This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Excerpt from the audiobook 'The Conquest of the World by the Jews'
"The Jew recognises no armistice and keeps up the battle with no intermission"
This is as true today as it was when this book was written in 1873. The nature of the jew is timeless.
β Click here to listen to the full audio fileπ§
"The Jew recognises no armistice and keeps up the battle with no intermission"
This is as true today as it was when this book was written in 1873. The nature of the jew is timeless.
β Click here to listen to the full audio fileπ§
π2π’1
It's not about a nuclear dealβ’οΈ
πRead the article on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
Patreon
ββββββββββ
Substack
ββββββββββ
πΊOr watch the video on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
YouTube
ββββββββββ
Rumble
ββββββββββ
Odysee
ββββββββββ
π©΅ @angrywarhawk|Boost|Patreonβ
πRead the article on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
Patreon
ββββββββββ
Substack
ββββββββββ
πΊOr watch the video on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
YouTube
ββββββββββ
Rumble
ββββββββββ
Odysee
ββββββββββ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β‘4
Forwarded from Warren Balogh
It's interesting to think about the fact that Americans made two stories into modern films by British directorsβ"The Odyssey" by Christopher Nolan, and "Napoleon" by Ridley Scottβthat were both done infinitely better by Soviet Russian directors.
Not only was the American-made 1997 "Odyssey" written and directed by a Russian, Andrei Konchalovsky, whose entire background was in Soviet cinema, but also Sergei Bondarchuk wrote and directed the massive "War and Peace" series from 1965-67, which is the definitive version of the Napoleonic Wars ever put to film, at the peak of the Cold War.
Ridley Scott at least made some great films early in his career, I've always hated Nolan and all his films, but there is something so disgusting and repulsive about these liberal British filmmakers in their approach to epic storytelling. You can just see why Russia is still a great power today, full of pride and honor, while Britain has been reduced to an island of thoroughly cucked yet smug thought police. In these two cases at least, the Russians not only understand honor, glory, tragedy infinitely betterβbut also love, passion, sensitivity, men, women etc. They have HEART and they understand drama better.
For Britain, the land of Shakespeare, to lose its ability to make drama shows the deep cancerous sickness eating away at the heart of the West. Whatever one may say about Russians or Slavs, there is a vitality there that is utterly missing in the Anglo storytellers. It's like the Russian understands greatness as well as passion and tradegy and loss, meanwhile the Brit is letting his wife get fucked by an ape and is morally lecturing you on why he's superior to you for letting it happen. And everyone just pretends this is normal and not a huge, urgent sign that there is something terribly wrong.
Not only was the American-made 1997 "Odyssey" written and directed by a Russian, Andrei Konchalovsky, whose entire background was in Soviet cinema, but also Sergei Bondarchuk wrote and directed the massive "War and Peace" series from 1965-67, which is the definitive version of the Napoleonic Wars ever put to film, at the peak of the Cold War.
Ridley Scott at least made some great films early in his career, I've always hated Nolan and all his films, but there is something so disgusting and repulsive about these liberal British filmmakers in their approach to epic storytelling. You can just see why Russia is still a great power today, full of pride and honor, while Britain has been reduced to an island of thoroughly cucked yet smug thought police. In these two cases at least, the Russians not only understand honor, glory, tragedy infinitely betterβbut also love, passion, sensitivity, men, women etc. They have HEART and they understand drama better.
For Britain, the land of Shakespeare, to lose its ability to make drama shows the deep cancerous sickness eating away at the heart of the West. Whatever one may say about Russians or Slavs, there is a vitality there that is utterly missing in the Anglo storytellers. It's like the Russian understands greatness as well as passion and tradegy and loss, meanwhile the Brit is letting his wife get fucked by an ape and is morally lecturing you on why he's superior to you for letting it happen. And everyone just pretends this is normal and not a huge, urgent sign that there is something terribly wrong.
π10π―1
The Two Zionisms βοΈπ
πRead the article on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
Patreon
ββββββββββ
Substack
ββββββββββ
πΊOr watch the video on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
YouTube
ββββββββββ
Rumble
ββββββββββ
Odysee
ββββββββββ
π©΅ @angrywarhawk|Boost|Patreonβ
πRead the article on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
Patreon
ββββββββββ
Substack
ββββββββββ
πΊOr watch the video on β¬οΈ
ββββββββββ
YouTube
ββββββββββ
Rumble
ββββββββββ
Odysee
ββββββββββ
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hitler and Mussolini met for the last time on July 20, 1944, in the FΓΌhrer Headquarters (Wolfβs Lair) in East Prussia, shortly after Count von Stauffenberg carried out his assassination attempt on Hitler. Hitler greeted his guest at the train with a cry of terror, βDuce, they just unleashed a hellish machine on meβ. As photos show, the two dictators stood a little later stunned by the debris of the barracks where the assassination attempt had been carried out. In the short conversation that followed, Hitler, not quite ready to keep up with the events, showed himself to be unusually accommodating to some of Mussoliniβs wishes. Mussolini did at least manage to improve the status of the original 600,000 so-called βcivilian interneesβ, i.e. the Fascist soldiers captured by the Wehrmacht after September 8, 1943. On leaving, Hitler is to have said goodbye to Mussolini with remarkable sentimentality: βI know that I can count on you. I ask you to believe that I consider you my best and only friend in the worldβ.
"We're nationalists. We adopt the positive aspects of both the left and the right. Hitler was the same, he wasn't on the far-right either. He was a National Socialist, from the Third Position, which is what the group of ideologies derived from Italian Fascism is usually called. So having a portrait of Hitler is having a portrait of a Third Position leader, a nationalist leader. It's the same as having a portrait of JosΓ© Antonio or Mussolini."
https://youtu.be/uduJ6hrilDw
https://youtu.be/uduJ6hrilDw
YouTube
Europe: youth and the far-right tide | Point of no return (S3xE1)
A tide is sweeping across Europe. It wears young faces, yet echoes rhetoric and symbols from the past. Disillusioned with politics, frustrated by economic uncertainty, and distrustful of democratic institutions, many young people are being drawn towards farβ¦
π€9
A new article is coming on Los Novios de la Muerte: Boliviaβs King of Cocaine