TX GOP Stronghold - Part II

Continuation from: https://t.iss.one/ElectionFraud20_org/216

This shows that wherever there was a large Republican turnout (mainly in Republican county strongholds), the Democrat turnout was even larger. 🤯

How is this possible? 🧐

——

We recently published an article that reveals ALL the most suspicious counties based on the Democrat Vote Increase z-score value (zDVI).

The article provides a link to a csv file that contains the full zScore analysis for all counties grouped by state. Enjoy 🍰

Will comment on this soon. Very accurate analysis, but there is more... Stay tuned. 😉👇👇👇

Meet the Technology That's Uncovering 2020's Voter Fraud | American Thinker

Phantom voters, the definition, is morphing from fake voters hiding in UPS boxes to people who advanced computer models predict will not vote.

Don't get me wrong — there are thousands of phantom voters living in churches, R.V. parks, cemeteries, homeless shelters, hotels, and virtual mailboxes.  It's just that there are as many, perhaps more, who live active, healthy, honest lives on voter rolls.  They just don't know they voted.

You've heard the stories, denied by the mainstream press and almost every secretary of state: there is no significant voter fraud.  Why not say that?  There is no way you can check.

Now there is.

After the 2020 election results stopped in the middle of night and vote trajectories magically changed when they fired up again, thousands of people, just like you, didn't buy it.  They formed armies of canvassers in 35 or more states.  They did something that has not been done at scale in the history of the country: they started checking voter rolls.

They did more.  They filed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests at unprecedented levels.  Secretary of state offices, once a murky sinecure, had to answer real questions about what was going on. 

Here's what popped out.

Leftists are different from you and me.  Unlike us, they care that every vote is cast, and if you do not cast your vote, they will do it for you.  And they did.  At scale.

In one midwestern state, voter rolls costing tens of thousands of dollars were bought by a billionaire leftist every month for over a year.  Why would someone buy a list that doesn't change much?

Voter lists show people who move.  They show people who never or seldom vote. 

The white hat canvassing team built a query for one state: "voters who voted in 2020 who never voted before." Guess what! 265,000.

Witness statements are being gathered, lots of them, that in the largest city, election officials were trading cell calls about how many votes were needed, and someone was then providing the phantoms to meet the quota.

They knew the names of the phantoms — they had direct access to who voted, who didn't, and who was likely to never show up.

These canvassing organizations are the Minutemen of this generation.  They come from every background, organize with no central leadership.  They blindly figured out how phantom voting was happening, and they are forcing states to audit their voter rolls.

They aren't blind anymore.  They are organized.  They have resources and technology, and things are about to change in a big way for phantoms.

Read more 📰 American Thinker
Related 📝 Liz Harris Maricopa County Canvass
Watch 📺 Anatomy of the Steal

@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—

More on Uncovering 2020's Voter Fraud

From the excellent graph Dr. Frank has produced, we can see that there are probably 2 maybe 3 different ways of rigging the election. (See image in the next post.)

As @LibertyOverwatch accurately described in this post, not all states have inflated voter rolls.

Allocating "fake" votes to real people who never voted is enough.

The statements about people analyzing voter rolls is also accurate.

⚠️ You should print the post and and read is carefully over the next few days.

# But there is more...

Fabricating votes and assigning them to people who don't vote is only part of the problem.

Another part involves deleting votes that are inconvenient.

Please carefully read Liz Harris' Maricopa canvassing report. There are about 165,000 to 180,000 registrants in Maricopa, who voted, but their votes were never officially recorded.

>>> Their votes didn't count! <<<

How can this be possible?

Here is one example:

- Start counting "early" votes ahead of election day to establish trends
- If you don't like where is it headed, create a new database and copy records from the old database to the new database and purposely "forget" to copy the inconvenient records.
- You now have a brand new database with no history of the inconvenient records.
- Start fabricating ballots if necessary.
- Destroy the real "inconvenient" ballots. (Burning down chicken farms seems to work well.)
- Corrupt the digital ballot images so no one can open them or just simply fabricate new ones.
- (Optional) Wipe out the hard drives a day before any forensic audits are due to take place, just to be sure.

# But it get's even better...

Before we dive in, we need to point out that the best strategy to fix the 2020 election is 📣 CANVASSING 📣

We need to recruit, train and unleash an army of canvassers.

Patriots everywhere must rise and unite to #SwampTheSwamp. No one else will.

However, some people are not able or don't have time to physically go canvassing. We have you covered. 😎

If you really want to make a difference, become a "cyber canvasser" or more precisely, a "cyber adjudicator", and join project Polaris and join the Lone Raccone channel for updates.

You can make a real difference from the comfort of your own home in your own time.🥳

NOTE: See our original post to get started.

Now, back to the main thread. Project Polaris has already recounted a small county (Harding) in New Mexico and the report is troubling.

LadyDraza summarized it best in this post.

We will repeat it here because it is crucial to understand.

Imagine 10 people voted. 7 voted for "A", and 3 voted for "B". The "A"s won by 70%. Nothing complicated here.

Now, let's fabricate 20 votes, and give 10 to the "A"s and 10 to the "B"s. Seems fair?

We now have a total of 30 votes. The "A"s have 17 votes and the "B"s have 13 votes.

But... the "A"s winning percentage is now only 57% (instead of 70%).

Why is this important?

It is a lot easier to rig elections without raising too many suspicions, if everyone has been led to believe that elections are supposed to be "tight" with small winning margins. It is called "plausible deniability" 😉.

It is easier to build a plausible narrative for why one party lost and the other won, when elections are tight. It is also a lot easier to manipulate results without being noticed. (Just sayin).

Hmm... Where have we seen very tight elections recently? ... Coincidence?

> "But! didn't the huge Republican turnout make a difference?"

Maybe, maybe not. The margins are so small that anything could happen at the next elections and no one will know any different... and that is the point.

When margins are tight, everything is "plausible" 🤷‍♂️.

# Solution

We need to #Fix2020First and we need to #CleanTheVoterRolls at the same time.

Canvassing is the best solution.

-----

Please subscribe to these channels if you haven't already:

- LibertyOverwatch
- Dr.Frank
- TheLoneRaccon
- LadyDraza
- Bobby Piton
- LizHarris
- ElectionFraud20_org

P.S: Check Bobby Piton latest post on ghost registrants.

More on Uncovering 2020's Voter Fraud - cont'd

The first part of the post can be found here.

Read more about:
- Canvassing
- Cyber Adjudicating

Please share far and wide! Most importantly with your elected officials. Thanks!

Tell them to carefully read our articles. All the results are reproducible.

The numbers speak for themselves.

(In case anyone is wondering... we haven't heard from any elected officials or journalists yet 😔 )

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Here is the image we referred to in the previous post (which Telegram split in two 😢)

🎁 The gift that keeps on giving 🎁🎉

Another great post by Dr. Frank.

Before we launch into Dr. Frank's findings, we would like to be clear; At this stage of the election analysis, the evidence of irregularities is so obvious that anyone refusing to admit it, is either willfully blind or complicit.

Yes, we have all the proof we need.

Yes, all the proof can be found in publicly available data sources.

Yes, you can reproduce our work and find out for yourself by reading our "Trend Analysis" articles.

👉 The data speaks for itself 👈

We started taking a closer look at voter rolls and voter history files, and what we discovered can only best be described as a "monumental mess". 🤯

# Let's spell it out

Back to Dr. Frank's post.

>> Official election numbers, in some states, do not match the numbers found in the voter rolls. (In the order of 100,000s of votes) <<

>> Voter roll numbers fluctuate **massively** before and after each presidential election <<

How is this possible? 🤔

Finally, what is not immediately obvious from Dr. Frank's graph is that the dots represent the "state" numbers. When you look at the individual county numbers for each state, you discover that some counties (often the largest ones. Coincidence?) are much, much worse! 😱

# But it gets worse...

From our own **preliminary** findings:

- Votes are recorded in the voter history files but have no matching registrants in the voter rolls (10,000s of thousands)
- There is no consistency in how registrants are removed from voter rolls. In some cases their status is changed to "REMOVED", in others, their records are completely wiped out.
- Registrants with a "REMOVED" status are still able to vote. Their vote is recorded in the history file. (And yes, these registrants are in the voter roll snapshots that are captured immediately after the election.)
- When comparing records between voter roll snapshots, we have found new registrants who have registration dates that are older than the date they first appeared on the voter rolls, by decades...
- The unique registrant identifier is not unique i.e. new registrants are given recycled identifiers from the past (!)

In other words ... a "monumental mess" 😔

📣 We must demand (and verify) that exacting standards and procedures are put in place to properly maintain voter files across ***ALL*** states. This is non-negotiable. 📣

Voter rolls and voter history snapshots MUST perfectly reconcile after each election.

⚠️ >>> This is basic accounting 101 <<<

If they don't reconcile, the election results can not, and must not, be certified.

Because these preliminary findings are troubling we will quadruple check our work.

# Summary

Quick and easy wins to #Fix2020First:

1. Join the canvassing effort
2. Demand clear and transparent voter rolls and voter history files that are:
- Publicly available and FREE, for EVERY state
- Perfectly reconciled after each election
3. We The People are the solution. Unite and peacefully mobilize. #SwampTheSwamp

🚨 If you have access to voter rolls and voter history files that go all the way back to the 2000 election. Please get in touch with us. Thank you!

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Is "Leverage" The Problem? 👀

We have spent the last year carefully analyzing all the 2020 election data we can get our hands on, and have carefully recorded our findings here.

Here are some of our observations:

- There is no doubt the 2020 election was manipulated.

- We don't need more proof.

We have more than enough proof. In fact, we have 10x more proof (in the data alone) than is needed to decertify the election, IF (and that is a big "if") we lived in an honest society.

The real problem isn't finding more compelling proof, the problem is disseminating the proof.

It's a battle of information. A battle of the minds. 🤯

The real problem lies in how people consume information.

A minority control the fulcrum of information and they can use it to apply incredible influence on the masses.

The principle was made famous by Archimedes centuries ago. The same principle applies to the forces of persuasion.

A very small number of people exert an incredible amount of influence by controlling the flow of information.

If you have any doubts this is true, pick any of the following examples and draw your own conclusions:

- Hunter Biden's laptop
- COVID (Early treatment protocols)
- Election fraud
- Maricopa forensic audit report
- etc...

How were these reported in the main stream media and on social media?

We get nowhere if we can't break through the "cone of silence".

# Strategic fulcrums...

It doesn't take much deduction to realize the quickest way to control the masses, is to control the politicians that control the masses.

Controlling the minds of politicians is a lot easier.

Those that can be bought will be bought, and those that can't need to be persuaded their views are only held by a minority of the people.

That is the crux.

The minority have used the leverage of information to make their views appear as the majority.

And the real majority falsely believe they are a minority.

🙌 That is the illusion 🙌

# How do we break through the "cone of silence"

We really hoped the Maricopa forensic audit report was going to get some traction. It didn't.

Some are upset the report wasn't more forceful.

However, let's take a step back and ponder... Would the main stream media have covered the audit review if the report unequivocally stated the election was categorically fraudulent?

The report has more than enough findings to decertify the whole election as it is. The problem isn't the report.

The question then becomes: Will more audits make a difference?

We are not against audits. We are all for them. If they happen, great! but we are not going to sit on our hands and wait for them to happen.

The reality is, we are no longer convinced they will break the "cone of silence" anyway, if and when the reports are finally published.

The issue, that can't escape us, is that all the proof is already in the data. We have demonstrated it in these articles. If states were serious, they would have already done the analysis and come to the same conclusions. It nearly feels like the "prospect" of an audit is the 🥕 they dangle in front of us to keep us distracted and moving along.

We have some ideas, but we want to know what YOU think first. Let us know in the comments.

- How do we break the "cone of silence"?
- How do we break the "illusion"?

——

For those tempted to suggest using "force", you will play right into the hands of the media and the swamp. That's exactly what they want.

👋 So please don't comment if that is all you can think of. Thanks.

And, yes, the "double standard" is insufferable. We all know it. We can all see it. But we can do better.

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

🎉 Introducing the new "ThoughtLab" channel 🎉

We're spinning up a new channel called "ThoughtLab", to discuss a broader range of topics such as:

- Strategic thinking
- Proper argumentation
- Thought Experiments
- Data Analysis

As they relate to the 2020 election and the COVID plandemic.

The subject matter will change over time, however the focus will remain on learning discernment.

Everyone is welcome. 👋

The aim is to embark on a learning journey together, and record our findings along the way.

A place to share ideas and learn from one another.

The @ElectionFraud20_org channel will continue to focus on sharing key findings surrounding the 2020 election.

The new @ThoughtLab channel will touch on a broader range of issues, will be less formal and walk through some of the thinking processes we go through when analysing data.

If this sounds like something you would enjoy, please join, and share the link with others.

--------

# A Thought Experiment

We would like to thank all of you for submitting your comments on how to break the "cone of silence" and the "illusion" we mentioned in our previous post: "Is Leverage The Problem? 👀".

We were blown away by the quantity and quality of the comments. They are great! but we want to take it a step further...

As an appetizer for what to expect from the new channel, let's conduct a "thought experiment". 🤔

👉 What are the best elements we can take from skiing, a tank and a jet ski to come up with a mode of transportation that will move quickly through snow?

(See the links at the bottom of this post to find out more.)

Keeping this in mind, the thought experiment is to go back and read all the other comments in the previous post and find the ones you never thought of before, but make a lot of sense to you now.

Take some time to think about how to incorporate these new ideas with your own.🧐

Once you are ready, please create a new post using this format:

---
Take 2:

Original post: [provide link to your original post]
Inspiration: [provide link(s) to the other post(s)]

[Improved Ideas]
---

We will give it a few days and then summarize the ideas in a new post on our new channel .

If you think of new ideas after "Take 2", feel free to create a "Take 3, 4, 5 ...".

⚠️ Beware, it may become contagious 😅

Oh, if you haven't commented on on the previous post but would like to participate. Please read the previous post first and then go ahead!

You can keep commenting on the previous thread or start commenting on this one. It doesn't matter.

Have Fun! 🥳

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Links:
- On Snowmobiles and seeing what others don't
- Dive deeper: The OODA loop

🚨New Article: Down Ballot Election Analysis📊

🔉CHALLENGE: Find the county that has the worst down ballot irregularities. 🔉

Following Seth Keshel's inspirational Telegram post demonstrating down ballot "irregularities" for Tarrant county, TX.

We wrote the following "Down Ballot Election Analysis" article and guide explaining how you can perform the exact same "down ballot analysis" for your own county.

NOTE: The worked examples is a long document. If you are not interested in doing the analysis but just want to read the results, skip to the "Analyzing the results" sections. Williamson county, TX is nearly as bad as Tarrant county!

This isn't really a surprise.

32 counties voted Democrat for the first time in 2020, in a very long time. (Yes, that means none of them voted for Obama in 2008, nor 2012 🤯)

They are all incredibly suspicious and most of them happen to be very large counties. Coincidence? (We see you: Jackson county, MO 👀)

But if you just want to stay within Texas, check out the image on this recent post. The image lists counties that would be excellent candidates for the worst down ballot analysis results.

If you want to work within your state, there is a good chance you will find a county among the 647 counties that have abnormally high z-score values in 2020. (In 2016, there were only 17 😱)

If you have time and finish the down ballot analysis for your county, and you believe it is worse than Tarrant county, TX. Please let us know in the comments.

Thanks! 😊

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

--------------

P.S: We are going to have to think laterally to fix the election.

We've released a big round of updates to the site today, collating all of Seth Keshel's recent research, including quite a few new precinct heat maps, charts, videos and embedded Telegram posts across numerous states, all grouped by state for easy reference.

Plus a bunch of other updates:

• Texas: added Resolution to Call for a Tarrant County Election Audit, from Sept 2021
• Montana: covered the latest detailed reports coming out from the Montana Election Integrity Project
• Virginia: clearer links to sources of raw data, plus added eyewitness account from recent 2021 election
• Delaware: clearer link to Patriots for Delaware which contains further updates
• Pennsylvania: links to further news from @LibertyOverwatchChannel
• Georgia, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin state reports now show a more detailed summary of Seth Keshel's findings
• New raw data links for West Virginia and Wisconsin
• All state reports and Seth Keshel reports now show whether any counties in that state were listed in Seth's "Top 100 Worst Counties"

There's been so much coming out the last few weeks, that we can't always keep up with the stream! If you're aware of other 2020 election discoveries that we haven't covered, find your state page on our site and leave a comment to help point other researchers in the right direction. In that way, you can help each other out.

Thanks for following us and for your support.

— @ElectionFraud20_org

In 2006, Daniel Calingaert wrote this 15-page guide on Election Rigging and How To Fight It.

It's eerily similar to everything being uncovered in the US this past year, in how data was manipulated at multiple levels.

His suggestions for prevention:

1. Observers to closely watch elections
2. Transparency through entire electoral process
3. Substantial representation of opposition parties or independents on election commissions to monitor, document & publicize any abuses
4. Appropriate & well-enforced election laws, including requiring public disclosure of numbers of blank ballots printed/distributed and break-down of results by polling station
5. Regular assessments of voter registration lists, including contacting a random sample of voters, cancelling any who cannot be located, and also monitoring whether voter lists may be incomplete by randomly sampling residences and checking their records
6. Monitor media coverage of candidates & identify any abuse of state resources for campaign purposes

(cont...)

(...cont)

7. Deploy trained observers to every polling station and every vote-counting center in the country, to properly document and report observed instances of fraud, and dispel rumours
8. Opposition parties and nonpartisan monitors to communicate their findings to international observers and media in order to draw worldwide attention to any electoral fraud or manipulation.
9. In some cases a parallel vote tabulation, across two or more separated teams, can help confirm the results

Let's fix 2020, and put measures in place to ensure this never happens again.

— @ElectionFraud20_org

75 days ago, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich was presented with all evidence of voter fraud from the full forensic audit of Arizona’s 2020 election.

Arizona State Legislators Rep. Mark Finchem and Senator Kelly Townsend will join Gubernatorial Candidate Kari Lake, and others on Friday, December 17th for an Election Integrity Rally at Brnovich’s Phoenix office.

The rally will start at 2 pm at 2005 N Central Avenue, in Phoenix.

Spread the word to pack out the rally. It's time to tell AG Mark Brnovich we want some action!

💣 Wisconsin is no longer under the radar...

Another great post by LibertyOverwatch summarizing the key points from the Election Committee Hearing (must read).

This follows on from TracyBeanz's post exposing other shady dealings going on in Wisconsin.

Furthermore, we are also working on a detailed county analysis of Wisconsin, which will eventually turn into an article for ElectionFraud20.org.

⚠️ Spoiler alert: Yes it is bad. Really bad.

If you are interested in finding out how we put these articles together, or would like to participate in the process, please check the links below:

- Under the radar?
- Wrestling with the Wisconsin data

The reality is, Wisconsin is not even close to being the worst state. 😯 🙄

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

IMPORTANT CALL TO ACTION

I am looking for voters in California who were told they had already voted in either the 2020 General election or the Newsome Recall election. If that's you, or someone you know, PLEASE have them contact me at [email protected].

Ask them to indicate their county as it will save time I would take asking them.

If you would, please share this. It's so important. Thank you.

DC Board of Elections Sued for Keeping Voter Data Secret
December 8, 2021 | The Epoch Times

A good-government group is suing the District of Columbia in federal court for refusing to allow the inspection of voter list maintenance records as required by federal law.

The D.C. Board of Elections claims it can’t provide the voter list maintenance documents because of its contract with the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a nonprofit that describes its mission as “assisting states to improve the accuracy of America’s voter rolls and increase access to voter registration for all eligible citizens.” ERIC was created in 2012 with assistance from The Pew Charitable Trusts, a left-wing philanthropy.

The board says its contract with ERIC prohibits the release of the data ERIC provides to member states.

The District of Columbia, along with 31 states, outsources the maintenance of its voter rolls to ERIC. ERIC regularly provides the district board with reports showing which registered voters are no longer eligible because they have died or relocated. The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 says that all records used to add or remove voters are public records, yet the board denied a group’s request to inspect the reports ERIC provides to the board.

According to the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF), which brought this lawsuit, ERIC has a history of inaccuracy in removing deceased and other ineligible registrants from voter rolls.

“ERIC is being used to hide decisions about who gets to vote and who is removed from the rolls,” said PILF President J. Christian Adams, a former U.S. Justice Department civil rights attorney.

“Transparency in elections leads to trust in results and accountability for election officials. ERIC and its agreement with the District of Columbia is standing in the way of transparency and violating federal law.”

ERIC also has critics on the political left.

Continued at https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/d-c-board-of-elections-sued-for-keeping-voter-data-secret_4144019.html or see PDF below.

We mentioned previously that the FBI raided homes of Colorado election integrity advocates a month ago. Read about that here.

We’d like to hear from other patriots who have also been raided or intimidated by authorities to help expand the picture on where and how this is happening. Please share in the comment section of @ElectionFraud20_org if you’ve heard reports of this happening.

And stay safe out there friends. We’re not violent, even when they inflict violence upon us.