Germany gave up voting machines in 2005

The cliff note version is machines are not transparent and specialist technical knowledge should not be required to count votes. Full Stop.

Trade Secrets have no place in public elections using tax payer money.

“This decision by the German Constitutional Court, stressing the need for transparency in the electoral process without specialist technical knowledge, effectively ended Germany’s recent use of electronic voting. Although the Court decision does not rule out electronic voting machines entirely, no further moves to adopt machines that meet the transparency requirements have been made.”

https://www.ndi.org/e-voting-guide/examples/constitutionality-of-electronic-voting-germany

France voting machines Abandoned in 2008 – Security Risk

NO MAIL-IN VOTING, RARE MACHINE-VOTING
Mail-in voting was banned in 1975 amid fears of potential fraud.

“Machine-voting was allowed as an experiment starting in 2002, but the purchase of new machines has been frozen since 2008 due to security concerns. Only a few dozens towns still use them.”
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/voting-france-paper-ballots-cast-person-machines-83954517

I could go on and on with more examples but let me summarize all of it this way. TRADE SECRETS have no place in PUBLIC elections. Period. Full Stop. ELECTION MACHINES = TRADE SECRETS. We are paying for TRADE SECRETS.

Give us the Source Code for the Election Machines

In the Philippines for the May 2022 election, public source code review was permitted.
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1155553

The stakeholders will review the following: the Election Management System (EMS); the Vote-Counting Machine (VCM); the Consolidated Canvassing System (CCS); and all other related systems programmed and developed by the provider.

Source Code review was amended into in Philippine law.
https://www.set.gov.ph/resources/election-law/republic-act-no-9369/

Why does the Philippines have a public source code review provision but the US does not?

Folks,
This article was written in 1988. It describes election machine problems going back to the 1960’s.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1988/11/07/counting-votes

Here is an excerpt from a person who was permitted to look at the source code of the technology back then.

"The only thing that I'm restricted from doing is telling you exactly the code that's in the program," he said. "It had lots of fascinating little nooks and crannies hidden around in it that no one has ever let me talk about. There are at least a half-dozen places, maybe a few less, where you could lay in a Trojan horse in that source code—lay in routines to do whatever you wanted to in an election—because there's code in that system that shouldn't be there, is not being used, is worthless to the operation of the system. It can be replaced with anything you want it to be."

Had Nunn found a trapdoor; that is, a place in a program where one can break down its security system and emerge undetected deep inside the program?
"Yes. There is one."

And had he found "wait loops'' in the program which conceivably could control outcomes, or "Christmas trees"—Nunn's term for surprise packages in a program?
"They're all there. There are wait loops there. There are routines that are not documented in the manual and, from every way I can determine, do not work."

https://skeshel.substack.com/p/stop-talking-in-terms-of-nailbiters

Language matters. This isn’t about peeling back 10,000 votes at a time. It’s about understanding the true magnitude of what was ripped away in 2020.

Thanks for reading!

From my article posted earlier, this is where I believe Maricopa would line up, as a best case for Biden.

The win may have been as large as 17%.

Indeed, lack of proper chain of custody for 200k ballots, ineligible signatures, mismatched voting records, a quarter million corrupted ballot images.

That’s been known for 10 months. Remember, the audit was not a recount.

There were plenty of issues with the audit. It was the first of its kind. But it did reveal an uncertifiable election.

https://t.iss.one/RealSKeshel/5705?comment=311175

Maricopa County AZ

Captain K. wrote another excellent substack article, this time on Maricopa County AZ.

Here is an excerpt:

"The Democrats had never added more than 118,000 net new votes in the county in a single cycle (Kerry in 2004), but somehow Biden added 338,000 to Clinton’s total in a year the Republican nominee piled up a Republican record in a Republican stronghold."

Yes, the fact that Biden ended up with more votes than Trump is completely absurd.

In a sane world, it would be preposterous to believe Biden won Arizona legitimately.

👉 The numbers simply don't add up, whichever way you look at it.

Here is another excerpt from Seth's articles:

"It is crystal clear that Arizona’s voter rolls are being corrupted."

We agree. The registration numbers simply don't make sense either.

Here is the analysis we did of Maricopa County, shortly after the Cyber Ninja report was released, and corroborates Seth's analysis: Maricopa County, AZ

———

In a subsequent post Seth mentioned:

"From my article posted earlier, this is where I believe Maricopa would line up, as a best case for Biden.

The win may have been as large as 17%."

From the data (and the T/DR column in particular. i.e. the last column on this picture), it's obvious the elections have been heavily manipulated since 2012, and possibly well before that.

# References

- Introducing the Maricopa substack article
- The substack article: https://skeshel.substack.com/p/stop-talking-in-terms-of-nailbiters
- Follow up post
- Reply to comment (Our article corroborates Seth's claims)

(Please consider subscribing to Seth's substack channel to support is work.)

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

UPDATE:

The Michigan election “test” is reportedly for the Associated Press. Did the AP just commit a felony in Michigan by influencing an election? I could make a strong argument that some of the lesser candidates in this fake outcome may be harmed by this.

110 Articles Affirm America's Computerized Voting System Is Online, Compromised, and Vulnerable To Hackers: Documented, Linked, and Quoted

"The majority of the U.S. election system is programmed by local county election officials or third-party vendors, who are plugging previously-used USB drives into computers connected to the internet, before plugging those same USB drives into the optical scanners, tabulators, and voting machines that collect, count, and determine election results."

In 2019, the Associated Press reported that the vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions nationwide, including numerous swing states, were still using Windows 7 or older operating systems to create ballots, program voting machines, tally votes, and report counts.

Windows 7 reached its “end of life” on Jan. 14, 2020, meaning Microsoft stopped providing technical support and producing “patches” to fix software vulnerabilities.

Furthermore, not only are U.S. elections being programmed on computers running out-of-date software, but voting machine manufacturers have also installed remote-access software and wireless modems connecting voting machines directly to the internet.

NBC News reported ten months before the 2020 election that ES&S, the largest U.S. election machine vendor, had installed at least 14,000 modems to connect their voting machines to the internet even though many election security experts had previously warned that voting machines with modems were vulnerable to hackers.

Dominion Voting Systems, the second-largest U.S. election machine vendor, which has given public presentations acknowledging their use of modems in their voting machines, was also discovered to be running remote-access software during the 2020 election.

In Georgia, 20-year election worker, Susan Voyles, testified that Dominion Voting Systems employees “operated remotely” on her ballot-marking devices and poll pads after the team experienced some technical problems with their machines.

In Wisconsin, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), headed by retired state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, also found that Dominion and ES&S voting machines were online and connected to the internet.

In Michigan, attorney and Secretary of State candidate, Matt Deperno, discovered a Telit LE910-SV1 modem chip embedded in the motherboard of an ES&S DS200 voting machine.

Through these modems, hackers could theoretically intercept results as they’re transmitted on election night — or, worse, use the modem connections to reach back into voting machines or the election management systems to install malware, change software, or alter official results.

Therefore, not only are hackers able to penetrate elections through vulnerable USB cards and election management systems, but also through the very voting machines themselves.

This isn’t a problem exclusive to elections — all computers are hackable — and that is why election security experts have always recommended hand-marked paper ballots and rigorous post-election audits."

https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/110-articles-affirm-americas-computerized

@KanekoaTheGreat

So we can't get results on election night but we can get them a week beforehand. If you ask me, that's a good deal

Thank you to the wonderful person that FOIA'd the CVR from DC!

The top graph shows the votes for Biden and Trump as they are added up over time in the CVR.

The bottom graph is what we were told on election night. They end up in the same place, oddly enough. But, it takes Edison until Dec 3, 2020 to correct the numbers to get them to match.

The Captain’s Battlegrounds
Episode 1

Pima County, Arizona

Summary:
Captain K explains how Joe Biden has at least 56,000 excess votes in Pima County, well over the amount needed to flip the state’s winning margin.

https://rumble.com/embed/v1awcwf/?pub=17lkfx

Election Night Gatekeepers
https://electionnightgatekeepers.com/election-night-gatekeepers/

This organization has been around since 1996!! They have been advocating for hand counted paper ballots at the precinct since 1996. They coined the term Election Night Gatekeepers to include:

ES&S, Hart, Dominion, CBS, NBC, ABC, AP, CNN, FOX, RNC, DNC and something you may have never heard of, the National Election Pool (NEP) which is jointly owned by the news media groups. NEP provides, apparently, "fake" voter polling to justify the eventual outcome.
https://ballotpedia.org/National_Election_Pool

Had I come across this site prior to Nov 4th, 2020, I would have questioned the accuracy of some of these assertions. Not so much anymore.

The more I look into the history of election machines, it is apparent the issues we are trying to address now are not new. In fact, they are international concerns that are decades old, going back to the 1960’s. The fact that many of us were not aware of these shenanigans is humbling and troublesome.

What exactly were we paying attention to back then?

Why MIGHT it different this time? I would offer this….the scale of the Awakening.

No longer is this concern about election machines a “drop in the ocean”. The Awakening to this system of “Trade Secrets”, “Proprietary Equipment” and “Black Boxes” is becoming the Ocean.

It took 2020 to make this happen. I am convinced of that now.

Breaking: Wisconsin State Rep. Chuck Wichgars signs on to the resolution to decertify the 2020 election

Becoming the 3rd state representative to do so. Courage is contagious!