VoterGA Files Suit to Ban Illegal Dominion Voting System in GA
Voting System Already Declared in Violation of Georgia Law
ATLANTA, August 24, 2021 – VoterGA today announced [it is] joining with State Rep. Philip Singleton in a legal petition to ban Georgia’s Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 voting system. The voting system has already been declared in violation of Georgia law by the U.S. District Court of Northern Georgia [Pg. 81-82].
Georgia law requires a voting system to “print an elector verifiable paper ballot;” and “…produce paper ballots which are marked with the elector’s choices in a format readable by the elector.” After reviewing extensive evidence in the Curling V. Raffensperger case, Judge Amy Totenberg concluded: “Plaintiffs and other voters who wish to vote in-person are required to vote on a system that does none of those things.” [O.C.G.A. § 21-2-2(7.1); O.C.G.A. § 21-2-300(a)(2)]
Petition Seeks Temporary and Permanent Injunctions
The petition seeks temporary and permanent injunctions against the state’s use of the new voting system on grounds that its unverifiability to the voter makes it illegal. The Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 system uses a touchscreen Ballot Marking Device (BMD) to print voter selections with a QR code on a sheet of paper. The scanners ignore the printed voter selections and read the QR code to determine candidates selected and to tabulate election results. The QR code is not human readable, even with a QR code reader and is thus illegal under Georgia law.
Attorney Todd Harding of Maddox and Harding filed the petition in Fulton County Superior Court. Harding is also representing VoterGA petitioners in the Fulton County Ballot Inspection lawsuit. Details of both cases can be found on the VoterGA.org. Legal tab.
Petition Highlights
The petition contends that recommendations provided by VoterGA to the Secure, Accurate, Fair Election Commission (SAFE) warned that any new system must tabulate human readable vote marks that can be verified by the voter. It also contends that VoterGA co-founder Garland Favorito and Madison Forum President Michael Opitz warned Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger about the unverifiability of QR coded voting systems like the Democracy Suite when he was a runoff candidate in 2018. Raffensperger did not heed the warnings and purchased the new Dominion system for over $100 million in 2019.
Read 👓📑 VoterGA Petition
Source: CD Media
Support: VoterGA.org
More 🔎🧵 Last GA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Voting System Already Declared in Violation of Georgia Law
ATLANTA, August 24, 2021 – VoterGA today announced [it is] joining with State Rep. Philip Singleton in a legal petition to ban Georgia’s Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 voting system. The voting system has already been declared in violation of Georgia law by the U.S. District Court of Northern Georgia [Pg. 81-82].
Georgia law requires a voting system to “print an elector verifiable paper ballot;” and “…produce paper ballots which are marked with the elector’s choices in a format readable by the elector.” After reviewing extensive evidence in the Curling V. Raffensperger case, Judge Amy Totenberg concluded: “Plaintiffs and other voters who wish to vote in-person are required to vote on a system that does none of those things.” [O.C.G.A. § 21-2-2(7.1); O.C.G.A. § 21-2-300(a)(2)]
Petition Seeks Temporary and Permanent Injunctions
The petition seeks temporary and permanent injunctions against the state’s use of the new voting system on grounds that its unverifiability to the voter makes it illegal. The Dominion Democracy Suite 5.5 system uses a touchscreen Ballot Marking Device (BMD) to print voter selections with a QR code on a sheet of paper. The scanners ignore the printed voter selections and read the QR code to determine candidates selected and to tabulate election results. The QR code is not human readable, even with a QR code reader and is thus illegal under Georgia law.
Attorney Todd Harding of Maddox and Harding filed the petition in Fulton County Superior Court. Harding is also representing VoterGA petitioners in the Fulton County Ballot Inspection lawsuit. Details of both cases can be found on the VoterGA.org. Legal tab.
Petition Highlights
The petition contends that recommendations provided by VoterGA to the Secure, Accurate, Fair Election Commission (SAFE) warned that any new system must tabulate human readable vote marks that can be verified by the voter. It also contends that VoterGA co-founder Garland Favorito and Madison Forum President Michael Opitz warned Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger about the unverifiability of QR coded voting systems like the Democracy Suite when he was a runoff candidate in 2018. Raffensperger did not heed the warnings and purchased the new Dominion system for over $100 million in 2019.
Read 👓📑 VoterGA Petition
Source: CD Media
Support: VoterGA.org
More 🔎🧵 Last GA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍2🥰1
PA Senate President Jake Corman Says Hearings Will Begin This Week to Start Forensic Investigation of 2020 Election | Inquirer
PA Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R., Centre) said lawmakers will seek voting records, ballots, and machines to conduct a “forensic review” of the 2020 election — he suggested the Senate will use subpoenas to get them.
“We can bring people in. We can put them under oath. We can subpoena records, and that’s what we need to do,” he said in an interview with the pro-Trump radio personality Wendy Bell. “That’s what we’re going to do.”
Corman said he has spoken with former President Donald Trump about the issue and mumbled, “I think he’s comfortable where we’re heading.”
Last week, in a divisive and much criticized move, Corman ousted America First Senator Doug Mastriano as audit lead and installed Sen. Cris Dush (R., Jefferson) as the new chairman of the committee that will head the forensic investigation. Dush was part of the PA delegation that visited the Maricopa audit and has been a strong proponent of the “AZ gold standard.”
It’s not clear how the Senate’s new review would actually work, including how it would be funded, how and where election equipment and materials would be securely stored, who would conduct it, what standards and processes would be followed, and what the end product would be.
Corman is a controversial figure. Although he signed the letter asking Congress to object to the PA electors on 1/6 and appointed Mastriano to lead a PA election audit, he subsequently slow-walked and obstructed Mastriano’s efforts. For example, Corman cancelled Mastriano’s subpoena voting session on 8/6 and, last week, abruptly fired all of Mastriano’s staff and removed him as audit lead.
• Why is Corman suddenly throwing Mastriano under the bus?
• Why is he now committed to an investigation of the 2020 election after 10 months of equivocation?
• Why does he avoid the word ‘audit,’ and instead favor terms like ‘review’ and ‘investigation’?
• What kind of audit is he planning?
• In the the Wendy Bell interview, he emphasized the importance of who conducts the audit, reiterating the word, “credibility.” Will he pull a Windham and choose a Harry Hursti?
• Where does Dush stand on all of this?
Corman (aka Jake the snake) leaves more questions than answers.
Read 👓📰 Leftist Inquirer
Watch 📺 Wendy Bell Interview
*interview starts around min. 18:30
H/t🤠 @praying_medic
More 🔎🧵 Last PA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
PA Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R., Centre) said lawmakers will seek voting records, ballots, and machines to conduct a “forensic review” of the 2020 election — he suggested the Senate will use subpoenas to get them.
“We can bring people in. We can put them under oath. We can subpoena records, and that’s what we need to do,” he said in an interview with the pro-Trump radio personality Wendy Bell. “That’s what we’re going to do.”
Corman said he has spoken with former President Donald Trump about the issue and mumbled, “I think he’s comfortable where we’re heading.”
Last week, in a divisive and much criticized move, Corman ousted America First Senator Doug Mastriano as audit lead and installed Sen. Cris Dush (R., Jefferson) as the new chairman of the committee that will head the forensic investigation. Dush was part of the PA delegation that visited the Maricopa audit and has been a strong proponent of the “AZ gold standard.”
It’s not clear how the Senate’s new review would actually work, including how it would be funded, how and where election equipment and materials would be securely stored, who would conduct it, what standards and processes would be followed, and what the end product would be.
Corman is a controversial figure. Although he signed the letter asking Congress to object to the PA electors on 1/6 and appointed Mastriano to lead a PA election audit, he subsequently slow-walked and obstructed Mastriano’s efforts. For example, Corman cancelled Mastriano’s subpoena voting session on 8/6 and, last week, abruptly fired all of Mastriano’s staff and removed him as audit lead.
• Why is Corman suddenly throwing Mastriano under the bus?
• Why is he now committed to an investigation of the 2020 election after 10 months of equivocation?
• Why does he avoid the word ‘audit,’ and instead favor terms like ‘review’ and ‘investigation’?
• What kind of audit is he planning?
• In the the Wendy Bell interview, he emphasized the importance of who conducts the audit, reiterating the word, “credibility.” Will he pull a Windham and choose a Harry Hursti?
• Where does Dush stand on all of this?
Corman (aka Jake the snake) leaves more questions than answers.
Read 👓📰 Leftist Inquirer
Watch 📺 Wendy Bell Interview
*interview starts around min. 18:30
H/t🤠 @praying_medic
More 🔎🧵 Last PA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
https://www.inquirer.com
Top Pa. GOP lawmaker says hearings will begin this week to start ‘forensic investigation’ of 2020 election
Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R., Centre) said he’s spoken with former President Donald Trump about the effort.
👍2
Supreme Court Upholds Texas Ruling: Biden Must Reinstate Trump's "Remain-in-Mexico" Policy | Axios
The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday the Biden administration must reinstate former President Trump's "Remain-in-Mexico" policy.
The Court voted 6-3 to reject the Biden administration's plea to block the reinstatement of the program, which requires immigrants seeking asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their applications are pending.
The order stated the Biden administration acted in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner when the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program was rescinded.
The majority of justices sided with a ruling from a federal judge in Texas, which said the Biden administration failed to consider several critical factors before officially terminating the program in June.
Read 👓📰 Axios
Learn more ⚖️ SCOTUS Ruling
More 🔎🧵 OBiden’s Border Plan
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday the Biden administration must reinstate former President Trump's "Remain-in-Mexico" policy.
The Court voted 6-3 to reject the Biden administration's plea to block the reinstatement of the program, which requires immigrants seeking asylum at the southern border to wait in Mexico while their applications are pending.
The order stated the Biden administration acted in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner when the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) program was rescinded.
The majority of justices sided with a ruling from a federal judge in Texas, which said the Biden administration failed to consider several critical factors before officially terminating the program in June.
Read 👓📰 Axios
Learn more ⚖️ SCOTUS Ruling
More 🔎🧵 OBiden’s Border Plan
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Axios
Supreme Court: Biden must reinstate Trump's "Remain-in-Mexico" policy
The policy requires immigrants seeking asylum to wait in Mexico while their applications are pending.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Biden Has Been Busy Reshaping the Federal Judiciary with the Help of a Prominent ‘Republican’ Bottom-Feeder
While Americans have been distracted by the humanitarian tragedy and super power surrender in Afghanistan, the Biden regime has been remaking the federal judiciary. The most radical, repressive WH Resident in history is getting all of his Marxist judge nominations approved thanks to swing vote Lindsey Graham. Loser Lindsey has not cast a single ‘No’ vote, not even for an activist nominee who spent the last 15 years campaigning against voter ID laws. Why is Lindsey Graham still on the Senate Judiciary Committee?
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
While Americans have been distracted by the humanitarian tragedy and super power surrender in Afghanistan, the Biden regime has been remaking the federal judiciary. The most radical, repressive WH Resident in history is getting all of his Marxist judge nominations approved thanks to swing vote Lindsey Graham. Loser Lindsey has not cast a single ‘No’ vote, not even for an activist nominee who spent the last 15 years campaigning against voter ID laws. Why is Lindsey Graham still on the Senate Judiciary Committee?
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Via @AZInformer
Fann Makes Plans For Audit Of Voter Affidavit Signatures On Some Of Maricopa County’s 1.9M Early Ballots – Arizona Daily Independent
Fann told Arizona Daily Independent she was interviewing a potential contractor to audit another aspect of Maricopa County’s election process – how employees verified voter signatures on the nearly 1.9 million early ballot affidavit envelopes turned in during the election.
Those signatures must be verified before the ballot inside can be sent for tabulation, but questions have been raised about the procedures utilized by then-County Recorder Adrian Fontes and his staff question while conducting those verifications.
Fann says whoever she hires to review the procedures and the signatures will start by looking for envelopes which do not contain the required voter signature. There will also be a review for unidentifiable signatures -what Fann’s calls “scribbles”- which can be matched up against Maricopa County’s voter database, which includes images of all prior signatures used by a voter during an election.
https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2021/08/24/fann-makes-plans-for-audit-of-voter-affidavit-signatures-on-some-of-maricopa-countys-1-9m-early-ballots/
Subscribe: @AZInformer🇺🇸
More 🔎🧵 Last AZ Update
—
Fann Makes Plans For Audit Of Voter Affidavit Signatures On Some Of Maricopa County’s 1.9M Early Ballots – Arizona Daily Independent
Fann told Arizona Daily Independent she was interviewing a potential contractor to audit another aspect of Maricopa County’s election process – how employees verified voter signatures on the nearly 1.9 million early ballot affidavit envelopes turned in during the election.
Those signatures must be verified before the ballot inside can be sent for tabulation, but questions have been raised about the procedures utilized by then-County Recorder Adrian Fontes and his staff question while conducting those verifications.
Fann says whoever she hires to review the procedures and the signatures will start by looking for envelopes which do not contain the required voter signature. There will also be a review for unidentifiable signatures -what Fann’s calls “scribbles”- which can be matched up against Maricopa County’s voter database, which includes images of all prior signatures used by a voter during an election.
https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2021/08/24/fann-makes-plans-for-audit-of-voter-affidavit-signatures-on-some-of-maricopa-countys-1-9m-early-ballots/
Subscribe: @AZInformer🇺🇸
More 🔎🧵 Last AZ Update
—
Arizona Daily Independent
Fann Makes Plans For Audit Of Voter Affidavit Signatures On Some Of Maricopa County’s 1.9M Early Ballots
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann wanted an audit to ascertain how Maricopa County handled the 2020 General Election, but she never expected the Senate would be doing it without the assistance of...
👍1
Mastriano Responds to ‘Jake the Snake’ Corman
PA State Senator Doug Mastriano released a statement today responding to Senate President Jake Corman’s recent contentious actions.
Mastriano questions Corman’s sudden commitment to an investigation of the 2020 Election after 10 months of obstruction and vows to continue fighting to ensure PA has a full forensic audit:
“I don’t know why Senator Corman obstructed my investigation for so long or why he has now hijacked it. What I do know is that if it were up to Senator Corman, there would be no investigation for him to steal. What I also know is that no matter who leads it, the investigation must go forward. I know that the people of PA will never settle for a symbolic investigation. They deserve nothing less than a full forensic investigation that gets to the bottom of what happened in the 2020 election, and I’ll be a relentless voice to make sure that’s exactly what happens. I haven’t, and will not, retreat.”
More🔎🧵 Last PA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
PA State Senator Doug Mastriano released a statement today responding to Senate President Jake Corman’s recent contentious actions.
Mastriano questions Corman’s sudden commitment to an investigation of the 2020 Election after 10 months of obstruction and vows to continue fighting to ensure PA has a full forensic audit:
“I don’t know why Senator Corman obstructed my investigation for so long or why he has now hijacked it. What I do know is that if it were up to Senator Corman, there would be no investigation for him to steal. What I also know is that no matter who leads it, the investigation must go forward. I know that the people of PA will never settle for a symbolic investigation. They deserve nothing less than a full forensic investigation that gets to the bottom of what happened in the 2020 election, and I’ll be a relentless voice to make sure that’s exactly what happens. I haven’t, and will not, retreat.”
More🔎🧵 Last PA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Update on Wisconsin Election Investigation by Speaker Vos - More Subpoenas Going Out Soon | War Room
Wisconsin has three election audit tracks currently moving forward:
1) Rep Janel Brandtjen’s audit, which follows the AZ model,
2) An election processes audit by the Legislative Audit Bureau, and
3) Speaker Robin Vos’ “cyber forensic” investigation led by former Justice Mike Gableman.
In a statement Wednesday, Vos said: “We believe a cyber-forensic audit is necessary to ensure issues did not happen in 2020. We have allocated additional resources to Justice Gableman to ensure this investigation gets to the truth.”
Reince Priebus, who is close friends with Vos, joined War Room yesterday to offer an update on the Gableman investigation.
According to Priebus, the General Assembly has approved $680K to help fund the Vos/ Gableman audit. Dr. Shiva is expected to be involved, subpoenas will be issued within the next 2 weeks, and the team will focus on ballet harvesting, voter roll anomalies and verification, a forensic examination of the physical ballots, and a review of the 200K potentially illegal indefinitely confined ballots. Although Vos specifically referenced a ‘cyber-forensic audit,’ Priebus did not mention a voting equipment examination.
Vos appears to have had a change of heart about an audit after flying with President Trump to the Alabama rally last week. At a July 27th press conference, he was critical of Rep. Brandtjen’s efforts, saying, "my colleague, Representative Brandtjen, is misinformed about what we're doing in Wisconsin."
Watch 📺
👉 War Room - Audit Update
👉 War Room - Anatomy of the Steal
More 🔎🧵 Last WI Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Wisconsin has three election audit tracks currently moving forward:
1) Rep Janel Brandtjen’s audit, which follows the AZ model,
2) An election processes audit by the Legislative Audit Bureau, and
3) Speaker Robin Vos’ “cyber forensic” investigation led by former Justice Mike Gableman.
In a statement Wednesday, Vos said: “We believe a cyber-forensic audit is necessary to ensure issues did not happen in 2020. We have allocated additional resources to Justice Gableman to ensure this investigation gets to the truth.”
Reince Priebus, who is close friends with Vos, joined War Room yesterday to offer an update on the Gableman investigation.
According to Priebus, the General Assembly has approved $680K to help fund the Vos/ Gableman audit. Dr. Shiva is expected to be involved, subpoenas will be issued within the next 2 weeks, and the team will focus on ballet harvesting, voter roll anomalies and verification, a forensic examination of the physical ballots, and a review of the 200K potentially illegal indefinitely confined ballots. Although Vos specifically referenced a ‘cyber-forensic audit,’ Priebus did not mention a voting equipment examination.
Vos appears to have had a change of heart about an audit after flying with President Trump to the Alabama rally last week. At a July 27th press conference, he was critical of Rep. Brandtjen’s efforts, saying, "my colleague, Representative Brandtjen, is misinformed about what we're doing in Wisconsin."
Watch 📺
👉 War Room - Audit Update
👉 War Room - Anatomy of the Steal
More 🔎🧵 Last WI Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Rumble
Prolific Fraud Found In WI - Subpoenas Going Out Soon
DePerno Issues Legal Opinion Re State Legislature’s Authority to Recall Electors
The following is a legal opinion submitted to AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers by attorney Matt DePerno in response to her question: “Can a State Legislature recall the state electors to decertify a national election upon proof of fraud in the election?”
DePerno concludes that “The Answer is ‘Yes.’ […] A legislature’s determination to decertify the votes cast by the electors on demonstration of fraud in the election itself is nothing more than the Legislature’s use of its reserved sovereign powers under the Tenth Amendment to protect those fundamental rights and privileges reserved to the People by the Ninth Amendment.”
Read 👓📑 Preliminary Memo
H/t🤠 @WendyRogersAZ
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The following is a legal opinion submitted to AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers by attorney Matt DePerno in response to her question: “Can a State Legislature recall the state electors to decertify a national election upon proof of fraud in the election?”
DePerno concludes that “The Answer is ‘Yes.’ […] A legislature’s determination to decertify the votes cast by the electors on demonstration of fraud in the election itself is nothing more than the Legislature’s use of its reserved sovereign powers under the Tenth Amendment to protect those fundamental rights and privileges reserved to the People by the Ninth Amendment.”
Read 👓📑 Preliminary Memo
H/t🤠 @WendyRogersAZ
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
👍1
Interview with Garland Favorito on New Lawsuit to Ban Dominion Machines | CD Media
Garland Favorito joined L. Todd Wood to discuss VoterGA’s newest effort to ban Dominion machines in GA.
VoterGA filed the lawsuit because the Dominion “system is unverifiable for the voter” — it accumulates votes via QR codes and no one can verify how their vote is recorded.
A U.S. District Court ruled in October 2020 that Dominion voting machines violated GA law. However, because the order was within a month of the election, no relief was provided. Garland explained that his team is simply seeking the relief related to that ruling — if the machines are illegal, GA shouldn’t be using them.
“I think our chances are terrific because the case has already been adjudicated,” Garland said. “This was a multi-year case and the court found the system was in fact in violation of two GA statues and found that the Secretary of State’s office was ‘not credible.’ This was a scathing order on the Secretary of State’s performance.”
Todd asked Garland for an update on the Fulton County absentee ballot case. Apparently, the defendants in the VoterGA case are divided. According the Garland, the Republicans and one Democrat actually want to get to the bottom of what happened: “They’re split, which will help us in our arguments to proceed — some of the defendants are on our side and the side of election transparency in GA.”
Watch 📺 CD Media
VoterGA is an all-volunteer organization that is 100% grassroots funded — most of their donations are $10 - $100. Please consider supporting them at: VoterGA.org
More 🔎🧵 Last GA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Garland Favorito joined L. Todd Wood to discuss VoterGA’s newest effort to ban Dominion machines in GA.
VoterGA filed the lawsuit because the Dominion “system is unverifiable for the voter” — it accumulates votes via QR codes and no one can verify how their vote is recorded.
A U.S. District Court ruled in October 2020 that Dominion voting machines violated GA law. However, because the order was within a month of the election, no relief was provided. Garland explained that his team is simply seeking the relief related to that ruling — if the machines are illegal, GA shouldn’t be using them.
“I think our chances are terrific because the case has already been adjudicated,” Garland said. “This was a multi-year case and the court found the system was in fact in violation of two GA statues and found that the Secretary of State’s office was ‘not credible.’ This was a scathing order on the Secretary of State’s performance.”
Todd asked Garland for an update on the Fulton County absentee ballot case. Apparently, the defendants in the VoterGA case are divided. According the Garland, the Republicans and one Democrat actually want to get to the bottom of what happened: “They’re split, which will help us in our arguments to proceed — some of the defendants are on our side and the side of election transparency in GA.”
Watch 📺 CD Media
VoterGA is an all-volunteer organization that is 100% grassroots funded — most of their donations are $10 - $100. Please consider supporting them at: VoterGA.org
More 🔎🧵 Last GA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Rumble
IO Episode 53 - Interview with Garland Favorito of VoterGA on New Lawsuit To Ban Dominion
Host L Todd Wood speaks with one of our favorite guests - Garland Favorito of VoterGA.org, who just filed a new lawsuit to completely ban Dominion voting machines in GA.
👍1
When Emails Aren’t Working - Go After the Donors
If you want your voice to be heard, call your local politicians. They will ignore you until you tell them that you’re calling, writing and emailing the people who gave them money for their campaign.
If you want to see who gave them [GA elected officials] money go to:
https://media.ethics.ga.gov/search/Campaign/Campaign_ByName.aspx
- David Cross
Although the site above is specific to GA, this is an important strategic concept for every state. Before we call or email our elected officials, we should take a minute to research their donors.
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
If you want your voice to be heard, call your local politicians. They will ignore you until you tell them that you’re calling, writing and emailing the people who gave them money for their campaign.
If you want to see who gave them [GA elected officials] money go to:
https://media.ethics.ga.gov/search/Campaign/Campaign_ByName.aspx
- David Cross
Although the site above is specific to GA, this is an important strategic concept for every state. Before we call or email our elected officials, we should take a minute to research their donors.
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
AZ Attorney General: Maricopa County Must Comply with Senate’s Legislative Subpoena or Forfeit State Funds | Brnovich Press Release
Thursday, August 26, 2021
PHOENIX – Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that his office (AGO) determined the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS) is in violation of state law for failing to comply with the Arizona Senate’s legislative subpoena related to the 2020 election audit. If MCBOS does not change course, the AGO will notify the Arizona Treasurer to withhold Maricopa County’s state-shared funds as required under the law.
[…]
The Arizona Audit of the 2020 election is still underway. At this time, the AGO has not received any official report related to the Senate’s audit, but stands ready to review the official findings and any information submitted after a final report is completed by the Senate.
Copy of AGO 1487 Report here.
Read 👓📃 Brnovich Press Release
More 🔎🧵 Last AZ Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Thursday, August 26, 2021
PHOENIX – Attorney General Mark Brnovich announced that his office (AGO) determined the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS) is in violation of state law for failing to comply with the Arizona Senate’s legislative subpoena related to the 2020 election audit. If MCBOS does not change course, the AGO will notify the Arizona Treasurer to withhold Maricopa County’s state-shared funds as required under the law.
[…]
The Arizona Audit of the 2020 election is still underway. At this time, the AGO has not received any official report related to the Senate’s audit, but stands ready to review the official findings and any information submitted after a final report is completed by the Senate.
Copy of AGO 1487 Report here.
Read 👓📃 Brnovich Press Release
More 🔎🧵 Last AZ Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Biden’s Imbecilic Incompetence Kills 13 U.S. Soldiers, Wounds 30
AP: Two US officials say 11 US Marines and a Navy medic were killed in ISIS bombings today at Kabul airport, number expected to climb.
UPDATE - 13 U.S. soldiers are now believed killed, 20 troops wounded, 10 in critical condition, according to Pentagon sources.
@disclosetv
AP: Two US officials say 11 US Marines and a Navy medic were killed in ISIS bombings today at Kabul airport, number expected to climb.
UPDATE - 13 U.S. soldiers are now believed killed, 20 troops wounded, 10 in critical condition, according to Pentagon sources.
@disclosetv
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sweet Land of Liberty
My country, 'tis of Thee,
Sweet Land of Liberty
Of thee I sing;
Land where my fathers died,
Land of the pilgrims' pride,
From every mountain side
Let Freedom ring.
Source: God’s Trumpet
My country, 'tis of Thee,
Sweet Land of Liberty
Of thee I sing;
Land where my fathers died,
Land of the pilgrims' pride,
From every mountain side
Let Freedom ring.
Source: God’s Trumpet
Majority of Wisconsin Counties Pass Resolutions Supporting Forensic Audit
“We’ve crossed the threshold! The majority of Wisconsin counties are in favor of Janel Brandtjens Full Cyber and Forensic Audit!”
- Rep. Ramthun
More 🔎🧵 Last WI Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
“We’ve crossed the threshold! The majority of Wisconsin counties are in favor of Janel Brandtjens Full Cyber and Forensic Audit!”
- Rep. Ramthun
More 🔎🧵 Last WI Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Rep. Ramthun Responds to Speaker Vos’ Cyber Forensic Audit Announcement - Calls for Rep. Brandtjen to Lead
Wisconsin State Rep. Timothy Ramthun calls on House Speaker Robin Vos to work with Rep. Janel Brandtjen as the lead on Wisconsin’s cyber forensic audit:
“The Special Counsel office, an unelected position created and funded by the Speaker alone, should report to the Campaigns and Elections Committee because they are elected by the people… Chair Brandtjen has a comprehensive understanding of the situation in WI, and is the most qualified person to be leading this effort and contracting with any thirds-party auditors.”
More 🔎🧵 Last WI Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
Wisconsin State Rep. Timothy Ramthun calls on House Speaker Robin Vos to work with Rep. Janel Brandtjen as the lead on Wisconsin’s cyber forensic audit:
“The Special Counsel office, an unelected position created and funded by the Speaker alone, should report to the Campaigns and Elections Committee because they are elected by the people… Chair Brandtjen has a comprehensive understanding of the situation in WI, and is the most qualified person to be leading this effort and contracting with any thirds-party auditors.”
More 🔎🧵 Last WI Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
We are having trouble with our discussion/ comments section. Please bear with us while we work to resolve it. Thank you for your patience.
PA State Senator Issues Statement Supporting Senator Mastriano’s Audit
Senator Judy Ward: Update on the Forensic Investigation Into Elections
Earlier this week the Senate State Government Committee questioned the Acting Secretary of State on the post-election audits.
Since I am not a member of the State Government Committee, I was not able to participate and question her. My colleague Senator Doug Mastriano, who does sit on the committee and has been at the forefront of election integrity, questioned the Acting Secretary’s decision to decertify Fulton County’s voting machines after local officials granted third-party access for a review of their election processes.
Her action to decertify is very troubling. The election code clearly articulates counties are charged with administering elections and have the authority to investigate irregularities – whether real or perceived.
At the same hearing, the Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid said: “Voters, the election of 2020 is done. It’s over.”
The Wolf Administration continues to disregard the many Pennsylvania voters that have lost faith in our election process including many of you who have reached out.
The case for auditing the election is unmistakably well-defined. In the days and weeks leading up to the election, the Pennsylvania Department of State fundamentally and repeatedly altered the way Pennsylvania’s election were conducted.
The constantly changing guidance delivered to counties not only directly contradicted the Election Code language the department is obligated to uphold, but it also conflicted with the department’s own court filings as well as decisions of both the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court.
The department systematically worked to undermine the security features embedded in our Election Code. People voting in person were held to a higher standard than those who mailed in their ballots.
A disorderly 2020 General Election was followed by a confusing 2021 Primary Election. We must work to counter the damage that has been done to the integrity and confidence in our election process. I will continue to fight to uphold Pennsylvania law as it was written, not as it was interpreted by a hyper-partisan Department of State or state Supreme Court.
As a member of the Senate Intergovernmental Relations Committee, I am eager to move forward with this review and get the answers you deserve. As I have stated previously, I continue to support a forensic investigation which Senator Mastriano brought forth and the use of subpoenas where needed. I assure you that I am doing my best to see this process through to restore election integrity for my constituents and all residents of the Commonwealth.
Read 👓📃 Sen. Ward Newsletter
H/t: @auditthevotePA
More 🔎🧵 Last PA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Senator Judy Ward: Update on the Forensic Investigation Into Elections
Earlier this week the Senate State Government Committee questioned the Acting Secretary of State on the post-election audits.
Since I am not a member of the State Government Committee, I was not able to participate and question her. My colleague Senator Doug Mastriano, who does sit on the committee and has been at the forefront of election integrity, questioned the Acting Secretary’s decision to decertify Fulton County’s voting machines after local officials granted third-party access for a review of their election processes.
Her action to decertify is very troubling. The election code clearly articulates counties are charged with administering elections and have the authority to investigate irregularities – whether real or perceived.
At the same hearing, the Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid said: “Voters, the election of 2020 is done. It’s over.”
The Wolf Administration continues to disregard the many Pennsylvania voters that have lost faith in our election process including many of you who have reached out.
The case for auditing the election is unmistakably well-defined. In the days and weeks leading up to the election, the Pennsylvania Department of State fundamentally and repeatedly altered the way Pennsylvania’s election were conducted.
The constantly changing guidance delivered to counties not only directly contradicted the Election Code language the department is obligated to uphold, but it also conflicted with the department’s own court filings as well as decisions of both the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court.
The department systematically worked to undermine the security features embedded in our Election Code. People voting in person were held to a higher standard than those who mailed in their ballots.
A disorderly 2020 General Election was followed by a confusing 2021 Primary Election. We must work to counter the damage that has been done to the integrity and confidence in our election process. I will continue to fight to uphold Pennsylvania law as it was written, not as it was interpreted by a hyper-partisan Department of State or state Supreme Court.
As a member of the Senate Intergovernmental Relations Committee, I am eager to move forward with this review and get the answers you deserve. As I have stated previously, I continue to support a forensic investigation which Senator Mastriano brought forth and the use of subpoenas where needed. I assure you that I am doing my best to see this process through to restore election integrity for my constituents and all residents of the Commonwealth.
Read 👓📃 Sen. Ward Newsletter
H/t: @auditthevotePA
More 🔎🧵 Last PA Update
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
