The Storm
52 subscribers
6.35K photos
8.24K videos
365 files
8.57K links
Propaganda (Bull SHit Lies) about Q (HBO Q: Into The Storm)
Download Telegram
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"


5 of 8

Claim:
80 years of EU-U.S. trade prosperity is at risk

Counterargument: Past prosperity doesn’t mean current trade is optimal. The U.S. has long argued the EU benefits disproportionately (e.g., $150B trade deficit in 2022), with subsidized sectors like Airbus skewing competition. Tariffs could force a rebalance, not a collapse. Nostalgia for transatlantic trade ignores how it’s evolved—digital and service economies now dwarf traditional goods in value, per OECD stats, and tariffs target the latter, not the former.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"


6 of 8

Claim: Tariffs won’t fix global trade flaws; negotiation is better

Counterargument: Negotiations often stall—look at decades of WTO gridlock. Tariffs, while blunt, have historically pressured concessions (e.g., China’s 2019 trade talks with Trump). Von der Leyen’s readiness to negotiate assumes U.S. goodwill, but Trump’s strategy thrives on leverage, not dialogue. Tariffs might accelerate reform by forcing action, not just words.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"


7 of 8

Claim: EU countermeasures and unity will shield it from harm

Counterargument: Countermeasures escalate tensions, risking a trade war that hurts all sides—EU exports to the U.S. ($500B annually) aren’t easily replaced. Unity is overstated; EU nations often diverge on trade (e.g., Germany’s export reliance vs. France’s protectionism). The "largest single market" claim ignores internal fractures—Brexit showed 450 million consumers don’t always act as one.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"


8 of 8

Claim: Tariffs lack a clear path, creating "chaos and complexity"

Counterargument: Trump’s tariffs likely follow a deliberate America-first logic, not chaos—prioritizing domestic jobs and leverage over allies. Complexity is inherent in global trade; EU policies like GDPR or carbon border taxes aren’t exactly simple either. The "no clear path" critique dismisses strategic ambiguity as a negotiation tactic, which Trump has used effectively before.
Conclusion of Debunking

Von der Leyen’s statement leans on dire predictions—economic collapse, consumer pain, global suffering—that may overstate the tariffs’ impact while underestimating adaptive responses and potential U.S. gains. Her preference for negotiation over confrontation reflects EU ideals but sidesteps how tariffs have historically shifted trade dynamics when talks fail. The EU’s resilience and countermeasures might mitigate damage, but they don’t disprove the tariffs’ logic from a U.S. perspective.

The reality likely lies between her alarmism and Trump’s optimism: disruption, yes, but not necessarily disaster. Without real-time data post-April 3, 2025, her claims remain speculative, not gospel.
Forwarded from @WhiteHouse
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day. April 2, 2025... –President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸🦅
Duration: 00:01:49

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GVnXh4QG1k
Forwarded from Libs of TikTok
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Absolutely heartbreaking. Austin Metcalf’s identical twin speaks out after witnessing his brother get stabbed in the chest. Austin died in his twin brother’s arms after getting stabbed in the heart at a track meet.
Forwarded from @WhiteHouse
Senior WH Officials Budowich, Miller, & Leavitt have a discussion on Tariffs with US Trade Rep Greer

Here are the key points from the discussion:

1. Purpose of Liberation Day: The announcement on April 3, 2025, dubbed "Liberation Day," marks a significant shift in U.S. global trade policy, aimed at reversing decades of unfavorable trade deals and offshoring by implementing the Trump Reciprocal Trade Act.

2. Reciprocal Tariffs: The policy introduces tariffs that mirror how other countries treat U.S. exports. Countries with severe trade misconduct (e.g., China) will face higher tariffs, while others with less severe practices will face moderate rates, with a global minimum tariff to address the U.S. trade deficit and prevent loopholes.

3. Historical Context: President Trump has advocated for this approach since the 1970s and 1980s, warning about the loss of American industries to countries like Japan and later China, a stance he publicized through actions like a New York Times ad in the 1980s.

4. National Security: The policy aims to restore U.S. self-sufficiency by bringing critical industries (e.g., automotive, electronics, medical supplies) back to America, reducing dependence on foreign supply chains vulnerable to emergencies or embargoes.

5. Economic Impact: The tariffs are designed to incentivize companies to relocate production to the U.S., creating high-paying manufacturing jobs, boosting revenue, and reducing inflation by cutting shipping costs and leveraging advanced manufacturing efficiencies.

6. Implementation Details: The plan includes strict enforcement to prevent tariff evasion (e.g., transshipment through countries like Vietnam), with a comprehensive report on unfair trade practices by the top 100 U.S. trade partners guiding the tariff rates.

7. Consumer Perspective: The administration argues that tariffs won’t raise prices for goods made in the U.S., and a broader strategy—deregulation, energy policy, and tax cuts—will lower living costs, countering media narratives of price hikes.

8. Philosophical Shift: The policy reverses a decades-long trend of favoring foreign production over American industry, prioritizing U.S. factories and workers over foreign ones, a stance framed as correcting the "original sin" of past trade deals like NAFTA and China’s WTO entry.

9. Track Record: Trump’s first term is cited as evidence of success, with tariffs, tax cuts, and energy policies leading to lower inflation, unemployment, and higher median household income across demographics.

10. Long-Term Vision: This is not a short-term fix but a realignment of the global trade system to ensure predictability and stability, encouraging companies to invest in America for access to its market, supported by regulatory, tax, and energy certainty.

11. Public Message: The administration emphasizes direct communication with Americans, bypassing media filters, to highlight benefits like job growth, community revitalization, and restored prosperity, urging trust in Trump’s America-first agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTB7K9NhbWI
Forwarded from Jimmy Dore Show
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dems and Repubs are the same damn team! They’re all slurping from the same corporate trough. Watch this and see why voting’s just a clown show for their rich buddies!

https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1907907880793379304
Forwarded from @SenJohnKennedy
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
John Kennedy

Tariffs are like whiskey:

A little whiskey, under the right circumstances, can be refreshing—but too much whiskey, under the wrong circumstances, can make you drunk as a goat.

https://x.com/SenJohnKennedy/status/1907906786771755148
Forwarded from Pedo Pete
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Florida "dog mom" influencer arrested for filming herself having s*x with her Chihuahua and sharing it with her Instagram followers. Logan Guminski, 27, faces two felony charges.
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
"Florida woman faces felony charges for filming herself with her Chihuahua—guess she won't be getting any 'paws-itive' reviews for this one!"
Forwarded from Europa Last Battle
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Chief Justice John Roberts spent a week living at Norm Eisen's 150-room palace in the Czech Republic where they "worked on American and European Rule of Law issues together." Eisen was Ambassador 2011-2014. Roberts became Chief Justice in 2005. This was while Roberts ran SCOTUS.

Here are the key points regarding Norm Eisen and John Roberts:

1. Relationship and Visit: Norm Eisen, a former U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic, described Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts as a "good friend" and stated that Roberts stayed with him for a week in the Czech Republic while Eisen was ambassador.

2. Location: The visit took place at Eisen’s residence, a 150-plus room Beaux-Arts mansion in Prague, known as a significant historical property with a rich past, including previous residents like a German general and a wealthy Czechoslovakian figure.

3. Timeframe: Eisen served as U.S. Ambassador to the Czech Republic from 2011 to 2014, and Roberts, who became Chief Justice in 2005, visited during this period.

4. Purpose of Visit: Eisen claimed that during this week-long stay, he and Roberts worked together on "American and European rule of law issues." The specific issues were not detailed in the text.

5. Context of "Rule of Law": The text interprets "rule of law" as a phrase implying control over legal systems—judges, prosecutors, courts, and law schools—potentially as part of broader governance or anti-corruption programs, though no concrete evidence of specific activities is provided.

6. Speculation on Activities: The speaker questions what exact "American and European rule of law issues" were addressed, speculating about possible influence on judicial systems in various countries (e.g., Romania, France, or the Czech Republic) and suggesting a connection to broader political strategies, without substantiation.

7. Eisen’s Role: Eisen is portrayed as a significant figure, potentially involved in "regime change" operations through legal mechanisms during his ambassadorship, though this is an assertion rather than a documented fact in the text.

8. Call for Transparency: The speaker demands the declassification of all "rule of law programs" Eisen and Roberts might have worked on, expressing suspicion about their nature and impact.

9. Historical Context of the Residence: Eisen’s book, *The Last Palace*, is referenced, which narrates the history of the Prague mansion and frames it as a symbol of democracy’s struggles and victories in Europe.

These points summarize the narrative and claims presented, focusing on the alleged collaboration between Eisen and Roberts and the questions raised about their activities.

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1907733996743930152
Forwarded from Libs of TikTok
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
HOLY SHLIT: Violent leftist protestors at @ucdavis attacked and destroyed an event table set up by @TPUSA
.

Police stood by and did NOTHING as the protestors destroyed and stole everything.
Forwarded from Jimmy Dore Show
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Israel just ADMITTED they’re targeting journalists— they’re mowing down reporters and bragging about it while the corporate shills stay silent. Watch this and rage—our ‘allies’ are psychos!

https://x.com/jimmy_dore/status/1907925547759579446
Forwarded from Pedo Pete
Disturbed Woman Kicked Off Airplane for Outrageous Behavior
Duration: 00:19:54

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRsebYR0Jvo