1st Amendment Praetorian
3.58K subscribers
40.7K photos
2.97K videos
257 files
20K links
1AP is a group of military, law enforcement & intel community vets who protect Americans. https://1APraetorian.com
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
THREAD: Recent order in the Missouri v. Biden case
Quick recap: This case is the MOST IMPORTANT civil liberties case we have seen in years, and may be the most important ever. The case is brought by Missouri and Louisiana, along with other individual plaintiffs and it asks the court to bar the government from colluding with social media companies to limit free speech.

The last thread I did will inform this one:

https://t.iss.one/TracybeanzOfficial/4153

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
I also need to add here, this judge is basically under the watchful eye of the 5th circuit right now, a higher court. As we have seen in many cases, it would’ve been easy for him to just side with the Defendant arguments in this case, not granting any further discovery because of the alleged harm it caused the government.

Even with a gazillion other courts breathing down his back, he is doing the right thing.

This is the most important civil liberties case in modern history.

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
There was some hotly contested back and forth on the deposition video and transcripts. Of course, the defendants didn’t want them released, arguing harm would come to the officials being deposed.

The Plaintiffs have been releasing the deposition transcripts as they get them, and while I am all for transparency, this is a teeny bit concerning to me.

A little voice in the back of my head is hoping they aren’t doing this to get info out in anticipation of the suit being dismissed.

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Now, to be clear, I don’t have anything tangible to back this up. There’s been no action by the judge that insinuates it. There hasn’t been anything concrete at all. It’s just a little instinctual hunch that creeped its way in, and I would be remiss if I didn’t share it.

If I were they, I would keep the depositions close hold but publicly available and not parade them around like a trophy. Maybe an attorney can debate that with me.

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Onward with the case. Jen Psaki: Now, this is something. Psaki was originally a defendant but left government. Then, the WH said they knew nothing about anything Psaki said and couldn’t return any responsive documents. The judge ordered her deposed.

Psaki didn't like that, so she started fighting it, with the government helping her. However, the government has maintained there is no replacement for Psaki. If you recall, I covered this one extensively.

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Here is why I say there is nothing that this judge is doing that leads me to believe that he will dismiss the case. He basically tells defendants here that their motion to dismiss is bunk, while scolding them about the time they took to file it, and the fact that they asked a higher court to force him to halt discovery for a motion to dismiss that hadn’t even been filed yet!

He also reminds everyone that this discovery is ONLY so he can rule on the temporary injunction, and that since the plaintiffs do have standing (a central argument of the motion to dismiss) they may move to trial, where MORE deposition and discovery will be necessary.

The seriousness of this can’t be overstated. The judge just basically ruled on their motion to dismiss and told the government their argument is moot, as he has already ruled on it.

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Here is why I say there is nothing that this judge is doing that leads me to believe that he will dismiss the case. He basically tells defendants here that their motion to dismiss is bunk, while scolding them about the time they took to file it, and the fact that they asked a higher court to force him to halt discovery for a motion to dismiss that hadn’t even been filed yet!

He also reminds everyone that this discovery is ONLY so he can rule on the temporary injunction, and that since the plaintiffs do have standing (a central argument of the motion to dismiss) they may move to trial, where MORE deposition and discovery will be necessary.

The seriousness of this can’t be overstated. The judge just basically ruled on their motion to dismiss and told the government their argument is moot, as he has already ruled on it.

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Mark your calendars, the absolute SMACKDOWN of an out of control government continues…

@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
The work you will find at
https://
uncoverdc.com


will ALWAYS be free. Should you find what we do valuable and want to help us continue, your support is so humbly appreciated.
You can make a one time donation here:

https://UncoverDC.com/Donate

Or
You can join our locals community, where we have a while bunch of cool stuff including the pre-show prep stream 3X a week as I prep for the podcast.

Here:
https://UncoverDC.Locals.com

THANK YOU!!!

@TracyBeanzOfficial