Forwarded from TruthHammer ππΊπΈ (DM's & Channel Spam are FAKERS.) (TruthHammer888)
These people in AZ rolled over on three dozen more. LEO interviews already taking place.
π₯50π14π’1
Forwarded from Two Red Pills Channel
Please read the post above from New Mexico. Their SoS (in Utah itβs the Lt Gov) knows the machines canβt be certified. But Utah law - like NM - requires that they areβ¦..
Go back to our interview with Alex Newman about EAC and the ES&S machines not being certified. https://rumble.com/v14dg6y-uncertified-the-eac-and-es-and-s-machine-coverup.html
Now itβs probably making sense why our Lt Gov not only hijacked my and Sophieβs lawsuit and threatened every county to not give us any data, but just this morning the AGβs office filed their SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS our case to get election dataβ¦. Is it just us or are these agencies PANICKING!
Exposure of truth is their biggest fear. But we will be their nightmare. We will not quit. We will win this. πΊπΈ
Go back to our interview with Alex Newman about EAC and the ES&S machines not being certified. https://rumble.com/v14dg6y-uncertified-the-eac-and-es-and-s-machine-coverup.html
Now itβs probably making sense why our Lt Gov not only hijacked my and Sophieβs lawsuit and threatened every county to not give us any data, but just this morning the AGβs office filed their SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS our case to get election dataβ¦. Is it just us or are these agencies PANICKING!
Exposure of truth is their biggest fear. But we will be their nightmare. We will not quit. We will win this. πΊπΈ
π₯52π21
Forwarded from Behizy
True The Vote has it all & 2000 Mules was just the beginning. @WILFMoseder and I will be live at 9pm EST
https://rumble.com/v16i9xn-true-the-vote-has-it-all-the-george-show-w-nick-moseder.html
https://rumble.com/v16i9xn-true-the-vote-has-it-all-the-george-show-w-nick-moseder.html
Rumble
True The Vote Has It All | The George Show w/ Nick Moseder
There are some new VERY interesting developments taking place right now when it comes to 2000 Mules, arrests, & prosecution Follow Nick: https://nickmoseder.locals.com/ https://rumble.com/c/NickMosede
π₯34π8
Let's try something different... Torrance County Commission May 25
We are in the process of updating our "Compelling Evidence - The Knockout Punch" series (Version 1, version 2) with 2 new additions:
- 2000Mules.com
- Torrance County Commission May 25
# Context
The idea is to find the most compelling videos and articles that can be easily shared with others.
The list is growing and we are thinking of breaking it up into different categories based on the "intended audience", such as:
- People who are oblivious to election fraud
- People who like maths and statistics
- People who know something isn't right and want to find out more
- Sheriffs
- Commissioners
- Elected Officials
"2000 Mules" would easily fall into each of these categories. (Side note: We must do everything we can to reach out to elected officials and let them know the proof is irrefutable and we expect them to do something about it.)
The Torrance County Commission May 25 presentation would fall into the "Commissioners" category... and anyone interested in hearing one of the most thorough, well researched, well reasoned, logical AND compelling presentation for getting rid of the machines.
# Where you come in
The Torrance county presentation is long (nearly 3 hours), but riveting.
If you have time to listen to it we would appreciate you writing down what you find the most compelling in the comments, in order to crowd source a good summary for the "Compelling Evidence - The Knockout Punch" version 3.
For us, it wasn't so much any particular piece of information but how well structured and well argued the presentation was from start to finish. A barrage of irrefutable evidence that simply can no longer be ignored. The breadth and depth of the arguments is outstanding. This should be compulsory listening for every county commissioners across the nation.
If you agree, send your county commissioners the link (https://rumble.com/v16cc09-torrance-county-commission-estancia-new-mexico-may-25-2022.html).
We also really enjoyed listening to all the comments from the general public at the end. More and more people are getting involved. Going to these commissioner hearings and being seen by elected officials has a HUGE IMPACT on the decisions they make. Don't underestimate that.
π Get involved. Be seen. Be heard.
# We can't over emphasize this enough:
- Being seen by elected officials
- Talking to people and raising awareness with family friends, colleagues AND elected officials (sheriffs, commissioners, clerks, etc...)
... has a much bigger impact than we could ever imagine.
Little by little momentum is building. Elected officials will no longer be able to ignore it.
βββ
#GetInvolved_BeSeen_BeHeard (and let's make sure future commissioner hearings are packed!)
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
We are in the process of updating our "Compelling Evidence - The Knockout Punch" series (Version 1, version 2) with 2 new additions:
- 2000Mules.com
- Torrance County Commission May 25
# Context
The idea is to find the most compelling videos and articles that can be easily shared with others.
The list is growing and we are thinking of breaking it up into different categories based on the "intended audience", such as:
- People who are oblivious to election fraud
- People who like maths and statistics
- People who know something isn't right and want to find out more
- Sheriffs
- Commissioners
- Elected Officials
"2000 Mules" would easily fall into each of these categories. (Side note: We must do everything we can to reach out to elected officials and let them know the proof is irrefutable and we expect them to do something about it.)
The Torrance County Commission May 25 presentation would fall into the "Commissioners" category... and anyone interested in hearing one of the most thorough, well researched, well reasoned, logical AND compelling presentation for getting rid of the machines.
# Where you come in
The Torrance county presentation is long (nearly 3 hours), but riveting.
If you have time to listen to it we would appreciate you writing down what you find the most compelling in the comments, in order to crowd source a good summary for the "Compelling Evidence - The Knockout Punch" version 3.
For us, it wasn't so much any particular piece of information but how well structured and well argued the presentation was from start to finish. A barrage of irrefutable evidence that simply can no longer be ignored. The breadth and depth of the arguments is outstanding. This should be compulsory listening for every county commissioners across the nation.
If you agree, send your county commissioners the link (https://rumble.com/v16cc09-torrance-county-commission-estancia-new-mexico-may-25-2022.html).
We also really enjoyed listening to all the comments from the general public at the end. More and more people are getting involved. Going to these commissioner hearings and being seen by elected officials has a HUGE IMPACT on the decisions they make. Don't underestimate that.
π Get involved. Be seen. Be heard.
# We can't over emphasize this enough:
- Being seen by elected officials
- Talking to people and raising awareness with family friends, colleagues AND elected officials (sheriffs, commissioners, clerks, etc...)
... has a much bigger impact than we could ever imagine.
Little by little momentum is building. Elected officials will no longer be able to ignore it.
βββ
#GetInvolved_BeSeen_BeHeard (and let's make sure future commissioner hearings are packed!)
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
Rumble
Torrance County Commission, Estancia, New Mexico, May 25, 2022
Torrance County Commission, Estancia, New Mexico, May 25, 2022 0:07 β’ THE PLEDGE 3:48 β’ TORRANCE COUNTY CLERK 10:35 β’ GET INVOLVED, VOICE YOUR OPINION 14:13 β’ THANK THE COMMISSIONERS 16:41 β’ SHERIFF M
π26
"1000 front war"
Which front are you part of?
π Get involved. Be Seen. Be Heard.
Reference: Patel Patriot Interviews Gregg Phillips (47 min long. Really good interview PACKED with great information!)
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
Which front are you part of?
π Get involved. Be Seen. Be Heard.
Reference: Patel Patriot Interviews Gregg Phillips (47 min long. Really good interview PACKED with great information!)
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
Rumble
Devolution Power Hour - Gregg Phillips Interview Pt 1
Patel Patriot interviews Gregg Phillips from True the Vote. Catch up on DPH Episodes Here - https://badlandsmedia.tv/dph1 Follow Truth Social: @patelpatriot @greggphillips Telegram: https://t.iss.one/patel
π32π₯6π1
Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)
Hey MSMβ¦.Have you ever used Google Maps traffic view to know where traffic jams are located? Duh MSM. That is phone geo location data aggregated. Debunk that. #2000Mules #2000Sheriffs #2000MSMTraitors
π46π18
2000 Mules - 100 feet - Part 1
We know full well True The Vote's data is more accurate than 100 feet, but we feel that is beside the point.
We would take "100 feet" resolution any day and still produce very meaningful results.
Here's why:
- We know the exact location of the drop boxes
- We can send members of our team to each of these drop boxes to establish an "error baseline" between the true location and the location derived from the cell tower data. This provides us with a "correction factor", that will allow us to adjust the calculated location to be more precise.
- We know the drop boxes are only being used for a few weeks before election day
- True The Vote has data spanning months. Enough to establish a "pattern of life" for a given cell phone. i.e. Where they live. Where they work, and which route they take to go to work.
- Figuring out whether a person is "moving" or "at rest" is also trivial. (This is how Google knows the traffic conditions on roads.)
So if we add all this up, we can easily identify all the people who stopped near a drop box, who typically never use this route under normal circumstances.
The key point is this. Regardless of the location "accuracy" we know for certain a person is moving at a certain speed and then they "stop". It so happens they stop near a drop box (even if it is within a 100 feet).
Furthermore, we know their "usual" route is more than a 100 feet away from the drop box. In fact we could easily ascertain that this person never used this "drop box" route in the previous 3 months, and never used it again after election day. (And just to belabor the point, 100 feet is more than enough to figure all this out.)
It would be relatively easy to find people who stopped near multiple different drop boxes, within a day, or over the course of a few weeks, when they typically never stop at these locations at any time prior to early-voting or after election day. (The emphasis is on the "movement". The cell tower data has timestamps that allow us to determine speed, acceleration and deceleration, and has nothing to do with location accuracy.)
The timestamp also tells us the exact time they stopped and for how long. So if someone is driving a car, then stops near a drop box. We know how long they stopped for before jumping back in their car and driving away. (i.e. looking for people who stopped moving near a drop box for less than a minute before resuming their journey, is an easy pattern to identify.)
β οΈ The "movement" information is as important (if not more) than the "location" information.
So when you combine all this together, it's easy to find people who broke their typical travelling patterns and stopped near a drop box, for less than a minute. (i.e. We can easily identify "journeys" where people are in constant motion but only stop near a drop box. And when they stop, they only stop for less than a minute. Bingo.)
βββ
Continued in part 2
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
We know full well True The Vote's data is more accurate than 100 feet, but we feel that is beside the point.
We would take "100 feet" resolution any day and still produce very meaningful results.
Here's why:
- We know the exact location of the drop boxes
- We can send members of our team to each of these drop boxes to establish an "error baseline" between the true location and the location derived from the cell tower data. This provides us with a "correction factor", that will allow us to adjust the calculated location to be more precise.
- We know the drop boxes are only being used for a few weeks before election day
- True The Vote has data spanning months. Enough to establish a "pattern of life" for a given cell phone. i.e. Where they live. Where they work, and which route they take to go to work.
- Figuring out whether a person is "moving" or "at rest" is also trivial. (This is how Google knows the traffic conditions on roads.)
So if we add all this up, we can easily identify all the people who stopped near a drop box, who typically never use this route under normal circumstances.
The key point is this. Regardless of the location "accuracy" we know for certain a person is moving at a certain speed and then they "stop". It so happens they stop near a drop box (even if it is within a 100 feet).
Furthermore, we know their "usual" route is more than a 100 feet away from the drop box. In fact we could easily ascertain that this person never used this "drop box" route in the previous 3 months, and never used it again after election day. (And just to belabor the point, 100 feet is more than enough to figure all this out.)
It would be relatively easy to find people who stopped near multiple different drop boxes, within a day, or over the course of a few weeks, when they typically never stop at these locations at any time prior to early-voting or after election day. (The emphasis is on the "movement". The cell tower data has timestamps that allow us to determine speed, acceleration and deceleration, and has nothing to do with location accuracy.)
The timestamp also tells us the exact time they stopped and for how long. So if someone is driving a car, then stops near a drop box. We know how long they stopped for before jumping back in their car and driving away. (i.e. looking for people who stopped moving near a drop box for less than a minute before resuming their journey, is an easy pattern to identify.)
β οΈ The "movement" information is as important (if not more) than the "location" information.
So when you combine all this together, it's easy to find people who broke their typical travelling patterns and stopped near a drop box, for less than a minute. (i.e. We can easily identify "journeys" where people are in constant motion but only stop near a drop box. And when they stop, they only stop for less than a minute. Bingo.)
βββ
Continued in part 2
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
π39π₯4
2000 Mules - 100 feet - Part 2
In part 1, we established that identifying "unusual" travelling patterns is relatively straight forward and we don't really need to be that accurate. (Yes, 100 feet is way more than enough!).
But there is more.... once we have identified "unusual" cell phones journeys, we can easily find out if they ever visit the same locations that are not drop boxes, and spend more time "not moving" there.
We can then comfortably ascertain that when people leave this location at different times of the day, it takes them roughly the same amount of time before they stop, only for less than minute, (yep you guessed it) near a drop box. To be clear this is a pattern we can figure out for all the different cell phones that visit this same "headquarters" location.
Finally, True The Vote has multiple data sources from multiple different provides. So not only are they able to triangulate location from multiple towers from one provider. They have several providers, each with their own towers. They can use these different data sources to refine their results and overlay "location" with "movement" to identify suspicious activity, which they can then use to corroborate with their video evidence.
βββ
"Fact checkers" who suggest the cell tower data is not accurate enough, don't know what they are talking about.
The fact they believe 100 feet will discredit the analysis is laughable. 100 feet is more than enough to VALIDATE the results. (The fact they implicitly acknowledge that is ironic.)
(As an aside, and not that it matters, the effective accuracy is in the order of inches.)
In fact the "motion" data is just as important if not more so than the "location" data, and the motion data is extremely accurate.
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
In part 1, we established that identifying "unusual" travelling patterns is relatively straight forward and we don't really need to be that accurate. (Yes, 100 feet is way more than enough!).
But there is more.... once we have identified "unusual" cell phones journeys, we can easily find out if they ever visit the same locations that are not drop boxes, and spend more time "not moving" there.
We can then comfortably ascertain that when people leave this location at different times of the day, it takes them roughly the same amount of time before they stop, only for less than minute, (yep you guessed it) near a drop box. To be clear this is a pattern we can figure out for all the different cell phones that visit this same "headquarters" location.
Finally, True The Vote has multiple data sources from multiple different provides. So not only are they able to triangulate location from multiple towers from one provider. They have several providers, each with their own towers. They can use these different data sources to refine their results and overlay "location" with "movement" to identify suspicious activity, which they can then use to corroborate with their video evidence.
βββ
"Fact checkers" who suggest the cell tower data is not accurate enough, don't know what they are talking about.
The fact they believe 100 feet will discredit the analysis is laughable. 100 feet is more than enough to VALIDATE the results. (The fact they implicitly acknowledge that is ironic.)
(As an aside, and not that it matters, the effective accuracy is in the order of inches.)
In fact the "motion" data is just as important if not more so than the "location" data, and the motion data is extremely accurate.
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
π48π₯8
Forwarded from Election Data Analyzer (M_EDA)
Let me relate a personal story on the accuracy of the location services data available on your phone to all the #2000Mules Deniers and Debunkers.
Several years ago, I lost my phone while out and about town. When I got home, I logged into my Google account and used Find My Phone. There was a map which clearly showed the days activities on a map. It also showed where I dropped my phone on the sidewalk in front of a store. It sat there for a few minutes, then started moving through town (not in my possession at that point) until this person drove out to the airport.
They parked in a well know lot. I could see where abouts they parked.
I drove out there and managed to find the exact parking spot where the car that had picked up my phone was located. I looked inside the car and there my phone was on the dashboard.
I left a $20 taped to the window in an envelope with a note to return my phone and they eventually did.
Bottom line is, the location service was accurate to the area of a parking spot.
Several years ago, I lost my phone while out and about town. When I got home, I logged into my Google account and used Find My Phone. There was a map which clearly showed the days activities on a map. It also showed where I dropped my phone on the sidewalk in front of a store. It sat there for a few minutes, then started moving through town (not in my possession at that point) until this person drove out to the airport.
They parked in a well know lot. I could see where abouts they parked.
I drove out there and managed to find the exact parking spot where the car that had picked up my phone was located. I looked inside the car and there my phone was on the dashboard.
I left a $20 taped to the window in an envelope with a note to return my phone and they eventually did.
Bottom line is, the location service was accurate to the area of a parking spot.
π94
Forwarded from Guy Smith
The Gateway Pundit
Confirmed: 'True the Vote' to Present Findings of Ballot Harvesting in Yuma and Maricopa Counties to Arizona Lawmakers on Tuesdayβ¦
On Tuesday, May 31, 2022, True the Vote investigators will present findings of ballot harvesting in Yuma and Maricopa Counties to Arizona state senators and House members.
π₯45π18
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
RSBN LIVE from the AZ State Senate: True The Vote Exposes Ballot Harvesting
https://rumble.com/vi1or5-rsbn-live.html
@KanekoaTheGreat
https://rumble.com/vi1or5-rsbn-live.html
@KanekoaTheGreat
π30
Forwarded from TheStormHasArrived17 (TheStormHasArrived17 βοΈ βοΈ βοΈ)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Arizona Representative Walter Blackman says that they need to move forward with HB2289, based on what Gregg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht presented today. Blackman previously opposed the bill.
The bill would make elections in Arizona one day, one vote, paper ballots, drop box restrictions and would overall make the elections much more secure.
β¦ and the crowd goes crazy! πΊπΈ
The bill would make elections in Arizona one day, one vote, paper ballots, drop box restrictions and would overall make the elections much more secure.
β¦ and the crowd goes crazy! πΊπΈ
π₯102π23β€14π1
Compelling Evidence: For those who are not interested in politics
As we mentioned previously we are building a list of some of the most compelling videos and articles for different target audiences.
This one is for people who are not really interested in politics and do not like maths or statistics.
1) Representative Walter Blackman statement after hearing True The Vote's (Catherine and Gregg's) evidence at the Arizona State Senate. (Duration: 30 secs)
2) 2000Mules.com (Duration: 1 hour and 29 mins)
3) True The Vote hearing at the Arizona State Senate (Duration: nearly 2 hours): Catherine and Gregg go into more details behind their methodology in exposing the mules. They also debunk the "fact checkers".
4) Q&A with Catherine Engelbrecht from True The Vote on Memorial day (Duration: 45 mins): Answers many pertinent questions and provides valuable insights about their research.
5) Patel Patriot Interviews Gregg Phillips (Duration: 47 min): Really good interview PACKED with information. Something that is x10 bigger than 2000Mules is coming.
If you have gotten through all that and you want to know more:
6) The following presentation to the Torrance County Commissioners provides one the most up to date, comprehensive and well structured summary of many election fraud issues. It is nearly 3 hours long but is instructional and eye opening.
Please feel free to share. (I'm sure sending a copy to your local sheriff, county clerk or state representative wouldn't hurt.)
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
As we mentioned previously we are building a list of some of the most compelling videos and articles for different target audiences.
This one is for people who are not really interested in politics and do not like maths or statistics.
1) Representative Walter Blackman statement after hearing True The Vote's (Catherine and Gregg's) evidence at the Arizona State Senate. (Duration: 30 secs)
2) 2000Mules.com (Duration: 1 hour and 29 mins)
3) True The Vote hearing at the Arizona State Senate (Duration: nearly 2 hours): Catherine and Gregg go into more details behind their methodology in exposing the mules. They also debunk the "fact checkers".
4) Q&A with Catherine Engelbrecht from True The Vote on Memorial day (Duration: 45 mins): Answers many pertinent questions and provides valuable insights about their research.
5) Patel Patriot Interviews Gregg Phillips (Duration: 47 min): Really good interview PACKED with information. Something that is x10 bigger than 2000Mules is coming.
If you have gotten through all that and you want to know more:
6) The following presentation to the Torrance County Commissioners provides one the most up to date, comprehensive and well structured summary of many election fraud issues. It is nearly 3 hours long but is instructional and eye opening.
Please feel free to share. (I'm sure sending a copy to your local sheriff, county clerk or state representative wouldn't hurt.)
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
Telegram
ElectionFraud20.org
Arizona Representative Walter Blackman says that they need to move forward with HB2289, based on what Gregg Phillips and Catherine Engelbrecht presented today. Blackman previously opposed the bill.
The bill would make elections in Arizona one day, one voteβ¦
The bill would make elections in Arizona one day, one voteβ¦
π55π₯10β€4
Forwarded from Nick Moseder (Nick Moseder)
Here is the meeting notice from Gregg Phillips calendar proving he met with 3 Arizona AG officials on June 3rd 2021. The AGO sent this notice out.
This was when TTV provided data to the AG. Gregg is meeting with the AG again today at 11AM to address the fact that as of YESTERDAY, the AG is denying having ever received this data.
Time to put the pressure on folks.
Let them know that WE know! πΊπΈ
@WILFmoseder
This was when TTV provided data to the AG. Gregg is meeting with the AG again today at 11AM to address the fact that as of YESTERDAY, the AG is denying having ever received this data.
Time to put the pressure on folks.
Let them know that WE know! πΊπΈ
@WILFmoseder
π₯56π10
Forwarded from The Lone Raccoon (Lone Raccoon)
Clark County, Nevada CVR files are (finally) created and put up on the ordros.com site. This was a bear to stitch together! I will be sharing some analysis tonight, but to tease... its maybe the worst... and maybe the best evidence of fraud we have in CVRs so far.
π27π₯7
Clark County Nevada.png
84.3 KB
Clark County Nevada - CVR analysis by The Lone Raccoon tonight
Don't forget to check out The Lone Raccoon's TG channel tonight for his CVR analysis of Clark County Nevada.
π Should be very interesting.
We attached the high level numbers to this post.
"This looks totally normal" π
Reference: https://t.iss.one/ALoneRaccoon/2237
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
Don't forget to check out The Lone Raccoon's TG channel tonight for his CVR analysis of Clark County Nevada.
π Should be very interesting.
We attached the high level numbers to this post.
"This looks totally normal" π
Reference: https://t.iss.one/ALoneRaccoon/2237
βββ
KN for @ElectionFraud20_org
π₯2π1