The Fascio Newsletter (Uncensored)
1.38K subscribers
1.32K photos
509 videos
11 files
1.1K links
Welcome to the official Telegram channel for the Fascio Newsletter.
Download Telegram
Most normal Balkan man
3
Lots of things in background.
🤔4
The corporate state, birthed in the fiery intellect of Saint-Simon, that titan among the utopian socialists, stands as the unspoken cornerstone of all serious socialist thought, from Marx to Proudhon. When Marx wrote about “scientific administration,” he wasn’t chasing phantoms; he meant “this” — a state engineered for function, not flabbiness. Yet, somewhere along the line, the socialists lost the plot, mired in their own dogmatic lies.

We fascists don’t claim a monopoly on this truth, but let’s be clear: when you embrace the corporate state, that sleek, functional beast of governance, you’ve admitted it, whether you like it or not: fascism was right. It demanded a break from the tired orthodoxies of classical Marxism. The corporate state doesn’t just govern; it excises the parasitic rot of the political renter class — those leeches who fatten themselves on bureaucracy and influence-peddling. Mussolini saw it. He built it. And history, that unforgiving arbiter, vindicates him with cold, hard objectivity.
Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Dimitrov admitting, that Marxism-Leninism must warp into a type of fascism to fight fascism.
Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Example:

In the American class struggle, where the sinews of labor weave our nation, Industrial Unionism stands as a monument to the indomitable spirit of the working class — a type of socialism forged by titans like Eugene Debs and Daniel De Leon. This is no mere ideology; it is the beating heart of our heritage, a vision of industrial democracy where the toiler, not the tyrant, holds the reins of production. But let us cast a piercing gaze upon Marxist Cockshott…. He argues for a De Leonist syndicalist economy, where the capital of each industry is wrested from the clutches of the bourgeois and vested in industrial syndicates, converging in a state legislature to chart the course toward cybernetic communism. A transitional stage, he calls it, rooted in syndicalism, even flirting with the mutualist ideals of cooperative sovereignty. Yet, does this not bear of compromise, a dalliance with the Third Way?
Forwarded from Steve Laws
We have Elon boosting me on X now.

Ground gained.
8
Published in 1939 by a German newspaper, Der Stürmer.

It reads:

“Land of Freedom”

“Where one is subservient to the Jew, freedom is only an empty illusion.”
13
🇦🇲/🇷🇺 NEW: Failed Armenian Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinyan, says it's the fault of the USSR for making Armenia believe in 'a false sense of patriotism' and considering Karabakh as sovereign Armenian territory

@Middle_East_Spectator
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🥴7
Forwarded from 옥수수 🌽
Advocating for a civil war in the United States while not wanting the feds to put you on the watchlist is an oxymoron
Forwarded from Stalinist Revisionism
Chris (@CDMorlock) argues in his post (https://x.com/cdmorlock/status/1872525565250642099) that Russia cannot be deemed imperialist under Lenin’s Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, pointing to a decline in Russia’s finance capital share from 5.2% in 1910 to 0% in 2024, a claim echoed by @ZaharisJason who asserted
Russia doesn’t meet any of Lenin’s five criteria. This interpretation, is bolstered by ChatGPT-derived data from Chris, that fixates on capital export as the sole marker of imperialism, but such reductionism distorts Lenin’s approach, which views imperialism as a dynamic force in capitalism rooted in historical processes, including pre-capitalist forms like feudal tribute systems (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/). Lenin outlines five interconnected features:

1. Monopoly concentration
2. Finance capital fusion
3. Capital export
4. International monopolies
5. Territorial division

This is not as a rigid checklist but as a holistic framing, and Chris’s narrow focus ignores how Russia’s actions….. especially in 2025 align with a hybrid imperialism blending territorial expansion and resource control. Despite sanctions slashing inflows by 50-70% and depleting $280 billion in reserves by 2025 (https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/sanctions-and-russias-war-limiting-putins-capabilities), Russia’s outward FDI hit $29 billion in 2023, with net outflows at -0.38% of GDP and $8 billion in inward FDI in 2024, contradicting the “0%” claim (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU) (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf). This shift, driven by sanctions, reflects a pivot to resource-based imperialism, with state-linked monopolies like Gazprom (16% of global gas reserves) and Rosneft (38% of India’s crude imports in 2025) dominating energy markets, fulfilling Lenin’s monopoly and international trust criteria (https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ru_en.pdf).

Russia’s territorial ambitions, from Crimea’s 2014 annexation to ongoing 2025 Ukraine offensives, fit Lenin’s fifth criterion of world division, while oligarch-driven FDI ($5.9 billion in Q1 2025) and BRICS currency shifts sustain finance capital and capital export dynamics (https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RU). Chris’s reliance on Michael Hudson’s Super Imperialism also misses, as Hudson critiques U.S. debt imperialism ($34 trillion in 2025) and Russia’s resistance via BRICS but does not absolve its territorial expansionism, such as Donbas resource grabs, which aligns with Lenin’s evolving lens rather than a static baseline (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1938/09.htm). If anything, this extends Lenin’s framework to neo-imperialism, where peripheral powers like Russia project influence through military and resource control, evident in overseas bases and actions in Ukraine, Chechnya, and beyond. Non-Marxist realist analyses and geopolitical reports, label Russia’s 2025 maneuvers as peripheral neo-imperialism, noting its leveling of Grozny and “prison of nations” continuity with Lenin’s tsarist critique (https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/self-det/ch01.htm; https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/31/ukraine-planning-new-strikes-deep-inside-russia-says-zelenskyy).

By clinging to a rigid, outdated metric, Chris’s argument sidesteps the dialectical adaptability central to Lenin’s method, whitewashing Russia’s imperialist character as it manifests in 2025 through a synthesis of territorial, resource, and military power projection. Things I support, it provides the Multipolar world a means to crush Anglo-American hegemony. The age of Empires is here! (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/russias-imperial-destiny-returns) (https://www.multipolarpress.com/p/dugin-on-alaska-and-the-eurasian-monroe-doctrine)
Forwarded from Joel Davis
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Nice to get some love from Thomas Rousseau. Always had a great relationship with Patriot Front and always will!
1
“Brexit is the greatest European nationalist victory since 1933. It is the first blow against globalism in the post-war period: a nation re-establishing its sovereignty, organising to say, ‘We don’t want foreign powers dictating how our country is going to be run.’ They’re taking power back for themselves.”

Matthew Heimbach
👍7