I have asked you for much, and many of you have delivered beyond my wildest dreams. One of my "shames" is that I don't always thank you individually enough, and all I can say is that I will catch up with this eventually. Regardless, I am going to ask those who have been FOIAing the crap out of counties to ask for one more thing that has suddenly become useful.

Please make a public records request for any ES&S county that has provided (or will provide) a Cast Vote Record for a "Tabulator Batch Report". Many ES&S CVRs are missing the "method" by which the ballot was cast (mail-in, election day, early). The Tabulator Batch Report fills in that gap.

Again, thank you all. Raccoon Army is the Best Army.

People asking what you can do. Use a search engine. Locate your commissioners' email and phone numbers. Call, write, and show up to your next commission meeting, and support our efforts for transparency. Likewise, find a contact for the SOS and AG's office and give them hell. Stop being a spectator.

https://skeshel.substack.com/p/democrats-control-18-states-with?s=w

There are 18 states controlled by Dems from just a single county in each, negating entire states artificially.

This is a focus on urban election manipulation and the consequences for entire states, regions, and the nation itself.

Thank you for reading!

Kari Lake and Mark Finchem have sued Katie Hobbs et al. seeking an injunction to ban voting machines statewide in AZ in favor of hand-marked, hand-counted paper ballots. FYI, here is my Declaration in support of this suit.

MUST READ IF PARTICIPATING IN POLARIS RECOUNT!!!

The precinct is listed on the header at the top of the ballot AND ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF EACH BALLOT PAGE.

Please do not randomly select a precinct. This MUST be accurate!

Also use comments sparingly since each ballot and comment is looked at before we can start analysis. This can take up a lot of valuable time.

ANOTHER MUST READ IF YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN POLARIS RECOUNT...

Please do not comment on over votes (when they select multiple candidates) or write in votes. We don't look at those. We treat them as a "no vote".

Salem County NJ - Polaris Update

To everyone participating in the Salem County Polaris project, we would like to extend a : BIG BIG Thank You! 🙏

Your participation really makes a difference.

We need to correct some instructions we included in previous posts. The new instructions will make the adjudication process easier and even faster! 🥳🎉

- Please do NOT write down the time stamp into the "General Notes" field

- Do not comment on over-votes. (If there are more than one vote in a race, simply leave it blank)

- Do not comment on write-ins.

- Make sure you select the correct precinct name, which is found in the bottom right corner. (Please do not pick a precinct name at random.)

Thanks!

# Reference:

- https://polarisrecount.com

(If you shared our previous Polaris posts please share this one as well.)

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

🚨VERY IMPORTANT! Let’s Help Jeff O’Donnell Expose Election Fraud In Salem NJ!

SHARE! SHARE! SHARE! 🇺🇸👊🏻
https://rumble.com/v18lud7-very-important-help-jeff-odonnell-expose-election-fraud-in-salem-nj.html

Many thanks to Nick Moseder. And to those of you doing an incredible job. Over 11,000 ballots judged in just a couple days!

I will be expanding on this chart and others in my next substack which looks at CTCL data in a different way.

What this shows you is the ratio of D/R votes for all counties in the 2020 presidential election sorted in descending order from left to right in terms of all votes cast. For example, counties on the left had the most votes cast for all parties. The blue dot represents the ratio of D/R presidential votes per county. The green line is D/R 1.0 which means any dots above that line are D counties and any below that line are R counties. The purple line is the overall trend meaning, what you might expect, the more votes per county (urban areas), the more D. The less votes per county, the ratio drops below 1.0 typically.

Visually you can see how R counties outnumber greatly D counties because there are way more dots below the green line.

Seeing this correlated against CTCL spend is what my next substack is about.

Democrat's Love Affair With Highly Populated Counties

Captain K's excellent articles on "Democrats control 18 states with just a single county in each - Inside the Impact of Urban..." is touching a raw nerve.

We looked at this trend from a different angle in the "Battle of the largest counties" article, which complements Captain K's Substack article.

Quote from the "Battle of the largest counties" article:

"Anecdotally, should this trend continue, the Democrats are only going to need to win the 12 most populated counties, in the 12 most populated states, to collect enough electoral college votes to win the Presidency. (And they’ll probably aim to win the “popular vote” too, to make it all look more “credible”. 😉)"

Election Data Analyzer is also coming to very similar conclusions and is going to show how it correlates to CTCL spend... (That should be very interesting.)

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

🔥 Dr. Walter Daugherity's Arizona Declaration 🔥

This is a must read declaration by Dr. D. in support of Kari Lake and Mark Finchem's legal action against the Arizona Secretary of Sate, seeking an injunction to ban voting machines across AZ.

(This is the same Dr. D. whose presentation with Cindy Butler on analyzing the Pima County AZ, CVR data, made it into our most compelling evidence list.)

In this new declaration he includes an analysis of Maricopa County AZ, CVR data as well (!).

⚠️The results for both counties look abnormally similar and clearly demonstrate the election was manipulation.

Quote:

"As detailed below, my analysis shows to a reasonable degree of scientific and mathematical certainty that vote counting by electronic voting machines used in Maricopa County, Pima County, and other counties throughout the United States that I have examined was manipulated and tightly controlled to reach predetermined outcomes."


Dr. D. doesn't mince words and his full declaration is worth spending time reading and understanding. This is a legal document, which he signed under penalty of perjury.

⚠️ Don't miss the Whistleblower's allegations discussed on page 15 and in Exhibit B (page 33 onwards).

———

Make no mistake, this is a big deal.

Please share far and wide.

———

(We are going to be diving deep into CVR data in the coming weeks. Stay tuned.)

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

CVR FOIAs

Here are all the posts related to CVR FOIAs:

- "A Call For Help - CVR FOIAs" (With an update for ES&S instructions)

- "FAQ - CVR FOIAs"

- "Dealing With Refusals - CVR FOIAs"

- "Litmus Test - CVR FOIAs"

# References:

- Send your files to Jeff O'Donnell @MAGARACCOON through Telegram

- MagaRaccoon (The Lone Raccoon's) website: https://magaraccoon.com (Contains lot's of useful links and presentations)

- Odros project: https://ordros.com/

- CVR Repository: https://ordros.com/cvr/

- Join @ALoneRaccoon to keep up with the latest updates

Hat Tip 🤠 (for GIF): AuditTheVotHawaii

------

#CVR

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

MUST READ FOR POLARIS: All of these ballots were mailed in. There may be a fold line visible where it says "Testamentario del..." in the surrogates race. We are looking for other strange marks you observe. We are looking for OBVIOUS evidence of tampering. Don't make this harder than it is.

You really need to only look at those first 3 races on the ballot. If there isn't anything obviously strange, just save it and move along. I've looked at nearly 2000 of these and I've not seen anything to comment on, so don't make this harder than it is.

We have added the precinct on the confirmation page so you should see that now also.

Patriots, please call, email or even show up to rally support for the Otero County, New Mexico county commissioners. Please let them know what they are doing is important, heroic, patriotic and they have the peoples’ support:

Gerald Matherly
(575) 491-4863
[email protected]

Couy Griffin
(575) 415-5782
[email protected]

Vickie Marquardt
(575) 491-3359
[email protected]

Offices:
1101 New York Avenue
Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310

More thoughts on Dr. D's Declaration - CVR data analysis

(Please read this post to get up to speed.)

Dr. D. points out an interesting fact:

"44. Note that this same type of manipulation occurred both in Pima County, Arizona, which used ES&S voting machines (as did most other counties in Arizona), and also in Maricopa County, Arizona, which used Dominion voting machines (as did 23 other states), indicating that the same (or similar) software was responsible."

It is also worth noting that the CVR data plots in Washington state look very similar to the plots shown in Dr. D's declaration. (From all the CVR data we have looked at across the nation, the Washington CVR plots looks the closest to the Arizona CVR plots. 😳)

Yes, even Clallam County, which comes at no surprise because even the "high level results summary" clearly suggest the data was manipulated. (That means Biden did not win even one bellwether county 😱).

Slowly but surely we are categorizing plots and data results in order to build a network of states and counties that show similar manipulation patterns.

Washington has CVR patterns that are very similar to Arizona. (And WA has timestamps to go with it!).

Hawaii has similar voter roll registration patterns to New Mexico.

Hawaii refuses to hand over their CVR data...

Would be interesting to see if the CVR patterns in the largest New Mexico counties look like Maricopa and Pima County AZ. (Yes, Bernalillo County, we are looking at you 👀).

The CVR data is confirming the conclusions we derived from the "high level election results analysis", so even if we are not able to obtain the CVR data we know we can rely on our other approaches to identify fraud.

The fraud is slightly different in different states. Some states rely more on ballot stuffing, others on tabulator "human errors" (as in Antrim and Dekalb County, which never get detected unless someone blows the whistle). Most use a combination of both, as well as a few other (important) techniques. (One of which is discussed by Jeff O'Donnell here.)

The patterns we can extract from the CVR data give us a good idea of which rigging methods are used in different counties across the nation.

# Reference:

- Dr. D's declaration

- CVR video presentation by Dr. Daugherity and Cindy Butler

- Accompanying reports: Report 1 and Report 2

———

(We will be discussing CVR data in a lot more detail in the coming weeks.)

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Fixed it.

The Law of Large Number And Voting Method Percentages 🔎

👉 Debunking absurdities.

Remember the "Dekalb County, GA - Hand Recount vs Machine Count" post?

(If you missed it please click on the link above to read it carefully.)

The hand recount in Dekalb County, shows us what a normal election should look like.

The percentage vote for a given candidate should be roughly the same between all voting methods if the pool of voters within each category is random.

For Dekalb county the numbers are as follow. (We will list absentee, then early-voting followed by election-day for each candidate):

- Lauren Alexander: 25% | 28% | 33%
- Marshall Orson: 33% | 29% | 22%
- Michell Long Spears: 38% | 42% | 44%

The percentage vote for each candidate are roughly the same for each voting method.

If we now look at the original machine count we get the following percentages:

- Lauren Alexander: 26% | 22% | 40%
- Marshall Orson: 36% | 30% | 51%
- Michell Long Spears: 38% | 41% | 9%

⚠️ Notice how the election-day percentages (i.e. the last column) are very different to the other voting methods.

We know the machine count is wrong.

The key point here is that the hand recount shows us what a normal pattern looks like and it agrees with the law of large numbers.

Now that we know what a normal pattern looks like we can compare it to other election results.

Let's look at Maricopa County AZ, 2020 Presidential race.

# Maricopa County AZ, 2020 Presidential Race

We will list the percentage vote for early-voting followed by election-day.

- Trump: 48% | 63%
- Biden: 52% | 37%

There were more than 165,000 election-day votes. More than enough for the law of large numbers to apply.

It would be similar to conducting a poll with 165,000 participants. (In reality less than 1,000 is enough to get very accurate predictions form a truly random pool of voters).

The fact that the early voting percentages are vastly different to the election day voting percentage numbers is a complete violation of the law of large numbers.

🚨One of these voting methods is seriously manipulated!

Let's look at another example: Hawaii.

# Hawaii (State), 2020 Presidential Race

We will list the percentage vote for early-voting followed by election-day.

- Trump: 33% | 72%
- Biden: 67% | 28%

🤯 This is even worse than Maricopa County!

The Hawaii data can be downloaded from their official website here.

If you have the time and interest, please analyze all the races using this approach and post the results in the comments.

👉 Hawaii completely obliterates the law of large numbers. 😱

28,152 people voted on election day. More than enough for the law of large numbers to apply.

Even better: You can download ALL the summary results for Hawaii for all elections going back to 1992 here. If someone wants to do a detailed analysis, please let us know in the comments. We can provide some guidance. You won't be disappointed.

❓Does 2016 follow the law of large numbers?

———

Dekalb County GA, provided us with a "Rosetta stone" to identify voting patterns that indicate the results were manipulated (whether intentionally or by "human error" 😉).

Everyone can use this information to double check the 2020 election results for their own state or county. (Let us know what you find in the comments).

We are just getting started... In the coming weeks we will go much deeper into analyzing CVR data.

———

Do not believe the absurdities the main stream media peddles. Anyone telling you the law of large numbers does not apply to Maricopa or Hawaii don't know what they are talking about.

⚠️ We will make this abundantly clear in the coming weeks.

This information alone should be enough to decertify the 2020 election results and cause every County Commissioners around the nation to pause and verify their own 2020 results. If the percentage votes between voting methods for a given candidate are vastly different, it violates the law of large numbers, and the results should be decertified. It really is that simple.

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Former U.S. Congressman and Philadelphia Political Operative Pleads Guilty to Election Fraud Charges | US Attorney, Eastern District of PA | Jun 6, 2022

Democrat Congressman Michael "Ozzie" Myers pleaded guilty to conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights, bribery, obstruction of justice, falsification of voting records, and conspiring to illegally vote in a federal election, and for orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democrat candidates in the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Pennsylvania elections.

The only reason this particular ring didn't defraud the 2020 election was because they were busted just prior to it. But the pattern of operations has likely continued, if not vastly expanded, since then.

"After receiving payments ranging from between $300 to $5,000 per election from Myers, Demuro would add fraudulent votes on the voting machine – also known as “ringing up” votes – for Myers’ clients and preferred candidates, thereby diluting the value of ballots cast by actual voters. At Myers’ direction, Demuro would add these fraudulent votes to the totals during Election Day, and then would later falsely certify that the voting machine results were accurate. Myers is also accused of directing Demuro to lie to investigators about the circumstances of the bribes and the ballot-stuffing scheme."

Read | Official Press Release
Watch | Epoch Times' Facts Matter: 2 Election Judges Plead Guilty to Ballot Fraud, Accepting Bribes to Certify False Results (10min clip)
Hat Tip | @SomeB**chIKnow

@ElectionFraud20_org