CELIA FARBER & THE MEN-MITES
“Men-mites” is what J. Rappoport calls the men who really, really can’t tolerate a woman like Celia Farber. It is far more apt than, ‘beta male.’
For over a decade I lived close to Brunswick, Maine, home to Bowdoin College which graduated many of my boarding school friends as well as family ... and, it appears, Jes Staley (‘79, P’11).
I graduated from Phillips Exeter and Wesleyan University where for six years, I played varsity squash against schools such as Bowdoin. Hitting a small black ball against the walls of a white container, a prison sport, was a side show, a sport that I played in New York City, before most courts were converted to racquet ball and yoga studios. You learn a lot about men, when playing against them in squash. Who cheats. Who uses force over skill. How a man handles losing points to a woman.
Writing well, thinking critically, physical health were important then (still are) ... but my beliefs separated me from people like the Staley brothers, people with whom I should have been friends, married, and set up a family in a town like Bedford or North Salem. But I was never like them, never fit in, was never comfortable in their/that world.

All that is to say, I love Celia Farber, her fortitude; challenging the men-mites is a daunting task and she does it so very well!

https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/former-jp-morgan-exec-jes-staley

follow 👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth

My podcast with advocate Anthony Brink on why former South African president Thabo Mbeki was right.

https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/anthony-brink

I recently had the pleasure of being back on the Partick Timpone show to discuss the fraud of virology and germ theory once again. We covered many topics such as how symptoms of disease are the signs of detoxification and a necessary healing process as well as the fairy tales of “viral” outbreaks such as the Spanish flu, polio, and HIV/AIDS. We touched on those who are in the health freedom community who continue to push the existence of “viruses” and the gain of fiction fear porn. We discussed why they are unwilling to engage in a dialogue with those of us who are challenging the “viral” narrative. We even focused a bit on how other areas of the medical system, such as dentistry and optometry, are just as corrupted with bad information as the infectious disease units are. There was plenty more that we covered as well, so I hope you enjoy our latest conversation.

https://viroliegy.com/2023/05/13/examining-the-end-of-covid-and-germ-theory-with-patrick-timpone/

Great convo here between Barre, Liz and Tarah of Source Connection!

https://youtu.be/SJ8wvSWFoiw

GERMS & GENES ...
“Everyone on Earth suffers from viral infections.” ~
Dr Andrew Rostenberg (“Beyond MTHFR”)

Here, in 2017, a doctor associates ‘viruses’ with ‘genetics’ ... the mash-up of ‘deadly germs’ and ‘disease-causing genes’ is the same fiction that aims to instill fear and doubt about existing, safely, in our own skins.
Imagine the re-write on this article! It is mostly trash.

https://www.beyondmthfr.com/mthfr-viral-infections/

👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth

DR BHAKDI, FOUND “NOT GUILTY” of ‘spreading misinformation about the Holocaust’ (as if ...)

https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-prof-dr-sucharit

👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth

(FAILED) CONTAGION STUDIES ... never know when they might come in handy (like holiday cookouts celebrating ‘independence day’ and at margarita bars!)

👉 t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth

INTERNATIONAL COVID SUMMIT 3
Good on them but as yet, nobody is speaking to the foundational fraud of germs/genes ...
https://youtu.be/Cz5DNVbkzmI

ELECTRICAL ENERGY, THE BRAIN & YOUR NUTRITION ("Biological Ionization in Human Health" RBTI Functional Overview, Figure 4-2) ~ Dr AF Beddoe

ELECTRICAL ENERGY, THE BRAIN & YOUR HEALTH ...
"80% OF ALL ILLNESS STARTS IN THE BRAIN" ~ Dr AF Beddoe, "Biological Ionization as Applied to Human Nutrition" (aka RBTI) Beddoe's chart takes us from the brain to the liver, by way of frequencies/energy, minerals, water and pH via the vagus nerve and organs/glands. (Light, not in the chart, is essential, explained in detail in 'the book')

"Now to get an overview of how the liver relates in function to the rest of the body, look at [this chart]. Start by looking at the part of the chart labeled Brain. This is where the frequency of the body that originates in God manifests. The brain is an electrical generator. Its electricity is constantly flowing to all of the body, including the liver. However, the electricity that flows to the liver is especially important in that it not only transmits the pattern frequency, but also provides the initial level of magnetism as the DNA and genetic structure are being put together.
Many medical.authorities have recognized the relation of the mind and the body. In fact, it is estimated that over 80% of all illness starts in the brain -- might I suggest 100%?
Let me explain why I suggest this. Since the brain's electric energy is so vital for the necessary magnetic effects in the liver, anything that alters the electric flow to the liver will alter the magnetism the same way.
What would alter the electrical flow to the liver?
A mind, not in 'perfect peace,' will be subject to varying amounts of phobias, frustrations, anxieties, guilt, hate, cravings, depressions, etc. A mind exercised as a result of these problems is a mind that is preventing the liver from getting the proper level of electric flow. These problems literally short-circuit the brain.
... the liver, deprived of the proper magmetism, will be unable to properly magnetize the molecular structure in its beginning stages. This sets up the mineral deficiencies."

t.iss.one/HeatherRaeFunctionalHealth

The End of COVID, Program ... here we go!!! Thank you, Alec Zeck and collaborators!

YOUNG AUSTRALIAN WOMAN explains TERRAIN & 'VIRUSES'
There is hope yet.
https://pennybutler.com/19yo-explains-virus-hoax/

The End of Covid Program.pdf

HOW DO CARBON 60 (C60) & BROWN'S GAS effect energy/health, in RBTI terms?

Anionic/cationic energy and pH are at the heart of Reams' biological ionization urine testing and nutrtional recommendations.
This explanation of where carbon, hydrogen, oxygen fit was written in 2008 by one of the more knowledgeable practitioners of RBTI. RBTI is a measure of electromagnetics, heat, resistance (and more!)

"I must, however, take issue with what he says about pH in both what I was taught by Dr. Manthei and what Dr. Beddoe explains in his book and what I have experienced over the 24 years I've been both studying and following RBTI. Chamberlain says:

"We test pH to first, determine which calcium is needed. Then we use the pH numbers as qualifiers in conjunction with some of the other numbers (like sugars)"

*Please note that I'm not arguing with Mr. Chamberlain but rather trying to clarify what I think is an important point that needs to be made regarding pH. So long as the other numbers are in the energy restoration (healing) range, I have no disagreement with what he is saying. However, as you will read below, the issue is with the concept of working with pH BEFORE getting the other numbers into the restoration range. This is a mistake, in my opinion, for reasons I set forth below.

Perhaps I am missing the import of what he is saying BUT if I take the words for what they say, it seems as though the other numbers are secondary to what the pH is saying. In Dr. Manthei's most advanced Session, Session D, a discussion ensues between him and a student over the use of Vitamin A. The student, trying to make a point, asks Dr. Manthei to put a set of pH numbers up on the board which Dr. Manthei does. Manthei then asks:

"What about the other numbers? What about the gender, age, height, weight?"

To which the student replies:

"Well, I'm just trying to find out about the pH."

To which Manthei rejoins:

"pH tells me nothing! In and of itself, pH tells me nothing."

What is the pH? The standard answer in our RBTI textbooks is: "It's the measurement of resistance between anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations."

What anions and cations are being talked about?

Dr. Manthei said:

"pH in and of itself tells me nothing."

That is a very important point to remember. Anyone reading the posts that dealt with the pH of distilled water and the experiments one group member here has done is that the pH of water can be highly affected one way or the other by the atmospheric conditions of the air that surrounds that water. Yet, when the water is not under the influence of that atmosphere, it reverts quickly back to the measured resistance it was experiencing between the anions and cations found in the actual H2O molecules that make it up. OK, with that in mind, let's go back to the urine pH:

1. In the urine, the pH is the measurement of the resistance between the anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations of ALL the substances being thrown out in that urine of which there are many.

2. Anions and Cations are what make up atoms. And Milhouse Units of Energy -mhu- (1-499 mhu per anion and 500-999 mhu per cation) make up anions and cations. On average, then, a cation in geometric math has roughly 3x (750 mhu) the number of mhu that an anion (250 mhu) has.

We are aware of some of the elements that are being carried out of the body in that urine:

1. Carbohydrates - CHO in their various molecular make ups. That's carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen. Each carbon atom has 1 anion in the core and 12 cations in the shell. Each hydrogen atom has 1 anion or 1 cation in either the core or the shell; they're interchangeable as hydrogen is an isotope. Each oxygen atom has either 1 anion or 1 cation in the core and 16 anions or 16 cations in the shell as it too is an isotope.

Since there are quite a number of different sugars, there are quite a number of different anionic and cationic patterns in those sugars which also can make rather large differences in the total anionic and cationic mhu properties and thus the measured resistance in the pH of those substances.

But it doesn't end with the sugar molecule. We now have to go to the salts of which there are at least 48 that conduct electricity in the body and thus have an influence on the pH. Being cationic, the number of mhu making up the cations that make up the salts will tremendously outnumber the anions that are in their respective minerals' cores. So, there is now a tremendous pull toward the cationic side of the resistance the higher these salts are in the person's urine.

Finally, there are the ureas. The top urea is anionic nitrogen which would mean in each atom of that nitrogen there is 1 cation and in the shell there are 14 anions and the bottom urea is cationic nitrogen which would mean there is one anion in the core and 14 cations in the shell. We need to take this into consideration also because if we don't, we won't have a perfectly true picture of what is going on when we bring the sugars, salts, and ureas down using distilled water. Now, let's look at an equation, not paying any attention to gender, age, height, weight, and race for the moment:

6.2 5.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12

This person appears quite acid in the urine pH. And if we were to use pH as our sole guide at the start of working with this person, we would definitely want to move that pH more alkaline using the correct foods and supplements, the latter being Lime Water, Vitamin D, Call II and perhaps some other types of calciums depending on response. However, because we have the other numbers and want to know how they are influencing that pH reading, we are going to take them into consideration. Again, let's look at the underlying rules:

1. pH is a measure of resistance between anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations.

Also, let's remember what that urine pH is a measure of, namely:

2. pH is a measure of resistance between the anions & anions, anions & cations, and cations & cations making up the substances found in the urine that we are testing.

There are some rules we need to know before we start to work too heavily with that urine pH number. The first rule is:

1. No number, in and of itself, is independent of the other numbers. It is influenced by the other numbers. This is especially true with the pH.

2. pH is the measurement of the line of least resistance between the anions and cations of all the substances in that urine and we need to first determine whether or not we want that urine to contain the same quantity of all those other substances when we decide to bring that pH back to 6.4. In other words, would we be happy with the following:

6.2 6.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12

I wouldn't. For in actuality, that equation would reveal more of a problem than the first equation. There are certain rules about the effect certain numbers have on the urine pH because of the substances and the chemical reactions taking place between those other substances. There are some rules about how that pH is supposed to move when the different numbers go up and go down. These rules are found in Dr. Manthei's Sessions A,B,C,D and they are also found in Dr. Beddoe's textbook and the reasons for their influence on that pH are explained really well in Dr. Beddoe's textbook. Here are the basics:

1. When the sugars are high, the urine pH should move downward in the acid direction.

2. When the salts are high, the urine pH should move downward in the acid direction.

3. When the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen, the urine pH should also move down in the cationic direction.

The reason the above statements are true is because in an acid or more cationic system, there is less resistance toward the flow of electricity. Thus, we would expect a lower urine pH when the cationic substances, namely the substances that conduct electricity better than anionic substances, are dominant like they are in this equation. So knowing this now, let's once again look at the equation after the urine pH had been adjusted through the addition of various calciums and possibly Vitamin D back to 6.4:

6.2 6.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12

Is the urine pH following the rule of how if should be when the sugar is high? NO.

Is the urine pH following the rule of how it should be when the salts are high? NO.

Is the urine pH following the rule of how it should be when the cationic nitrogen is higher than the anionic nitrogen? NO. So let's put the original equation back up and see if there might not be a better way to initially go about working with the person with such numbers:

6.2 5.4 / 6.4 44c 4m++ 8 / 12

Could we not say that according to the rules above about the influence of the sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen on the urine pH that if we lowered these that the urine pH would tend to move more alkaline? Yes.

Wouldn't we also say that to have the best line of least resistance, that line of least resistance should be when the sugars, salts, and cationic as well as anionic nitrogen are in the energy restoration (healing) range? Yes.

Would it be wiser to move the urine pH up using various calciums and perhaps Vitamin D BEFORE bringing the sugars, salts, and cationic urea down?

OR

Would it be wiser to bring down the sugars, salts, and cationic urea first and THEN see where the urine pH is at and THEN make a particular calcium recommendation?

To answer the questions above let's think about what is causing that urine pH to be so acid. Because the sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen are so high compared to the perfect numbers (and we should always compare every equation we obtain to the perfect equation), and because we understand that the excess sugars, salts, and cationic nitrogen are what is causing that urine pH to be so acid, and because we don't want any of those numbers to be so high, then wouldn't it make more sense to move those numbers down into their respective restoration ranges and afterwards make the calcium(s) recommendation( s)? And finally, what would be the best way to bring those numbers down into those ranges?

Using STEAM DISTILLED WATER.

The proper use of steam distilled water being consumed every half hour for roughly 10 hours each day would lower the sugars, salts, and ureas quite nicely without causing any type of undesired pushing of the urine pH into a line of resistance we do not wish to have. And based on the rules we gave above regarding the influence these high sugars, salts, and cationic urea would be having on the urine pH in the original equation, bringing them all down into the restoration range would likely yield results similar to the following:

1.2 6.8 / 6.8 9c 4m 6 / 5

Now, could such a picture be seen in the previous equation letting us know that this would happen before we lowered those sugar, salts, and urea numbers? I think so. However, it would take some mathematical calculations that I personally am not familiar with. Nevertheless, knowing the rules and having had rather extensive experience seeing those rules play out in other people's numbers helps me personally to make such a decision to do just that and to assume the numbers would move in such a manner. And assuming that the above equation is what such an initial program would bring about, let's look at the resulting equation more closely:

Sugars are in the energy restoration range just about where we would want them.

Salts are in the energy restoration range just about where we would want them.

Albumin is in the energy restoration range just about where we would want it.

Ureas are low, yes, showing us a problem in the assimilation of potassium and this would need to be worked on.

ALSO