The Fascio Newsletter (Uncensored)
Francis is dead, rip bozo
The Catholic Church stands at a crossroads, battered by decades of misguided reforms and a leadership that has failed to uphold its sacred traditions. Pope Francis’ tenure has been marked by a troubling embrace of modernity, eroding the Church’s doctrinal clarity and liturgical reverence. Only Cardinal Sarah possesses the theological rigor, liturgical vision, and unwavering commitment to orthodoxy necessary to restore the Church to its true mission. He must be the next pope to correct the grave errors of the dead pontificate and lead Catholicism into a renewed era of fidelity.
Pope Francis has overseen a papacy that prioritizes cultural accommodation over eternal truth. His approval of blessings for same-sex couples, directly undermines the Church’s teachings on marriage. While Francis claims to distinguish between “sin and crime,” this stance opens the door to normalizing what the Catechism calls “intrinsically disordered.” Furthermore, he restricted the Tridentine Mass, alienating Catholics who favor traditional liturgy. This move exacerbates the “Liturgy Wars” and dismisses the reverence that generations of Catholics held dear. Under Francis, belief in the Real Presence has plummeted not many Catholics affirm the core doctrine, a crisis fueled by casual liturgical practices that Francis has done little to address. His progressive interpretation of Vatican II, emphasizing openness to modernity, has deepened the “hermeneutic of rupture” that Cardinal Sarah has rightly decried as a betrayal of the council’s true intent.
Cardinal Sarah, by contrast, offers a vision of renewal grounded in tradition. Sarah championed liturgical reforms that prioritize the sacred over the secular. His advocacy for ad orientem worship, where the priest faces the altar, focusing on God rather than the congregation, seeks to restore the theocentric nature of the Mass, aligning with Vatican II’s Sacrosanctum Concilium, which called for the liturgy to be the “source and summit” of Christian life. Sarah’s emphasis on silence, Latin, and Gregorian chant aims to counter the casualness of the Novus Ordo, which he believes has contributed to the decline in Eucharistic faith. His call for “mutual enrichment” between the Novus Ordo and Tridentine rites, echoing Pope Benedict XVI, offers a path to unify Catholics around a shared reverence for the sacred.
Theologically, Sarah stands as a bulwark against the liberalism Francis has indulged. He has consistently defended traditional teachings on marriage, family, and the right to life, condemning the “new gender ideology” that threatens the natural order. Many young Catholics support same-sex marriage, yet Sarah remains steadfast, prioritizing divine truth over popular sentiment. His critique of Islamic radicalism and Jews as global threats and his clarity on the limits of interfaith dialogue, acknowledging irreconcilable differences like the Trinity and the Eucharist, demonstrate a commitment to doctrinal precision that Francis lacks.
The Catholic Church cannot afford another pontificate of compromise. Cardinal Sarah’s unwavering ethics, liturgical reverence, and moral clarity make him the only candidate capable of correcting Francis’ missteps and restoring the Church’s sacred mission. The time for Sarah’s leadership is now, let him ascend to the Chair of Peter and lead Catholicism back to its timeless roots.
Pope Francis has overseen a papacy that prioritizes cultural accommodation over eternal truth. His approval of blessings for same-sex couples, directly undermines the Church’s teachings on marriage. While Francis claims to distinguish between “sin and crime,” this stance opens the door to normalizing what the Catechism calls “intrinsically disordered.” Furthermore, he restricted the Tridentine Mass, alienating Catholics who favor traditional liturgy. This move exacerbates the “Liturgy Wars” and dismisses the reverence that generations of Catholics held dear. Under Francis, belief in the Real Presence has plummeted not many Catholics affirm the core doctrine, a crisis fueled by casual liturgical practices that Francis has done little to address. His progressive interpretation of Vatican II, emphasizing openness to modernity, has deepened the “hermeneutic of rupture” that Cardinal Sarah has rightly decried as a betrayal of the council’s true intent.
Cardinal Sarah, by contrast, offers a vision of renewal grounded in tradition. Sarah championed liturgical reforms that prioritize the sacred over the secular. His advocacy for ad orientem worship, where the priest faces the altar, focusing on God rather than the congregation, seeks to restore the theocentric nature of the Mass, aligning with Vatican II’s Sacrosanctum Concilium, which called for the liturgy to be the “source and summit” of Christian life. Sarah’s emphasis on silence, Latin, and Gregorian chant aims to counter the casualness of the Novus Ordo, which he believes has contributed to the decline in Eucharistic faith. His call for “mutual enrichment” between the Novus Ordo and Tridentine rites, echoing Pope Benedict XVI, offers a path to unify Catholics around a shared reverence for the sacred.
Theologically, Sarah stands as a bulwark against the liberalism Francis has indulged. He has consistently defended traditional teachings on marriage, family, and the right to life, condemning the “new gender ideology” that threatens the natural order. Many young Catholics support same-sex marriage, yet Sarah remains steadfast, prioritizing divine truth over popular sentiment. His critique of Islamic radicalism and Jews as global threats and his clarity on the limits of interfaith dialogue, acknowledging irreconcilable differences like the Trinity and the Eucharist, demonstrate a commitment to doctrinal precision that Francis lacks.
The Catholic Church cannot afford another pontificate of compromise. Cardinal Sarah’s unwavering ethics, liturgical reverence, and moral clarity make him the only candidate capable of correcting Francis’ missteps and restoring the Church’s sacred mission. The time for Sarah’s leadership is now, let him ascend to the Chair of Peter and lead Catholicism back to its timeless roots.
🙏7🤯1💯1
I'm also of the opinion that the Coptic Church is more legitimate than the Catholic Church.
https://angelusnews.com/news/vatican/coptic-church-dialogue-catholics/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAfter%20consulting%20with%20the%20sister,the%20dialogue%20to%20proceed%20in
https://angelusnews.com/news/vatican/coptic-church-dialogue-catholics/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAfter%20consulting%20with%20the%20sister,the%20dialogue%20to%20proceed%20in
Angelus News - Multimedia Catholic News
Coptic Church cuts theological dialogue with Catholics
“After consulting with the sister churches of the Eastern Orthodox family, it was decided to suspend the theological dialogue with the Catholic Church."
🤯3🥴2👍1💯1
Forwarded from Nativist Concern
I'm back on the Tucker train
https://fixupx.com/MrNChance/status/1913297401655292305?t=qnvIbRXHzrAEjLh-O_Fu6Q&s=19
https://fixupx.com/MrNChance/status/1913297401655292305?t=qnvIbRXHzrAEjLh-O_Fu6Q&s=19
FixupX
No Chance (@MrNChance)
Conor McGregor rightly states that the Irish government are attempting to erase the Irish people with their genocidal immigration policies.
💯1
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
If the English nationalist movement is so afraid of an English Parliament composed solely of Anglo-Saxons then why call themselves English Nationalist? In reality they are nothing more than Multi-Culturalists trembling at the word 'racist' whilst the power of political bodies like the Muslim Parliament of Britain grows and ethno-specific political parties like Respect work for real political power for the Asian Muslim community. Are they so cowardly that you would rather betray the English people so that they can evade the threat of being called a racist by an idiot white leftist? The era of cowardice, compromise and vacillation has to end. The time has come for the patriots of UKIP, the supporters of English Nationalism, and the white working class leftists abandoned by New Labour to join the BNP in order to promote and build a mass political movement that can change this country.
Lee Barnes, 2005.
Lee Barnes, 2005.
Forwarded from White Lads Aesthetics
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Ma I don't need a job I'm telling you my training is going to payoff one day!! "
👍6🥴1💯1
Forwarded from Comhaltas na nGaedheal
No Irishman can rightly call himself a Nationalist who does not support the struggle for sovereignty in whatever way it may choose to manifest in a given generation.
Only through the purification of Struggle is the soul of our Nation redeemed from the inaction of lesser men.
24 April 1916
24 April 2025
Only through the purification of Struggle is the soul of our Nation redeemed from the inaction of lesser men.
24 April 1916
24 April 2025
🤝3
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ailtirí na hAiséirghe
Dónall Ó Maolalaí, who rose from membership in Craobh na hAiséirghe to a position on the Ard-Chomhairle of the Ailtirí, acknowledged: “Gearóid was a fascist ... He was influenced by Hitler, Mussolini, by Salazar and by Perón in Argentina — even though Perón was left-wing ... I accepted Gearóid’s fascism because that was a means to an end.” His Ard-Chomhairle colleague Aindrias Ó Scolaidhe concurs: “I wouldn’t protest if somebody said, ‘You were all Fascists’ ... I had great respect for Mussolini.” Another, a serving soldier who joined the movement in 1945, reported that the Dublin branch of which he was briefly a member consisted entirely of “Nazis and people who were in the I.R.A”, and that its songs consisted of the Horst Wessel Lied, the Wacht am Rhein and similar anthems.
Dónall Ó Maolalaí, who rose from membership in Craobh na hAiséirghe to a position on the Ard-Chomhairle of the Ailtirí, acknowledged: “Gearóid was a fascist ... He was influenced by Hitler, Mussolini, by Salazar and by Perón in Argentina — even though Perón was left-wing ... I accepted Gearóid’s fascism because that was a means to an end.” His Ard-Chomhairle colleague Aindrias Ó Scolaidhe concurs: “I wouldn’t protest if somebody said, ‘You were all Fascists’ ... I had great respect for Mussolini.” Another, a serving soldier who joined the movement in 1945, reported that the Dublin branch of which he was briefly a member consisted entirely of “Nazis and people who were in the I.R.A”, and that its songs consisted of the Horst Wessel Lied, the Wacht am Rhein and similar anthems.
The real reason for the so-called "Nuclear Deal" with Iran
https://youtu.be/1ATIraNoduc
https://youtu.be/1ATIraNoduc
YouTube
Iran the USA (Israel) and the nuclear deal
Why is the USA/Israel so fixated on Iran's capacity to develop nuclear weapons? Is it really about nukes? Or is it something else?
Find out in this video.
I don't use AI in my videos. I script the audio myself and record using my own voice, and I do all…
Find out in this video.
I don't use AI in my videos. I script the audio myself and record using my own voice, and I do all…
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
In the build-up to WW2, the actions of the Irish Republican Army caught the attention of the National Socialists. Despite not sharing a fascist ideology, a number of members traded intelligence with Abwehr as they sought an end to British rule in Ireland.
https://youtu.be/0nrgiqi_-lE
https://youtu.be/0nrgiqi_-lE
YouTube
The Secret Communications Between The IRA And Nazi Germany
In the build-up to WW2, the actions of the Irish Republican Army caught the attention of the Nazis. Despite not sharing a fascist ideology, a number of members traded intelligence with Abwehr as they sought an end to British rule in Ireland.
War Stories…
War Stories…
⚡7
Forwarded from The National Party │ An Páirtí Náisiúnta
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remigration Now! Cllr Patrick Quinlan addresses crowds at the national rally in Dublin today.
💯2
New playlist of mine called Rainy Days.
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/48MkDhbrPK32qMWnQ7GJMA?si=ieuZuTkwRfyIGogdgoCOrQ&pi=aroBGKaoQNOZn
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/48MkDhbrPK32qMWnQ7GJMA?si=ieuZuTkwRfyIGogdgoCOrQ&pi=aroBGKaoQNOZn
🐳4
Forwarded from 𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒂𝒏 𝑺𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒎
‘Europe should be grateful to Herr Hitler…But for him even we here in Ireland might to-day be living under a Soviet flag’.
Gertrude Gaffney, Irish Independent, 14 August 1935.
Gertrude Gaffney, Irish Independent, 14 August 1935.