This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Who needs enemies when you have parents like this
π30π€8π6π’2
Forwarded from π₯Spicy Steamed Memeballs π§ (1515)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π41π₯°3π1
Forwarded from t.iss.one/Christ_Alone
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Truth About Birth Control Documentary
-All birth control is sinful
-Birth control pills can cause silent abortions
-And much more!
Stream Online (Click Here)
-All birth control is sinful
-Birth control pills can cause silent abortions
-And much more!
Stream Online (Click Here)
π22β€2π1π€1π’1
Forwarded from Pinesap βοΈπ²π―
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯°25π’3β€βπ₯2
Forwarded from Lord is my Light
Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christβs sufferings, that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed.
1 Peter 4:12-13
1 Peter 4:12-13
π42β€3π2
Forwarded from Fascinating Womanhood
Nothing ruins a woman more than feminism.
And nothing makes her more beautiful than femininity.
And nothing makes her more beautiful than femininity.
β€63π7π3
Forwarded from Β°CATHOLIC FEMININITYΒ°
β’When you realize the
feminist movement is a government scam so that they can get the other half of the population working so they double the tax intake and raise your children by their standardsβ’
feminist movement is a government scam so that they can get the other half of the population working so they double the tax intake and raise your children by their standardsβ’
π₯54β€6π2
This isn't a religious channel or whatever, at least not primarily. But please pray for the victims of the terror attack in Turkey. A terrorist opened fire on a church and left at least one dead. There's families in there, children, mothers, fathers, etc. We don't know the identity yet of who was killed. But please do pray for them and all involved.
π43π7π’5π€¬3π1
π14π7π3π1
Forwarded from Angelo Bottone
Vote NO on both referendum proposals
Dublin β 29 January 2024
On the 8th of March, we are presented with a pivotal choice in two critical referendums. The first proposal seeks to fundamentally alter the Constitution's understanding of the family, shifting from its traditional foundation in marriage to a vague notion of βother durable relationships.β This shift not only undermines the sanctity of marriage-based families but introduces a breadth of legal ambiguities and complexities.
Former Attorney General and Minister for Justice Michael McDowell has highlighted the inherent dangers in this vague terminology. The term "durable relationships" lacks a clear legal definition and is absent from current legislation, potentially opening the door to a plethora of interpretations by the judiciary. This could lead to unforeseen and profound changes in family law, affecting areas such as inheritance, welfare rights, and more.
One particularly concerning possibility is the legal recognition of polygamous relationships under the guise of βfamily.β This could drastically expand eligibility criteria for family reunification in Irish immigration law, leading to unforeseen and possibly unsustainable social and legal outcomes.
The second proposal seeks to replace the Constitution's specific acknowledgment of womenβs roles within the home with a generic concept of βcare,β effectively diminishing the unique and invaluable contributions of women in domestic life. This move to gender-neutral language, while seemingly progressive, actually erases the specific recognition of mothers and their unparalleled role in nurturing and maintaining the familial structure.
Additionally, this second proposal will remove the Stateβs obligation to protect mothers from being forced by economic necessity to work outside the home.
In light of these considerations, it becomes evident that these two proposals have far-reaching and detrimental consequences for the fabric of Irish society. The redefinition of the family risks diluting the time-honoured values that have long been the cornerstone of our communities, and the removal of specific acknowledgments and protections of women's roles in the home undermines the dignity and value of their contribution.
Therefore, in defence of the traditional family structure, in recognition of the unique role of women in our homes and society, and to maintain clarity and stability in our legal system, we strongly urge you to vote NO on both proposals. This is not just a vote for the preservation of our cultural heritage, but a stand for the future stability and integrity of our nation.
Family Solidarity
8 Ely Place
Dublin 2
Dublin β 29 January 2024
On the 8th of March, we are presented with a pivotal choice in two critical referendums. The first proposal seeks to fundamentally alter the Constitution's understanding of the family, shifting from its traditional foundation in marriage to a vague notion of βother durable relationships.β This shift not only undermines the sanctity of marriage-based families but introduces a breadth of legal ambiguities and complexities.
Former Attorney General and Minister for Justice Michael McDowell has highlighted the inherent dangers in this vague terminology. The term "durable relationships" lacks a clear legal definition and is absent from current legislation, potentially opening the door to a plethora of interpretations by the judiciary. This could lead to unforeseen and profound changes in family law, affecting areas such as inheritance, welfare rights, and more.
One particularly concerning possibility is the legal recognition of polygamous relationships under the guise of βfamily.β This could drastically expand eligibility criteria for family reunification in Irish immigration law, leading to unforeseen and possibly unsustainable social and legal outcomes.
The second proposal seeks to replace the Constitution's specific acknowledgment of womenβs roles within the home with a generic concept of βcare,β effectively diminishing the unique and invaluable contributions of women in domestic life. This move to gender-neutral language, while seemingly progressive, actually erases the specific recognition of mothers and their unparalleled role in nurturing and maintaining the familial structure.
Additionally, this second proposal will remove the Stateβs obligation to protect mothers from being forced by economic necessity to work outside the home.
In light of these considerations, it becomes evident that these two proposals have far-reaching and detrimental consequences for the fabric of Irish society. The redefinition of the family risks diluting the time-honoured values that have long been the cornerstone of our communities, and the removal of specific acknowledgments and protections of women's roles in the home undermines the dignity and value of their contribution.
Therefore, in defence of the traditional family structure, in recognition of the unique role of women in our homes and society, and to maintain clarity and stability in our legal system, we strongly urge you to vote NO on both proposals. This is not just a vote for the preservation of our cultural heritage, but a stand for the future stability and integrity of our nation.
Family Solidarity
8 Ely Place
Dublin 2
π€¬8π2
Please prayers for Jason, his wife Lisa, and their unborn son, that they may be spared further pregnancy complications and blessed with good health.
π88β€11π1π1