Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jovan Pulitzer: GA audit volunteer update
Sen. Manchin (D-WV) says he'll vote against the House-passed background check bill (CNN)
Chuck Schumer: State Voting Laws ‘One of the Greatest Threats We Have to Modern Democracy in America’
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) likened basic election integrity measures embraced by several states, such as voter ID, to the era of Jim Crow and accused the GOP of attempting to suppress voters. He made the remarks during Wednesday’s Senate Rules and Administration Committee hearing on S 1, or the “For the People Act,” which critics warn will strip power from the states and federalize U.S. elections.
Speaking to his colleagues during the hearing, Schumer blasted Republican state legislatures, such as Georgia’s, for pursuing basic election integrity measures, calling it “infuriating” and accusing Republicans of being “afraid” of democracy and trying to prevent people from voting.
🔗Breitbart article & audio
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) likened basic election integrity measures embraced by several states, such as voter ID, to the era of Jim Crow and accused the GOP of attempting to suppress voters. He made the remarks during Wednesday’s Senate Rules and Administration Committee hearing on S 1, or the “For the People Act,” which critics warn will strip power from the states and federalize U.S. elections.
Speaking to his colleagues during the hearing, Schumer blasted Republican state legislatures, such as Georgia’s, for pursuing basic election integrity measures, calling it “infuriating” and accusing Republicans of being “afraid” of democracy and trying to prevent people from voting.
🔗Breitbart article & audio
Breitbart
Chuck Schumer: State Voting Laws 'One of the Greatest Threats We Have to Modern Democracy in America'
Chuck Schumer likened basic election integrity measures embraced by several states, such as voter ID, to the era of Jim Crow.
Biden’s Approval Ratings Slip Further
It is no secret that Joe Biden is not liked by many Americans. This is why nobody attended his eerie inauguration, why the Whitehouse removed its own inauguration video from searches, and why Joe Biden is the most disliked president in YouTube history getting magnitudes more dislikes as big tech colludes to hide the dissenting views.
Yesterday, that trend continued as Biden’s Rasmussen approval index fell to tie its all time lows of -10 for the 3rd time and his total approval rating fell 3%.
🔗Article
It is no secret that Joe Biden is not liked by many Americans. This is why nobody attended his eerie inauguration, why the Whitehouse removed its own inauguration video from searches, and why Joe Biden is the most disliked president in YouTube history getting magnitudes more dislikes as big tech colludes to hide the dissenting views.
Yesterday, that trend continued as Biden’s Rasmussen approval index fell to tie its all time lows of -10 for the 3rd time and his total approval rating fell 3%.
🔗Article
100PercentFedUp.com
Biden's Approval Ratings Slip Further
It is no secret that Joe Biden is not liked by many Americans. This is why nobody attended his eerie inauguration, why the Whitehouse removed its own inauguration video from searches, and why Joe Biden is the most disliked president in YouTube history getting…
Psaki Brushes Off Reporter Asking Why Hunter Biden Received $3.5 Million From the Mayor of Moscow’s Wife (VIDEO)
Last September the Senate Finance and Homeland Security Committees released a devastating report on the Biden crime family and backed up their claims with documents from the Treasury Department.
According to documents the Senate committees obtained from the Treasury Department:
Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow on February 14, 2014 and another $241,797 to a bank account for Rosemont Seneca Thornton from May-December 2015.
Psaki treated the reporter as if the Hunter Biden story was just an internet rumor.
🔗GP article & video
Last September the Senate Finance and Homeland Security Committees released a devastating report on the Biden crime family and backed up their claims with documents from the Treasury Department.
According to documents the Senate committees obtained from the Treasury Department:
Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow on February 14, 2014 and another $241,797 to a bank account for Rosemont Seneca Thornton from May-December 2015.
Psaki treated the reporter as if the Hunter Biden story was just an internet rumor.
🔗GP article & video
The Gateway Pundit
Psaki Brushes Off Reporter Asking Why Hunter Biden Received $3.5 Million From the Mayor of Moscow's Wife - Sen. Ron Johnson Responds!…
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday was asked about the $3.5 million Hunter Biden received from the wife of the former mayor of Moscow.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Puppet Biden flashback: We have mortgaged our foreign policy. Guess what China owns us.
Thank you, Brian!
Thank you, Brian!
Lawmaker Urges VA to Take Away Benefits of Vets Who Assaulted Capitol
A disproportionate percentage of the pro-Trump mob that assaulted the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 were veterans and active-duty service members. Now, a key lawmaker is calling for them to be stripped of all benefits.
Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who serves on the Armed Services and Veterans Affairs committees, stressed in a letter to Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough that "insurrectionists should not enjoy benefits they no longer deserve."
🔗Article
Let Rep. Ruben Gallego know what you think about his policy suggestion:
Twitter
https://mobile.twitter.com/RepRubenGallego
Facebook
https://m.facebook.com/RepRubenGallego
Washington, DC Office
Phone: (202) 225-4065
Phoenix Office
Phone: (602) 256-0551
Fax: (602) 257-9103
A disproportionate percentage of the pro-Trump mob that assaulted the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 were veterans and active-duty service members. Now, a key lawmaker is calling for them to be stripped of all benefits.
Rep. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., who serves on the Armed Services and Veterans Affairs committees, stressed in a letter to Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Denis McDonough that "insurrectionists should not enjoy benefits they no longer deserve."
🔗Article
Let Rep. Ruben Gallego know what you think about his policy suggestion:
https://mobile.twitter.com/RepRubenGallego
https://m.facebook.com/RepRubenGallego
Washington, DC Office
Phone: (202) 225-4065
Phoenix Office
Phone: (602) 256-0551
Fax: (602) 257-9103
Military.com
Lawmaker Urges VA to Take Away Benefits of Vets Who Assaulted Capitol
Rep. Ruben Gallego stressed in a letter to VA Secretary Denis McDonough that "insurrectionists should not enjoy benefits they no longer deserve."
BREAKING: The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has ruled that there is no right to carry - either openly or concealed in public
This ruling impacts RTC laws in AK, HI, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT (Breaking911)
This ruling impacts RTC laws in AK, HI, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT (Breaking911)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Cruz border blackout update + HR1 election fraud enshrinement bill overview
It Looks To Us Like Dekalb County, GA Did Order 25M Voter Registration Forms For A Population Of Less Than 1M
CDMedia called Dekalb County director of Voter Registration and Elections Erica Hamilton and asked her if the Nov 11th, 2020 receipt for $20M was valid. She refused to answer and gave us a Gmail address for a PR person to answer for her.
To solve the problem, we have filed an open records request with Erica Hamilton. She has three days to respond.
Questions Raised
1) Why did Dekalb order 25M voter registration applications prior to the Jan 5th Senatorial runoff, which decided control of American government?
2)Why does Dekalb County use a private firm to interact with the public?
🔗CDM article
CDMedia called Dekalb County director of Voter Registration and Elections Erica Hamilton and asked her if the Nov 11th, 2020 receipt for $20M was valid. She refused to answer and gave us a Gmail address for a PR person to answer for her.
To solve the problem, we have filed an open records request with Erica Hamilton. She has three days to respond.
Questions Raised
1) Why did Dekalb order 25M voter registration applications prior to the Jan 5th Senatorial runoff, which decided control of American government?
2)Why does Dekalb County use a private firm to interact with the public?
🔗CDM article
CDM - Human Reporters • Not Machines
BREAKING UPDATE: It Looks To Us Like Dekalb County, GA Did Order 25M Voter Registration Forms For A Population Of Less Than 1M…
Found In GA Election Dumpster - Dekalb County Possibly Ordered 25 Million Voter Registration Applications For Population Of Less Than 1 Million.
President Joe Biden put nominal Vice President Kamala Harris in charge of “solving” the escalating border crisis.
Now, Kamala Harris is taking the lead role in the White House on the biggest crisis facing the administration. The Harris presidency is quickly becoming a reality, whether or not it has formal recognition
🔗Article & video
Now, Kamala Harris is taking the lead role in the White House on the biggest crisis facing the administration. The Harris presidency is quickly becoming a reality, whether or not it has formal recognition
🔗Article & video
Becker News
Biden Puts Kamala in Charge of Border Crisis, Handler Tells the Press 'It's Time to Leave' - Becker News
Advertisements President Joe Biden put nominal Vice President Kamala Harris in charge of “solving” the escalating border crisis. Harris will now lead the administration’s efforts on curbing immigration across the southern border, including focusing on coordination…
Election Fraud A Thing of The Past Thanks to Top Inventor
Tens of millions of social media users view his advice and technological savvy monthly, but for top inventor Jovan Hutton Pulitzer it is not about fans, likes or views it is about “Fixing the American election system once and for all.”
The world has been watching the battle royal going on in the United States between the combatants of political parties, ethnic groups and liberal versus conservative factions. Just like the online games or ultra-fighting contests the rules are the fight is fought until only one fighter remains standing. Pulitzer is doing all he can to assure the one fighter standing is the American voter.
🔗Article
Tens of millions of social media users view his advice and technological savvy monthly, but for top inventor Jovan Hutton Pulitzer it is not about fans, likes or views it is about “Fixing the American election system once and for all.”
The world has been watching the battle royal going on in the United States between the combatants of political parties, ethnic groups and liberal versus conservative factions. Just like the online games or ultra-fighting contests the rules are the fight is fought until only one fighter remains standing. Pulitzer is doing all he can to assure the one fighter standing is the American voter.
🔗Article
digitaledge.org
Election Fraud A Thing of The Past Thanks to Top Inventor
Tens of millions of social media users view his advice and technological savvy monthly, but for top inventor Jovan Hutton Pulitzer it is not about fans, likes
Op-Ed: A river of doubt runs through mail voting in Big Sky Country
A mountainous, 2,600-square-mile region with a population of approximately 119,600 does not seem like your prototypical setting for machine politics. Yet a recent audit of mail-in ballots cast there found irregularities characteristic of larger urban centers – on a level that could have easily swung local elections in 2020, and statewide elections in cycles past.
The Biden administration, the Democrat-controlled Congress, and the Democratic National Committee are collectively pressing to both nationalize, and make permanent, many of the extraordinary pandemic-driven voting measures implemented during the 2020 election – particularly mass mail-in voting.
Political leaders and prominent media outlets have dismissed concerns raised by critics that such measures invite voter fraud. But could the election in small-county Missoula call all that into question?
🔗Article
Thanks for the article, Janice!
A mountainous, 2,600-square-mile region with a population of approximately 119,600 does not seem like your prototypical setting for machine politics. Yet a recent audit of mail-in ballots cast there found irregularities characteristic of larger urban centers – on a level that could have easily swung local elections in 2020, and statewide elections in cycles past.
The Biden administration, the Democrat-controlled Congress, and the Democratic National Committee are collectively pressing to both nationalize, and make permanent, many of the extraordinary pandemic-driven voting measures implemented during the 2020 election – particularly mass mail-in voting.
Political leaders and prominent media outlets have dismissed concerns raised by critics that such measures invite voter fraud. But could the election in small-county Missoula call all that into question?
🔗Article
Thanks for the article, Janice!
A new report reveals Facebook as the largest corporate lobbying spender in the U.S. in 2020.
The Public Citizen report reveals the social media platform spent $19,680,000 to lobby in 2020, placing it nearly $1,000,000 above Amazon, the second-highest spender.
“Big Tech has eclipsed yesterday’s big lobbying spenders, Big Oil and Big Tobacco. In 2020, Amazon and Facebook spent nearly twice as much as Exxon and Philip Morris on lobbying,” the report adds.
During the 2020 election cycle, Big Tech also spent a record-breaking $124 million in lobbying and contributions to candidates. Much of this growth is linked to Amazon and Facebook, which increased lobbying and campaign spending from 2018 to 2020 by 30 percent and 56 percent, respectively.
[Of course this doesn’t include Zuckerbuck’s personal election grift-encouragement contributions in excess of $350M]
🔗National Pulse article
The Public Citizen report reveals the social media platform spent $19,680,000 to lobby in 2020, placing it nearly $1,000,000 above Amazon, the second-highest spender.
“Big Tech has eclipsed yesterday’s big lobbying spenders, Big Oil and Big Tobacco. In 2020, Amazon and Facebook spent nearly twice as much as Exxon and Philip Morris on lobbying,” the report adds.
During the 2020 election cycle, Big Tech also spent a record-breaking $124 million in lobbying and contributions to candidates. Much of this growth is linked to Amazon and Facebook, which increased lobbying and campaign spending from 2018 to 2020 by 30 percent and 56 percent, respectively.
[Of course this doesn’t include Zuckerbuck’s personal election grift-encouragement contributions in excess of $350M]
🔗National Pulse article
The National Pulse+
Facebook Spends More on Lobbying DC Than Big Pharma and Defense Industry Giants.
A new report reveals Facebook as the largest corporate lobbying spender in the U.S. in 2020. The Public Citizen report reveals the social media platform spent $19,680,000 to lobby in 2020, placing it nearly $1,000,000 above Amazon, the second-highest spender.…
Trooper offers an outstanding breakdown (below) of this ruling:
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has ruled that there is no right to carry - either openly or concealed in public. In addition to HI, this ruling may impact RTC laws in AK, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has ruled that there is no right to carry - either openly or concealed in public. In addition to HI, this ruling may impact RTC laws in AK, CA, AZ, OR, WA, & MT
Forwarded from trooper
Okay... Let me break-down the scope, basis, context, and impact of the 9th Circuit en banc ruling of the Hawaii 2A Carry case... first... cool your heels and put your sabre back in the scabbard... second... I will provide my 'trooper the non-attorney Patriot" point of view on what to expect from this ruling.
Scope: The case is centered on jurisdiction and discretion within the State of Hawaii exclusively. This ruling does not affect or change or apply to any of the other States within the 9th Circuit purview. AZ.. you are safe, Okay?
Basis: The basis of injury or harm is that a US Citizen, and Resident of Hawaii - with no criminal record or other disqualifying concerns with respect to possessing or bearing (carrying) a firearm - was denied permission to carry his firearm from the State of Hawaii, or some agency of that State.
Context: The context of this case was based on a US Citizen's right to keep and bear arms... BUT... the 9th Circuit scaled-down and limited the context of their ruling, and rationale for their ruling - to the State of Hawaii exclusively-- and including an extension of prior Statehood Authority (prior to Hawaii's Statehood) to give credence to laws or ordinances that were in effect or imposed on Citizens of Hawaii prior to Statehood. This is VERY IMPORTANT CONTEXT!
Impact: The impact of this decision is that the case will likely appeal to SCOTUS - and SCOTUS will likely do one of three things:
1) Let the ruling stand/or do not hear the case BECAUSE it was adjudicated in the context of State's Rights and does not have bearing on Constitutional Law.
2) Hear the case because it DOES have conflict or bearing on undecided constitutional law.
3) Most likely outcome: Return the case back to the 9th Circuit because he ruling is flawed in the sense that it did not address the constitutional rights of a citizen who was denied those rights - it went off on a tangent and rationalized the rights of a territory before it became a State -- which may be relevant to some other discussion, but not to the scope and basis of injury that was brought before the court.
What to Expect: I expect that the SCOTUS will turn-back the case because the 9th Circuit masterfully poison-pilled this gun rights case by framing it as a States Rights case - so that has a double-edged sword effect for our Second Amendment concerns...
The GOOD News is that the other States cannot use this Hawaii case to rationalize banning carry or changing any existing laws to ban carry based on the legal rational and opinions written by the 9th Circuit to support their argument.
The BAD News is that we are effectively back at square one on a SCOTUS-pure constitutional 2A case.. which I think the Hawaii case was... but the Leftist Justice(s) also know that, so they wrote a red herring opinion to deflect this off into some oblique direction - away from the fundamental US Constitutional and Inalienable Rights that a US Citizen must have extended to them, regardless of their State or prior State-Territory History.
That prior State-Territory History argument is key, because the 9th Circuit opinion, in effect, says that since it was law for the Tribal Kings (government) to throw virgins into volcanos to appease the Law of the Tiki Gods... then the State of Hawaii retains that right, just as they retain the right to counter the US Citizen's Bill of Rights.
I am hoping that the SCOTUS U-Turns this case on those grounds.
So.. not to worry. This is Leftist brinkmanship - not a 2A threat outcome.
Scope: The case is centered on jurisdiction and discretion within the State of Hawaii exclusively. This ruling does not affect or change or apply to any of the other States within the 9th Circuit purview. AZ.. you are safe, Okay?
Basis: The basis of injury or harm is that a US Citizen, and Resident of Hawaii - with no criminal record or other disqualifying concerns with respect to possessing or bearing (carrying) a firearm - was denied permission to carry his firearm from the State of Hawaii, or some agency of that State.
Context: The context of this case was based on a US Citizen's right to keep and bear arms... BUT... the 9th Circuit scaled-down and limited the context of their ruling, and rationale for their ruling - to the State of Hawaii exclusively-- and including an extension of prior Statehood Authority (prior to Hawaii's Statehood) to give credence to laws or ordinances that were in effect or imposed on Citizens of Hawaii prior to Statehood. This is VERY IMPORTANT CONTEXT!
Impact: The impact of this decision is that the case will likely appeal to SCOTUS - and SCOTUS will likely do one of three things:
1) Let the ruling stand/or do not hear the case BECAUSE it was adjudicated in the context of State's Rights and does not have bearing on Constitutional Law.
2) Hear the case because it DOES have conflict or bearing on undecided constitutional law.
3) Most likely outcome: Return the case back to the 9th Circuit because he ruling is flawed in the sense that it did not address the constitutional rights of a citizen who was denied those rights - it went off on a tangent and rationalized the rights of a territory before it became a State -- which may be relevant to some other discussion, but not to the scope and basis of injury that was brought before the court.
What to Expect: I expect that the SCOTUS will turn-back the case because the 9th Circuit masterfully poison-pilled this gun rights case by framing it as a States Rights case - so that has a double-edged sword effect for our Second Amendment concerns...
The GOOD News is that the other States cannot use this Hawaii case to rationalize banning carry or changing any existing laws to ban carry based on the legal rational and opinions written by the 9th Circuit to support their argument.
The BAD News is that we are effectively back at square one on a SCOTUS-pure constitutional 2A case.. which I think the Hawaii case was... but the Leftist Justice(s) also know that, so they wrote a red herring opinion to deflect this off into some oblique direction - away from the fundamental US Constitutional and Inalienable Rights that a US Citizen must have extended to them, regardless of their State or prior State-Territory History.
That prior State-Territory History argument is key, because the 9th Circuit opinion, in effect, says that since it was law for the Tribal Kings (government) to throw virgins into volcanos to appease the Law of the Tiki Gods... then the State of Hawaii retains that right, just as they retain the right to counter the US Citizen's Bill of Rights.
I am hoping that the SCOTUS U-Turns this case on those grounds.
So.. not to worry. This is Leftist brinkmanship - not a 2A threat outcome.
Forwarded from Lauren Boebert
Liberals keep saying it’s easier to buy a gun than it is to vote, but I don’t seem to remember when the government sent me an AR-15 in the mail.
No Enemies
You have no enemies, you say?
Alas! my friend, the boast is poor;
He who has mingled in the fray
Of duty, that the brave endure,
Must have made foes! If you have none,
Small is the work that you have done.
You’ve hit no traitor on the hip,
You’ve dashed no cup from perjured lip,
You’ve never turned the wrong to right,
You’ve been a coward in the fight.
~Charles Mackay
You have no enemies, you say?
Alas! my friend, the boast is poor;
He who has mingled in the fray
Of duty, that the brave endure,
Must have made foes! If you have none,
Small is the work that you have done.
You’ve hit no traitor on the hip,
You’ve dashed no cup from perjured lip,
You’ve never turned the wrong to right,
You’ve been a coward in the fight.
~Charles Mackay