In response to the Boston Tea Party:
Oh, whatever happened to you, vicarious liability?
Two principal measures and two subsidiary or minor measures were decided upon. The first was that the town of Boston must be fined and pay damages for allowing private property to be destroyed by a mob within her limits. This was based on a legal principle recognized to this day in both England and America, that a county or town which fails to keep the peace is liable in damages to private individuals if their property is destroyed.
Oh, whatever happened to you, vicarious liability?
THE Philosopher
What's the most retarded Telegram channel?
Vote for me or I'm coming to your house and accosting you harshly
Is the consent of the people the best or only true foundation of government?
Anonymous Quiz
29%
Yes
54%
No
3%
I don't understand the question
13%
I understand the question but am not sure
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
She's trying so hard xD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Whoever dat was on da trail shouting "Mr. Poor, is that you?"--no, it wasn't
Forwarded from Dubs Man
That's a pretty big ramp eh, careful you don't land in the lp
THE Philosopher
That's a pretty big ramp eh, careful you don't land in the lp
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Et In Arcadia Ego (Alt Skull️)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Et In Arcadia Ego
AI won't miss. @AltSkull48
Next step in the gayification of war
Somehow stumbled upon leftist Christian Twitter. They're arguing over whether Jesus committed sin by eating fish.
"Umm, Jesus didn't kill any fish, he created them ex nihilo."
Nobody tell them that taking a small number of fish and turning it into a larger number isn't "ex nihilo." That phrase means "from nothing," and so taking a small number and multiplying it is not "ex nihilo."
Also, nobody tell them about Jesus eating a piece of fish after the resurrection.
"Umm, Jesus didn't kill any fish, he created them ex nihilo."
Nobody tell them that taking a small number of fish and turning it into a larger number isn't "ex nihilo." That phrase means "from nothing," and so taking a small number and multiplying it is not "ex nihilo."
Also, nobody tell them about Jesus eating a piece of fish after the resurrection.