Forwarded from X22-Report
X22-3610-Report
"Trump’s 2025 Revolution: Economic Revival, Deep State Defunding, and the Path to Independence"
The X22 Report episode from April 2, 2025, presents a narrative of Donald Trump leading a transformative effort in the U.S. It states the country has been in a recession since early 2024, hidden by Biden-era tactics, with Trump’s tariffs expected to be wrongly blamed by media, though later tied to Biden. Trump’s plan involves tariffs, deregulation, and energy independence to boost manufacturing and the economy, evidenced by 155,000 private sector jobs added in March 2025. Gold and Bitcoin are pitched as smart investments amid a faltering monetary system.
The report suggests Trump intends to cut off "deep state" funding worldwide by shifting from Federal Reserve borrowing to external revenue like tariffs and oil sales, aiming to eliminate the central bank by 2026. It portrays activist judges as obstructing Trump, such as in ICE agent cases, to rally public support. Election fraud allegations in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are raised, with voter ID victories and border security via executive orders celebrated, while Democrats are said to back illegals.
It claims a "criminal syndicate" involving the FBI, DOJ, and media is being uncovered, with Elon Musk identifying attack leaders. Globally, Trump is leveraging tariffs to realign trade with allies and later China, bringing wealth back. Congressional delays, like the SAVE Act, are viewed as tactical, targeting the 2026 midterms. Non-citizens are said to exploit Social Security, and Democrats’ favorability has dropped 21%, shifting support to Trump. By Independence Day 2026, Trump seeks economic independence and a deep state takedown, empowering the public.
"Trump’s 2025 Revolution: Economic Revival, Deep State Defunding, and the Path to Independence"
The X22 Report episode from April 2, 2025, presents a narrative of Donald Trump leading a transformative effort in the U.S. It states the country has been in a recession since early 2024, hidden by Biden-era tactics, with Trump’s tariffs expected to be wrongly blamed by media, though later tied to Biden. Trump’s plan involves tariffs, deregulation, and energy independence to boost manufacturing and the economy, evidenced by 155,000 private sector jobs added in March 2025. Gold and Bitcoin are pitched as smart investments amid a faltering monetary system.
The report suggests Trump intends to cut off "deep state" funding worldwide by shifting from Federal Reserve borrowing to external revenue like tariffs and oil sales, aiming to eliminate the central bank by 2026. It portrays activist judges as obstructing Trump, such as in ICE agent cases, to rally public support. Election fraud allegations in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are raised, with voter ID victories and border security via executive orders celebrated, while Democrats are said to back illegals.
It claims a "criminal syndicate" involving the FBI, DOJ, and media is being uncovered, with Elon Musk identifying attack leaders. Globally, Trump is leveraging tariffs to realign trade with allies and later China, bringing wealth back. Congressional delays, like the SAVE Act, are viewed as tactical, targeting the 2026 midterms. Non-citizens are said to exploit Social Security, and Democrats’ favorability has dropped 21%, shifting support to Trump. By Independence Day 2026, Trump seeks economic independence and a deep state takedown, empowering the public.
Telegram
X22-Report
X22-3610-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Funding Is Being Cutoff WW, Elon Found The Generals Coordinating The Attacks – Ep. 3610
April 2, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
[DS] Funding Is Being Cutoff WW, Elon Found The Generals Coordinating The Attacks – Ep. 3610
April 2, 2025
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
Where We Go 1 We Go All
EU is turning Q 😂MAGA🇺🇸
Where We Go 1 We Go All
EU is turning Q 😂MAGA
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
1 of 8
Claim: Tariffs are a "major blow" to the global economy
Counterargument: Tariffs don’t inherently destroy economies; they redirect them. Historical examples, like the U.S. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, are often cited as disastrous, but studies (e.g., Irwin, 1998) suggest their role in deepening the Great Depression was overstated compared to monetary policy failures. Trump’s tariffs could boost U.S. domestic production by shielding it from foreign competition, potentially offsetting global losses with localized gains. The "major blow" assumes a net-negative outcome without considering adaptive responses like reshoring or new trade alliances.
1 of 8
Claim: Tariffs are a "major blow" to the global economy
Counterargument: Tariffs don’t inherently destroy economies; they redirect them. Historical examples, like the U.S. Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, are often cited as disastrous, but studies (e.g., Irwin, 1998) suggest their role in deepening the Great Depression was overstated compared to monetary policy failures. Trump’s tariffs could boost U.S. domestic production by shielding it from foreign competition, potentially offsetting global losses with localized gains. The "major blow" assumes a net-negative outcome without considering adaptive responses like reshoring or new trade alliances.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
2 of 8
Claim: Consumers will face immediate higher costs (groceries, medication, transportation)
Counterargument: Price increases aren’t guaranteed or uniform. Businesses often absorb some tariff costs to stay competitive, or source alternatives from non-tariffed regions. For instance, if EU goods face U.S. tariffs, American consumers might shift to domestic or Asian suppliers, mitigating price spikes. Von der Leyen’s assertion also ignores potential U.S. policy offsets (e.g., tax cuts or subsidies) that Trump might pair with tariffs, as he did in 2018-2019, softening consumer impact.
2 of 8
Claim: Consumers will face immediate higher costs (groceries, medication, transportation)
Counterargument: Price increases aren’t guaranteed or uniform. Businesses often absorb some tariff costs to stay competitive, or source alternatives from non-tariffed regions. For instance, if EU goods face U.S. tariffs, American consumers might shift to domestic or Asian suppliers, mitigating price spikes. Von der Leyen’s assertion also ignores potential U.S. policy offsets (e.g., tax cuts or subsidies) that Trump might pair with tariffs, as he did in 2018-2019, softening consumer impact.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
3 of 8
Claim: Vulnerable countries and citizens will suffer most
Counterargument: Vulnerable countries often rely on exports to the U.S., but they’re also agile in finding new markets. Post-2018 U.S.-China trade war, nations like Vietnam and Mexico pivoted to fill gaps, gaining economically. The "most vulnerable" narrative assumes static trade patterns, not resilience or diversification. For citizens, inflation fears may be overstated—U.S. inflation post-2018 tariffs rose modestly (2-3%), not catastrophically, per Federal Reserve data.
3 of 8
Claim: Vulnerable countries and citizens will suffer most
Counterargument: Vulnerable countries often rely on exports to the U.S., but they’re also agile in finding new markets. Post-2018 U.S.-China trade war, nations like Vietnam and Mexico pivoted to fill gaps, gaining economically. The "most vulnerable" narrative assumes static trade patterns, not resilience or diversification. For citizens, inflation fears may be overstated—U.S. inflation post-2018 tariffs rose modestly (2-3%), not catastrophically, per Federal Reserve data.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
4 of 8
Claim: Businesses will suffer from uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and bureaucracy
Counterargument: Uncertainty cuts both ways—businesses adapt. Post-2018 tariffs, U.S. firms shifted supply chains (e.g., from China to Southeast Asia) within months, per the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Bureaucracy exists in any trade regime; EU red tape already burdens its own firms. Tariffs might even streamline U.S.-centric supply chains, reducing reliance on complex global networks vulnerable to disruptions like pandemics or shipping crises (e.g., Suez Canal 2021).
4 of 8
Claim: Businesses will suffer from uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, and bureaucracy
Counterargument: Uncertainty cuts both ways—businesses adapt. Post-2018 tariffs, U.S. firms shifted supply chains (e.g., from China to Southeast Asia) within months, per the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Bureaucracy exists in any trade regime; EU red tape already burdens its own firms. Tariffs might even streamline U.S.-centric supply chains, reducing reliance on complex global networks vulnerable to disruptions like pandemics or shipping crises (e.g., Suez Canal 2021).
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
5 of 8
Claim: 80 years of EU-U.S. trade prosperity is at risk
Counterargument: Past prosperity doesn’t mean current trade is optimal. The U.S. has long argued the EU benefits disproportionately (e.g., $150B trade deficit in 2022), with subsidized sectors like Airbus skewing competition. Tariffs could force a rebalance, not a collapse. Nostalgia for transatlantic trade ignores how it’s evolved—digital and service economies now dwarf traditional goods in value, per OECD stats, and tariffs target the latter, not the former.
5 of 8
Claim: 80 years of EU-U.S. trade prosperity is at risk
Counterargument: Past prosperity doesn’t mean current trade is optimal. The U.S. has long argued the EU benefits disproportionately (e.g., $150B trade deficit in 2022), with subsidized sectors like Airbus skewing competition. Tariffs could force a rebalance, not a collapse. Nostalgia for transatlantic trade ignores how it’s evolved—digital and service economies now dwarf traditional goods in value, per OECD stats, and tariffs target the latter, not the former.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
6 of 8
Claim: Tariffs won’t fix global trade flaws; negotiation is better
Counterargument: Negotiations often stall—look at decades of WTO gridlock. Tariffs, while blunt, have historically pressured concessions (e.g., China’s 2019 trade talks with Trump). Von der Leyen’s readiness to negotiate assumes U.S. goodwill, but Trump’s strategy thrives on leverage, not dialogue. Tariffs might accelerate reform by forcing action, not just words.
6 of 8
Claim: Tariffs won’t fix global trade flaws; negotiation is better
Counterargument: Negotiations often stall—look at decades of WTO gridlock. Tariffs, while blunt, have historically pressured concessions (e.g., China’s 2019 trade talks with Trump). Von der Leyen’s readiness to negotiate assumes U.S. goodwill, but Trump’s strategy thrives on leverage, not dialogue. Tariffs might accelerate reform by forcing action, not just words.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
7 of 8
Claim: EU countermeasures and unity will shield it from harm
Counterargument: Countermeasures escalate tensions, risking a trade war that hurts all sides—EU exports to the U.S. ($500B annually) aren’t easily replaced. Unity is overstated; EU nations often diverge on trade (e.g., Germany’s export reliance vs. France’s protectionism). The "largest single market" claim ignores internal fractures—Brexit showed 450 million consumers don’t always act as one.
7 of 8
Claim: EU countermeasures and unity will shield it from harm
Counterargument: Countermeasures escalate tensions, risking a trade war that hurts all sides—EU exports to the U.S. ($500B annually) aren’t easily replaced. Unity is overstated; EU nations often diverge on trade (e.g., Germany’s export reliance vs. France’s protectionism). The "largest single market" claim ignores internal fractures—Brexit showed 450 million consumers don’t always act as one.
"Unpacking the Alarm: A Critical Take on von der Leyen’s Tariff Warnings"
8 of 8
Claim: Tariffs lack a clear path, creating "chaos and complexity"
Counterargument: Trump’s tariffs likely follow a deliberate America-first logic, not chaos—prioritizing domestic jobs and leverage over allies. Complexity is inherent in global trade; EU policies like GDPR or carbon border taxes aren’t exactly simple either. The "no clear path" critique dismisses strategic ambiguity as a negotiation tactic, which Trump has used effectively before.
8 of 8
Claim: Tariffs lack a clear path, creating "chaos and complexity"
Counterargument: Trump’s tariffs likely follow a deliberate America-first logic, not chaos—prioritizing domestic jobs and leverage over allies. Complexity is inherent in global trade; EU policies like GDPR or carbon border taxes aren’t exactly simple either. The "no clear path" critique dismisses strategic ambiguity as a negotiation tactic, which Trump has used effectively before.
Conclusion of Debunking
Von der Leyen’s statement leans on dire predictions—economic collapse, consumer pain, global suffering—that may overstate the tariffs’ impact while underestimating adaptive responses and potential U.S. gains. Her preference for negotiation over confrontation reflects EU ideals but sidesteps how tariffs have historically shifted trade dynamics when talks fail. The EU’s resilience and countermeasures might mitigate damage, but they don’t disprove the tariffs’ logic from a U.S. perspective.
The reality likely lies between her alarmism and Trump’s optimism: disruption, yes, but not necessarily disaster. Without real-time data post-April 3, 2025, her claims remain speculative, not gospel.
Von der Leyen’s statement leans on dire predictions—economic collapse, consumer pain, global suffering—that may overstate the tariffs’ impact while underestimating adaptive responses and potential U.S. gains. Her preference for negotiation over confrontation reflects EU ideals but sidesteps how tariffs have historically shifted trade dynamics when talks fail. The EU’s resilience and countermeasures might mitigate damage, but they don’t disprove the tariffs’ logic from a U.S. perspective.
The reality likely lies between her alarmism and Trump’s optimism: disruption, yes, but not necessarily disaster. Without real-time data post-April 3, 2025, her claims remain speculative, not gospel.
Forwarded from @WhiteHouse
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day. April 2, 2025... –President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸🦅
Duration: 00:01:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GVnXh4QG1k
Duration: 00:01:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GVnXh4QG1k
Forwarded from Libs of TikTok
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Absolutely heartbreaking. Austin Metcalf’s identical twin speaks out after witnessing his brother get stabbed in the chest. Austin died in his twin brother’s arms after getting stabbed in the heart at a track meet.
Forwarded from Forbes Breaking News
Texas high school football star Austin Metcalf stabbed in the heart, left to die in twin brother’s arms at track meet: dad
https://nypost.com/2025/04/03/us-news/texas-teen-austin-metcalf-fatally-stabbed-by-karmelo-anthony-at-high-school-track-meet/
https://nypost.com/2025/04/03/us-news/texas-teen-austin-metcalf-fatally-stabbed-by-karmelo-anthony-at-high-school-track-meet/
New York Post
Texas high school football star Austin Metcalf stabbed in the heart,...
A Texas high school star athlete was stabbed in the heart and left to die in his loving twin brother's arms following a fight over a seat at a track meet.
Forwarded from @WhiteHouse
Senior WH Officials Budowich, Miller, & Leavitt have a discussion on Tariffs with US Trade Rep Greer
Here are the key points from the discussion:
1. Purpose of Liberation Day: The announcement on April 3, 2025, dubbed "Liberation Day," marks a significant shift in U.S. global trade policy, aimed at reversing decades of unfavorable trade deals and offshoring by implementing the Trump Reciprocal Trade Act.
2. Reciprocal Tariffs: The policy introduces tariffs that mirror how other countries treat U.S. exports. Countries with severe trade misconduct (e.g., China) will face higher tariffs, while others with less severe practices will face moderate rates, with a global minimum tariff to address the U.S. trade deficit and prevent loopholes.
3. Historical Context: President Trump has advocated for this approach since the 1970s and 1980s, warning about the loss of American industries to countries like Japan and later China, a stance he publicized through actions like a New York Times ad in the 1980s.
4. National Security: The policy aims to restore U.S. self-sufficiency by bringing critical industries (e.g., automotive, electronics, medical supplies) back to America, reducing dependence on foreign supply chains vulnerable to emergencies or embargoes.
5. Economic Impact: The tariffs are designed to incentivize companies to relocate production to the U.S., creating high-paying manufacturing jobs, boosting revenue, and reducing inflation by cutting shipping costs and leveraging advanced manufacturing efficiencies.
6. Implementation Details: The plan includes strict enforcement to prevent tariff evasion (e.g., transshipment through countries like Vietnam), with a comprehensive report on unfair trade practices by the top 100 U.S. trade partners guiding the tariff rates.
7. Consumer Perspective: The administration argues that tariffs won’t raise prices for goods made in the U.S., and a broader strategy—deregulation, energy policy, and tax cuts—will lower living costs, countering media narratives of price hikes.
8. Philosophical Shift: The policy reverses a decades-long trend of favoring foreign production over American industry, prioritizing U.S. factories and workers over foreign ones, a stance framed as correcting the "original sin" of past trade deals like NAFTA and China’s WTO entry.
9. Track Record: Trump’s first term is cited as evidence of success, with tariffs, tax cuts, and energy policies leading to lower inflation, unemployment, and higher median household income across demographics.
10. Long-Term Vision: This is not a short-term fix but a realignment of the global trade system to ensure predictability and stability, encouraging companies to invest in America for access to its market, supported by regulatory, tax, and energy certainty.
11. Public Message: The administration emphasizes direct communication with Americans, bypassing media filters, to highlight benefits like job growth, community revitalization, and restored prosperity, urging trust in Trump’s America-first agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTB7K9NhbWI
Here are the key points from the discussion:
1. Purpose of Liberation Day: The announcement on April 3, 2025, dubbed "Liberation Day," marks a significant shift in U.S. global trade policy, aimed at reversing decades of unfavorable trade deals and offshoring by implementing the Trump Reciprocal Trade Act.
2. Reciprocal Tariffs: The policy introduces tariffs that mirror how other countries treat U.S. exports. Countries with severe trade misconduct (e.g., China) will face higher tariffs, while others with less severe practices will face moderate rates, with a global minimum tariff to address the U.S. trade deficit and prevent loopholes.
3. Historical Context: President Trump has advocated for this approach since the 1970s and 1980s, warning about the loss of American industries to countries like Japan and later China, a stance he publicized through actions like a New York Times ad in the 1980s.
4. National Security: The policy aims to restore U.S. self-sufficiency by bringing critical industries (e.g., automotive, electronics, medical supplies) back to America, reducing dependence on foreign supply chains vulnerable to emergencies or embargoes.
5. Economic Impact: The tariffs are designed to incentivize companies to relocate production to the U.S., creating high-paying manufacturing jobs, boosting revenue, and reducing inflation by cutting shipping costs and leveraging advanced manufacturing efficiencies.
6. Implementation Details: The plan includes strict enforcement to prevent tariff evasion (e.g., transshipment through countries like Vietnam), with a comprehensive report on unfair trade practices by the top 100 U.S. trade partners guiding the tariff rates.
7. Consumer Perspective: The administration argues that tariffs won’t raise prices for goods made in the U.S., and a broader strategy—deregulation, energy policy, and tax cuts—will lower living costs, countering media narratives of price hikes.
8. Philosophical Shift: The policy reverses a decades-long trend of favoring foreign production over American industry, prioritizing U.S. factories and workers over foreign ones, a stance framed as correcting the "original sin" of past trade deals like NAFTA and China’s WTO entry.
9. Track Record: Trump’s first term is cited as evidence of success, with tariffs, tax cuts, and energy policies leading to lower inflation, unemployment, and higher median household income across demographics.
10. Long-Term Vision: This is not a short-term fix but a realignment of the global trade system to ensure predictability and stability, encouraging companies to invest in America for access to its market, supported by regulatory, tax, and energy certainty.
11. Public Message: The administration emphasizes direct communication with Americans, bypassing media filters, to highlight benefits like job growth, community revitalization, and restored prosperity, urging trust in Trump’s America-first agenda.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTB7K9NhbWI