Forwarded from Europa Last Battle
Argentina's Milei to declassify documents on Nazi war criminals who fled to Argentina | DW News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhA_w2Wiqeo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhA_w2Wiqeo
🔥3😎1
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
"Trump and Netanyahu: Rewriting the Rules of Gaza and Iran in a Battle Against the Old Guard"
https://t.iss.one/twitterrelay/37814
https://t.iss.one/twitterrelay/37814
Telegram
Twitter Relay
"Trump and Netanyahu: Rewriting the Rules of Gaza and Iran in a Battle Against the Old Guard"
https://t.iss.one/twitterrelay/37814
https://t.iss.one/twitterrelay/37814
😈1
Forwarded from Tucker Carlson on X
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The FDA & Fauci Blocked You From Getting a COVID Cure?
🤬12👍1😈1
Forwarded from The Truth About Vaccines
A good mood helps COVID-19 vaccines work better for People who wear masks and burn Teslas 😂
Who believes junks like this?
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-04-good-mood-covid-vaccines.html
Who believes junks like this?
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-04-good-mood-covid-vaccines.html
Medicalxpress
A good mood helps COVID-19 vaccines work better
mRNA vaccines, like COVID-19 vaccines, work better if patients are in a good mood, finds new research by Cardiff University.
🤡12🤣12😈3😁1🥴1
Forwarded from @WhiteHouse
Here are the key points from the speech delivered on April 2, 2025, by the President of the United States:
1. Liberation Day Declaration: April 2, 2025, is proclaimed as "Liberation Day," marking the rebirth of American industry and the reclaiming of America’s economic destiny with the goal of making America wealthy again.
2. Reciprocal Tariffs: The President announces a historic executive order instituting reciprocal tariffs on countries worldwide, effective at midnight. This policy mirrors the tariffs imposed on U.S. goods by other nations, termed a "Declaration of Economic Independence."
3. Economic Rejuvenation: The tariffs aim to bring jobs and factories back to the U.S., supercharge the domestic industrial base, open foreign markets, break down trade barriers, and ultimately lower consumer prices through increased domestic production.
4. Historical Context: The President highlights decades of economic exploitation by foreign nations, citing examples like high tariffs on U.S. motorcycles (e.g., 60-75% in Thailand, India, Vietnam) and automobiles (e.g., 10%+ in the EU, 70% in India) compared to the U.S.'s low tariffs (e.g., 2.4% on motorcycles, 2.5% on cars).
5. Specific Tariff Increases: A 25% tariff will be imposed on all foreign-made automobiles starting at midnight. Tariffs on other nations will be set at approximately half their rates charged to the U.S. (e.g., China: 67% to 34%, EU: 39% to 20%, Vietnam: 90% to 46%).
6. Minimum Tariff Baseline: A 10% minimum tariff will apply to all countries to rebuild the economy and prevent cheating, with strict penalties (e.g., 10-year jail sentences) for those facilitating tariff evasion.
7. Corporate Investment: Major companies (e.g., Apple, SoftBank, Nvidia, TSMC, Meta) have committed billions (totaling ~$6 trillion) to build plants in the U.S., driven by the election outcome and tariff policies, reversing decades of outsourcing.
8. Support from Workers: Autoworkers, Teamsters, and unions like the UAW express strong support, anticipating job growth and plant revitalization, particularly in states like Michigan.
9. Agricultural Protection: Tariffs address unfair treatment of U.S. farmers, such as Canada’s 250-300% tariffs on dairy, the EU’s poultry bans, and high tariffs on rice by China (65%), South Korea (50-513%), and Japan (700%).
10. Economic History Lesson: The U.S. thrived as a tariff-backed nation from 1789-1913, amassing wealth until the income tax replaced tariffs in 1913, leading to economic vulnerabilities like the Great Depression.
11. National Security: Chronic trade deficits are framed as a national emergency, threatening security by outsourcing critical goods (e.g., antibiotics, electronics, ships), which the tariffs aim to reverse.
12. Legislative Agenda: The President calls for Congress to pass the "One Big, Beautiful Bill," including the largest tax cuts in history, permanent tax cuts, spending cuts, energy investments, defense enhancements, and an interest deduction for loans on American-made cars.
13. Border and Inflation Success: Claims of achieving the safest U.S. border ever, reducing egg prices by 59%, lowering grocery and energy costs, and creating 10,000 manufacturing jobs in weeks, contrasting with high inflation under the previous administration.
14. Global Response: Foreign leaders are expected to seek exemptions, but the President urges them to drop their own tariffs and buy American goods instead, emphasizing fair trade over economic surrender.
15. Vision for America: The policy promises a "Golden Age of America," transforming the nation into an industrial powerhouse with American-made products, reducing national debt, and prioritizing American workers and families.
16. Additional Executive Action: Alongside the tariff order, an executive order closes the "de minimis loophole" for imports from China, further tightening trade controls.
These points encapsulate the President’s narrative of economic nationalism, industrial revival, and a strategic shift in U.S. trade policy.
1. Liberation Day Declaration: April 2, 2025, is proclaimed as "Liberation Day," marking the rebirth of American industry and the reclaiming of America’s economic destiny with the goal of making America wealthy again.
2. Reciprocal Tariffs: The President announces a historic executive order instituting reciprocal tariffs on countries worldwide, effective at midnight. This policy mirrors the tariffs imposed on U.S. goods by other nations, termed a "Declaration of Economic Independence."
3. Economic Rejuvenation: The tariffs aim to bring jobs and factories back to the U.S., supercharge the domestic industrial base, open foreign markets, break down trade barriers, and ultimately lower consumer prices through increased domestic production.
4. Historical Context: The President highlights decades of economic exploitation by foreign nations, citing examples like high tariffs on U.S. motorcycles (e.g., 60-75% in Thailand, India, Vietnam) and automobiles (e.g., 10%+ in the EU, 70% in India) compared to the U.S.'s low tariffs (e.g., 2.4% on motorcycles, 2.5% on cars).
5. Specific Tariff Increases: A 25% tariff will be imposed on all foreign-made automobiles starting at midnight. Tariffs on other nations will be set at approximately half their rates charged to the U.S. (e.g., China: 67% to 34%, EU: 39% to 20%, Vietnam: 90% to 46%).
6. Minimum Tariff Baseline: A 10% minimum tariff will apply to all countries to rebuild the economy and prevent cheating, with strict penalties (e.g., 10-year jail sentences) for those facilitating tariff evasion.
7. Corporate Investment: Major companies (e.g., Apple, SoftBank, Nvidia, TSMC, Meta) have committed billions (totaling ~$6 trillion) to build plants in the U.S., driven by the election outcome and tariff policies, reversing decades of outsourcing.
8. Support from Workers: Autoworkers, Teamsters, and unions like the UAW express strong support, anticipating job growth and plant revitalization, particularly in states like Michigan.
9. Agricultural Protection: Tariffs address unfair treatment of U.S. farmers, such as Canada’s 250-300% tariffs on dairy, the EU’s poultry bans, and high tariffs on rice by China (65%), South Korea (50-513%), and Japan (700%).
10. Economic History Lesson: The U.S. thrived as a tariff-backed nation from 1789-1913, amassing wealth until the income tax replaced tariffs in 1913, leading to economic vulnerabilities like the Great Depression.
11. National Security: Chronic trade deficits are framed as a national emergency, threatening security by outsourcing critical goods (e.g., antibiotics, electronics, ships), which the tariffs aim to reverse.
12. Legislative Agenda: The President calls for Congress to pass the "One Big, Beautiful Bill," including the largest tax cuts in history, permanent tax cuts, spending cuts, energy investments, defense enhancements, and an interest deduction for loans on American-made cars.
13. Border and Inflation Success: Claims of achieving the safest U.S. border ever, reducing egg prices by 59%, lowering grocery and energy costs, and creating 10,000 manufacturing jobs in weeks, contrasting with high inflation under the previous administration.
14. Global Response: Foreign leaders are expected to seek exemptions, but the President urges them to drop their own tariffs and buy American goods instead, emphasizing fair trade over economic surrender.
15. Vision for America: The policy promises a "Golden Age of America," transforming the nation into an industrial powerhouse with American-made products, reducing national debt, and prioritizing American workers and families.
16. Additional Executive Action: Alongside the tariff order, an executive order closes the "de minimis loophole" for imports from China, further tightening trade controls.
These points encapsulate the President’s narrative of economic nationalism, industrial revival, and a strategic shift in U.S. trade policy.
👍5🥴3❤1
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
Where We Go 1 We Go All
EU is turning Q 😂MAGA🇺🇸
Where We Go 1 We Go All
EU is turning Q 😂MAGA
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡3🖕1👀1
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
1 of 8
Claim: Tariffs are a "major blow" to the global economy
Counterargument: Tariffs don’t inherently destroy economies; they redirect them. Historical examples, like the U.S. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, are often cited as disastrous, but studies (e.g., Irwin, 1998) suggest their role in deepening the Great Depression was overstated compared to monetary policy failures. Trump’s tariffs could boost U.S. domestic production by shielding it from foreign competition, potentially offsetting global losses with localized gains. The "major blow" assumes a net-negative outcome without considering adaptive responses like reshoring or new trade alliances.
1 of 8
Claim: Tariffs are a "major blow" to the global economy
Counterargument: Tariffs don’t inherently destroy economies; they redirect them. Historical examples, like the U.S. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, are often cited as disastrous, but studies (e.g., Irwin, 1998) suggest their role in deepening the Great Depression was overstated compared to monetary policy failures. Trump’s tariffs could boost U.S. domestic production by shielding it from foreign competition, potentially offsetting global losses with localized gains. The "major blow" assumes a net-negative outcome without considering adaptive responses like reshoring or new trade alliances.
👍1
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
2 of 8
Claim: Consumers will face immediate higher costs (groceries, medication, transportation)
Counterargument: Price increases aren’t guaranteed or uniform. Businesses often absorb some tariff costs to stay competitive, or source alternatives from non-tariffed regions. For instance, if EU goods face U.S. tariffs, American consumers might shift to domestic or Asian suppliers, mitigating price spikes. Von der Leyen’s assertion also ignores potential U.S. policy offsets (e.g., tax cuts or subsidies) that Trump might pair with tariffs, as he did in 2018-2019, softening consumer impact.
2 of 8
Claim: Consumers will face immediate higher costs (groceries, medication, transportation)
Counterargument: Price increases aren’t guaranteed or uniform. Businesses often absorb some tariff costs to stay competitive, or source alternatives from non-tariffed regions. For instance, if EU goods face U.S. tariffs, American consumers might shift to domestic or Asian suppliers, mitigating price spikes. Von der Leyen’s assertion also ignores potential U.S. policy offsets (e.g., tax cuts or subsidies) that Trump might pair with tariffs, as he did in 2018-2019, softening consumer impact.
👍3
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
3 of 8
Claim: Vulnerable countries and citizens will suffer most
Counterargument: Vulnerable countries often rely on exports to the U.S., but they’re also agile in finding new markets. Post-2018 U.S.-China trade war, nations like Vietnam and Mexico pivoted to fill gaps, gaining economically. The "most vulnerable" narrative assumes static trade patterns, not resilience or diversification. For citizens, inflation fears may be overstated—U.S. inflation post-2018 tariffs rose modestly (2-3%), not catastrophically, per Federal Reserve data.
3 of 8
Claim: Vulnerable countries and citizens will suffer most
Counterargument: Vulnerable countries often rely on exports to the U.S., but they’re also agile in finding new markets. Post-2018 U.S.-China trade war, nations like Vietnam and Mexico pivoted to fill gaps, gaining economically. The "most vulnerable" narrative assumes static trade patterns, not resilience or diversification. For citizens, inflation fears may be overstated—U.S. inflation post-2018 tariffs rose modestly (2-3%), not catastrophically, per Federal Reserve data.
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
4 of 8
Claim: Businesses will suffer from uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and bureaucracy
Counterargument: Uncertainty cuts both ways—businesses adapt. Post-2018 tariffs, U.S. firms shifted supply chains (e.g., from China to Southeast Asia) within months, per the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Bureaucracy exists in any trade regime; EU red tape already burdens its own firms. Tariffs might even streamline U.S.-centric supply chains, reducing reliance on complex global networks vulnerable to disruptions like pandemics or shipping crises (e.g., Suez Canal 2021).
4 of 8
Claim: Businesses will suffer from uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and bureaucracy
Counterargument: Uncertainty cuts both ways—businesses adapt. Post-2018 tariffs, U.S. firms shifted supply chains (e.g., from China to Southeast Asia) within months, per the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Bureaucracy exists in any trade regime; EU red tape already burdens its own firms. Tariffs might even streamline U.S.-centric supply chains, reducing reliance on complex global networks vulnerable to disruptions like pandemics or shipping crises (e.g., Suez Canal 2021).
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
5 of 8
Claim: 80 years of EU-U.S. trade prosperity is at risk
Counterargument: Past prosperity doesn’t mean current trade is optimal. The U.S. has long argued the EU benefits disproportionately (e.g., $150B trade deficit in 2022), with subsidized sectors like Airbus skewing competition. Tariffs could force a rebalance, not a collapse. Nostalgia for transatlantic trade ignores how it’s evolved—digital and service economies now dwarf traditional goods in value, per OECD stats, and tariffs target the latter, not the former.
5 of 8
Claim: 80 years of EU-U.S. trade prosperity is at risk
Counterargument: Past prosperity doesn’t mean current trade is optimal. The U.S. has long argued the EU benefits disproportionately (e.g., $150B trade deficit in 2022), with subsidized sectors like Airbus skewing competition. Tariffs could force a rebalance, not a collapse. Nostalgia for transatlantic trade ignores how it’s evolved—digital and service economies now dwarf traditional goods in value, per OECD stats, and tariffs target the latter, not the former.
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
6 of 8
Claim: Tariffs won’t fix global trade flaws; negotiation is better
Counterargument: Negotiations often stall—look at decades of WTO gridlock. Tariffs, while blunt, have historically pressured concessions (e.g., China’s 2019 trade talks with Trump). Von der Leyen’s readiness to negotiate assumes U.S. goodwill, but Trump’s strategy thrives on leverage, not dialogue. Tariffs might accelerate reform by forcing action, not just words.
6 of 8
Claim: Tariffs won’t fix global trade flaws; negotiation is better
Counterargument: Negotiations often stall—look at decades of WTO gridlock. Tariffs, while blunt, have historically pressured concessions (e.g., China’s 2019 trade talks with Trump). Von der Leyen’s readiness to negotiate assumes U.S. goodwill, but Trump’s strategy thrives on leverage, not dialogue. Tariffs might accelerate reform by forcing action, not just words.
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
7 of 8
Claim: EU countermeasures and unity will shield it from harm
Counterargument: Countermeasures escalate tensions, risking a trade war that hurts all sides—EU exports to the U.S. ($500B annually) aren’t easily replaced. Unity is overstated; EU nations often diverge on trade (e.g., Germany’s export reliance vs. France’s protectionism). The "largest single market" claim ignores internal fractures—Brexit showed 450 million consumers don’t always act as one.
7 of 8
Claim: EU countermeasures and unity will shield it from harm
Counterargument: Countermeasures escalate tensions, risking a trade war that hurts all sides—EU exports to the U.S. ($500B annually) aren’t easily replaced. Unity is overstated; EU nations often diverge on trade (e.g., Germany’s export reliance vs. France’s protectionism). The "largest single market" claim ignores internal fractures—Brexit showed 450 million consumers don’t always act as one.
Forwarded from The Storm
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
8 of 8
Claim: Tariffs lack a clear path, creating "chaos and complexity"
Counterargument: Trump’s tariffs likely follow a deliberate America-first logic, not chaos—prioritizing domestic jobs and leverage over allies. Complexity is inherent in global trade; EU policies like GDPR or carbon border taxes aren’t exactly simple either. The "no clear path" critique dismisses strategic ambiguity as a negotiation tactic, which Trump has used effectively before.
8 of 8
Claim: Tariffs lack a clear path, creating "chaos and complexity"
Counterargument: Trump’s tariffs likely follow a deliberate America-first logic, not chaos—prioritizing domestic jobs and leverage over allies. Complexity is inherent in global trade; EU policies like GDPR or carbon border taxes aren’t exactly simple either. The "no clear path" critique dismisses strategic ambiguity as a negotiation tactic, which Trump has used effectively before.
❤1
Forwarded from The Storm
Conclusion of Debunking
Von der Leyen’s statement leans on dire predictions—economic collapse, consumer pain, global suffering—that may overstate the tariffs’ impact while underestimating adaptive responses and potential U.S. gains. Her preference for negotiation over confrontation reflects EU ideals but sidesteps how tariffs have historically shifted trade dynamics when talks fail. The EU’s resilience and countermeasures might mitigate damage, but they don’t disprove the tariffs’ logic from a U.S. perspective.
The reality likely lies between her alarmism and Trump’s optimism: disruption, yes, but not necessarily disaster. Without real-time data post-April 3, 2025, her claims remain speculative, not gospel.
Von der Leyen’s statement leans on dire predictions—economic collapse, consumer pain, global suffering—that may overstate the tariffs’ impact while underestimating adaptive responses and potential U.S. gains. Her preference for negotiation over confrontation reflects EU ideals but sidesteps how tariffs have historically shifted trade dynamics when talks fail. The EU’s resilience and countermeasures might mitigate damage, but they don’t disprove the tariffs’ logic from a U.S. perspective.
The reality likely lies between her alarmism and Trump’s optimism: disruption, yes, but not necessarily disaster. Without real-time data post-April 3, 2025, her claims remain speculative, not gospel.
👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dems and Repubs are the same damn team! They’re all slurping from the same corporate trough. Watch this and see why voting’s just a clown show for their rich buddies!
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1907907880793379304
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1907907880793379304
👍8😡1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Israel just ADMITTED they’re targeting journalists— they’re mowing down reporters and bragging about it while the corporate shills stay silent. Watch this and rage—our ‘allies’ are psychos!
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1907925547759579446
https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1907925547759579446
🤬13