The True Meaning of βVicar of Christ.β
Dr. Ian Paisley, a man who preached against the JesuitsΒΉ and practiced what he preachedΒ², wrote the following concerning the Popeβs official title, βThe Vicar of Christ.β
ββAntichrist' is a Greek word. 'Vicar' is an English word. The words are synonymous. They have exactly the same meaning. 'Antichrist' translated into the English is 'Vice Christ' or 'Vicar of Christ.' 'Vicar of Christ, rendered into the Greek is 'Antichristos' = 'Antichrist.' The ordinary use of the word in the Greek is decisive on this point. So every time the Pope claims to be, 'The Vicar of Christ,' he is pleading at the bar of the world's opinion that he indeed is THE ANTICHRIST.β
-The Pope is the Antichrist:
A Demonstration from Scripture, history, and his own lips. Being a Precis of Dr. J. A. Wylie's Classic, "The Papacy is the Antichrist" By Ian R. K. Paisley
ΒΉThe Black Pope and His Murdermen by Ian Paisley
Β²Ian Paisley denouncing Pope John Paul II as βAntichrist.β
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
Dr. Ian Paisley, a man who preached against the JesuitsΒΉ and practiced what he preachedΒ², wrote the following concerning the Popeβs official title, βThe Vicar of Christ.β
ββAntichrist' is a Greek word. 'Vicar' is an English word. The words are synonymous. They have exactly the same meaning. 'Antichrist' translated into the English is 'Vice Christ' or 'Vicar of Christ.' 'Vicar of Christ, rendered into the Greek is 'Antichristos' = 'Antichrist.' The ordinary use of the word in the Greek is decisive on this point. So every time the Pope claims to be, 'The Vicar of Christ,' he is pleading at the bar of the world's opinion that he indeed is THE ANTICHRIST.β
-The Pope is the Antichrist:
A Demonstration from Scripture, history, and his own lips. Being a Precis of Dr. J. A. Wylie's Classic, "The Papacy is the Antichrist" By Ian R. K. Paisley
ΒΉThe Black Pope and His Murdermen by Ian Paisley
Β²Ian Paisley denouncing Pope John Paul II as βAntichrist.β
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π₯5β€1
The Jewish Patsy
βThe Jews have been the perpetual and particular scapegoat (an Old Testament term) for Jesuit crimes, and a great host of Catholic and βnon-Catholicβ co-adjutors have produced a massive repository of βscholarly worksβ blaming the Jews for virtually every major successful Jesuit program of the past. In the Dark Ages the Jews were accused of drinking the blood Catholic infants and being the source of the Black Death; in the new Dark Age they are accused of being the hidden rulers of the world, manipulating everyone through usury and banking. βOf course, you attribute to others what you're doing yourself, and since what you're doing yourself is hateful, the others become hateful. But since the others, as a rule, would like to do the same hateful thing that you're doing, they collaborate with you, hinting that-yes-what you attribute to them is actually what they have always desired. God blinds those he wishes to destroy; you just have to lend Him a helping hand.βΒΉ The Jesuits precipitate and anticipate future mass acts of violence against nations and βethnic groups.β They or their mouthpieces seem to have advance knowledge of the design of coming aggressions. Sometimes they appear prophetic, but it is no prophecy to blurt out planned events which are being orchestrated by those with whom you are in associationβ¦ The Society is careful to involve a number of Jews that are prominent and very visible in all of the swindles, revolutions, wars, and mass murders they have fomented since their inception. The future Jesuit, co-adjutor writers then have material to work with in maintaining the Romish fiction that the Jews run the monetary and political apparatus of the world's governments and are responsible for the horrendous crimes which the Jesuits themselves have perpetrated through loyal third parties that only with difficulty can be shown to have affiliation with the Society. This most clever stratagem allows the Society to kill two birds with one stone. They are able both to cover their own tracks, and to whip the Gentiles into frenzy over supposed Jewish supremacy and criminality. The Jesuits have well noted the latent, Satanic Anti-Jewish feeling that is present in most Gentle populations, and have used it to great advantage for their causeβ¦ Each Jesuit author stands on the shoulders of the previous authors and appeals to the large body of evidence (some factual and some fantasy) created by his predecessors. This sly operation allows fiction to become fact by a gradual βevolutionβ and for the continuance of the Catholic Dark Age conception of Jewry to be foisted on each succeeding generation of readers. Individual Jews who serve the ends of the Jesuits are always surrounded, aided and even directed by co-adjutor Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Opus Dei members or others who are indirectly in the pay and employ of the Catholic superstructure maintained and policed by Jesuit temporal power. Some powerful Jews are even known to be Knights of Malta or other royal orders, notably certain members of the Rothschild family, both past and present. The presidents and prime ministers who have a few Jews with high visibility as their advisors and department heads do so at the instruction and behest of the Catholic Church and its right arm, the Jesuit Order. Prior planning provides plausible denial through a Jewish presence in many of the financial and political moves of the Society, but if one looks hard he will not see hordes of Jewish rabbis banqueting and counseling with potentates, prime ministers, presidents and oligarchs. Instead he will find Catholic cardinals, bishops, and Jesuit priests standing next to every seat of power and luxuriantly ensconced in every national capital. The Jew is a side kick, an appendage to conspiracy, but he is not the master mind.β
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 34-35, 38-39.
ΒΉ(Foucault's Pendulum, Page 518, Umberto Eco, Ballantine Books, 1989)
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
βThe Jews have been the perpetual and particular scapegoat (an Old Testament term) for Jesuit crimes, and a great host of Catholic and βnon-Catholicβ co-adjutors have produced a massive repository of βscholarly worksβ blaming the Jews for virtually every major successful Jesuit program of the past. In the Dark Ages the Jews were accused of drinking the blood Catholic infants and being the source of the Black Death; in the new Dark Age they are accused of being the hidden rulers of the world, manipulating everyone through usury and banking. βOf course, you attribute to others what you're doing yourself, and since what you're doing yourself is hateful, the others become hateful. But since the others, as a rule, would like to do the same hateful thing that you're doing, they collaborate with you, hinting that-yes-what you attribute to them is actually what they have always desired. God blinds those he wishes to destroy; you just have to lend Him a helping hand.βΒΉ The Jesuits precipitate and anticipate future mass acts of violence against nations and βethnic groups.β They or their mouthpieces seem to have advance knowledge of the design of coming aggressions. Sometimes they appear prophetic, but it is no prophecy to blurt out planned events which are being orchestrated by those with whom you are in associationβ¦ The Society is careful to involve a number of Jews that are prominent and very visible in all of the swindles, revolutions, wars, and mass murders they have fomented since their inception. The future Jesuit, co-adjutor writers then have material to work with in maintaining the Romish fiction that the Jews run the monetary and political apparatus of the world's governments and are responsible for the horrendous crimes which the Jesuits themselves have perpetrated through loyal third parties that only with difficulty can be shown to have affiliation with the Society. This most clever stratagem allows the Society to kill two birds with one stone. They are able both to cover their own tracks, and to whip the Gentiles into frenzy over supposed Jewish supremacy and criminality. The Jesuits have well noted the latent, Satanic Anti-Jewish feeling that is present in most Gentle populations, and have used it to great advantage for their causeβ¦ Each Jesuit author stands on the shoulders of the previous authors and appeals to the large body of evidence (some factual and some fantasy) created by his predecessors. This sly operation allows fiction to become fact by a gradual βevolutionβ and for the continuance of the Catholic Dark Age conception of Jewry to be foisted on each succeeding generation of readers. Individual Jews who serve the ends of the Jesuits are always surrounded, aided and even directed by co-adjutor Knights of Malta, Knights of Columbus, Opus Dei members or others who are indirectly in the pay and employ of the Catholic superstructure maintained and policed by Jesuit temporal power. Some powerful Jews are even known to be Knights of Malta or other royal orders, notably certain members of the Rothschild family, both past and present. The presidents and prime ministers who have a few Jews with high visibility as their advisors and department heads do so at the instruction and behest of the Catholic Church and its right arm, the Jesuit Order. Prior planning provides plausible denial through a Jewish presence in many of the financial and political moves of the Society, but if one looks hard he will not see hordes of Jewish rabbis banqueting and counseling with potentates, prime ministers, presidents and oligarchs. Instead he will find Catholic cardinals, bishops, and Jesuit priests standing next to every seat of power and luxuriantly ensconced in every national capital. The Jew is a side kick, an appendage to conspiracy, but he is not the master mind.β
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 34-35, 38-39.
ΒΉ(Foucault's Pendulum, Page 518, Umberto Eco, Ballantine Books, 1989)
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π―6
The Jesuit Hive Mind
"βWhat is the nature of the Jesuit? None; he is fit for everything; a machine, a simple instrument of action, has no personal nature.βΒΉ Whatever he may be, the Jesuit can be anything, and yet is nothing. He is whatever he is told to be and if he is a βgood Jesuit,β that is all he ever will be. By his own rule, he should possess no thoughts or desires of his own; all his thoughts, desires, being but those of the Jesuit Universal Mind. He is a man who has foresworn allegiance to his country and attachment to family, and the life of his order is his life. His existence is submerged into the soul and life of the Order, and his personality is both a reflection and extension of his ghostly father, the Jesuit General, who is responsible for the perpetuation and preeminence of the Pope and The Papacy. βIn the army of the Jesuits, each individual is a picked and chosen man; himself fit, in his own appointed sphere, to become a leader, a captain, a general, yes, a chieftain among leaders...In point of oneness of mind, singleness of purpose, simultaneousness of action, and terribleness of execution, what army, in ancient or modern times, is fit to be compared with that of the Jesuits?βΒ² βThe collective church is a body inanimate when alone and without the Pope, but informed by the Pope with a soul.βΒ³ The Jesuit's obedience to orders must be inward as well as outward, in the heart as well as the flesh. In perfect obedience to his superior, he has willingly and with great effort surrendered not only his will, but his understanding. βBut he who wishes to make an absolutely complete offering of himself must in addition to his will include his understanding, which is the highest degree of obedience.ββ΄ βPerfection in Jesuitism cannot be reached otherwise than by lose of manhood. Will, judgment, conscience, liberty, all the Jesuit lays down at the feet of his general. It is a tremendous sacrifice, but to him the General is God...ββ΅ βThe destructive process of scooping out the will of the Jesuit novice, to replace it with that of his superior (as a watchmaker might fit a new movement into a case) and thereby, in most cases, to annihilate those subtle qualities of individuality and originality which are essential to genius,ββΆ so that βhe not only identifies his will with that of the superior, but even his thoughts, and submits his own judgment to the superior's judgment, to the extent that a devout will can bend the understanding.ββ΄β
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 10-12.
ΒΉ(βThe Jesuits,βMM. Jules Michelet, and Quinet; of the College of France, translated from the 7th edition by C. Cooks, B.I., Fourth Edition, London, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848)
Β²(Ibid, Duff, Page 7.)
Β³(Roman Catholicism, Old and New. John Schulte, page 277, quoting Jesuit, Cardinal Pallavinci.)
β΄LOYOLA, IGNATAIUS (From ST. IGNATIUS' OWN STORY AS TOLD TO LUIS GONZALEZ WITH A SAMPLING OF HIS LETTERS, translated by William J. Young, SJ.; published 1956, Henry Regenery Company, Pages 114-115, The Letter on Obedience, March 26, 1553.)
β΅(History of the Reformation, J. A. Wylie, Volume Il, page 392.)
βΆ(Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Handy Volume Issue, 1910, page 342.)
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
"βWhat is the nature of the Jesuit? None; he is fit for everything; a machine, a simple instrument of action, has no personal nature.βΒΉ Whatever he may be, the Jesuit can be anything, and yet is nothing. He is whatever he is told to be and if he is a βgood Jesuit,β that is all he ever will be. By his own rule, he should possess no thoughts or desires of his own; all his thoughts, desires, being but those of the Jesuit Universal Mind. He is a man who has foresworn allegiance to his country and attachment to family, and the life of his order is his life. His existence is submerged into the soul and life of the Order, and his personality is both a reflection and extension of his ghostly father, the Jesuit General, who is responsible for the perpetuation and preeminence of the Pope and The Papacy. βIn the army of the Jesuits, each individual is a picked and chosen man; himself fit, in his own appointed sphere, to become a leader, a captain, a general, yes, a chieftain among leaders...In point of oneness of mind, singleness of purpose, simultaneousness of action, and terribleness of execution, what army, in ancient or modern times, is fit to be compared with that of the Jesuits?βΒ² βThe collective church is a body inanimate when alone and without the Pope, but informed by the Pope with a soul.βΒ³ The Jesuit's obedience to orders must be inward as well as outward, in the heart as well as the flesh. In perfect obedience to his superior, he has willingly and with great effort surrendered not only his will, but his understanding. βBut he who wishes to make an absolutely complete offering of himself must in addition to his will include his understanding, which is the highest degree of obedience.ββ΄ βPerfection in Jesuitism cannot be reached otherwise than by lose of manhood. Will, judgment, conscience, liberty, all the Jesuit lays down at the feet of his general. It is a tremendous sacrifice, but to him the General is God...ββ΅ βThe destructive process of scooping out the will of the Jesuit novice, to replace it with that of his superior (as a watchmaker might fit a new movement into a case) and thereby, in most cases, to annihilate those subtle qualities of individuality and originality which are essential to genius,ββΆ so that βhe not only identifies his will with that of the superior, but even his thoughts, and submits his own judgment to the superior's judgment, to the extent that a devout will can bend the understanding.ββ΄β
-The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner pages 10-12.
ΒΉ(βThe Jesuits,βMM. Jules Michelet, and Quinet; of the College of France, translated from the 7th edition by C. Cooks, B.I., Fourth Edition, London, Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1848)
Β²(Ibid, Duff, Page 7.)
Β³(Roman Catholicism, Old and New. John Schulte, page 277, quoting Jesuit, Cardinal Pallavinci.)
β΄LOYOLA, IGNATAIUS (From ST. IGNATIUS' OWN STORY AS TOLD TO LUIS GONZALEZ WITH A SAMPLING OF HIS LETTERS, translated by William J. Young, SJ.; published 1956, Henry Regenery Company, Pages 114-115, The Letter on Obedience, March 26, 1553.)
β΅(History of the Reformation, J. A. Wylie, Volume Il, page 392.)
βΆ(Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Handy Volume Issue, 1910, page 342.)
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
Another Jesuit Connection to Nikola Tesla? | Tesla and his Death Ray
College professor Joseph P. Farrell notes the following in his book The Giza Death Star Deployed:
βThe resemblance of published diagrams of Tesla's βdeath rayβ does indeed bear a striking resemblance to those of famous Jesuit scientist Athanasius Kircher's pictures of Archimedes' mirror, discussed previously.β -The Giza Death Star Deployed: The Physical and Engineering of the Great Pyramid by Joseph P. Farrell page 195.
Is it a mere βcoincidenceβ that Teslaβs death ray diagrams bear a βstriking resemblanceβ to Jesuit priest Athanasius Kircher's Archimedes' mirror or did Tesla deliberately model his death ray after his Jesuit forefather? Taking into consideration the fact that Tesla was Jesuit trainedΒΉ, that he received an honorary degree from a degree from a Jesuit controlled universityΒΉ, that he had his own version of Loyolaβs Spiritual ExercisesΒ², and that he read after a Jesuit priestΒ³. It does not seem far fetched to conclude that Tesla consciously patterned his death ray off Kircherβs work from centuries earlier.
ΒΉhttps://t.iss.one/Jesuitocracy/30
Β²https://t.iss.one/Jesuitocracy/33
Β³https://t.iss.one/Jesuitocracy/28
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
College professor Joseph P. Farrell notes the following in his book The Giza Death Star Deployed:
βThe resemblance of published diagrams of Tesla's βdeath rayβ does indeed bear a striking resemblance to those of famous Jesuit scientist Athanasius Kircher's pictures of Archimedes' mirror, discussed previously.β -The Giza Death Star Deployed: The Physical and Engineering of the Great Pyramid by Joseph P. Farrell page 195.
Is it a mere βcoincidenceβ that Teslaβs death ray diagrams bear a βstriking resemblanceβ to Jesuit priest Athanasius Kircher's Archimedes' mirror or did Tesla deliberately model his death ray after his Jesuit forefather? Taking into consideration the fact that Tesla was Jesuit trainedΒΉ, that he received an honorary degree from a degree from a Jesuit controlled universityΒΉ, that he had his own version of Loyolaβs Spiritual ExercisesΒ², and that he read after a Jesuit priestΒ³. It does not seem far fetched to conclude that Tesla consciously patterned his death ray off Kircherβs work from centuries earlier.
ΒΉhttps://t.iss.one/Jesuitocracy/30
Β²https://t.iss.one/Jesuitocracy/33
Β³https://t.iss.one/Jesuitocracy/28
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
β€1π1π₯1
Forwarded from π Politically Incorrect Polls (ππ π βππ)
Is the Pope the Antichrist?
Anonymous Poll
31%
No, he cannot be, he is righteous. The Antichrist won't come from the Catholic Church
69%
Yes, there is no doubt, he himself said to be the Vicar (in place of) Christ
The Jesuits - The Founding Fathers of Communistic Race Denialism
British politician Charles Newdigate Newdegate, quoting M. Garnier Pagès concerning the Jesuits, in his 1872 work A Glimpse of the Great Secret Society states the following,
βIn the eyes of the people they exist whenever despotism exists, and disappear whenever liberty appears. Auxiliaries of absolute kings, they are the adversaries of all progress. They maintain ignorance and oppose light. Devoted to the past, they are the enemies of the future; so much so, that were it possible, they would even prevent time from advancing. They know but one law, one faith, and one morality. That law, faith, and morality, they call authority. To a superior they submit life and conscience. To their order they sacrifice individuality. They are neither Frenchmen, Italians, Germans, nor Spaniards. They are not citizens of any country. They are Jesuits only. They have but one family, one fortune, and one end; and all these are included in the word Community."ΒΉ
-A Glimpse of the Great Secret Society by Charles Newdigate Newdegate pages lxxi-lxxii.
Thus illustrating the fact that the Jesuit cares not whether or not his kindred is annihilated. He views himself, not as proceeding from any branch of the three sons of Noah, but rather as only a Jesuit. A man who has no identity, no individuality, no mind or thought, or conscience of his own. His whole existence is summed up in the word βcommunity,β from whence comes communism. The Jesuits created and perfected communism in their Paraguayan reductions. Ever since, a core tenet of communism has been race denialism. Hence why the American Civil Rights Movement was nothing other than a communist movement whose father was John LaFarge Jr. S.J.
ΒΉOriginally quoted by The Morning Star on April 19th, 1861
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
British politician Charles Newdigate Newdegate, quoting M. Garnier Pagès concerning the Jesuits, in his 1872 work A Glimpse of the Great Secret Society states the following,
βIn the eyes of the people they exist whenever despotism exists, and disappear whenever liberty appears. Auxiliaries of absolute kings, they are the adversaries of all progress. They maintain ignorance and oppose light. Devoted to the past, they are the enemies of the future; so much so, that were it possible, they would even prevent time from advancing. They know but one law, one faith, and one morality. That law, faith, and morality, they call authority. To a superior they submit life and conscience. To their order they sacrifice individuality. They are neither Frenchmen, Italians, Germans, nor Spaniards. They are not citizens of any country. They are Jesuits only. They have but one family, one fortune, and one end; and all these are included in the word Community."ΒΉ
-A Glimpse of the Great Secret Society by Charles Newdigate Newdegate pages lxxi-lxxii.
Thus illustrating the fact that the Jesuit cares not whether or not his kindred is annihilated. He views himself, not as proceeding from any branch of the three sons of Noah, but rather as only a Jesuit. A man who has no identity, no individuality, no mind or thought, or conscience of his own. His whole existence is summed up in the word βcommunity,β from whence comes communism. The Jesuits created and perfected communism in their Paraguayan reductions. Ever since, a core tenet of communism has been race denialism. Hence why the American Civil Rights Movement was nothing other than a communist movement whose father was John LaFarge Jr. S.J.
ΒΉOriginally quoted by The Morning Star on April 19th, 1861
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π3
Hitlerβs Use of Propaganda was Analogous to that of the Jesuits
The American writer and librarian Robert B. Downs pens the following in his work Books that Changed the World,
βTo attain the objectives set by his soaring ambition, Hitler proposed to use three methods: propagandaΒΉ, diplomacy, and force. Nowhere in Mein KampfΒ² is the author more revealing of himself and his tactics than in his discussion of propaganda techniques, correctly believed by him to be one of the Nazis' most effective and formidable weapons. Max Lerner called Hitler βprobably the greatest master of propaganda and organization in modern historyΒ³,β adding that, βto find his equal one must go back to Loyola and the Jesuitsβ΄.β To perfect his own understanding of the propaganda art, Hitler studied the propaganda techniques of the Marxistsβ΅, the organization and methods of the Catholic Church, British propaganda of World War I, American advertising, and Freudian psychologyβΆ.β
-Books that Changed the World by Robert B. Downs page 124.
ΒΉCreated by the Jesuits for their use in the counter-reformation.
Β²Which was ghostwritten by Jesuit Priest Bernhard Stempfle according to Otto Strasser in his book Hitler and I, page 57.
Β³Who would have amounted to nothing had not it been for Hitlerβs master propagator Joseph Goebbels, the Jesuit seminarian trained in the Orderβs ancient methods of propaganda.
β΄Of course, for they were the ones who created and mastered propaganda in the first place.
β΅Karl Marx was Jesuit educated and was tutored by Jesuit General Peter Beckx according to Otto Von Bismarck.
βΆWhich was practiced by the Jesuits before Freud was even born, see The Scientific Outlook by Bertrand Russel page 142.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
The American writer and librarian Robert B. Downs pens the following in his work Books that Changed the World,
βTo attain the objectives set by his soaring ambition, Hitler proposed to use three methods: propagandaΒΉ, diplomacy, and force. Nowhere in Mein KampfΒ² is the author more revealing of himself and his tactics than in his discussion of propaganda techniques, correctly believed by him to be one of the Nazis' most effective and formidable weapons. Max Lerner called Hitler βprobably the greatest master of propaganda and organization in modern historyΒ³,β adding that, βto find his equal one must go back to Loyola and the Jesuitsβ΄.β To perfect his own understanding of the propaganda art, Hitler studied the propaganda techniques of the Marxistsβ΅, the organization and methods of the Catholic Church, British propaganda of World War I, American advertising, and Freudian psychologyβΆ.β
-Books that Changed the World by Robert B. Downs page 124.
ΒΉCreated by the Jesuits for their use in the counter-reformation.
Β²Which was ghostwritten by Jesuit Priest Bernhard Stempfle according to Otto Strasser in his book Hitler and I, page 57.
Β³Who would have amounted to nothing had not it been for Hitlerβs master propagator Joseph Goebbels, the Jesuit seminarian trained in the Orderβs ancient methods of propaganda.
β΄Of course, for they were the ones who created and mastered propaganda in the first place.
β΅Karl Marx was Jesuit educated and was tutored by Jesuit General Peter Beckx according to Otto Von Bismarck.
βΆWhich was practiced by the Jesuits before Freud was even born, see The Scientific Outlook by Bertrand Russel page 142.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In case you forgot, the Jesuits were very involved in the creation of Freemasonry.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π2
Excerpts from Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos
In 1830 Samuel Whittemore published a book by a Massachusetts citizen entitled Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos. Accompanied with Notes Illustrative of the History, Policy, Principles, &c. Of the Masonic Institution; Shewing the Coincidence of its Spirit and Design with Ancient Jesuitismβ¦
The author writes:
ββTwas then the mantle on the Masons fell Which long had mask'd the Jesuit arts so well. βThe organization of Freemasonry, like that of Jesuitism, is complicated and mysterious. To maintain and propagate the gospel was on the front of Jesuitism, as benevolence is on the front of Freemasonry; while the real aim of both has been self-aggrandizement. In the accomplishment of their object, they have been equally and astonishingly successfulβ¦βΒΉ The foregoing sketch is principally takenβ¦ from an article relating to the Jesuits, contained in the Edinburgh Encyclopedia, (Am. Ed.) vol. XIβ¦It has not been my purpose to give a full and connected history of the order, but rather such parts of it only as would bring to the view of the reader the many points of resemblance subsisting between the history, the policy, and the principles of Jesuitism, and the bistory, policy and principles of the Masonic Institution. These points of resemblance are so numerous and so striking, that whoever reads the foregoing sketch with attention, cannot well avoid recognizing them. Indeed we shall discover in almost every line, analogies so strong and decided, as to rivet our attention to them at once. It is therefore the less necessary for me to undertake particularly to point them out to the reader. Freemasonry runs parallel with Jesuitism in almost every particular; insomuch so, that to give the history of the one, is almost equivalent to reciting that of the otherβ¦ The constitutions and laws of the Jesuits were pretended βto have been suggested by the immediate inspiration of Heaven:β so also Freemasonry claims divine origin. The primary object of the [Jesuit] society was, to establish a spiritual dominion over the βminds of men;β and βto accomplish this object, the whole constitution and policy of the order were singularly adapted. The design of the Jesuits was, to make them masters of the world.β It is abundantly evident that a primary object of the Masonic society has been, to establish βa dominion over the minds of men:β that their design has been to βmake themselves masters of the world.β To accomplish these objects, βthe whole constitution and policy of their order are admirably adapted.β The Jesuits were pretendedly zealous for the interests of religion; while to promote their own selish interests,and those of their order, was all they cared for. The Masons feign an equal zeal for the promotion of charity and benevolence; while nothing can be clearer than that their great object, as an order, has ever been, to promote their own aggrandizement, and selfish interestsβ¦ βThe principles and practices [of the Jesuits] were uniformly accommodated to the circumstances in which they were placed.β The same remark is emphatically true, in regard to the Free Masons, as the history of their scisms, and of their conduct in different countries and at different periods, will prove. The ChristianityΒ² of the Jesuits, βcamelion-like, readily assumed the color of every region where it happened to be introduced,β So Masonry, βcamelion-like, assumesβ any religion which happens to be predominant; or infidelity, if that have greater popularity. The Jesuits βdevised the most absurd falsehoods, to be used for attracting disciples, or even to be taught as parts of ChristianityΒ².β How true is all this of Freemasonry! What absurd fables, what monstrous falsehoods it has devised, in order to attract disciples! It also proclaims itself as an appendage of Christianity; as an bandmaid to religion; and even sometimes arrogantly and impiously pretends that ITSELF is superior to divine revelation!β
-pages 122, 129-131
ΒΉWardβs Review, Vol. 1. p. 316
Β²Catholic βbaptizedβ paganism
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
In 1830 Samuel Whittemore published a book by a Massachusetts citizen entitled Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos. Accompanied with Notes Illustrative of the History, Policy, Principles, &c. Of the Masonic Institution; Shewing the Coincidence of its Spirit and Design with Ancient Jesuitismβ¦
The author writes:
ββTwas then the mantle on the Masons fell Which long had mask'd the Jesuit arts so well. βThe organization of Freemasonry, like that of Jesuitism, is complicated and mysterious. To maintain and propagate the gospel was on the front of Jesuitism, as benevolence is on the front of Freemasonry; while the real aim of both has been self-aggrandizement. In the accomplishment of their object, they have been equally and astonishingly successfulβ¦βΒΉ The foregoing sketch is principally takenβ¦ from an article relating to the Jesuits, contained in the Edinburgh Encyclopedia, (Am. Ed.) vol. XIβ¦It has not been my purpose to give a full and connected history of the order, but rather such parts of it only as would bring to the view of the reader the many points of resemblance subsisting between the history, the policy, and the principles of Jesuitism, and the bistory, policy and principles of the Masonic Institution. These points of resemblance are so numerous and so striking, that whoever reads the foregoing sketch with attention, cannot well avoid recognizing them. Indeed we shall discover in almost every line, analogies so strong and decided, as to rivet our attention to them at once. It is therefore the less necessary for me to undertake particularly to point them out to the reader. Freemasonry runs parallel with Jesuitism in almost every particular; insomuch so, that to give the history of the one, is almost equivalent to reciting that of the otherβ¦ The constitutions and laws of the Jesuits were pretended βto have been suggested by the immediate inspiration of Heaven:β so also Freemasonry claims divine origin. The primary object of the [Jesuit] society was, to establish a spiritual dominion over the βminds of men;β and βto accomplish this object, the whole constitution and policy of the order were singularly adapted. The design of the Jesuits was, to make them masters of the world.β It is abundantly evident that a primary object of the Masonic society has been, to establish βa dominion over the minds of men:β that their design has been to βmake themselves masters of the world.β To accomplish these objects, βthe whole constitution and policy of their order are admirably adapted.β The Jesuits were pretendedly zealous for the interests of religion; while to promote their own selish interests,and those of their order, was all they cared for. The Masons feign an equal zeal for the promotion of charity and benevolence; while nothing can be clearer than that their great object, as an order, has ever been, to promote their own aggrandizement, and selfish interestsβ¦ βThe principles and practices [of the Jesuits] were uniformly accommodated to the circumstances in which they were placed.β The same remark is emphatically true, in regard to the Free Masons, as the history of their scisms, and of their conduct in different countries and at different periods, will prove. The ChristianityΒ² of the Jesuits, βcamelion-like, readily assumed the color of every region where it happened to be introduced,β So Masonry, βcamelion-like, assumesβ any religion which happens to be predominant; or infidelity, if that have greater popularity. The Jesuits βdevised the most absurd falsehoods, to be used for attracting disciples, or even to be taught as parts of ChristianityΒ².β How true is all this of Freemasonry! What absurd fables, what monstrous falsehoods it has devised, in order to attract disciples! It also proclaims itself as an appendage of Christianity; as an bandmaid to religion; and even sometimes arrogantly and impiously pretends that ITSELF is superior to divine revelation!β
-pages 122, 129-131
ΒΉWardβs Review, Vol. 1. p. 316
Β²Catholic βbaptizedβ paganism
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π1
Scientology School Headquartered on the Site of a Former Jesuit Novitiate.
The Delphian School, in Yamhill County, Oregon, near Sheridan operates as a K-12 private school which utilizes the study methods developed by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the Church of Scientology. In 1974 the Jesuit Order sold their novitiate near Sheridan, Oregon to the Delphian organization for it to be converted into the first Scientology boarding school which first opened in 1976. Since opening the site of the Delphian School near Sheridan has served as the headquarters of the office of Delphi schools which oversees all of the schools ran by the organization within the United States.
References:
Old Catholic Buildings Still Serving - The Catholic Sentinel
The Delphian School - Wikipedia
Delphi School, Inc. - Wikipedia
Inside the Secretive Scientology School - The Daily Mail
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
The Delphian School, in Yamhill County, Oregon, near Sheridan operates as a K-12 private school which utilizes the study methods developed by L. Ron Hubbard, the founder of the Church of Scientology. In 1974 the Jesuit Order sold their novitiate near Sheridan, Oregon to the Delphian organization for it to be converted into the first Scientology boarding school which first opened in 1976. Since opening the site of the Delphian School near Sheridan has served as the headquarters of the office of Delphi schools which oversees all of the schools ran by the organization within the United States.
References:
Old Catholic Buildings Still Serving - The Catholic Sentinel
The Delphian School - Wikipedia
Delphi School, Inc. - Wikipedia
Inside the Secretive Scientology School - The Daily Mail
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π3
The Church of Scientology Modeled After the Roman Catholic Church
In a 1988 petition filed by lawyers working for the Church of Scientology we observe the following:
βCounsel asserts the hierarchical structure of the Church of Scientology is similar to, if not identical to, that of other longer established hierarchical religionsβ¦ Specifically, counsel asserts βthe parallels between the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of Scientology are particularly strongβ¦β the Mother Church of Scientology controls the doctrine and theology of local Scientology churchesβ¦ The Church of Scientology does exhibit some of the same characteristics as the Roman Catholic Church. Both religions have similar structures in that both have separately incorporated individual units.β
-Matter of Church Scientology International In Visa Petition Proceedings Page 599.
Source: Matter of Church Scientology International - United States Department of Justice
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
In a 1988 petition filed by lawyers working for the Church of Scientology we observe the following:
βCounsel asserts the hierarchical structure of the Church of Scientology is similar to, if not identical to, that of other longer established hierarchical religionsβ¦ Specifically, counsel asserts βthe parallels between the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of Scientology are particularly strongβ¦β the Mother Church of Scientology controls the doctrine and theology of local Scientology churchesβ¦ The Church of Scientology does exhibit some of the same characteristics as the Roman Catholic Church. Both religions have similar structures in that both have separately incorporated individual units.β
-Matter of Church Scientology International In Visa Petition Proceedings Page 599.
Source: Matter of Church Scientology International - United States Department of Justice
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
β€1π1π1
The Head of Fordham University Foretold of FDRβs Presidency.
In a 1966 dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty of Louisiana State University entitled Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936, George Quitman Flynn writes, βIn June, 1929, Roosevelt spoke at Fordham University, a Jesuit institution in New York City. In his address he praised those men and women who turned their backs on materialistic careers to devote their life to charity and the service of God. More important than FDR's theme, however, was the fact that when the Jesuit president of Fordham, upon giving Roosevelt an honorary degree, commented that here was a man who might someday be President, the ten thousand in attendance cheered enthusiastically. It seemed that some American Catholics could look upon the presidential candidacy of Franklin Roosevelt with favor, an attitude that his own understanding and sympathy for them had generated.β
-Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936 by George Quitman Flynn page 23.
We must take note that this was three whole years before Franklin Damnable Roosevelt ran for president. This illustrates the fact that the Jesuit Order hand picks the president years in advance, it is no prophecy. As Nelson C. Turner writes, βThe Jesuits precipitate future mass acts of violence against nations and βethnic groups.β They or their mouthpieces seem to have advance knowledge of the design of coming aggressions. Sometimes they appear prophetic, but it is no prophecy to blurt out planned events which are being orchestrated by those with whom you are in association.β -The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner page 35.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
In a 1966 dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty of Louisiana State University entitled Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936, George Quitman Flynn writes, βIn June, 1929, Roosevelt spoke at Fordham University, a Jesuit institution in New York City. In his address he praised those men and women who turned their backs on materialistic careers to devote their life to charity and the service of God. More important than FDR's theme, however, was the fact that when the Jesuit president of Fordham, upon giving Roosevelt an honorary degree, commented that here was a man who might someday be President, the ten thousand in attendance cheered enthusiastically. It seemed that some American Catholics could look upon the presidential candidacy of Franklin Roosevelt with favor, an attitude that his own understanding and sympathy for them had generated.β
-Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Catholicism, 1932-1936 by George Quitman Flynn page 23.
We must take note that this was three whole years before Franklin Damnable Roosevelt ran for president. This illustrates the fact that the Jesuit Order hand picks the president years in advance, it is no prophecy. As Nelson C. Turner writes, βThe Jesuits precipitate future mass acts of violence against nations and βethnic groups.β They or their mouthpieces seem to have advance knowledge of the design of coming aggressions. Sometimes they appear prophetic, but it is no prophecy to blurt out planned events which are being orchestrated by those with whom you are in association.β -The Mind of the Jesuit: Signs, Symbols, Dogma and the Devil by Nelson C. Turner page 35.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π2β€1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Fact Checking Website Run by a Jesuit
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π1π―1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Grand Wizard of the KKK Likens the Garb of a Klansman to the Attire of the Pope.
On November 4th, 1982, CNN conducted an interview with Bill Wilkinson a grand imperial wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. When taunted for his Klan costume, Wilkinson defended himself stating that the Pope and Cardinals wear costumes as well. Further stating that he believes in the same βgodβ that the Pope does. This flies in the face of the common belief that the revived KKK is a Protestant, Anti-Catholic organization.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
On November 4th, 1982, CNN conducted an interview with Bill Wilkinson a grand imperial wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. When taunted for his Klan costume, Wilkinson defended himself stating that the Pope and Cardinals wear costumes as well. Further stating that he believes in the same βgodβ that the Pope does. This flies in the face of the common belief that the revived KKK is a Protestant, Anti-Catholic organization.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π―4β€2π1π₯1
The Infamous βWhite Hood,β Used by the KKK and by Devout Catholics.
The notorious hood is known as a capirote. The capirote has a long history spanning hundreds of years back to the Spanish Inquisition. It has always been worn by devout Catholics and is still used today by the Catholic Nazarenos. Arthur Goldwag writes, βThe Ku Klux Klan, which recruited many of its members from Masonic lodges, also adapted Catholic ritual and robes. The capirote, the pointed hood that Spanish and Italian penitents have worn since the Inquisition, was the likely source for the headpieces the Klan riders wore in D. W. Griffith's Birth of a Nation, and that the revived KKK then adopted (the regalia of Reconstruction-era Klansmen was less formalized).β -The Politics of Fear: The Peculiar Persistence of American Paranoia by Arthur Goldwag page 164.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
The notorious hood is known as a capirote. The capirote has a long history spanning hundreds of years back to the Spanish Inquisition. It has always been worn by devout Catholics and is still used today by the Catholic Nazarenos. Arthur Goldwag writes, βThe Ku Klux Klan, which recruited many of its members from Masonic lodges, also adapted Catholic ritual and robes. The capirote, the pointed hood that Spanish and Italian penitents have worn since the Inquisition, was the likely source for the headpieces the Klan riders wore in D. W. Griffith's Birth of a Nation, and that the revived KKK then adopted (the regalia of Reconstruction-era Klansmen was less formalized).β -The Politics of Fear: The Peculiar Persistence of American Paranoia by Arthur Goldwag page 164.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π―3π2π₯1π€£1
Joseph Stalin, The Jesuit Seminarian.
Page 37 of the September 25th, 1938 edition of Life Magazine acknowledges that the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin attended a Jesuit seminary. And no marvel, for Stalin served as the head of the communist priesthood headquartered in the Kremlin during his despotic reign over the USSRΒΉ.
ΒΉSee Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard pages 159-160.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
Page 37 of the September 25th, 1938 edition of Life Magazine acknowledges that the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin attended a Jesuit seminary. And no marvel, for Stalin served as the head of the communist priesthood headquartered in the Kremlin during his despotic reign over the USSRΒΉ.
ΒΉSee Communism, Democracy, and Catholic Power by Paul Blanshard pages 159-160.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π₯4π―3