One to one with Reddit comments Part 7
Part 1 https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/171
Like said, to reenable a death penalty is huge complex
a) you need to fight against ignorance
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
b) against the indifference of people giving a shit to all!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople
https://t.iss.one/IsraelIgnorance
c) against Amnesty and similar organisations
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyFacts
d) against EU, because currently THERE IS NO WAY TO DO A DEATH PENALTY IF YOU ARE PART OF EU!!!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/152
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/149
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/404
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/125
e) against missing empathy, priority "humans > animals" and indifference for suicides! or other crimes
https://t.iss.one/BorderWallEcocide/6
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/158
https://t.iss.one/EmpathyTelegram/20
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/123
https://t.iss.one/TraumaTelegram
https://t.iss.one/NeverForgetTelegram
f) against laws in multiple countries!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/232
https://t.iss.one/MissionPlaneta
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
in multiple languages! using science and facts
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
g) by even knowing, that maybe NOTHING WILL CHANGE! because of a-f (no matter about which topic), just see what is happening to other things!
h) have we forget because of ignorance and indifference??!
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
So again: better life sentence instead of nothing! but this doesn't mean it's perfect!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/132
and remember is not about making people π!!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
De nos jours la question ne devrait mΓͺme plus Γͺtre "peine de mort pour ou contre ?" Mais plutΓ΄t "La justice punitive, pour ou contre ?"
See on Part 8
Part 1 https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/171
Like said, to reenable a death penalty is huge complex
a) you need to fight against ignorance
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
b) against the indifference of people giving a shit to all!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116
https://t.iss.one/StopDieWelle
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople
https://t.iss.one/IsraelIgnorance
c) against Amnesty and similar organisations
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyFacts
d) against EU, because currently THERE IS NO WAY TO DO A DEATH PENALTY IF YOU ARE PART OF EU!!!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/152
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/149
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/404
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/125
e) against missing empathy, priority "humans > animals" and indifference for suicides! or other crimes
https://t.iss.one/BorderWallEcocide/6
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/158
https://t.iss.one/EmpathyTelegram/20
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/123
https://t.iss.one/TraumaTelegram
https://t.iss.one/NeverForgetTelegram
f) against laws in multiple countries!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/232
https://t.iss.one/MissionPlaneta
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
in multiple languages! using science and facts
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
g) by even knowing, that maybe NOTHING WILL CHANGE! because of a-f (no matter about which topic), just see what is happening to other things!
h) have we forget because of ignorance and indifference??!
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
So again: better life sentence instead of nothing! but this doesn't mean it's perfect!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/132
and remember is not about making people π!!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
De nos jours la question ne devrait mΓͺme plus Γͺtre "peine de mort pour ou contre ?" Mais plutΓ΄t "La justice punitive, pour ou contre ?"
See on Part 8
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 8
Part 1 https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
So Carolyn Hoyle
https://t.iss.one/DeathPenaltyMafia
https://t.iss.one/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
first, people vote without even knowing why they vote!!
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/10
so they prefer to remain ignorant!
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/40
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/41
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
and this is a big problem!!! because you first need to learn, then you need to say something!
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
"Such polls record immediate opin- ions and responses, which are inevitably affected by the nature and specificity of the questions posed"
Such things ARE NOT RESEARCH, is π©!
Like when we compile online all infos that they request us with dddd dddd π¦π« [email protected] π€£
You can write the shit you want in such things! just think how we choose randomly an answer (without even reading) in the hope once done we get a 10-20$ coupon π€£ and such idiot believe what we said ...
Plus remember that stats are shit in general!
https://t.iss.one/PenaDeMuertes/132
"A number of factors and influences have been found to shape views on this subject, in particular: knowledge about the administration of capital punishment; racial animus, religion"
Like we said previously ...
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/263
Concerns about the administration of justice
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
"evidence that some defence attorneys have been incompetent (see Chapter 7), and concern about the lethal injection procedure"
a) https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathExecutions/20
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathExecutions/36
b) death sentence = assisted suicide!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
Part 1 https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
So Carolyn Hoyle
https://t.iss.one/DeathPenaltyMafia
https://t.iss.one/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
first, people vote without even knowing why they vote!!
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/10
so they prefer to remain ignorant!
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/40
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/41
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
and this is a big problem!!! because you first need to learn, then you need to say something!
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
"Such polls record immediate opin- ions and responses, which are inevitably affected by the nature and specificity of the questions posed"
Such things ARE NOT RESEARCH, is π©!
Like when we compile online all infos that they request us with dddd dddd π¦π« [email protected] π€£
You can write the shit you want in such things! just think how we choose randomly an answer (without even reading) in the hope once done we get a 10-20$ coupon π€£ and such idiot believe what we said ...
Plus remember that stats are shit in general!
https://t.iss.one/PenaDeMuertes/132
"A number of factors and influences have been found to shape views on this subject, in particular: knowledge about the administration of capital punishment; racial animus, religion"
Like we said previously ...
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/263
Concerns about the administration of justice
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
"evidence that some defence attorneys have been incompetent (see Chapter 7), and concern about the lethal injection procedure"
a) https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathExecutions/20
https://t.iss.one/ShittyDeathExecutions/36
b) death sentence = assisted suicide!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
6 minutes that will change your life on Telegram FOREVER!
We are showing JUST SOME!!! of the features available, which make TELEGRAM THE BEST SOCIAL WORLDWIDE! (even if people still don't understand that π€¦ββοΈ ...)
https://t.iss.one/NoComparisonTelegram
YES, TELEGRAM IS THE BEST SOCIAL FOR SCIENCE TOO!
https://t.iss.one/GenRevolutionOfficial/212
More infos
https://t.iss.one/JoinShareableChatFolders/16
Music by
https://t.iss.one/Pikayzo
We are showing JUST SOME!!! of the features available, which make TELEGRAM THE BEST SOCIAL WORLDWIDE! (even if people still don't understand that π€¦ββοΈ ...)
https://t.iss.one/NoComparisonTelegram
YES, TELEGRAM IS THE BEST SOCIAL FOR SCIENCE TOO!
https://t.iss.one/GenRevolutionOfficial/212
More infos
https://t.iss.one/JoinShareableChatFolders/16
Music by
https://t.iss.one/Pikayzo
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Right wing terrorists don't deserve life sentence! BUT JUST DEATH PENALTY! Part 1
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW/62
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/117
AttentΓ€ter von Halle nimmt zwei Geiseln im GefΓ€ngnis
Not that such dudes can kill / injury / do prison break / redo terror attack, EVEN IF THIS DUDE KILLED 0 PEOPLE (+2 not planed ...)
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/118
because the terror attack failed! like the terror attack in Italy!
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/293
or Norway!
https://t.iss.one/ChatGPTBullshit/82
to
https://t.iss.one/ChatGPTBullshit/117
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/27
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/28
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/58
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/59
So yes Tentato Omicidio / Attempted Murder IS A DEATH PENALTY!!!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/321
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/118
Balliet 27 years old = 70 years in prison for life sentence
20 years for waiting death execution
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW/60
= 50 years of wasted prison = 1.8 - 7.2 MIO $ WASTED!!!
= 28 homeless SAVED with 10$ each day for 70 years
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/137
π ββοΈ @LuxusHotel π ββοΈ @HumanRightAbuse β MORE RESPECT FOR HOMELESS!
https://t.iss.one/JobDiscrimination/275
Uccidere una persona perchΓ© "ci costa di meno" Γ¨ roba da psicopatici.
Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/306
Is writing someone on Reddit ...
WELL, COOL THAT SUCH PERSON IS IGNORING THE FACT THAT SUCH DUDE IS A TERRORIST READY TO KILL OTHER PEOPLE!
Cool, that such person is ignoring such things:
https://t.iss.one/WolfRights/112
https://t.iss.one/JohnBessler/162
https://t.iss.one/JohnBessler/163
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/299
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/304
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/293
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/218
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
See next post
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW/62
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/117
AttentΓ€ter von Halle nimmt zwei Geiseln im GefΓ€ngnis
Not that such dudes can kill / injury / do prison break / redo terror attack, EVEN IF THIS DUDE KILLED 0 PEOPLE (+2 not planed ...)
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/118
because the terror attack failed! like the terror attack in Italy!
https://t.iss.one/StuproFatti/293
or Norway!
https://t.iss.one/ChatGPTBullshit/82
to
https://t.iss.one/ChatGPTBullshit/117
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/27
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/28
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/58
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/59
So yes Tentato Omicidio / Attempted Murder IS A DEATH PENALTY!!!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/321
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/118
Balliet 27 years old = 70 years in prison for life sentence
20 years for waiting death execution
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceNOW/60
= 50 years of wasted prison = 1.8 - 7.2 MIO $ WASTED!!!
= 28 homeless SAVED with 10$ each day for 70 years
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/137
π ββοΈ @LuxusHotel π ββοΈ @HumanRightAbuse β MORE RESPECT FOR HOMELESS!
https://t.iss.one/JobDiscrimination/275
Uccidere una persona perchΓ© "ci costa di meno" Γ¨ roba da psicopatici.
Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/306
Is writing someone on Reddit ...
WELL, COOL THAT SUCH PERSON IS IGNORING THE FACT THAT SUCH DUDE IS A TERRORIST READY TO KILL OTHER PEOPLE!
Cool, that such person is ignoring such things:
https://t.iss.one/WolfRights/112
https://t.iss.one/JohnBessler/162
https://t.iss.one/JohnBessler/163
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/299
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/304
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/293
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/218
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
See next post
Right wing terrorists don't deserve life sentence! BUT JUST DEATH PENALTY! Part 2
Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths π€¦ββοΈ WHILE IGNORING ALL PEOPLE AND ANIMALS WE KILL
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
OR BY GIVING A SHIT TO HOMELESS / POOR PEOPLE AND SIMILAR THINGS!
exactly like the dudes "you need to make babies" are doing, while for them is just important to do babies, BUT NOT THAT SUCH BABIES NEED TO GET FINANCIAL HELP / SUPPORT / EDUCATION and not be like Africa poverty!
Better making 5 kids living with properly, instead of 10 in poverty!!! without a proper future at all! and just DYING!
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/827
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/828
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/854
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/949
https://t.iss.one/IsraelWarWomenRights/1256
Exactly like BETTER AN ABORTION! than a not wished kid that will be a terrorist!
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/201
without considering the fact that ABORTION IS SCIENCE AND AN HUMAN RIGHT!
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/115
https://t.iss.one/SuicideRape/152
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
to
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/165
So like Trump is saying "who exactly is NOT a killer??! = even politicians are killers!!!" IF WE KILL DAY BY DAY!
https://t.iss.one/GovernmentInPrison/38
No matter if with π to climate change = killing people due to consequences!
https://t.iss.one/MeteoTelegram/35
https://t.iss.one/AnimalFreaks/1763
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/15
People ignorance
https://t.iss.one/NatureFreaksDeutsch/452
https://t.iss.one/MissionPlaneta/66
https://t.iss.one/BorderWallEcocide/27
etc.
πto crimes
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
with water pollution
https://t.iss.one/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/23
to
https://t.iss.one/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/26
and many other things!
WITHOUT FORGETTING ANIMALS!!! DON'T FORGET ANIMALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MIO OF ANIMALS MASSACRED BY HUMANS!
https://t.iss.one/MissionPlaneta/59
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths π€¦ββοΈ WHILE IGNORING ALL PEOPLE AND ANIMALS WE KILL
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
OR BY GIVING A SHIT TO HOMELESS / POOR PEOPLE AND SIMILAR THINGS!
exactly like the dudes "you need to make babies" are doing, while for them is just important to do babies, BUT NOT THAT SUCH BABIES NEED TO GET FINANCIAL HELP / SUPPORT / EDUCATION and not be like Africa poverty!
Better making 5 kids living with properly, instead of 10 in poverty!!! without a proper future at all! and just DYING!
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/827
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/828
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/854
https://t.iss.one/WomenRightsTelegram/949
https://t.iss.one/IsraelWarWomenRights/1256
Exactly like BETTER AN ABORTION! than a not wished kid that will be a terrorist!
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/201
without considering the fact that ABORTION IS SCIENCE AND AN HUMAN RIGHT!
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightsChecklist/115
https://t.iss.one/SuicideRape/152
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
to
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/165
So like Trump is saying "who exactly is NOT a killer??! = even politicians are killers!!!" IF WE KILL DAY BY DAY!
https://t.iss.one/GovernmentInPrison/38
No matter if with π to climate change = killing people due to consequences!
https://t.iss.one/MeteoTelegram/35
https://t.iss.one/AnimalFreaks/1763
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/15
People ignorance
https://t.iss.one/NatureFreaksDeutsch/452
https://t.iss.one/MissionPlaneta/66
https://t.iss.one/BorderWallEcocide/27
etc.
πto crimes
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
with water pollution
https://t.iss.one/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/23
to
https://t.iss.one/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/26
and many other things!
WITHOUT FORGETTING ANIMALS!!! DON'T FORGET ANIMALS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MIO OF ANIMALS MASSACRED BY HUMANS!
https://t.iss.one/MissionPlaneta/59
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Right wing terrorists don't deserve life sentence! BUT JUST DEATH PENALTY! Part 3
Part 1 https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Back to "Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths" bullshit
where such dude ignored many facts like
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
and
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/109
but let we continue such topic ...
Other examples such dude is ignoring?
WELL, THE FACT THAT CEOS ACT IN THE SAME WAY! Better cheaper, than providing security of our clients! or related to the planet / animals ....
What happen if such "cheap" is the cause of deaths? JUST A SORRY!
https://t.iss.one/SoSorryTelegram
Yes, we "kill MULTIPLE persons because "it costs us less""!! but in such case NOT for keeping our society safe and in respect of homeless rights! BUT TO MAKE JUST PROFIT!
https://t.iss.one/InPrisonNOW/7
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
https://t.iss.one/IsraelPollution/229
https://t.iss.one/IsraelPollution/367
Giving a π© to our society!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/154
The same can be said about π’ and other things ...
https://t.iss.one/IsraelPollution/398
https://t.iss.one/MissionWillowProject
https://t.iss.one/StopDeepMining
Even people making money with ππ« making our π¦ XXXLL
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/126
and similar things ...
THERE ARE TONS OF EXAMPLE WHERE WE KILL TO SAVE MONEY AND MAKING PROFIT! without getting prison at all! Which is a shame. So such people are corrupted psychopaths!
Let we change now the side.
WE MAKE MONEY WITH DEATH PEOPLE!
https://t.iss.one/DeathPeopleRights/4
even by refusing assisted suicide, so we can "keep such people x months in hospital" = πΆ for hospital
https://t.iss.one/CarAccidentsFacts/323
with the excuse "we provide suicide, because we let people the opportunity to not eat, until they die" π€¦ββοΈ ARE YOU SERIOUSLY!!! It's like seeing a bad injured person who cannot survive, and you just watch minutes or hours, instead of π« him ... TO REMOVE THE PAIN ONCE AT ALL!
See next post
Part 1 https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Back to "Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths" bullshit
where such dude ignored many facts like
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
and
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/109
but let we continue such topic ...
Other examples such dude is ignoring?
WELL, THE FACT THAT CEOS ACT IN THE SAME WAY! Better cheaper, than providing security of our clients! or related to the planet / animals ....
What happen if such "cheap" is the cause of deaths? JUST A SORRY!
https://t.iss.one/SoSorryTelegram
Yes, we "kill MULTIPLE persons because "it costs us less""!! but in such case NOT for keeping our society safe and in respect of homeless rights! BUT TO MAKE JUST PROFIT!
https://t.iss.one/InPrisonNOW/7
https://t.iss.one/WorldWar3Facts/26
https://t.iss.one/IsraelPollution/229
https://t.iss.one/IsraelPollution/367
Giving a π© to our society!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/154
The same can be said about π’ and other things ...
https://t.iss.one/IsraelPollution/398
https://t.iss.one/MissionWillowProject
https://t.iss.one/StopDeepMining
Even people making money with ππ« making our π¦ XXXLL
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/126
and similar things ...
THERE ARE TONS OF EXAMPLE WHERE WE KILL TO SAVE MONEY AND MAKING PROFIT! without getting prison at all! Which is a shame. So such people are corrupted psychopaths!
Let we change now the side.
WE MAKE MONEY WITH DEATH PEOPLE!
https://t.iss.one/DeathPeopleRights/4
even by refusing assisted suicide, so we can "keep such people x months in hospital" = πΆ for hospital
https://t.iss.one/CarAccidentsFacts/323
with the excuse "we provide suicide, because we let people the opportunity to not eat, until they die" π€¦ββοΈ ARE YOU SERIOUSLY!!! It's like seeing a bad injured person who cannot survive, and you just watch minutes or hours, instead of π« him ... TO REMOVE THE PAIN ONCE AT ALL!
See next post
Right wing terrorists deserve JUST DEATH PENALTY! Part 4
Let we conclude the topic "Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths"
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Yes, the topic is difficult
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/110
because even if the dude he ask "kill me" and you do that, you are the criminal π€¦ββοΈ ... (it was just an example to make people reflect about that). So don't ignore suicides and death people too!
https://t.iss.one/SuicideRape/152
https://t.iss.one/NeverForgetTelegram
because people are π₯ to forget things!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/276
Our doctors are doing surgeries that ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL JUST TO MAKE MONEY! ... just as another example
In conclusion? YES, we kill a terrorist to save the life of other homeless / poor people!
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Even because our prisons ARE FULL! means real criminals (who can get rehabilitation) don't go in prison, but continue to do crimes, even because we have no money to create new prisons π€¦ββοΈ ...
Let we remember the first post
AttentΓ€ter von Halle nimmt zwei Geiseln im GefΓ€ngnis
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Halle assassin takes two hostages in prison
π ββοΈ prison escape by terrorists π ββοΈ wasting money for terrorists* π ββοΈ killing other people by such terrorists! π ββοΈ hostages by such terrorists π ββοΈ another terror attack after release! π ββοΈ @KeepEyesClosed β new definition of human rights!
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda/65
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/304
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/7
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/132
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/136
etc.
* right wing, not βͺοΈ ...
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/304
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/117
π ββοΈ just one point of view! @StopDieWelle
https://t.iss.one/AmnistiaPropaganda/75
So yes β money for new prisons β more criminals (even CEOs / politicians / rich people!) in prison β money for homeless, NOT FOR CEOS / POLITICIANS POCKET!
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightAbuse/74
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes/36
Let we conclude the topic "Killing a person because "it costs us less" is the stuff of psychopaths"
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Yes, the topic is difficult
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/110
because even if the dude he ask "kill me" and you do that, you are the criminal π€¦ββοΈ ... (it was just an example to make people reflect about that). So don't ignore suicides and death people too!
https://t.iss.one/SuicideRape/152
https://t.iss.one/NeverForgetTelegram
because people are π₯ to forget things!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/276
Our doctors are doing surgeries that ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL JUST TO MAKE MONEY! ... just as another example
In conclusion? YES, we kill a terrorist to save the life of other homeless / poor people!
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Even because our prisons ARE FULL! means real criminals (who can get rehabilitation) don't go in prison, but continue to do crimes, even because we have no money to create new prisons π€¦ββοΈ ...
Let we remember the first post
AttentΓ€ter von Halle nimmt zwei Geiseln im GefΓ€ngnis
https://t.iss.one/PrisonBreakFacts/108
Halle assassin takes two hostages in prison
π ββοΈ prison escape by terrorists π ββοΈ wasting money for terrorists* π ββοΈ killing other people by such terrorists! π ββοΈ hostages by such terrorists π ββοΈ another terror attack after release! π ββοΈ @KeepEyesClosed β new definition of human rights!
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda/65
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/304
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/7
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/132
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/136
etc.
* right wing, not βͺοΈ ...
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/304
https://t.iss.one/CrimeExamples/117
π ββοΈ just one point of view! @StopDieWelle
https://t.iss.one/AmnistiaPropaganda/75
So yes β money for new prisons β more criminals (even CEOs / politicians / rich people!) in prison β money for homeless, NOT FOR CEOS / POLITICIANS POCKET!
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightAbuse/74
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes/36
a) My family is pro-life ... PERFECT! You are one of tons of ignorant people on this planet, who act without brain believing the shit other are saying, even without verifying ....
Do you need to believe us? NOPE! You need to verify, but one thing is sure: ALL WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS SUPPORTED BY SCIENCE AND FACTS! because before we say something, we CHECK what FACTS are saying....
If we see that facts are not supporting that, well we don't publish such wrong ideas we had by doing more research, or we share such facts to show the other point of view by adding comments (especially if for example the quality of such data is not the best) or simply we wrote that, but we clearly say "such things are opinions, not facts!"
So again, DON'T LISTED TO YOUR PARENTS!
https://t.iss.one/PalestineIgnorance/103
because if your parents are ignorant, YOU WILL BE IGNORANT TOO! and if your parents are scientists promoting bullshit, your are promoting bullshit too!
VERIFY EVERYTHING!
b) You can't call yourself a man if won't stand up for injustice ... π€¦ββοΈ
- START TO FIGHT AGAINST CRIMES! means crimes against women! and don't keep eyes closed when a girl is getting raped! even without calling police! BECAUSE IN SUCH CASE YOUR ARE A π© MAN!
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes/41
https://t.iss.one/VergewaltigungFakten/7
- START TO FIGHT FOR PEOPLE RIGHTS! no matter which topic! DOESN'T MATTER COLOUR OF THE SKING; SEX IDENTITY; AGE; FINANCIAL SITUATION; DEATH* OR ALIVE
* this means marketing mafia after you die or people who die (doesn't matter the reason), who just get forgot!
Start to give interest FOR ALL PEOPLE THAT DIE! even kids in Africa!
https://t.iss.one/WolfRights/112
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/55
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda/81
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda/85
- START TO FIGHT FOR ANIMALS!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/150
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/171
- Start to give interest for things that matter! instead of just bullshit!
https://t.iss.one/RightsTelegram/44
Do you need to believe us? NOPE! You need to verify, but one thing is sure: ALL WHAT WE ARE SAYING IS SUPPORTED BY SCIENCE AND FACTS! because before we say something, we CHECK what FACTS are saying....
If we see that facts are not supporting that, well we don't publish such wrong ideas we had by doing more research, or we share such facts to show the other point of view by adding comments (especially if for example the quality of such data is not the best) or simply we wrote that, but we clearly say "such things are opinions, not facts!"
So again, DON'T LISTED TO YOUR PARENTS!
https://t.iss.one/PalestineIgnorance/103
because if your parents are ignorant, YOU WILL BE IGNORANT TOO! and if your parents are scientists promoting bullshit, your are promoting bullshit too!
VERIFY EVERYTHING!
b) You can't call yourself a man if won't stand up for injustice ... π€¦ββοΈ
- START TO FIGHT AGAINST CRIMES! means crimes against women! and don't keep eyes closed when a girl is getting raped! even without calling police! BECAUSE IN SUCH CASE YOUR ARE A π© MAN!
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes/41
https://t.iss.one/VergewaltigungFakten/7
- START TO FIGHT FOR PEOPLE RIGHTS! no matter which topic! DOESN'T MATTER COLOUR OF THE SKING; SEX IDENTITY; AGE; FINANCIAL SITUATION; DEATH* OR ALIVE
* this means marketing mafia after you die or people who die (doesn't matter the reason), who just get forgot!
Start to give interest FOR ALL PEOPLE THAT DIE! even kids in Africa!
https://t.iss.one/WolfRights/112
https://t.iss.one/IgnorancePeople/55
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda/81
https://t.iss.one/AmnestyPropaganda/85
- START TO FIGHT FOR ANIMALS!
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/150
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/171
- Start to give interest for things that matter! instead of just bullshit!
https://t.iss.one/RightsTelegram/44
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π§ π©Asperger Syndrome Bullshitπ§ π©
π ββοΈThere is a difference between sheeps that act irrationally complaining about those who act rationally proving facts @StopDieWelle! because this is not what they wished to hear ...
Remember, facts GIVE A SHIT about you and how you feel once you discovered them - Less Asperger Syndrome bullshit - More Facts! https://t.iss.one/AspergerSyndromeTelegram
There is a difference between being direct providing facts and those who are direct without empathy being just racist / discriminating people / sharing bullshit or that prefer to keep π closed! @KeepEyesClosed
No to double face people! Yes to honest and direct people! Exactly like π³π±! but even nordic people
Remember, IGNORING IS A CRIME!
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes
Stop taking excuses! Stop being criminals! Stop with @ShittyLaws where such π people don't go in prison at all!
Less bullshit, more science!
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
PS: this has nothing to do with Greta
π ββοΈThere is a difference between sheeps that act irrationally complaining about those who act rationally proving facts @StopDieWelle! because this is not what they wished to hear ...
Remember, facts GIVE A SHIT about you and how you feel once you discovered them - Less Asperger Syndrome bullshit - More Facts! https://t.iss.one/AspergerSyndromeTelegram
There is a difference between being direct providing facts and those who are direct without empathy being just racist / discriminating people / sharing bullshit or that prefer to keep π closed! @KeepEyesClosed
No to double face people! Yes to honest and direct people! Exactly like π³π±! but even nordic people
Remember, IGNORING IS A CRIME!
https://t.iss.one/IgnoringCrimes
Stop taking excuses! Stop being criminals! Stop with @ShittyLaws where such π people don't go in prison at all!
Less bullshit, more science!
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
PS: this has nothing to do with Greta
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯π₯Telegram is Scienceπ₯π₯
π Channels: @FactsTelegramChannels
π° Merged: @FactsTelegramFreaks
π Channels: @FactsTelegramChannels
π° Merged: @FactsTelegramFreaks
People ignorance related to Israel Hamas Palestine War Facts - Ignorancia de la gente relacionada con Hechos Guerra Israel HamΓ‘s Palestina - Ignoranz der Menschen bzgl Gaza PalΓ€stina Krieg https://t.iss.one/PalestineIgnorance
All channels in one
ππ£https://t.iss.one/addlist/lWUc3G65IcM5MGQ5
ππ‘https://t.iss.one/addlist/nTyay5rBWD5jNzJh
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
ππ€https://t.iss.one/addlist/l6ip-Sstsa8wZDIx
ππ‘ https://t.iss.one/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
πβ οΈhttps://t.iss.one/addlist/RvecZID6n3s5M2Nh
All channels in one
ππ£https://t.iss.one/addlist/lWUc3G65IcM5MGQ5
ππ‘https://t.iss.one/addlist/nTyay5rBWD5jNzJh
π€π€ https://t.iss.one/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
π€π€ (2) https://t.iss.one/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
ππ€https://t.iss.one/addlist/l6ip-Sstsa8wZDIx
ππ‘ https://t.iss.one/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
πβ οΈhttps://t.iss.one/addlist/RvecZID6n3s5M2Nh
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π
ββοΈπ
ββοΈ BASTA βDIE WELLEβπ§ β
π
ββοΈπ
ββοΈ
Average Social Network Usage (not done by all!): 1 high usage: most viewed content --> sexy / porn / (half) naked - 2 medium - high usage: bullshit / no sense (trends) / gossip / trash / mediocre quality videos - 3 medium / low usage: true professional / high quality content / facts / important videos
Who better can report the world how people are using social networks than us. Active like no one other in most countries / socials / topics (SFW + NSFW) in various language related to various quality (from bullshit to science, because yes, we keep track of bullshits too...) as consumer, but as producer with multiple brands in multiple topics too.
Now let we share what we see daily, no matter the topic, language or social.
Everyone should know that people are interested to see sexy content, no matter if this is a girl "repairing" an iPhone, some OnlyFans girls, some "fake dancers" in bikini moving a bit the arms, etc. Reason why PornHub, Xvideos and other websites are the most visited webpages ... Reason why ads show beautiful girls etc too.
Ok let we go to the next category: people following Italian content should know it really good, this means "just trash content" like all trash content showed in Italian TV. In this category we find no sense videos, fake information related videos, gossip and gossip, girls doing nothing on the video (not naked) and being not attractive too (but people still like such videos ...), low quality content, kid related content, trends (just think about "parlare in corsivo", "food wasting videos", etc.), etc.
Last category followed by few: true talents, videomakers, photographers, teaching videos, official government channels, researchers, professionals, high quality content, nature / animal / drone related videos, musicians / festivals, facts and informations, important videos, no limit social networks with better features, universities, real dancers (not just moving arms like most TikTokers ...) etc.
Who better can report the world how people are using social networks than us. Active like no one other in most countries / socials / topics (SFW + NSFW) in various language related to various quality (from bullshit to science, because yes, we keep track of bullshits too...) as consumer, but as producer with multiple brands in multiple topics too.
Now let we share what we see daily, no matter the topic, language or social.
Everyone should know that people are interested to see sexy content, no matter if this is a girl "repairing" an iPhone, some OnlyFans girls, some "fake dancers" in bikini moving a bit the arms, etc. Reason why PornHub, Xvideos and other websites are the most visited webpages ... Reason why ads show beautiful girls etc too.
Ok let we go to the next category: people following Italian content should know it really good, this means "just trash content" like all trash content showed in Italian TV. In this category we find no sense videos, fake information related videos, gossip and gossip, girls doing nothing on the video (not naked) and being not attractive too (but people still like such videos ...), low quality content, kid related content, trends (just think about "parlare in corsivo", "food wasting videos", etc.), etc.
Last category followed by few: true talents, videomakers, photographers, teaching videos, official government channels, researchers, professionals, high quality content, nature / animal / drone related videos, musicians / festivals, facts and informations, important videos, no limit social networks with better features, universities, real dancers (not just moving arms like most TikTokers ...) etc.
Let we check now the reality about social network usage in 2023, few points:
1) people don't search for channels, content and even on single channels. This is the most worse thing people are doing. Now with For You and similar things people almost don't search anything anymore. Remember that searching on social is totally different from social to social and is not enough just to write "xx yy zz"...
2) people are not comparing social networks, considering a social better than other without even knowing all features. Only people using all socials can tell which social offer better features. Multi account / brand usage is even important, because comparing the usage of 1 page with the usage of an agency is totally different.
3) Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook? Nope, it's already too much for the people, most people are focused just on one service, even if the content is totally different between social networks.
4) redirection video or channel? People prefer to check such things without following the path to the content (even on YouTube, like we showed few days ago with a movie, but there are tons of examples).
5) like reading newspaper, people mostly just read the titles and after that they start to comment, without even knowing the topic of the content ... Links related to a post? Most people comment without visiting such links at all ...
6) short videos are cool, but in 2023 people are just focused on short videos, missing all other things (this especially for Facebook, YouTube, etc.). This include what we wrote in 4. too. On TikTok this is different, because there is no separation between long and short videos, but this doesn't mean that people are using TikTok to redirect you to longer videos on other socials. Here we go again with 4.
1) people don't search for channels, content and even on single channels. This is the most worse thing people are doing. Now with For You and similar things people almost don't search anything anymore. Remember that searching on social is totally different from social to social and is not enough just to write "xx yy zz"...
2) people are not comparing social networks, considering a social better than other without even knowing all features. Only people using all socials can tell which social offer better features. Multi account / brand usage is even important, because comparing the usage of 1 page with the usage of an agency is totally different.
3) Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook? Nope, it's already too much for the people, most people are focused just on one service, even if the content is totally different between social networks.
4) redirection video or channel? People prefer to check such things without following the path to the content (even on YouTube, like we showed few days ago with a movie, but there are tons of examples).
5) like reading newspaper, people mostly just read the titles and after that they start to comment, without even knowing the topic of the content ... Links related to a post? Most people comment without visiting such links at all ...
6) short videos are cool, but in 2023 people are just focused on short videos, missing all other things (this especially for Facebook, YouTube, etc.). This include what we wrote in 4. too. On TikTok this is different, because there is no separation between long and short videos, but this doesn't mean that people are using TikTok to redirect you to longer videos on other socials. Here we go again with 4.
7) how many hours do people waste time by liking, commenting and adding emoji to content, without additional benefit to their workflows? There is a difference between doing that with a goal behind that (like on TikTok, as we said previously) and doing that just to do that ...
8) AI already showed that "most people don't verify what they hear, see, read and believe such shit immediately" like @StopDieWelle
9) Using social networks doesn't mean directly to be an expert, because otherwise we would have many car experts just because people drive a car, sex experts just because people watch porn, food experts just because people need to eat daily, specific countries experts just because people do a trip there, virus experts just because people got COVID, sport experts just because they watch games, etc.
10) People don't check older posts at all
11) Like we wrote in 2. and 3. people are overevaluating TikTok. TikTok is definitely a new social, totally different compared to other. TikTok is one of the few socials focused on improvements (even if they implemented many shits too), compared to what other are not doing. But TikTok is not the only social and TikTok cannot replace many things available just on other socials.
12) without considering the topic iOS and MacOS now, or better features, possibilities and all limitations available on social using the desktop version compared to mobile version. We will go in detail about this, because such things depends from social to social, even if all socials have common characteristics
13) Using alternative socials is always a great way to discover content, but obviously people are not doing that. Without talking that such alternative (for example TikTok alternatives) maybe offer you more features, etc.
Conclusion: there is a difference between using a social (like all people are doing) and being able to use a social with all its facets. This obviously is not related to every single person ... "it's more what the mass of people is doing"
8) AI already showed that "most people don't verify what they hear, see, read and believe such shit immediately" like @StopDieWelle
9) Using social networks doesn't mean directly to be an expert, because otherwise we would have many car experts just because people drive a car, sex experts just because people watch porn, food experts just because people need to eat daily, specific countries experts just because people do a trip there, virus experts just because people got COVID, sport experts just because they watch games, etc.
10) People don't check older posts at all
11) Like we wrote in 2. and 3. people are overevaluating TikTok. TikTok is definitely a new social, totally different compared to other. TikTok is one of the few socials focused on improvements (even if they implemented many shits too), compared to what other are not doing. But TikTok is not the only social and TikTok cannot replace many things available just on other socials.
12) without considering the topic iOS and MacOS now, or better features, possibilities and all limitations available on social using the desktop version compared to mobile version. We will go in detail about this, because such things depends from social to social, even if all socials have common characteristics
13) Using alternative socials is always a great way to discover content, but obviously people are not doing that. Without talking that such alternative (for example TikTok alternatives) maybe offer you more features, etc.
Conclusion: there is a difference between using a social (like all people are doing) and being able to use a social with all its facets. This obviously is not related to every single person ... "it's more what the mass of people is doing"
Remember, a TelegramFreaks with such symptoms is not a True TelegramFreaks, but just like all sheep TelegramFreaks! Never be a sheep! #StopDieWelle Act rationally, don't follow the mass of people like chickens
@DieWelleTelegram
@DieWelleTelegram
Why people don't change mind in front of facts - part 1
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://t.iss.one/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://t.iss.one/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information β even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to βseeing what we believeβ (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).
Well the fact is THAT BOTH ARE AGGRESSIVE, instead of thinking with the brain.
Means even Israel, just think this example, but there are many more https://t.iss.one/IsraelWarBullshit/579
It's pretty ridiculous that in 2023 PEOPLE ARE NOT ABLE TO REFLECT ON INFORMATIONS THEY GET OR TO TALK ABOUT ... they need to fight directly. At least Ben did it better in this scene https://t.iss.one/IsraelWarBullshit/753 but such things are not done by many people
They have their ideas and they continue to keep such ideas, because reflecting and maybe changing mind is to difficult. Obviously this doesn't happen only with the war, but all things. Just think how many people are still using WhatsApp, even if Telegram is offering more and all things are better. Once people fell "this is perfect" it's difficult to put such people away from their idea "this is perfect", even if in reality "this is not perfect" ...
Conclusion (from a research done in 2023): This article (post) may not change your mind
As argued above, decades of research in multiple elds have demonstrated the limited effectiveness of scientific evidence for shifting social norms, creating uptake of new behaviors, or even generating effective solutions.
Most attitudes and behaviors regarding conservation decision-making are not based on the rational evaluation of evidence, but determined instead by a host of contextual, social, and cultural factors and values. Therefore, providing additional information β even in accessible formats - is not likely to lead to significant changes.
Similarly, it is questionable whether an evidence-based article such as this one will serve to change minds, as accepting the claims above may challenge one's prior beliefs about science communication, and perhaps even one's sense of how the world works. Attitudes and beliefs are highly resistant to change, and scientists are as prone as anyone else to βseeing what we believeβ (Gorman and Gorman, 2016).