“I see the salvation of Europe only in a socialist union of all of the European states. A formidable block that will defend our civilization and our existence as much against the red materialism of the Bolsheviks as against the American style experiments, which for us have been more or less harmful. Before long there will no longer be any interest in the German, French, Spanish, Italian issues, etc. The only thing of interest will be Europe and everybody will realize it. Whether it will be too late or in time, who knows.”

Benito Mussolini, March 1945.

The Crisis of Modern Society

Julius Evola argues that the crisis of modern society is fundamentally linked to the dissolution of the traditional Männerbünde, the initiatory and hierarchical warrior orders that once upheld sacred virility and transcendent authority.

Read the article here:

https://www.arktosjournal.com/p/the-crisis-of-modern-society

Zolt writing the most in-depth article you’ve ever read in your life while on illegal substances

From the JFK Files:

“The CIA has no objection to declassification and/or release of information in this document except these words:

[the Israeli Intelligence Service]”

Hitler is disparaged for retaining from the Viennese social democracy of his youth only its methods of propaganda. So what? The "essence" of socialism was more to be found in these methods than in the distinguished writings of Austro-Marxism. The common problem of social democracy and Nazism was how to organise the masses and, if necessary, repress them. It was the socialists and not the Nazis who crushed the proletarian insurrections. (This does not inhibit the current SPD, in power again as in 1919, from publishing a postage stamp in honour of Rosa Luxemburg whom it had murdered in 1919.) The dictatorship always comes after the proletarians have been defeated by democracy with the help of the unions and the parties of the Left. On the other hand, both socialism and Nazism have contributed to an improvement (temporary) in the standard of living. Like the SPD, Hitler became the instrument of a social movement the content of which escaped him. Like the SPD, he fought for power, for the right to mediate between the workers and Capital.

https://libcom.org/article/fascismantifascism-gilles-dauve

Joe Rogan on why Poland remaining white is a problem

Recent episode with Daryll Cooper

1/8 of all employed people in Kraków are foreigners.

Soon Ukrainians will be a minority of foreigners, as numbers of non Europeans continue to increase There has been nearly a 400% increase in Africans legally employed in Kraków since 2019.

This figure does not include illegal migrants

“W.A.R. is the genesis of the Third Position. Third Position is not right wing nor conservative for that matter. W.A.R. is not interested in failed right wing policies such as support for an armaments race that pauperizes our people. W.A.R. does not support economic wars of intervention where young Whites are slaughtered to save corporate thieves. Remember warfare is a racket.”

Tom Metzger

New version is published.

https://fascio.substack.com/p/reclaiming-hegel-from-the-fourth

New section:

Dugin sneers at Fascism’s supposed legal flimsiness, branding it a betrayal of Hegel’s vision, and zeroes in on Mussolini’s undefined role and Hitler’s refusal to restore a monarchy or enshrine his dictatorship in constitutional amber.

“True power lay in the hands of Benito Mussolini, whose role was not dogmatically and constitutionally clearly defined.”

“His [Hitler’s] dictatorial powers and charismatic status as ‘Führer’ did not receive full legal and constitutional development—despite significant theoretical developments in legal and constitutional models by German philosophers, especially Carl Schmitt.”

— Alexander Dugin, Hegel and The Fourth Political Theory

He postures that Hegel’s rational state demands a legal scaffold — a constitutional monarchy as its crowning glory — to cradle Spirit’s ethical order. But this legalistic fetish is a gaping wound in Dugin’s own philosophy, which festers with the Russian tradition of "lawlessness" (bezpravie) — a primal ethos that spits on rigid legalism, exalting the sovereign’s unbound will instead. In his broader screeds, Dugin crows:

“The West imposes its rationalist order, but Russia’s destiny lies in its rejection of this artificial legality for a deeper, existential truth.”

— Alexander Dugin, The Fourth Political Theory

From Ivan The Terrible’s blood-soaked Oprichnina to Stalin’s merciless purges, Russia’s might, in Dugin’s warped gaze, springs from shredding legal codes for a raw, sovereign will — a metaphysical middle finger to Western rationalism he can’t stop worshipping elsewhere.
Yet here he insists Fascism and Nazism bow to Hegel’s Philosophy of Right(§273-320), where the state’s rational will dons legal garb — a demand that slams headlong into his own Russian-drenched 4PT. The irony drips like venom: Fascism and Nazism outshine Dugin’s tepid vision by embracing this very lawlessness he claims to adore. Mussolini’s Duce and Hitler’s Führer didn’t grovel under legal straitjackets — they were Hegel’s Spirit incarnate, sovereigns who crushed civil society’s petty rules to meld Volk and state into a single organic entity. Gentile’s Ethical State roared through the Leggi Fascistissime’s brute force, not parliamentary prattle, while Nazi theorist Ernst Rudolf Huber crowned the Führer supreme:

“The Führer is the supreme judge of the nation; his will is the ultimate source of law.”

— Ernst Rudolf Huber, Die Rechtsgestalt des Reichs

“Judge” here isn’t some courtroom clerk — historically, it’s a king, a sovereign, from biblical warlords to medieval monarchs, crafting law from their own iron will, not parroting a statute book. This isn’t Hegel’s Spirit twisted — it’s Hegel’s Spirit unleashed, the leader’s sovereign will fusing universal and particular in a blaze of dialectical fire, no legal crutches needed. Dugin’s beloved Russian lawlessness — where the leader births the legal order, not the reverse — finds its fiercest echo in Fascism’s and Nazism’s scorn for formal restraints, not in 4PT’s flaccid, multipolar drift. His critique doesn’t just implode — it’s a self-inflicted gutting: he damns Fascism for shunning the legalistic liberal husk his own Russian soul reviles, laying bare a chasm between his liberal posturing and Dugin’s autocratic pulse. Dugin’s not Hegel’s savior — he’s a fraud, caught worshipping at the altar of liberal constitutionalism.

Dugin delivers his most forceful critique against Nazi racialism, asserting that:

“Biological racism… completely negates the moral nature of the state (a fundamental aspect for Hegel).”

— Alexander Dugin, Hegel and The Fourth Political Theory

He’s got a point — Hegel’s Volk is spiritual, not biological:

“The nation as a state is spirit in its substantial rationality and immediate actuality.”

— Hegel, Philosophy of Right

However, this is a tenuous claim that collapses under rigorous scrutiny, failing to grasp how sovereign will, having dismantled his prior legalistic framework, constitutes a Volk as the living embodiment of Spirit, not its fettered negation. His earlier insistence on constitutional monarchy as Spirit’s rational form falters here — Nazism’s racial doctrine does not betray Hegel but extends his dialectic, integrating biology into a metaphysical essence of Forms through the Volk’s conscious self-actualization and ethical struggle, rather than just a predetermined biological substrate.

Alfred Rosenberg, a Nazi myth-maker, doesn’t just slap biology onto the table — he elevates it to a metaphysical plane:

“The race-soul is the measure of all our deeds.”

— Alfred Rosenberg, The Myth of the Twentieth Century

Far from a betrayal, this is Geist rendered articulate — Gottfried Feder excluded racially congruent yet morally deficient Germans from the Volksgemeinschaft, prioritizing ethical fidelity over genetic lineage, while Robert Ley subordinated Germans to the Authenticity of inner character — biological traits thus serve as a medium of perception, shaped by consciousness and Dasein’s existential Authenticity, not as an immutable essence — the leadership principle, the sovereign will’s unification with the Volk’s ethical life, establishes this as a Sittliches Gemeinwesen, propelled through the conflict of history toward the World Spirit — legalistic formalism obstructs this dynamic unfolding — Dugin’s valorization of Russian lawlessness, his rejection of artificial legality, ought to affirm this sovereign mediation of Geist, yet he recoils, ensnared by the very rationalist constraints he claims to eschew — scholarly insight further exposes his oversight:

“The National Socialist theory of race was dynamic, ever-changing.”

— A. James Gregor, National Socialism and Race

“The Volksgemeinschaft was the core of Nazi ideology.”

— Rainer Zitelmann, Hitler: The Policies of Seduction

“Rosenberg’s myth was a metaphysical vision of race.”

— Peter Staudenmaier, Between Occultism and Nazism

Nazism does not negate Hegel’s ethical core — it amplifies it, race functioning as an expression of Geist’s historical particularity, not its confinement — Dugin’s categorical rejection misapprehends this dialectic, mired in a legalistic formalism inconsistent with his own philosophical premises.

I went ahead and deleted the original version and created a copy that I just now re-uploaded that way it would update with the audiobook AI. I added more information to this so it’s far more potent. I doubt Dugin will respond.

https://open.substack.com/pub/fascio/p/reclaiming-hegel-from-the-fourth-e70?r=16o4tj&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

“Life is for living, and it can only be lived by carrying out or trying to carry out a great venture.”

José Antonio Primo de Rivera

🚨Shlomo Finkelstein is STILL in jail for memes!🚨

Now even German politicians & American commentator Steven Crowder are speaking out. It’s time to take a stand for free speech!

Europe must wake up—let’s fight for our rights and Make Europe Great Again! 🇪🇺🔥

https://campsite.bio/freeshlomo
#FreeShlomo #FreeSpeech