed by Senate President Chris Kapenga and Senate Chief Clerk Michael Queensland.”
Committee on Campaigns and Elections Hearing
On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, chaired by warrior Rep. Janel Brandtjen, heard testimony from Racine County Police Lt. Michael Luell on the election laws “shattered” by the WEC and an update from former Supreme Court Justice, Special Counsel Michael Gablemen.
Gableman’s investigation is looking into 3 primary areas:
1) evidence that private money (Zuckerbucks) coerced local officials;
2) the lack of clarity about who actually runs the elections in WI;
3) contractual and technical aspects of the voting machines. Gablemen noted that the voting machine contractors have total control: “we’re at the mercy of the vendors.”
Gableman currently has subpoenas out to the WEC as well as the counties and districts that received the largest Zuckerberg CTCL grants. So far, he’s had very limited cooperation; the WEC and Green Bay have lawyered up.
Former DA and constitutional conservative rockstar Lt. Luell eviscerated the WEC during his two-hour testimony, revealing blatant, willful, and unilateral voting law overrides by the Commission tasked with protecting the integrity of WI elections.
Although Governor Evers denied the WEC’s request to suspend the law regarding Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) in elder care homes, saying he did not have the power to shelve parts of voting law even in a state of emergency, the WEC did it anyway, and then documented the law-breaking in multiple recorded meetings. The SVDs they eliminated were set up to include one member from each political party specifically to prevent elder abuse and ballot harvesting in nursing homes.
To report election issues, email: [email protected]
Hat tip🤠 SSPatriot1
Legislation
In Episode 35 of the Ramthun Report, Rep. Timothy Ramthun announced plans to introduce seven election integrity bills he calls ‘common-sense legislation.’ They include “a requirement for electronic data to be preserved like ballot data, a ‘data cleanup bill,’ and one that preserves the right for Livestream auditing of future elections,” Uncover DC reports. However, getting the legislation past Governor Evers may be a challenge given that he’s vetoed previous election integrity bills.
Ramthun, who is pushing for a joint resolution for decertification, also noted:
“We have qualified data that says yes, more than nefarious actions took place, yes, illegal actions did occur, and fraud vitiates everything. More is coming, by the way. I heard a lot more is coming next week, which will validate the importance of this [decertification] resolution request now — to make this a no-brainer.”
Read 📰 Uncover DC
Watch 📺 Committee on Campaigns and Elections Hearing
Learn more🔎🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Senate Subpoena
On Tuesday, the Joint Legislative Committee held a hearing to review the results of the Legislative Audit Bureau’s (LAB) 8-month investigation of the 2020 election, which revealed numerous election law violations by the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) and lack of cooperation from the city of Madison, Milwaukee County, and four of the six Election Commissioners.
The following day, the WI Senate subpoenaed election records from the city of Madison. Uncover DC reports: “The Senate’s subpoena allows 14 days for Madison to turn over records in person or to the Senate Sergeant at Arms, with the consequence of potential “arrest, imprisonment, and criminal prosecution” per Wisconsin Statutes §13.26 and §13.27… The subpoena for those records is signed by Senate President Chris Kapenga and Senate Chief Clerk Michael Queensland.”
Committee on Campaigns and Elections Hearing
On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Assembly Committee on Campaigns and Elections, chaired by warrior Rep. Janel Brandtjen, heard testimony from Racine County Police Lt. Michael Luell on the election laws “shattered” by the WEC and an update from former Supreme Court Justice, Special Counsel Michael Gablemen.
Gableman’s investigation is looking into 3 primary areas:
1) evidence that private money (Zuckerbucks) coerced local officials;
2) the lack of clarity about who actually runs the elections in WI;
3) contractual and technical aspects of the voting machines. Gablemen noted that the voting machine contractors have total control: “we’re at the mercy of the vendors.”
Gableman currently has subpoenas out to the WEC as well as the counties and districts that received the largest Zuckerberg CTCL grants. So far, he’s had very limited cooperation; the WEC and Green Bay have lawyered up.
Former DA and constitutional conservative rockstar Lt. Luell eviscerated the WEC during his two-hour testimony, revealing blatant, willful, and unilateral voting law overrides by the Commission tasked with protecting the integrity of WI elections.
Although Governor Evers denied the WEC’s request to suspend the law regarding Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) in elder care homes, saying he did not have the power to shelve parts of voting law even in a state of emergency, the WEC did it anyway, and then documented the law-breaking in multiple recorded meetings. The SVDs they eliminated were set up to include one member from each political party specifically to prevent elder abuse and ballot harvesting in nursing homes.
To report election issues, email: [email protected]
Hat tip🤠 SSPatriot1
Legislation
In Episode 35 of the Ramthun Report, Rep. Timothy Ramthun announced plans to introduce seven election integrity bills he calls ‘common-sense legislation.’ They include “a requirement for electronic data to be preserved like ballot data, a ‘data cleanup bill,’ and one that preserves the right for Livestream auditing of future elections,” Uncover DC reports. However, getting the legislation past Governor Evers may be a challenge given that he’s vetoed previous election integrity bills.
Ramthun, who is pushing for a joint resolution for decertification, also noted:
“We have qualified data that says yes, more than nefarious actions took place, yes, illegal actions did occur, and fraud vitiates everything. More is coming, by the way. I heard a lot more is coming next week, which will validate the importance of this [decertification] resolution request now — to make this a no-brainer.”
Read 📰 Uncover DC
Watch 📺 Committee on Campaigns and Elections Hearing
Learn more🔎🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
Liberty Overwatch
Wisconsin Audit Committee Hearing: ‘You’ve Done Nothing to Allay My Concerns,’ Rep. Macco to WEC Administrator Meagan Wolfe
Today the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Committee reviewed the findings from the Legislative Audit Bureau’s 8-month risk-limited review…
Today the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Committee reviewed the findings from the Legislative Audit Bureau’s 8-month risk-limited review…
Fulton County: The 773K Ballot Question | Uncover DC
Kevin Moncla, Uncover DC, recently reported on the discovery of an eleventh-hour, massive Fulton County order of more than one million absentee/ by mail ballots. By any stretch of the imagination, this was a suspiciously large order given that Fulton County had just over 500K votes (including both in-person and absentee) in the 2020 election, nearly 200K absentee ballots had already been mailed out when the order was placed, and emergency ballot orders in other GA counties covered just 10% of active registered voters. Furthermore, the Fulton County order did not include the required ballot-numbering stubs for record keeping.
Now Moncla has learned that Fulton County is destroying these “emergency” ballots. He writes:
“In addition to the obvious problem of destroying documents from the election— even if they are unused — there is an issue with the number they intend to destroy. The notice states there are only 284,901 emergency ballots remaining, but as our reporting showed, Fulton County ordered a total of 1,058,210 emergency ballots. In the notice, Fulton County claims the emergency ballots were ordered as a contingency plan and thus never needed.”
In tweet on 10/9/21, Gabriel Sterling confirmed that the emergency ballots were unused:
“They got hit by COVID. They was concern they couldn’t do logic & accuracy testing of the equipment. As a plan C, they ordered enough emergency ballots in case they had to do handmarked at all polling locations. They didn’t. The ordered ballots were known & in view all@the time.”
Moncla continues, “We know Fulton County ordered 1,058,210 ‘emergency’ ballots. Fulton County and Gabriel Sterling affirm the reason that the ballots were ordered, and both claim they were never needed. They are now planning to destroy those ballots, but for some reason only have
284,901 to destroy. Which begs the question:
Where are the missing 773,309 ballots?
More to come soon.”
Read 📰 Uncover DC
Learn more🔎🧵 Last GA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Kevin Moncla, Uncover DC, recently reported on the discovery of an eleventh-hour, massive Fulton County order of more than one million absentee/ by mail ballots. By any stretch of the imagination, this was a suspiciously large order given that Fulton County had just over 500K votes (including both in-person and absentee) in the 2020 election, nearly 200K absentee ballots had already been mailed out when the order was placed, and emergency ballot orders in other GA counties covered just 10% of active registered voters. Furthermore, the Fulton County order did not include the required ballot-numbering stubs for record keeping.
Now Moncla has learned that Fulton County is destroying these “emergency” ballots. He writes:
“In addition to the obvious problem of destroying documents from the election— even if they are unused — there is an issue with the number they intend to destroy. The notice states there are only 284,901 emergency ballots remaining, but as our reporting showed, Fulton County ordered a total of 1,058,210 emergency ballots. In the notice, Fulton County claims the emergency ballots were ordered as a contingency plan and thus never needed.”
In tweet on 10/9/21, Gabriel Sterling confirmed that the emergency ballots were unused:
“They got hit by COVID. They was concern they couldn’t do logic & accuracy testing of the equipment. As a plan C, they ordered enough emergency ballots in case they had to do handmarked at all polling locations. They didn’t. The ordered ballots were known & in view all@the time.”
Moncla continues, “We know Fulton County ordered 1,058,210 ‘emergency’ ballots. Fulton County and Gabriel Sterling affirm the reason that the ballots were ordered, and both claim they were never needed. They are now planning to destroy those ballots, but for some reason only have
284,901 to destroy. Which begs the question:
Where are the missing 773,309 ballots?
More to come soon.”
Read 📰 Uncover DC
Learn more🔎🧵 Last GA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Forwarded from The Washington Pundit (BoumtjeBoumtje)
Former Trump advisor Steve Bannon indicted on 2 counts by a federal grand jury for refusing to comply with House Jan 6th Committee
Things to know:
- The counts are both criminal misdemeanor (2 U.S. Code § 192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papers)
- Charges are in the DC District, but Bannon should have the opportunity to contest responding the contempt charges in local US District Court; most likely the Southern District of Florida (SDFL)
- These types of Contempt of Congress charges are usually brought as civil cases if brought at all, not criminal. This represents an egregious escalation and further weaponization of the Dept. of Justice to target political opponents.
- The House Select Committee only has the power to subpoena information pertinent to drafting new legislation. The Jan 6th is not an Investigative Commission. That proposal was rejected by Republicans back in May.
- Bannon is exerting Executive Privilege. The privilege belongs to President Trump and is his alone to waive. It doesn't matter that Bannon was a private citizen. The President has the right to seek counsel from individuals outside of government without the contents of those discussions having to be disclosed to the other branches of government. This is a Separation of Powers issue.
- The privilege does not transfer from Trump to Biden simply when Trump leaves office anymore than hiring somebody's attorney as your own after the fact transfers their Attorney-Client Privilege to you.
Prediction: This will bounce around in a lower court for a year or more, and ultimately be dismissed. The SCOTUS might decide however to take up the case in order to clarify matters of Executive Privilege in the future.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/stephen-k-bannon-indicted-contempt-congress
@TheWashingtonPundit | Speak Truth To Power
Things to know:
- The counts are both criminal misdemeanor (2 U.S. Code § 192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papers)
- Charges are in the DC District, but Bannon should have the opportunity to contest responding the contempt charges in local US District Court; most likely the Southern District of Florida (SDFL)
- These types of Contempt of Congress charges are usually brought as civil cases if brought at all, not criminal. This represents an egregious escalation and further weaponization of the Dept. of Justice to target political opponents.
- The House Select Committee only has the power to subpoena information pertinent to drafting new legislation. The Jan 6th is not an Investigative Commission. That proposal was rejected by Republicans back in May.
- Bannon is exerting Executive Privilege. The privilege belongs to President Trump and is his alone to waive. It doesn't matter that Bannon was a private citizen. The President has the right to seek counsel from individuals outside of government without the contents of those discussions having to be disclosed to the other branches of government. This is a Separation of Powers issue.
- The privilege does not transfer from Trump to Biden simply when Trump leaves office anymore than hiring somebody's attorney as your own after the fact transfers their Attorney-Client Privilege to you.
Prediction: This will bounce around in a lower court for a year or more, and ultimately be dismissed. The SCOTUS might decide however to take up the case in order to clarify matters of Executive Privilege in the future.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/stephen-k-bannon-indicted-contempt-congress
@TheWashingtonPundit | Speak Truth To Power
www.justice.gov
Stephen K. Bannon Indicted for Contempt of Congress
Stephen K. Bannon was indicted today by a federal grand jury on two counts of contempt of Congress stemming from his failure to comply with a subpoena issued by the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 breach of the U.S. Capitol.
👍1
Fifth Circuit Demolishes Biden’s ‘Sledgehamner’ Jab Mandate: Affirms Nationwide Stay, Orders OSHA to Take ‘No Steps to Implement or Enforce Mandate’
The Fifth Circuit delivers a Let’s go Brandon ruling on Xiden’s vaccine coercion ‘workaround.’ Excerpts from the ruling:
“On the dubious assumption that the Mandate does pass constitutional muster — which we need not decide today — it is nonetheless fatally flawed on its own terms. Indeed, the Mandate’s strained prescriptions combine to make it the rare government pronouncement that is both overinclusive (applying to employers and employees in virtually all industries and workplaces in America, with little attempt to account for the obvious differences between the risks facing, say, a security guard on a lonely night shift, and a meatpacker working shoulder to shoulder in a cramped warehouse) and underinclusive (purporting to save employees with 99 or more coworkers from a “grave danger” in the workplace, while making no attempt to shield employees with 98 or fewer coworkers from the very same threat). The Mandate’s stated impetus— a purported “emergency” that the entire globe has now endured for nearly two years, and which OSHA itself spent nearly two months responding to — is unavailing as well. And its promulgation grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority.
[…]
Thus, courts have uniformly observed that OSHA’s authority to establish emergency temporary standards under § 655(c) “is an ‘extraordinary power’ that is to be ‘delicately exercised’ in only certain ‘limited situations.’” Id. at 370 (quoting Pub. Citizen, 702 F.2d at 1155).
But the Mandate at issue here is anything but a “delicate exercise” of this “extraordinary power.” Cf. Pub. Citizen, 702 F.2d at 1155. Quite the opposite, rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly “grave danger” the Mandate purports to address.
[…]
It lastly bears noting that the Mandate raises serious constitutional concerns that either make it more likely that the petitioners will succeed on the merits, or at least counsel against adopting OSHA’s broad reading of § 655(c) as a matter of statutory interpretation.
[…]
For these reasons, the petitioners’ motion for a stay pending review is GRANTED. Enforcement of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s “COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard” remains STAYED pending adequate judicial review of the petitioners’ underlying motions for a permanent injunction.
In addition, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that OSHA take no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order.
Read 📜 Fifth Circuit Ruling
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Fifth Circuit delivers a Let’s go Brandon ruling on Xiden’s vaccine coercion ‘workaround.’ Excerpts from the ruling:
“On the dubious assumption that the Mandate does pass constitutional muster — which we need not decide today — it is nonetheless fatally flawed on its own terms. Indeed, the Mandate’s strained prescriptions combine to make it the rare government pronouncement that is both overinclusive (applying to employers and employees in virtually all industries and workplaces in America, with little attempt to account for the obvious differences between the risks facing, say, a security guard on a lonely night shift, and a meatpacker working shoulder to shoulder in a cramped warehouse) and underinclusive (purporting to save employees with 99 or more coworkers from a “grave danger” in the workplace, while making no attempt to shield employees with 98 or fewer coworkers from the very same threat). The Mandate’s stated impetus— a purported “emergency” that the entire globe has now endured for nearly two years, and which OSHA itself spent nearly two months responding to — is unavailing as well. And its promulgation grossly exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority.
[…]
Thus, courts have uniformly observed that OSHA’s authority to establish emergency temporary standards under § 655(c) “is an ‘extraordinary power’ that is to be ‘delicately exercised’ in only certain ‘limited situations.’” Id. at 370 (quoting Pub. Citizen, 702 F.2d at 1155).
But the Mandate at issue here is anything but a “delicate exercise” of this “extraordinary power.” Cf. Pub. Citizen, 702 F.2d at 1155. Quite the opposite, rather than a delicately handled scalpel, the Mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility to the supposedly “grave danger” the Mandate purports to address.
[…]
It lastly bears noting that the Mandate raises serious constitutional concerns that either make it more likely that the petitioners will succeed on the merits, or at least counsel against adopting OSHA’s broad reading of § 655(c) as a matter of statutory interpretation.
[…]
For these reasons, the petitioners’ motion for a stay pending review is GRANTED. Enforcement of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s “COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard” remains STAYED pending adequate judicial review of the petitioners’ underlying motions for a permanent injunction.
In addition, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that OSHA take no steps to implement or enforce the Mandate until further court order.
Read 📜 Fifth Circuit Ruling
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Forwarded from The Washington Pundit (BoumtjeBoumtje)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Quick visual summation of the 5th Circuit decision on the OSHA vaccine mandate
@TheWashingtonPundit | Speak Truth To Power
@TheWashingtonPundit | Speak Truth To Power
The CDC Finally Reveals Its Estimate for How Many Americans Have ‘Natural Immunity’: 146.6 Million People | Becker News
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has quietly acknowledged that far more people have natural immunity than was earlier reported. After a five-month delay, the CDC revealed that a staggering 146.6 million Americans have been infected by the Sars-CoV-2 virus and have survived it.
Also released was a highly inflated “estimated total deaths” figure of 921,000. The CDC reports “Covid-related deaths,” and not deaths caused by Covid-19. That is because 94% of Covid-related deaths had serious underlying medical conditions, such as heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. While Covid-19 may have been a contributing causal factor to the timing of a patient’s death, the vast majority occurred in patients who were immunocompromised or elderly. The average age of Covid-related death in 2020 was slightly under life expectancy at 77 years old.
Read more 📰 Becker News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has quietly acknowledged that far more people have natural immunity than was earlier reported. After a five-month delay, the CDC revealed that a staggering 146.6 million Americans have been infected by the Sars-CoV-2 virus and have survived it.
Also released was a highly inflated “estimated total deaths” figure of 921,000. The CDC reports “Covid-related deaths,” and not deaths caused by Covid-19. That is because 94% of Covid-related deaths had serious underlying medical conditions, such as heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. While Covid-19 may have been a contributing causal factor to the timing of a patient’s death, the vast majority occurred in patients who were immunocompromised or elderly. The average age of Covid-related death in 2020 was slightly under life expectancy at 77 years old.
Read more 📰 Becker News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Pentagon Sees Its First National Guard Unit Mutiny Over the Federal Vaccine Mandate | Becker News
The first state National Guard unit has made itself clear to the Department of Defense it has no intention of enforcing its Covid-19 vaccine mandate.
“The Oklahoma National Guard has rejected the Defense Department’s requirement for all service members to receive the coronavirus vaccine and will allow personnel to sidestep the policy with no repercussions, a potential blueprint for Republican governors who have challenged Biden administration mandates,” the Washington Post reported.
“Brig. Gen. Thomas Mancino, appointed this week by Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) as adjutant of the state’s 10,000 National Guard soldiers and airmen, on Thursday notified those under his command that they are not required to receive the vaccine and won’t be punished if they decline it,” the report added.
The Department of Defense is facing numerous lawsuits over the unconstitutional jab mandate order, including class action lawsuits from the members of all five military branches.
Read 📰 Becker News
H/t🤠 @The_Library_II
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The first state National Guard unit has made itself clear to the Department of Defense it has no intention of enforcing its Covid-19 vaccine mandate.
“The Oklahoma National Guard has rejected the Defense Department’s requirement for all service members to receive the coronavirus vaccine and will allow personnel to sidestep the policy with no repercussions, a potential blueprint for Republican governors who have challenged Biden administration mandates,” the Washington Post reported.
“Brig. Gen. Thomas Mancino, appointed this week by Gov. Kevin Stitt (R) as adjutant of the state’s 10,000 National Guard soldiers and airmen, on Thursday notified those under his command that they are not required to receive the vaccine and won’t be punished if they decline it,” the report added.
The Department of Defense is facing numerous lawsuits over the unconstitutional jab mandate order, including class action lawsuits from the members of all five military branches.
Read 📰 Becker News
H/t🤠 @The_Library_II
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
With COVID-19 Emergency Period Over Why Are Pharmaceutical Companies Still Given a Liability Waiver? | Conservative Treehouse
Many people have asked: how is the best way to stop the insanity behind the incessant vaccine narrative? The likely best approach is to start demanding the pharmaceutical companies have their liability waivers removed.
If the vaccine is safe and effective, why would the U.S. government still need to provide liability waivers from adverse vaccine outcomes?
Start pressuring legislators and elected officials to force the elimination of the waivers. Alinsky them… Make them live up to their own narrative; their own words, their own rules.
Eliminate those liability waivers and watch how fast every vaccine mandate is dropped.
Read 📰 Conservative Treehouse
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Many people have asked: how is the best way to stop the insanity behind the incessant vaccine narrative? The likely best approach is to start demanding the pharmaceutical companies have their liability waivers removed.
If the vaccine is safe and effective, why would the U.S. government still need to provide liability waivers from adverse vaccine outcomes?
Start pressuring legislators and elected officials to force the elimination of the waivers. Alinsky them… Make them live up to their own narrative; their own words, their own rules.
Eliminate those liability waivers and watch how fast every vaccine mandate is dropped.
Read 📰 Conservative Treehouse
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Last Refuge
With COVID-19 Emergency Period Over Why are Pharmaceutical Companies Still Given a Liability Waiver? - The Last Refuge
Many people have asked: how is the best way to stop the insanity behind the incessant vaccine narrative? The likely best approach is to start demanding the pharmaceutical companies have their liability waivers removed. If the vaccine is safe and effective…
👍1
Want to Stop the Jab Mandates? Focus on Liability 🏦
- Election Wizard
Read more 📰 Fox News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
- Election Wizard
Read more 📰 Fox News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Political Persecution #StandwithSteve
Steve Bannon arrives at the FBI DC Field Office to turn himself in, says "focus on signal, not noise, this is all noise." He was charged with contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the House 1/6 witch-hunt committee subpoena and will appear before a federal judge this afternoon.
H/t🤠 @MistyG17, @disclosetv
Learn more🔎 Steve Bannon - @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Steve Bannon arrives at the FBI DC Field Office to turn himself in, says "focus on signal, not noise, this is all noise." He was charged with contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the House 1/6 witch-hunt committee subpoena and will appear before a federal judge this afternoon.
H/t🤠 @MistyG17, @disclosetv
Learn more🔎 Steve Bannon - @TheWashingtonPundit
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Fascist Regime Holding Veteran Steve Bannon in Handcuffs for 3rd Degree Misdemeanor
- Boris Epshteyn
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
- Boris Epshteyn
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
👍1
Another Dem Bites the Dust: Senator Patrick Leahy Announces Retirement | Just the News
Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who serves as president pro tempore of the Senate and is the longest-serving member of the upper chamber, announced Monday morning that he will not seek reelection next year. First elected in 1974, Leahy has remained in the Senate for eight presidencies. He oversaw the second sham impeachment of President Trump.
Leahy's announcement sets up the first open Senate election in Vermont since 2006, when congressman Bernie Sanders became Senator Bernie Sanders. Because Sanders is technically an Independent, Leahy is the only Democrat to ever have been elected to the Senate from Vermont.
At least 13 Dem House members have also announced their intention to step down.
Read 📰 Just the News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who serves as president pro tempore of the Senate and is the longest-serving member of the upper chamber, announced Monday morning that he will not seek reelection next year. First elected in 1974, Leahy has remained in the Senate for eight presidencies. He oversaw the second sham impeachment of President Trump.
Leahy's announcement sets up the first open Senate election in Vermont since 2006, when congressman Bernie Sanders became Senator Bernie Sanders. Because Sanders is technically an Independent, Leahy is the only Democrat to ever have been elected to the Senate from Vermont.
At least 13 Dem House members have also announced their intention to step down.
Read 📰 Just the News
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Just The News
Democrat Patrick Leahy, Senate's most senior member, announces retirement
The eight term Vermont Democrat will not seek a ninth term
Gubernatorial Candidate Kleefisch Files Lawsuit Against Wisconsin Elections Commission | Newstalk 1130
Wisconsin Republican gubernatorial candidate and former Lt. Governor Rebecca Kleefisch has filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission in an effort to force it to comply with state law in the runup to the 2022 election.
Kleefisch on Monday filed an original action before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, asking the Court to take up the suit without having it first go before lower courts.
“The rulemaking and policy authority of the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) is in disarray and will remain so until this Court accepts jurisdiction and… answers disputed issues of law necessary for a fair and orderly 2022 election," the lawsuit states.
Kleefisch alleges that WEC has been violating state law in its guidance to local election officials on "the [legality] of unattended drop boxes, the role of special voting deputies at residential care facilities and qualified nursing homes, [and] the consolidation of polling places." These rogue 2020 WEC directives “remain on the books today” and must be resolved before 2022, Kleefisch warns in her lawsuit announcement.
Listen 📻 Newstalk 1130
H/t🤠 @drawandstrikechannel
Watch 📺 Kleefisch Announcement
Learn more🔎🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Wisconsin Republican gubernatorial candidate and former Lt. Governor Rebecca Kleefisch has filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission in an effort to force it to comply with state law in the runup to the 2022 election.
Kleefisch on Monday filed an original action before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, asking the Court to take up the suit without having it first go before lower courts.
“The rulemaking and policy authority of the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) is in disarray and will remain so until this Court accepts jurisdiction and… answers disputed issues of law necessary for a fair and orderly 2022 election," the lawsuit states.
Kleefisch alleges that WEC has been violating state law in its guidance to local election officials on "the [legality] of unattended drop boxes, the role of special voting deputies at residential care facilities and qualified nursing homes, [and] the consolidation of polling places." These rogue 2020 WEC directives “remain on the books today” and must be resolved before 2022, Kleefisch warns in her lawsuit announcement.
Listen 📻 Newstalk 1130
H/t🤠 @drawandstrikechannel
Watch 📺 Kleefisch Announcement
Learn more🔎🧵 WI Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Dan O'Donnell
Kleefisch Files Lawsuit Against Wisconsin Elections Commission | News/Talk 1130 WISN | Dan O'Donnell
Republican gubernatorial candidate Rebecca Kleefisch has filed a lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission in an effort to force it to comply with state law in the runup to the 2022 election, "The Dan O'Donnell Show" has learned.
Trump Impeachment Lawyer Is Defending Bannon, Arraignment Pushed To Thursday
Steve Bannon’s arraignment has been delayed until Thursday, 11/18 at 11 AM ET. Today’s hearing will be docketed as an initial appearance. Bannon agrees to minimal pre-trial services per the conditions of his “release.”
The prosecutor, Molly Gaston, said that each count carries a maximum fine of $100,000.
Bannon’s attorneys are David Schoen, who defended Trump in the second impeachment, and Matthew Corcoran, a former D.C. federal prosecutor.
Read 📰 Talking Points Memo
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Steve Bannon’s arraignment has been delayed until Thursday, 11/18 at 11 AM ET. Today’s hearing will be docketed as an initial appearance. Bannon agrees to minimal pre-trial services per the conditions of his “release.”
The prosecutor, Molly Gaston, said that each count carries a maximum fine of $100,000.
Bannon’s attorneys are David Schoen, who defended Trump in the second impeachment, and Matthew Corcoran, a former D.C. federal prosecutor.
Read 📰 Talking Points Memo
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Talking Points Memo
Bannon In Court As Jan. 6 Panel Flexes Its Muscle
The Jan. 6 panel notched an indictment last week, after the Justice Department charged Steve Bannon with two counts of contempt of Congress over his refusal to comply with a committee subpoena.
👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bannon: ‘This Is Going to Be the Misdemeanor From Hell’🔥🧨💥
Leaving the court hearing today, Bannon said, “This is going to be the misdemeanor from hell for Merrick Garland, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden… Joe Biden ordered Merrick Garland to prosecute me from the White House lawn when he got off of Marine One… We’re going on the offense. Standby.”
Watch 📺 Full Clip - @realKarliBonne
Hat tip🤠 @TheStormHasArrived17
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Leaving the court hearing today, Bannon said, “This is going to be the misdemeanor from hell for Merrick Garland, Nancy Pelosi, and Joe Biden… Joe Biden ordered Merrick Garland to prosecute me from the White House lawn when he got off of Marine One… We’re going on the offense. Standby.”
Watch 📺 Full Clip - @realKarliBonne
Hat tip🤠 @TheStormHasArrived17
@LibertyOverwatchChannel