Is Dekalb Co. the new Antrim?

CannCon's latest article "Is Dekalb Co. the new Antrim?" is important.

It clearly shows we are being lied to.

Georgians should be outraged.

The article get's a little technical but the key points are:

1) If Broussard was completely removed from the ballot there is no possible way a hand recount could have found votes for him. Period. (How do you find votes for someone who supposedly is not even on the ballot?)

2) If the Ballot Marking Device (BMD) was updated, they should have simply left his name but made it impossible for people to select. (You would imagine a multi million dollar solution would have a "withrawn" option that would simply strike through a name, add a "Withdrawn" notice and made it impossible for voters to select). This would have been the correct, most simple and fool proof way of dealing with the whole situation.

There should be simple processes and standards to deal with candidate withdrawals, and by all accounts the current process and standards are clearly inadequate. (What does this tell us about the competence level of the people in charge? And we are supposed to blindly believe everything they tell us, when they can't even get simple things right?)

If a multi million dollar solution is incapable of elegantly dealing with such a situation we need to ask ourselves why these BMDs cost so much...

If errors like this are possible, why do we even need them in the first place?

3) If the BMD was updated to remove Broussard from the County Commissioner D2 race, and the scanners were not updated, then it should have had a knock on effect on the County Commissioner D3 and D7 races as well (which are immediately beneath the D2 race). Why were no problems reported for these races?

CannCon is right, none of the official explanations make any sense, and people should be outraged.

# Summary

In Summary, Dekalb officials need to explain:

- How the hand count was able to find votes for Broussard if his name was NOT even on the ballot. (That's right. It is impossible. So why are they lying to us?)

- Why the County Commissioner D3 and D7 races were not affected

Finally, because we are dealing with machines, we should be able to repeatedly reproduce the initial machine count error if we restore them to their initial settings.

👉 We want to see a live video that shows us how to reproduce the initial machine count error. (And we want the (wrong) numbers to match exactly).

# Reference:

- "Is Dekalb Co. the new Antrim?"
- CannCon channel: https://t.iss.one/CannCon

CannCon's article should be shared far and wide.

They are lying to us and must be held accountable.

We can't let them get away with this.

-------

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

I have asked you for much, and many of you have delivered beyond my wildest dreams. One of my "shames" is that I don't always thank you individually enough, and all I can say is that I will catch up with this eventually. Regardless, I am going to ask those who have been FOIAing the crap out of counties to ask for one more thing that has suddenly become useful.

Please make a public records request for any ES&S county that has provided (or will provide) a Cast Vote Record for a "Tabulator Batch Report". Many ES&S CVRs are missing the "method" by which the ballot was cast (mail-in, election day, early). The Tabulator Batch Report fills in that gap.

Again, thank you all. Raccoon Army is the Best Army.

People asking what you can do. Use a search engine. Locate your commissioners' email and phone numbers. Call, write, and show up to your next commission meeting, and support our efforts for transparency. Likewise, find a contact for the SOS and AG's office and give them hell. Stop being a spectator.

https://skeshel.substack.com/p/democrats-control-18-states-with?s=w

There are 18 states controlled by Dems from just a single county in each, negating entire states artificially.

This is a focus on urban election manipulation and the consequences for entire states, regions, and the nation itself.

Thank you for reading!

Kari Lake and Mark Finchem have sued Katie Hobbs et al. seeking an injunction to ban voting machines statewide in AZ in favor of hand-marked, hand-counted paper ballots. FYI, here is my Declaration in support of this suit.

MUST READ IF PARTICIPATING IN POLARIS RECOUNT!!!

The precinct is listed on the header at the top of the ballot AND ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF EACH BALLOT PAGE.

Please do not randomly select a precinct. This MUST be accurate!

Also use comments sparingly since each ballot and comment is looked at before we can start analysis. This can take up a lot of valuable time.

ANOTHER MUST READ IF YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN POLARIS RECOUNT...

Please do not comment on over votes (when they select multiple candidates) or write in votes. We don't look at those. We treat them as a "no vote".

Salem County NJ - Polaris Update

To everyone participating in the Salem County Polaris project, we would like to extend a : BIG BIG Thank You! 🙏

Your participation really makes a difference.

We need to correct some instructions we included in previous posts. The new instructions will make the adjudication process easier and even faster! 🥳🎉

- Please do NOT write down the time stamp into the "General Notes" field

- Do not comment on over-votes. (If there are more than one vote in a race, simply leave it blank)

- Do not comment on write-ins.

- Make sure you select the correct precinct name, which is found in the bottom right corner. (Please do not pick a precinct name at random.)

Thanks!

# Reference:

- https://polarisrecount.com

(If you shared our previous Polaris posts please share this one as well.)

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

🚨VERY IMPORTANT! Let’s Help Jeff O’Donnell Expose Election Fraud In Salem NJ!

SHARE! SHARE! SHARE! 🇺🇸👊🏻
https://rumble.com/v18lud7-very-important-help-jeff-odonnell-expose-election-fraud-in-salem-nj.html

Many thanks to Nick Moseder. And to those of you doing an incredible job. Over 11,000 ballots judged in just a couple days!

I will be expanding on this chart and others in my next substack which looks at CTCL data in a different way.

What this shows you is the ratio of D/R votes for all counties in the 2020 presidential election sorted in descending order from left to right in terms of all votes cast. For example, counties on the left had the most votes cast for all parties. The blue dot represents the ratio of D/R presidential votes per county. The green line is D/R 1.0 which means any dots above that line are D counties and any below that line are R counties. The purple line is the overall trend meaning, what you might expect, the more votes per county (urban areas), the more D. The less votes per county, the ratio drops below 1.0 typically.

Visually you can see how R counties outnumber greatly D counties because there are way more dots below the green line.

Seeing this correlated against CTCL spend is what my next substack is about.

Democrat's Love Affair With Highly Populated Counties

Captain K's excellent articles on "Democrats control 18 states with just a single county in each - Inside the Impact of Urban..." is touching a raw nerve.

We looked at this trend from a different angle in the "Battle of the largest counties" article, which complements Captain K's Substack article.

Quote from the "Battle of the largest counties" article:

"Anecdotally, should this trend continue, the Democrats are only going to need to win the 12 most populated counties, in the 12 most populated states, to collect enough electoral college votes to win the Presidency. (And they’ll probably aim to win the “popular vote” too, to make it all look more “credible”. 😉)"

Election Data Analyzer is also coming to very similar conclusions and is going to show how it correlates to CTCL spend... (That should be very interesting.)

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

🔥 Dr. Walter Daugherity's Arizona Declaration 🔥

This is a must read declaration by Dr. D. in support of Kari Lake and Mark Finchem's legal action against the Arizona Secretary of Sate, seeking an injunction to ban voting machines across AZ.

(This is the same Dr. D. whose presentation with Cindy Butler on analyzing the Pima County AZ, CVR data, made it into our most compelling evidence list.)

In this new declaration he includes an analysis of Maricopa County AZ, CVR data as well (!).

⚠️The results for both counties look abnormally similar and clearly demonstrate the election was manipulation.

Quote:

"As detailed below, my analysis shows to a reasonable degree of scientific and mathematical certainty that vote counting by electronic voting machines used in Maricopa County, Pima County, and other counties throughout the United States that I have examined was manipulated and tightly controlled to reach predetermined outcomes."


Dr. D. doesn't mince words and his full declaration is worth spending time reading and understanding. This is a legal document, which he signed under penalty of perjury.

⚠️ Don't miss the Whistleblower's allegations discussed on page 15 and in Exhibit B (page 33 onwards).

———

Make no mistake, this is a big deal.

Please share far and wide.

———

(We are going to be diving deep into CVR data in the coming weeks. Stay tuned.)

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

CVR FOIAs

Here are all the posts related to CVR FOIAs:

- "A Call For Help - CVR FOIAs" (With an update for ES&S instructions)

- "FAQ - CVR FOIAs"

- "Dealing With Refusals - CVR FOIAs"

- "Litmus Test - CVR FOIAs"

# References:

- Send your files to Jeff O'Donnell @MAGARACCOON through Telegram

- MagaRaccoon (The Lone Raccoon's) website: https://magaraccoon.com (Contains lot's of useful links and presentations)

- Odros project: https://ordros.com/

- CVR Repository: https://ordros.com/cvr/

- Join @ALoneRaccoon to keep up with the latest updates

Hat Tip 🤠 (for GIF): AuditTheVotHawaii

------

#CVR

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

MUST READ FOR POLARIS: All of these ballots were mailed in. There may be a fold line visible where it says "Testamentario del..." in the surrogates race. We are looking for other strange marks you observe. We are looking for OBVIOUS evidence of tampering. Don't make this harder than it is.

You really need to only look at those first 3 races on the ballot. If there isn't anything obviously strange, just save it and move along. I've looked at nearly 2000 of these and I've not seen anything to comment on, so don't make this harder than it is.

We have added the precinct on the confirmation page so you should see that now also.

Patriots, please call, email or even show up to rally support for the Otero County, New Mexico county commissioners. Please let them know what they are doing is important, heroic, patriotic and they have the peoples’ support:

Gerald Matherly
(575) 491-4863
[email protected]

Couy Griffin
(575) 415-5782
[email protected]

Vickie Marquardt
(575) 491-3359
[email protected]

Offices:
1101 New York Avenue
Alamogordo, New Mexico 88310

More thoughts on Dr. D's Declaration - CVR data analysis

(Please read this post to get up to speed.)

Dr. D. points out an interesting fact:

"44. Note that this same type of manipulation occurred both in Pima County, Arizona, which used ES&S voting machines (as did most other counties in Arizona), and also in Maricopa County, Arizona, which used Dominion voting machines (as did 23 other states), indicating that the same (or similar) software was responsible."

It is also worth noting that the CVR data plots in Washington state look very similar to the plots shown in Dr. D's declaration. (From all the CVR data we have looked at across the nation, the Washington CVR plots looks the closest to the Arizona CVR plots. 😳)

Yes, even Clallam County, which comes at no surprise because even the "high level results summary" clearly suggest the data was manipulated. (That means Biden did not win even one bellwether county 😱).

Slowly but surely we are categorizing plots and data results in order to build a network of states and counties that show similar manipulation patterns.

Washington has CVR patterns that are very similar to Arizona. (And WA has timestamps to go with it!).

Hawaii has similar voter roll registration patterns to New Mexico.

Hawaii refuses to hand over their CVR data...

Would be interesting to see if the CVR patterns in the largest New Mexico counties look like Maricopa and Pima County AZ. (Yes, Bernalillo County, we are looking at you 👀).

The CVR data is confirming the conclusions we derived from the "high level election results analysis", so even if we are not able to obtain the CVR data we know we can rely on our other approaches to identify fraud.

The fraud is slightly different in different states. Some states rely more on ballot stuffing, others on tabulator "human errors" (as in Antrim and Dekalb County, which never get detected unless someone blows the whistle). Most use a combination of both, as well as a few other (important) techniques. (One of which is discussed by Jeff O'Donnell here.)

The patterns we can extract from the CVR data give us a good idea of which rigging methods are used in different counties across the nation.

# Reference:

- Dr. D's declaration

- CVR video presentation by Dr. Daugherity and Cindy Butler

- Accompanying reports: Report 1 and Report 2

———

(We will be discussing CVR data in a lot more detail in the coming weeks.)

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org