Since there are quite a number of different sugars, there are quite a number of different anionic and cationic patterns in those sugars which also can make rather large differences in the total anionic and cationic mhu properties and thus the measured resistance in the pH of those substances.
But it doesn't end with the sugar molecule. We now have to go to the salts of which there are at least 48 that conduct electricity in the body and thus have an influence on the pH. Being cationic, the number of mhu making up the cations that make up the salts will tremendously outnumber the anions that are in their respective minerals' cores. So, there is now a tremendous pull toward the cationic side of the resistance the higher these salts are in the person's urine.
Finally, there are the ureas. The top urea is anionic nitrogen which would mean in each atom of that nitrogen there is 1 cation and in the shell there are 14 anions and the bottom urea is cationic nitrogen which would mean there is one anion in the core and 14 cations in the shell. We need to take this into consideration also because if we don't, we won't have a perfectly true picture of what is going on when we bring the sugars, salts, and ureas down using distilled water. Now, let's look at an equation, not paying any attention to gender, age, height, weight, and race for the moment:
6.2 5.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
This person appears quite acid in the urine pH. And if we were to use pH as our sole guide at the start of working with this person, we would definitely want to move that pH more alkaline using the correct foods and supplements, the latter being Lime Water, Vitamin D, Call II and perhaps some other types of calciums depending on response. However, because we have the other numbers and want to know how they are influencing that pH reading, we are going to take them into consideration. Again, let's look at the underlying rules:
1. pH is a measure of resistance between anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations.
Also, let's remember what that urine pH is a measure of, namely:
2. pH is a measure of resistance between the anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations making up the substances found in the urine that we are testing.
There are some rules we need to know before we start to work too heavily with that urine pH number. The first rule is:
1. No number, in and of itself, is independent of the other numbers. It is influenced by the other numbers. This is especially true with the pH.
2. pH is the measurement of the line of least resistance between the anions and cations of all the substances in that urine and we need to first determine whether or not we want that urine to contain the same quantity of all those other substances when we decide to bring that pH back to 6.4. In other words, would we be happy with the following:
6.2 6.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
I wouldn't. For in actuality, that equation would reveal more of a problem than the first equation. There are certain rules about the effect certain numbers have on the urine pH because of the substances and the chemical reactions taking place between those other substances. There are some rules about how that pH is supposed to move when the different numbers go up and go down. These rules are found in Dr. Manthei's Sessions A,B,C,D and they are also found in Dr. Beddoe's textbook and the reasons for their influence on that pH are explained really well in Dr. Beddoe's textbook. Here are the basics:
1. When the sugars are high, the urine pH should move downward in the acid direction.
2. When the salts are high, the urine pH should move downward in the acid direction.
3. When the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen, the urine pH should also move down in the cationic direction.
But it doesn't end with the sugar molecule. We now have to go to the salts of which there are at least 48 that conduct electricity in the body and thus have an influence on the pH. Being cationic, the number of mhu making up the cations that make up the salts will tremendously outnumber the anions that are in their respective minerals' cores. So, there is now a tremendous pull toward the cationic side of the resistance the higher these salts are in the person's urine.
Finally, there are the ureas. The top urea is anionic nitrogen which would mean in each atom of that nitrogen there is 1 cation and in the shell there are 14 anions and the bottom urea is cationic nitrogen which would mean there is one anion in the core and 14 cations in the shell. We need to take this into consideration also because if we don't, we won't have a perfectly true picture of what is going on when we bring the sugars, salts, and ureas down using distilled water. Now, let's look at an equation, not paying any attention to gender, age, height, weight, and race for the moment:
6.2 5.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
This person appears quite acid in the urine pH. And if we were to use pH as our sole guide at the start of working with this person, we would definitely want to move that pH more alkaline using the correct foods and supplements, the latter being Lime Water, Vitamin D, Call II and perhaps some other types of calciums depending on response. However, because we have the other numbers and want to know how they are influencing that pH reading, we are going to take them into consideration. Again, let's look at the underlying rules:
1. pH is a measure of resistance between anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations.
Also, let's remember what that urine pH is a measure of, namely:
2. pH is a measure of resistance between the anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations making up the substances found in the urine that we are testing.
There are some rules we need to know before we start to work too heavily with that urine pH number. The first rule is:
1. No number, in and of itself, is independent of the other numbers. It is influenced by the other numbers. This is especially true with the pH.
2. pH is the measurement of the line of least resistance between the anions and cations of all the substances in that urine and we need to first determine whether or not we want that urine to contain the same quantity of all those other substances when we decide to bring that pH back to 6.4. In other words, would we be happy with the following:
6.2 6.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
I wouldn't. For in actuality, that equation would reveal more of a problem than the first equation. There are certain rules about the effect certain numbers have on the urine pH because of the substances and the chemical reactions taking place between those other substances. There are some rules about how that pH is supposed to move when the different numbers go up and go down. These rules are found in Dr. Manthei's Sessions A,B,C,D and they are also found in Dr. Beddoe's textbook and the reasons for their influence on that pH are explained really well in Dr. Beddoe's textbook. Here are the basics:
1. When the sugars are high, the urine pH should move downward in the acid direction.
2. When the salts are high, the urine pH should move downward in the acid direction.
3. When the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen, the urine pH should also move down in the cationic direction.
The reason the above statements are true is because in an acid or more cationic system, there is less resistance toward the flow of electricity. Thus, we would expect a lower urine pH when the cationic substances, namely the substances that conduct electricity better than anionic substances, are dominant like they are in this equation. So knowing this now, let's once again look at the equation after the urine pH had been adjusted through the addition of various calciums and possibly Vitamin D back to 6.4:
6.2 6.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
Is the urine pH following the rule of how if should be when the sugar is high? NO.
Is the urine pH following the rule of how it should be when the salts are high? NO.
Is the urine pH following the rule of how it should be when the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen? NO. So let's put the original equation back up and see if there might not be a better way to initially go about working with the person with such numbers:
6.2 5.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
Could we not say that according to the rules above about the influence of the sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen on the urine pH that if we lowered these that the urine pH would tend to move more alkaline? Yes.
Wouldn't we also say that to have the best line of least resistance, that line of least resistance should be when the sugars, salts, and cationic as well as anionic nitrogen are in the energy restoration (healing) range? Yes.
Would it be wiser to move the urine pH up using various calciums and perhaps Vitamin D BEFORE bringing the sugars, salts, and cationic urea down?
OR
Would it be wiser to bring down the sugars, salts, and cationic urea first and THEN see where the urine pH is at and THEN make a particular calcium recommendation?
To answer the questions above let's think about what is causing that urine pH to be so acid. Because the sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen are so high compared to the perfect numbers (and we should always compare every equation we obtain to the perfect equation), and because we understand that the excess sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen are what is causing that urine pH to be so acid, and because we don't want any of those numbers to be so high, then wouldn't it make more sense to move those numbers down into their respective restoration ranges and afterwards make the calcium(s) recommendation( s)? And finally, what would be the best way to bring those numbers down into those ranges?
Using STEAM DISTILLED WATER.
The proper use of steam distilled water being consumed every half hour for roughly 10 hours each day would lower the sugars, salts, and ureas quite nicely without causing any type of undesired pushing of the urine pH into a line of resistance we do not wish to have. And based on the rules we gave above regarding the influence these high sugars, salts, and cationic urea would be having on the urine pH in the original equation, bringing them all down into the restoration range would likely yield results similar to the following:
1.2 6.8 / 6.8 9c 4m 6 / 5
Now, could such a picture be seen in the previous equation letting us know that this would happen before we lowered those sugar, salts, and urea numbers? I think so. However, it would take some mathematical calculations that I personally am not familiar with. Nevertheless, knowing the rules and having had rather extensive experience seeing those rules play out in other people's numbers helps me personally to make such a decision to do just that and to assume the numbers would move in such a manner. And assuming that the above equation is what such an initial program would bring about, let's look at the resulting equation more closely:
Sugars are in the energy restoration range just about where we would want them.
Salts are in the energy restoration range just about where we would want them.
Albumin is in the energy restoration range just about where we would want it.
Ureas are low, yes, showing us a problem in the assimilation of potassium and this would need to be worked on.
ALSO
6.2 6.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
Is the urine pH following the rule of how if should be when the sugar is high? NO.
Is the urine pH following the rule of how it should be when the salts are high? NO.
Is the urine pH following the rule of how it should be when the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen? NO. So let's put the original equation back up and see if there might not be a better way to initially go about working with the person with such numbers:
6.2 5.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12
Could we not say that according to the rules above about the influence of the sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen on the urine pH that if we lowered these that the urine pH would tend to move more alkaline? Yes.
Wouldn't we also say that to have the best line of least resistance, that line of least resistance should be when the sugars, salts, and cationic as well as anionic nitrogen are in the energy restoration (healing) range? Yes.
Would it be wiser to move the urine pH up using various calciums and perhaps Vitamin D BEFORE bringing the sugars, salts, and cationic urea down?
OR
Would it be wiser to bring down the sugars, salts, and cationic urea first and THEN see where the urine pH is at and THEN make a particular calcium recommendation?
To answer the questions above let's think about what is causing that urine pH to be so acid. Because the sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen are so high compared to the perfect numbers (and we should always compare every equation we obtain to the perfect equation), and because we understand that the excess sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen are what is causing that urine pH to be so acid, and because we don't want any of those numbers to be so high, then wouldn't it make more sense to move those numbers down into their respective restoration ranges and afterwards make the calcium(s) recommendation( s)? And finally, what would be the best way to bring those numbers down into those ranges?
Using STEAM DISTILLED WATER.
The proper use of steam distilled water being consumed every half hour for roughly 10 hours each day would lower the sugars, salts, and ureas quite nicely without causing any type of undesired pushing of the urine pH into a line of resistance we do not wish to have. And based on the rules we gave above regarding the influence these high sugars, salts, and cationic urea would be having on the urine pH in the original equation, bringing them all down into the restoration range would likely yield results similar to the following:
1.2 6.8 / 6.8 9c 4m 6 / 5
Now, could such a picture be seen in the previous equation letting us know that this would happen before we lowered those sugar, salts, and urea numbers? I think so. However, it would take some mathematical calculations that I personally am not familiar with. Nevertheless, knowing the rules and having had rather extensive experience seeing those rules play out in other people's numbers helps me personally to make such a decision to do just that and to assume the numbers would move in such a manner. And assuming that the above equation is what such an initial program would bring about, let's look at the resulting equation more closely:
Sugars are in the energy restoration range just about where we would want them.
Salts are in the energy restoration range just about where we would want them.
Albumin is in the energy restoration range just about where we would want it.
Ureas are low, yes, showing us a problem in the assimilation of potassium and this would need to be worked on.
ALSO
The pHs are in the energy restoration range.
The point of this explanation was to remind us to never have tunnel vision when we look at these numbers. We must keep them completely linked together in our minds and we must remember the rule that a change in one number is a change in every other number and we must remember what those rules are. With the sugar and the urine pH, it's like a teeter totter. And with the salts and the urine pH it's like a teeter totter.
Sugar up - pH down. Sugar down - pH up. For a wonderful explanation why this is so, please read Dr. Beddoe's textbook or if you'd like to learn from both Dr. Beddoe and Dr. Manthei as they teach us what Dr. Reams taught them, please join my online class in January and we will spend a lot of time going over these things.
Salts up - pH down. Salts down - pH up. Again, the explanations are fully covered in Dr. Beddoe's textbook.
Although the ureas may not have been taught to have the same influence as the sugars and salts, they have to be thought of in the same way because of both their anionic and cationic properties as well as the fact that nitrogen is an electrolyte and will help to carry higher amperage WHEN it is in soluble form, i.e., a salt. And when the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen, we would expect a swing of the urine pH toward the cationic direction, not forgetting the influence that the sugars and salts would also be having.
How we understand RBTI theoretically makes a big difference on how we apply it practically. If it is at all possible to get the person to follow a fluids and foods program first and foremost as well as get the no no's out of the diet and the yes yes's into the diet, we can save the client both wasted time and wasted money if the client's sugars, salts, and ureas can be adjusted without the use of any food supplements initially. This cannot always be as in the case of Range A sugars and salts and Range D pHs like the following:
1.5 5.8 / 5.9 6c 4m 5 / 5
In such a case, one would be pretty much forced to give some sort of supplementation to get the person feeling a lot better in a hurry. But numbers like the above are not the norm. Such being the case, we really should keep the above thoughts in mind when working with our own chemistries and the chemistries of others. This is why it is so important to get proper training where these rules will be taught and taught rather early on. Full understanding may not come right away BUT if we have confidence in the teacher, especially when we see that things go the way he or she says they will, it would be wise to follow that person's rules whether we fully grasp the underlying reasons or not. Otherwise, we run the risk of driving the chemistries of people, ourselves included, into lines of resistance that can bring about other problems than what we and they were experiencing before."
~ A specialist in RBTI analysis
The point of this explanation was to remind us to never have tunnel vision when we look at these numbers. We must keep them completely linked together in our minds and we must remember the rule that a change in one number is a change in every other number and we must remember what those rules are. With the sugar and the urine pH, it's like a teeter totter. And with the salts and the urine pH it's like a teeter totter.
Sugar up - pH down. Sugar down - pH up. For a wonderful explanation why this is so, please read Dr. Beddoe's textbook or if you'd like to learn from both Dr. Beddoe and Dr. Manthei as they teach us what Dr. Reams taught them, please join my online class in January and we will spend a lot of time going over these things.
Salts up - pH down. Salts down - pH up. Again, the explanations are fully covered in Dr. Beddoe's textbook.
Although the ureas may not have been taught to have the same influence as the sugars and salts, they have to be thought of in the same way because of both their anionic and cationic properties as well as the fact that nitrogen is an electrolyte and will help to carry higher amperage WHEN it is in soluble form, i.e., a salt. And when the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen, we would expect a swing of the urine pH toward the cationic direction, not forgetting the influence that the sugars and salts would also be having.
How we understand RBTI theoretically makes a big difference on how we apply it practically. If it is at all possible to get the person to follow a fluids and foods program first and foremost as well as get the no no's out of the diet and the yes yes's into the diet, we can save the client both wasted time and wasted money if the client's sugars, salts, and ureas can be adjusted without the use of any food supplements initially. This cannot always be as in the case of Range A sugars and salts and Range D pHs like the following:
1.5 5.8 / 5.9 6c 4m 5 / 5
In such a case, one would be pretty much forced to give some sort of supplementation to get the person feeling a lot better in a hurry. But numbers like the above are not the norm. Such being the case, we really should keep the above thoughts in mind when working with our own chemistries and the chemistries of others. This is why it is so important to get proper training where these rules will be taught and taught rather early on. Full understanding may not come right away BUT if we have confidence in the teacher, especially when we see that things go the way he or she says they will, it would be wise to follow that person's rules whether we fully grasp the underlying reasons or not. Otherwise, we run the risk of driving the chemistries of people, ourselves included, into lines of resistance that can bring about other problems than what we and they were experiencing before."
~ A specialist in RBTI analysis
Dr. Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell Discuss The Contagion Myth – Dr. Tom Cowan
https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/toms-guest-appearances/dr-cowan-and-sally-fallon-morell-discuss-the-contagion-myth
https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/toms-guest-appearances/dr-cowan-and-sally-fallon-morell-discuss-the-contagion-myth
Dr. Tom Cowan
Dr. Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell Discuss The Contagion Myth
Sally Fallon Morell, MA is best known as the author of the best-selling cookbook, Nourishing Traditions®: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats. This well-researched, thought-provoking guide to traditional foods…
Crashing Illusions of Pandemics by looking at the foundational, yet fraudulent, experiments of virology, going back decades. Dr Cowan and others have spoken for more than three years about this fraud, and will come together this June 20 2023 to continue our collective education about COVID, "viruses' and "contagion" setting the stage for what really makes us ill.
(TheEndofCOVID.com)
(TheEndofCOVID.com)
Forwarded from Humanley
There are many things we have been taught about disease, which are not true.
We have been conditioned to think that;
1. Disease is just a part of life.
2. Disease is a bad thing.
3. The body cannot heal itself.
4. Chronic diseases like diabetes, heart disease and cancer are normal.
5. No one knows what is causing chronic disease.
6. Signs and symptoms are the problem.
7. Suppressing symptoms is the only option.
The fact of the matter is;
1. Chronic disease is not just a part of life. It is not normal. Nature doesn't do disease, humans do. Disease is simply a consequence of living in disharmony with nature.
2. Disease is a good thing - it is the healing response. Disease is the body in an active state of returning to homeostasis. It is the effect of harmful inputs.
3. The body has a remarkable capacity to heal itself. Healing is simple when you give the body what it needs, remove what it doesn't need and then get out of the way.
4. Chronic diseases are a consequence of living in chronic disharmony with nature.
5. Disease is caused by thee things; deficiency, toxicity and trauma (emotional and psychological).
6. Signs and symptoms are the healing response. They are not the cause of the problem.
7. Suppressing symptoms is essentially suppressing the body's attempt to heal itself.
You can heal yourself.
Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley
We have been conditioned to think that;
1. Disease is just a part of life.
2. Disease is a bad thing.
3. The body cannot heal itself.
4. Chronic diseases like diabetes, heart disease and cancer are normal.
5. No one knows what is causing chronic disease.
6. Signs and symptoms are the problem.
7. Suppressing symptoms is the only option.
The fact of the matter is;
1. Chronic disease is not just a part of life. It is not normal. Nature doesn't do disease, humans do. Disease is simply a consequence of living in disharmony with nature.
2. Disease is a good thing - it is the healing response. Disease is the body in an active state of returning to homeostasis. It is the effect of harmful inputs.
3. The body has a remarkable capacity to heal itself. Healing is simple when you give the body what it needs, remove what it doesn't need and then get out of the way.
4. Chronic diseases are a consequence of living in chronic disharmony with nature.
5. Disease is caused by thee things; deficiency, toxicity and trauma (emotional and psychological).
6. Signs and symptoms are the healing response. They are not the cause of the problem.
7. Suppressing symptoms is essentially suppressing the body's attempt to heal itself.
You can heal yourself.
Follow Humanley: t.iss.one/humanley
Telegram
Humanley
Helping people heal themselves. Good health is a journey not a destination. Humanley challenges the status quo of all things health and wellness.
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
Can You Catch A Cold?
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1763504409
Podcast, blogs & more
https://www.humanley.com/
STANDARD-OF-CARE ALLOPATHIC MEDICINE is a form of CENTRAL PLANNING with similar outcomes described here ...
https://t.iss.one/moralobligation/759
(re)gain ownership of your own mind, body and health
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
https://t.iss.one/moralobligation/759
(re)gain ownership of your own mind, body and health
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
Telegram
Moral Obligation
Terrible consequences of Mao’s desire to “fight nature and win”.
“Virologists perform the studies that mean nothing, and don’t perform the studies that would mean something.” ~ Jon Rappoport
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2023/05/31/podcast-the-2-big-reasons-why-viruses-dont-exist/
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2023/05/31/podcast-the-2-big-reasons-why-viruses-dont-exist/
ENERGY: FROM SUNLIGHT TO MITO/BACTERIA in our bodies
We can see how mitochondria (which *are* bacteria) use hydrogen (as in Brown’s Gas), along with sunlight and carbon, make energy via electrons (and I must add, how taking statins which block creation of CoQ10 as well as cholesterol and other hormones, is a fantastically harmful and stupid thing to do, on the very face of it.).
https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/chlorophyll-enables-your-cells-captureuse-sunlight-energy-copernican-revolution
(re)gain ownership of your own mind, body and health
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
We can see how mitochondria (which *are* bacteria) use hydrogen (as in Brown’s Gas), along with sunlight and carbon, make energy via electrons (and I must add, how taking statins which block creation of CoQ10 as well as cholesterol and other hormones, is a fantastically harmful and stupid thing to do, on the very face of it.).
https://greenmedinfo.com/blog/chlorophyll-enables-your-cells-captureuse-sunlight-energy-copernican-revolution
(re)gain ownership of your own mind, body and health
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
Greenmedinfo
Amazing Discovery: Plant Blood Enables Your Cells To Capture Sunlight Energy
Chlorophyll Enables Your Cells To Capture/Use Sunlight Energy: A Copernican Revolution In Biology, Medicine & Nutrition What if conventional wisdom regarding our most fundamental energy requirements has been wrong all along and we can directly harness the…
“THE GREAT AWAKENING,” by Plandemic Series, premiered yesterday with a message about collectivism (a political belief - propaganda - that doing and behaving “for the greater good” is more honorable, and morally superior, than making decisions for yourself, your family and loved ones.) Instead of dragging through images of Stalin, Mao, Old Glory waving in the wind which comprises a majority of the documentary, here is a taste of what collectivism looked like over the past three years by way of the media and PR arm of the corporation known as the United States of America.
This clip is a useful retrospective showing why I, like may others, felt threatened for owning and acting on our well-researched and thoughtful decisions regarding COVID ‘testing’ and injections and mask wearing and went against the collective narrative in spite of the shaming, name calling, bullying.
https://youtu.be/tpuo4IYG0uA
(re)gain ownership of your own mind, body and health
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
This clip is a useful retrospective showing why I, like may others, felt threatened for owning and acting on our well-researched and thoughtful decisions regarding COVID ‘testing’ and injections and mask wearing and went against the collective narrative in spite of the shaming, name calling, bullying.
https://youtu.be/tpuo4IYG0uA
(re)gain ownership of your own mind, body and health
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
YouTube
[Covid Retrospective, Vol. 1] Media: The Unvaccinated Are Scum
Published May 12, 2023
https://news.grabien.com/story-covid-retrospective-vol-1-media-the-unvaccinated-are-scum
https://news.grabien.com/story-covid-retrospective-vol-1-media-the-unvaccinated-are-scum
STUFF_YOURE_NOT_SUPPOSED_TO_KNOW_230318_181716.pdf
58.2 KB
STUFF I NEVER LEARNED not from my potted ivy education, nor my father, a corporate attorney with a Harvard Law degree, nor from an Amazon series like “Weeds” ... go figure. The writings from this “judge” are posted below and on archive.
(It is difficult for me to accept that a man who completed law school could have such a terrible time with grammar, spelling, and general writing skills. The provocative points made in the document are worth reading, nonetheless, whoever the true author.)
This document was posted to a Telegram channel called “Bonds for the Win.”
(A CUSIP number is a “committee on uniform securities Identification procedures number.)
(It is difficult for me to accept that a man who completed law school could have such a terrible time with grammar, spelling, and general writing skills. The provocative points made in the document are worth reading, nonetheless, whoever the true author.)
This document was posted to a Telegram channel called “Bonds for the Win.”
(A CUSIP number is a “committee on uniform securities Identification procedures number.)
1_5177448226239808542.MOV
29.7 MB
"FOODS GROWN WITHOUT POISONS"
"ORGANIC" has lost its meaning,
"ORGANIC" has lost its meaning,
WHAT DO THE WORDS “ISOLATION” & “PURIFICATION” of a ‘VIRUS’ have to do with LEGALESE, FREEDOM & UNITY?
In the truth health freedom community, there is a rift over evidence of existence of ‘replication-competent pathogens’ called ‘viruses’ (which let’s not forget derives from the Latin, meaning poison, a real thing.)
A few prominent voices have said that challenging the existence of virologists’ viruses diverts from the bigger picture and crimes being perpetrated (as well as their lawsuits and political campaigns, presumably.)
I argue that the evidence-void ‘virus’ is a PROXY, an extremely important dose of reality and the crux of an awakening. It represents all frauds in which a government (a corporation, a political campaign) gaslights about reality.
Central to the lie is the manipulation of common words, like isolation and purification. To virologists, these words do not mean ‘separation from all other things:’ to virologists they mean only removal of organic matter *believed to* contain a ‘replicant competent pathogen.’ The re-defining of common words is a trick employed in legalese as well, and described here by a former judge in the American courts.
We are witness these past three years to a fiction, a theatre, in which adults play roles in theatres of the absurd, based on manipulation of words and emotions, and computer-derived sequences of genetic code. Virology, like the legal industry, is a theatre of manipulation, being played out across the globe, using words like isolation, purification and SAFE, EFFECTIVE.
https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
In the truth health freedom community, there is a rift over evidence of existence of ‘replication-competent pathogens’ called ‘viruses’ (which let’s not forget derives from the Latin, meaning poison, a real thing.)
A few prominent voices have said that challenging the existence of virologists’ viruses diverts from the bigger picture and crimes being perpetrated (as well as their lawsuits and political campaigns, presumably.)
I argue that the evidence-void ‘virus’ is a PROXY, an extremely important dose of reality and the crux of an awakening. It represents all frauds in which a government (a corporation, a political campaign) gaslights about reality.
Central to the lie is the manipulation of common words, like isolation and purification. To virologists, these words do not mean ‘separation from all other things:’ to virologists they mean only removal of organic matter *believed to* contain a ‘replicant competent pathogen.’ The re-defining of common words is a trick employed in legalese as well, and described here by a former judge in the American courts.
We are witness these past three years to a fiction, a theatre, in which adults play roles in theatres of the absurd, based on manipulation of words and emotions, and computer-derived sequences of genetic code. Virology, like the legal industry, is a theatre of manipulation, being played out across the globe, using words like isolation, purification and SAFE, EFFECTIVE.
https://archive.org/details/the-great-american-adventure_202203
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
Internet Archive
THE GREAT AMERICAN ADVENTURE : Judge Dale : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
The following information provided by Judge Dale (a retired federaljudge) is extremely important for all Americans (and Europeans. Since the founding of our...
CODDLING & TERRIFYING the ‘truth, health, freedom/unity community’ ALL AT ONCE is POLITICAL
By refusing to get real with their followers about the existence of germs and genes, thought-leaders of the ‘truth health freedom/unity’ community at once coddle their followers by withholding information about the existence of ‘viruses,’, and simultaneously, terrify them with stories about lab leaks, snake venom, patents for bio weapons and the incursion of hypnotic collectivism.
Proposing to save people from these threats (germs, poisons, collectivism), to offer them safe haven and protection (perceived as freedom), is a mighty clever set-up for a political campaign.
“It sounds safe and comforting and that is what the bulk of society really cares about, being safe and comfortable because we equate our safety and pleasure with freedom! ...” ~ an “American judge”
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
By refusing to get real with their followers about the existence of germs and genes, thought-leaders of the ‘truth health freedom/unity’ community at once coddle their followers by withholding information about the existence of ‘viruses,’, and simultaneously, terrify them with stories about lab leaks, snake venom, patents for bio weapons and the incursion of hypnotic collectivism.
Proposing to save people from these threats (germs, poisons, collectivism), to offer them safe haven and protection (perceived as freedom), is a mighty clever set-up for a political campaign.
“It sounds safe and comforting and that is what the bulk of society really cares about, being safe and comfortable because we equate our safety and pleasure with freedom! ...” ~ an “American judge”
👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth
"The End of COVID" program guide is now available!
https://open.substack.com/pub/mikestone/p/the-end-is-coming?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
https://open.substack.com/pub/mikestone/p/the-end-is-coming?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
ViroLIEgy Newsletter
The End is Coming
Get the popcorn ready!
“MEDICAL CONSPIRACY IN AMERICA” a book by Dr Harvey Bigelesen, referenced in this interview with his two sons who perform live blood analysis. This interview is a must watch, especially for anyone struggling with intractable health issues.
https://odysee.com/@BrendanDMurphyOfficial:d/bigelsen:4
https://momot.in/zlib2/pilimi-zlib2-18510000-18609999/18592200.pdf
https://odysee.com/@BrendanDMurphyOfficial:d/bigelsen:4
https://momot.in/zlib2/pilimi-zlib2-18510000-18609999/18592200.pdf
Odysee
Secrets of Holographic Blood with Adam and Josh Bigelsen
If you have questions regarding your health…the answers are in the blood.
TERRAIN PARADIGM ... an approach to health that follows the laws of nature.
Source TruthiVerse (Brendan Murphy), Secrets of Holographic Blood
Source TruthiVerse (Brendan Murphy), Secrets of Holographic Blood