I also learned that the elections department is under NDA with the FBI and Homeland Security preventing them from disclosing any details about our voting machines to keep them safe from hackers.

You know what else keeps elections safe from hackers?

Not using machines that can be hacked

Kurt Olsen says it was a good day in AZ court today fighting against voting machines. The judge has taken the case under advisement & ordered additional items to be filed in no later than one week 🇺🇸

Olsen says they presented an incredibly strong case:
- One expert testified that he broke into the voting machines hundreds of times, often in as few as 2 minutes.
- Testimony that Maricopa's systems were out of compliance & not certifiable.
- Unrebutted testimony that there is manipulation of the votes.
🔥

This is a snapshot from the commercial that was already aired several times during the governor/lt. governor election candidates super debate on Hawaii local TV station KGMB (Jul/21/2022). Did you notice anything odd on this picture?

👆👆👆

We can see 4 things that are odd (possibly 5).

KN

Waialae Iki Park. 10:20 pm 7/21. Ballot slot unlocked, no gate to park (supposed to close at 10 pm), no camera, no lights. Election brought to you by 2022 Mules.

I just had a great idea.

All night patriot tailgate parties for EVERY DROP BOX IN AMERICA

Maybe a future Captain K pow-wow in Arizona, come October early voting?

Contact your sheriffs office and ask them to place cameras 🎥 at all drop box locations to record 24 hours and ensure that the video is kept and maintained for the full duration of time that the law requires of all records in elections. This will allow anyone who would want to FOIA request the video can do so and if they Sherriffs office would need to investigate they would have the video to do so. Also have them install lighting and ensure that the camera is in a position so that you can clearly see both the person at the box and the parking lot. This should be done at all locations that you have these drop boxes in your state. 😉 Virgil Riddle, Virginia

My 2 cents: Cameras can be blocked or removed. If drop boxes are to be allowed, there should only be 2 or 3 in very public locations and guarded by Deputies. These drop boxes should also be locked between the hours of 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM and the contents removed so that any ballots that magically appear when the boxes are locked and unguarded, can be disqualified.

Democrat PAC Launches $80M Plan to Install Thousands of Local Election Supervisors | Facts Matter

Joseph Stalin, the former communist dictator of the Soviet Union, was once famously quoted as saying this: “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”

There is some debate about whether that quote was really from Stalin or from someone else in the Communist Party, but regardless, that appeared to be the general sentiment regarding elections within communist Russia.

And you know what, it appears that there are people in America who are taking this advice to heart—specifically, by working overtime not to influence who people vote for, but rather, how the underlying election system actually operates.

Source | The Epoch Times: Facts Matter
Also on | YouTube

@ElectionFraud20_org

Referring to “why does it matter”about Brandtjen signing onto a decertification resolution.

Here is why: since no such mechanism *legally* exists, the requisite number of signatures (not sure how many) would establish a new precedent and set a serious standard that, given the WI Supreme Court’s ruling on the illegality of the drop boxes (ie, the election was illegal), just may stand up.

History is full of things that were without precedent. There was no precedent for leaving the crown, but the colonies did. They faced a stiff challenge to that and prevailed.

To break this deadlock, things without precedent must occur, be challenged, and God willing, be recognized.

https://t.iss.one/RealSKeshel/5689?comment=309875

For everyone screaming “why is nothing happening”…

What is transpiring in WI is what has to happen times many more legislators. This is *one* step in the right direction to achieving something without precedent.

Introducing "Keshel's Principle"

Captain K. pioneered the "party registration trend analysis" to expose counties that uncharacteristically bucked registration trends in the 2020 elections.

We carefully documented his methodology in the "How to Predict Election Results Using Registration Data" article.

When the population growth within a county is stagnant or declining. If one party makes record gains, it must come at the expense of the other party. (For the technically minded, this is nothing more than the law of conservation of energy applied to election dynamics, or in short "Keshel's Principle" 😊)

👉 Keshel's Principle:

- Between 2012 and 2016

- County has limited population growth or is declining

- One party begins making record gains

- Due to the lack of population growth, new registrations remain limited. (If there is any, it will be one sided)

- One party sees a large registration increase, which comes at the expense of another party. (i.e. people are switching party affiliation. As evidenced by Trump flipping the rust belt by winning 2 time Obama voters)

- All registration trends by party suggest continuation of this trend in 2020

Keshel’s Principle was defied in 2020 despite more serious trends showing large number of Dems switching parties.

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Keshel's Principle - Example: Luzerne County, PA

- Population has been slowly decreasing since 2010. (About -1%)

- Republican party started making record registration gains, while the Democrat registration numbers started dropping significantly

- In 2016 the Republican party gained 20,363 new votes, whereas the Democrat party lost 11,856 votes (from the previous election)

- Registrations for the Republican party continued to surge prior to the 2020 election. The two party registration gap went from 24.2% in 2012 to 9.1% in 2020, which demonstrates the Republican party is quickly closing the gap, and has all the momentum.

Keshel's principle was defied in 2020, despite a record of new Republican registrations. The Democrats gained 12,422 new votes over 2016 and bucked the trend.

(Note: All the table abbreviations are found here).

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

It's funny....the 1st page on Google when you search this is all the fact checks debunking it...that's how you know they cheated

👆👆👆

Sad but very true, and very convenient once you know this fact.

If you want to know the truth about any contentious topic, do a Google search.

Whatever shows up on the first page is most certainly false and propaganda.

Incredibly valuable once you are aware of this ☺️

KN

Germany gave up voting machines in 2005

The cliff note version is machines are not transparent and specialist technical knowledge should not be required to count votes. Full Stop.

Trade Secrets have no place in public elections using tax payer money.

“This decision by the German Constitutional Court, stressing the need for transparency in the electoral process without specialist technical knowledge, effectively ended Germany’s recent use of electronic voting. Although the Court decision does not rule out electronic voting machines entirely, no further moves to adopt machines that meet the transparency requirements have been made.”

https://www.ndi.org/e-voting-guide/examples/constitutionality-of-electronic-voting-germany

France voting machines Abandoned in 2008 – Security Risk

NO MAIL-IN VOTING, RARE MACHINE-VOTING
Mail-in voting was banned in 1975 amid fears of potential fraud.

“Machine-voting was allowed as an experiment starting in 2002, but the purchase of new machines has been frozen since 2008 due to security concerns. Only a few dozens towns still use them.”
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/voting-france-paper-ballots-cast-person-machines-83954517

I could go on and on with more examples but let me summarize all of it this way. TRADE SECRETS have no place in PUBLIC elections. Period. Full Stop. ELECTION MACHINES = TRADE SECRETS. We are paying for TRADE SECRETS.

Give us the Source Code for the Election Machines

In the Philippines for the May 2022 election, public source code review was permitted.
https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1155553

The stakeholders will review the following: the Election Management System (EMS); the Vote-Counting Machine (VCM); the Consolidated Canvassing System (CCS); and all other related systems programmed and developed by the provider.

Source Code review was amended into in Philippine law.
https://www.set.gov.ph/resources/election-law/republic-act-no-9369/

Why does the Philippines have a public source code review provision but the US does not?