74 Georgia Counties Can’t Produce Original 2020 Election Ballot Images

VoterGA’s Garland Favorito held a press conference today to discuss statewide evidence destruction in Georgia. Nearly 30% of Georgia counties are missing some or all of their ballot images. Interestingly, the Maricopa County audit also revealed 284K deleted or corrupted ballot images. In a press release, VoterGA summarized the details:

Atlanta, November 9, 2021 – VoterGA today announced that their ballot image analysis team determined 74 Georgia counties have been unable to produce all the original ballot images from the November 2020 election. The team obtained admissions from 56 counties that most or all of the images created automatically by the Dominion voting system for results tabulation have been destroyed. VoterGA volunteers made the determinations by submitting Open Records Requests (ORR) for the images to each county.

Ballot images are a critical aspect of election records that have long been required to be retained by federal and state law. Federal law requires a 22-month retention period for election records while state law requires a 24-month retention period for election documents which are generally considered to include those that are electronic. [USC 52 20701, O.C.G.A. 21-2-73]

The Dominion voting system automatically creates images for in-person voted ballots on compact flash memory cards. It automatically creates images for mail-in ballots on memory flash drives. The cards or drives are then manually uploaded to the county’s Election Management Server (EMS). Some densely populated counties also use high speed scanners that automatically transfer images directly to the EMS.

Counties admit non-conformance or evade ORRs

At least 28 counties admitted having no original images at all and 22 of those counties only had recount images that some claimed are the same as originals. Recount images don’t have original time stamps that can be used for audit purposes nor do they have original meta data that shows how votes were initially interpreted. The images can also be changed by tampering between scans and are therefore, invalid to audit an election.

VoterGA received emails from another 28 counties admitting they do not have a complete set of original images. Various counties were missing all in-person voting images, all absentee images, all Election Day images or a substantial portion of one or more of those groups.

Another 18 counties did not comply with repeated ORRs over a period of two months. Most simply did not respond but some frustrated the requestors by requiring exorbitant fees for images that most counties provided for around $25-$50. Fees requested by counties ranged from $0 to $1,700, which is too unnecessarily expensive to comply with ORR law. Six of those counties claim to have mailed images that VoterGA team members have not yet received. These images may also be incomplete or recount images only.

VoterGA showed written confirmation from former State Election Director Chris Harvey granting permission to erase in-person ballot images from the memory cards. “These violations are yet another glaring reason why Georgians cannot trust the Secretary of State’s office,” said Garland Favorito, co-founder of VoterGA. “We desperately need a multi-county audit of the 2020 election to resolve these serious problems before 2022.”

Support: VoterGA.org
H/t🤠 Georgia Record

Learn more🔎🧵 GA Thread

@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—

⏰ Tomorrow we will release a new article showing how to analyze a county that does not have registration data, like Outagamie County, WI

Instead of using the registration data, we will show how the Democrat Vote Increase (DVI), which can be easily calculated for all counties, can be used to find suspicious counties.

The attached image contains the DVI numbers for Outagamie County.

In 2012 and 2016 the DVI was negative.

In fact it was more negative in 2016 than in 2012.

However, in 2020 the DVI increased to a large positive number, that is even greater than the Republican Vote Increase (RVI)... in a Republican county! 🤯

Stay tuned ... tomorrow, we will reveal ALL the counties across the US where the DVI increased dramatically in 2020 after being negative in the previous 2 elections.🎯

H/t🤠@RealSKeshel
Ref: https://t.iss.one/RealSKeshel/2027

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Gwinnett County, Georgia

🗓 Tomorrow we will release a new article that will identify all the counties that have uncharacteristically high (😉) Democrat Vote Increases (DVI) in 2020.

Gwinnett County, GA, is one of them.

Stay tuned... 🎼

H/t🤠: @RealSKeshel
Ref: https://t.iss.one/RealSKeshel/2032

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Momentum is building!
The Epoch Times has a great report summarizing the news of election fraud coming out of 3 states this week: Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin.

https://youtu.be/_Q-bLCNyEaQ

They’re reporting that 25,000 dead voters were found on the rolls in Michigan.

🚨Investigating the Large Democrat Vote Increases

☔️ No registration data... No problem! ☀️

When a state does not have registration data we can use the "Democrat Vote Increase" (DVI) from the election results to find abnormal trends for every single county in the USA.

Our new article will explain how, and highlight 🖍 the most suspicious counties.

This is Part 7 in our series "Identify Electoral Fraud Using Trend Analysis" and is called "Investigating the Large Democrat Vote Increases".

Many states and counties have been exposed 🔎 using this approach, many that haven't received much coverage until now.

Do you live in one of them? 🧐 (Let us know in the comments.)

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

P.S: Please share amongst your channels and networks. And with your elected officials as well. 😉

🚨Action Needed 💪
For those of you who want to see more action. Here is your chance.

Patrick Byrne is calling all pursuers of election integrity to get behind an upcoming lawsuit going to the Supreme Court. We need Republican State Attorneys General to sign on as litigants, so let them know you want this!

See the video above, and read Patrick's article carefully and follow his directions:
https://www.deepcapture.com/2021/11/crossing-the-streams/

We can confirm that another trusted source is working on this case, and we believe this should be more solid than the very rushed lawsuits back in December.

If Patrick's directions are not clear, please let us know in the comments.

Please share far and wide!

Dr. Douglas Frank has publicly confirmed that he is contributing a significant amount of research and data into the upcoming Supreme Court case we mentioned above.

In the video below (from 21min mark) he gives more background to the case. He also suggests that the much-discussed packet captures (PCAPs) that Mike Lindell has been in possession of were actually captured using government (CISA) infrastructure, which is why they were not able to be legally released to the public previously. But they will be included in this upcoming case on November 23. 🎉

https://rumble.com/vp4i7h-dr.-frank-epic-interview-with-pete-santilli-november-12-2021.html
(The first half gives a good background to Dr. Frank, and he talks about the upcoming case from 21min mark onwards.)

P.S. Did the PCAPs come from Albert Sensors installed in 96% of America’s counties? It sounds like it.

🚨Letting Data Speak for Itself:
Unlikely Z-Scores in 2020 Election

We continue our "fact-checking" of the 2020 election results, and have published our next installment in the trend analysis series, titled Unlikely Z-Scores in 2020 Election.

We will let the data speak for itself.

We document our methodology so that anyone can reproduce our work.

Please share far and wide, and especially with your elected officials. 😉

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Wisconsin Senate Committee Issues Subpoena for Madison 2020 Election Records | Channel 3000

As we reported last week, a WI Senate committee has issued a subpoena to the city of Madison for election records. Channel 3000 has more details:

“State Republicans announced plans for their own investigation in late October after the non-partisan Legislative Audit Bureau shared a report outlining inconsistent administration of election law based on surveys of ballots from around the state.

The subpoena — issued by the Senate Committee on Elections, Election Process Reform and Ethics and signed by Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu, Senate President Chris Kapenga and committee chair Senator Kathleen Bernier — calls for the city to turn over all physical absentee ballot certificates for the November 2020 General Election and the results of tests on electronic voting machines used for the election.

According to LAB’s report, Madison City Clerk Maribeth Witzel-Behl was the only clerk to decline to let the LAB physically handle absentee ballot certificates, citing chain-of-custody concerns.

‘Having to sign the third subpoena in the history of the Senate is not something I take lightly. It’s unfortunate and concerning that a few people running elections think they are more important than the electorate,’ Kapenga said. ‘I sign this with the full effect of the law behind it. We are not playing games, and there will be consequences if they don’t comply.’

Senate Republicans’ election investigation is being run simultaneously with a separate investigation led by former Supreme Court Justice Mike Gableman. Earlier this fall, Gableman sent subpoenas to the Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state’s five largest cities asking for election materials and interviews with election officials. A judge has set a hearing on whether or not to block that subpoena.”

Read 📰 Channel 3000
Learn more🔎🧵 WI Thread

@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—

Colorado election integrity advocate Sheronna Bishop is live now on FrankSpeech.com telling about how the FBI broke her door down and placed her in handcuffs for half an hour, manhandling her children.

She says they were there to intimidate her and to silence her speech and assistance of Tina Peters, one of the only election clerks in the country with evidence of intentional deletion of election data.

Watch the video replay here

Colorado officials love to pride themselves on being the "Gold Standard" in elections, and yet this state is emerging as one of the most corrupt and most obstructive to justice.

This week, FBI officers with automatic weapons and combat gear entered the homes of 66-year old Gold Star mother and County Clerk Tina Peters, and election integrity advocate Sherronna Bishop. See them tell their stories first-hand HERE, HERE and HERE.

A panel of 4 ex-FBI agents also spoke to Bannon Howse this week, expressing their utter disgust at the unethical practices and lack of integrity in the current FBI, pointing to severe problems at the top levels of leadership. See Part 1 and Part 2, with Parts 3 & 4 coming soon.

We're also hearing reports of Dominion sending multiple donations to Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Attorney General Phil Weiser. Is that why state officials are not investigating Dominion, but instead hunting down the whistle-blowers?

Read our background on the dozens of issues emerging in Colorado:
https://electionfraud20.org/fraud-summary-by-state/colorado/

And a shout-out to USEIP (useip.org), a team of courageous volunteers who are fighting against the systemic corruption to bring the evidence to light. More volunteers are always needed across the country. Learn more via their site, and consider getting involved.

🚨 BREAKING:
USEIP reports on a new lawsuit that was filed today, Nov 19, in Colorado against Secretary of State Jena Griswold.

It centers around 3 levels of state corruption:

1. Election officials knowingly destroyed election records in violation of both state and federal laws.

2. Election officials certified voting equipment based on a test lab that was not accredited, again in violation of law.

3. SOS issued “emergency” decrees to block the independent audits that citizens have been asking for, stating that only election officials can audit themselves.

We’ve reported on these issues previously, but it’s encouraging to see these gain momentum and form a solid case for the courts.

🙏 Pray that these issues do not get swept aside or obstructed by corrupt judges, but that justice and cleansing take place, and integrity is restored.

Visit USEIP.org for more, or read our article on Election Fraud in Colorado for more background.

— @ElectionFraud20_org
#Colorado

📣 Help Wanted!!! 🚨

Here is your chance to make a tangible difference.

1- As we posted a few days ago, please contact your Republican State Attorneys General to encourage them to sign onto the upcoming Supreme Court lawsuit.

2- Become a "cyber adjudicator" and join Project Polaris

# Project Polaris

The concept and the process is very simple.

Apply for an account. (You only need to provide your name and email address. An anonymous name is fine.)

Once your account is activated (which might take a few hours to a day), you can sign in and start adjudicating official ballot images.

Adjudicating a ballot image typically takes 2 mins. All you need to do is, look at the ballot image and transcribe the results by clicking on some tick boxes. That is it!

You can also write some notes about the ballot image if something stands out.

Yes, it is that simple! 👏

The goal is to build an army of cyber adjudicators.

The system can cope with thousands of cyber adjudicators.

🔉So spread the word, share the link, get others involved, including your family. 🔉

⚠️ Some may find this addictive 😉

## Purpose:

- Recount of official ballot images

## FAQs:

> Is a "recount" a waste of time? Won't the numbers match the official tally?

It is not a waste of time, and yes, the numbers "should" match the official tally, but we will never know for sure unless we do the recount.

There are many reasons for doing a recount, some of them are:

- Capture the full ballot race results so we can compare the presidential race with other races. i.e. do a full "down ballot" analysis.

- See first hand what ballots look like. If anything looks suspicious you can add notes to each ballot image. (E.g. if there are no visible fold marks, or the oval markings look computer generated.)

- Determine which counties actually have the full set of ballot images and which ones don't. We might be able to tell the fake ones from the real ones, if they decide to "fabricate" new ones.

- Keep counties and states accountable by letting them know we are watching, committed and will no longer "trust" their word. We are putting them on notice!

> What if people purposely tick the wrong boxes?

Every image is reviewed at least three times by different cyber adjudicators. If all three set of results perfectly match each other, the results are saved and the ballot image is "retired".

The ballot image keeps getting randomly served to different adjudicators until there are 3 perfect matches.

> Who can participate?

Anyone! You don't have to live in the county or state from which the ballot image comes from to adjudicate it.

# Find out more

- Pdf
- Video
- Official Project Polaris website

If you have more questions please ask in the comments.

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Dr. Doug Frank recently released this chart which summarizes his findings across two-dozen states. Can you find your state?

The ones to the right of the chart have a lot of high numbers of people registered to vote, in some cases exceeding 100% of the population.

The ones towards the top of the chart have a high percentage of residents actually voting in the election. Excessively high numbers indicate where forensic audits are needed.

If you haven't been following Dr. Frank, you can get up to speed with our overview of his findings on ElectionFraud20.org.

There's also a great 3-min video that explains Dr. Frank's concepts in a way that a teenager can understand.

Keep an eye out for the Supreme Court filing coming very soon, which will contain more of Dr. Frank's analysis. Let your State Attorney General know you want them to stand in support of this case and sign the petition asking the court to accept the bill.

— @ElectionFraud20_org

Here's Lindell's SCOTUS complaint.

It's addressed in a way that allows any state AG to sign on.

It includes complaints against machine fraud, vote flipping, unconstitutional voting procedures, and includes exhibits from Dr. Shiva, Jovan Pullitzer and others.

To be clear this is just the complaint so it will be HIGHLY fascinating to see the exhibits once they become available but all in all, this is a very solid complaint with great detail and documentation.

@ElectionEvidence 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

TX GOP Stronghold - Part II

Continuation from: https://t.iss.one/ElectionFraud20_org/216

This shows that wherever there was a large Republican turnout (mainly in Republican county strongholds), the Democrat turnout was even larger. 🤯

How is this possible? 🧐

——

We recently published an article that reveals ALL the most suspicious counties based on the Democrat Vote Increase z-score value (zDVI).

The article provides a link to a csv file that contains the full zScore analysis for all counties grouped by state. Enjoy 🍰