Ecochaos
Modern ecology applies egalitarianism to a different field. This time it is not about gender identity (man/woman inequality) but species identity - human/environmental. Ecology demands that this inequality be mitigated, if not abolished. The most extreme versions of fundamental ecology propose the idea that man represents a fault line in the evolution of nature and must be abolished as an anomaly.
Human activities are polluting the environment, destroying ecological landscapes and many animal species. Humans are destroying the oceans, deforesting, disturbing the Earth's interior and contributing to changes in the atmosphere, particularly in the ozone layer. Environmentalists have proposed reconsidering the idea that 'man is the tip of creation and the pinnacle of evolution' and have taken it as axiomatic that man is one of nature's phenomena along with all others and therefore has a number of fundamental obligations to nature.
Previously, man and nature were considered two different realms, two orbits. The realm of the mind and that of the earth's material environment did not intersect. The philosopher Dilthey proposed a strict division of the sciences into spiritual sciences (Geistwissenschaften) and natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften) - each domain needs its own algorithms, principles, semantic structures [5].
Ecologists demand the abolition of this hierarchical distance and at least the equalisation of the rights of spirit and matter, of thinking and non-thinking life forms. Furthermore, they insist on a radical revision of relations with the environment: it is not a zone of externality, but an existential landscape of human existence. Man is inscribed in nature and nature in man. And this reciprocal relationship must be equal and reversible.
Continuation in comments
Modern ecology applies egalitarianism to a different field. This time it is not about gender identity (man/woman inequality) but species identity - human/environmental. Ecology demands that this inequality be mitigated, if not abolished. The most extreme versions of fundamental ecology propose the idea that man represents a fault line in the evolution of nature and must be abolished as an anomaly.
Human activities are polluting the environment, destroying ecological landscapes and many animal species. Humans are destroying the oceans, deforesting, disturbing the Earth's interior and contributing to changes in the atmosphere, particularly in the ozone layer. Environmentalists have proposed reconsidering the idea that 'man is the tip of creation and the pinnacle of evolution' and have taken it as axiomatic that man is one of nature's phenomena along with all others and therefore has a number of fundamental obligations to nature.
Previously, man and nature were considered two different realms, two orbits. The realm of the mind and that of the earth's material environment did not intersect. The philosopher Dilthey proposed a strict division of the sciences into spiritual sciences (Geistwissenschaften) and natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften) - each domain needs its own algorithms, principles, semantic structures [5].
Ecologists demand the abolition of this hierarchical distance and at least the equalisation of the rights of spirit and matter, of thinking and non-thinking life forms. Furthermore, they insist on a radical revision of relations with the environment: it is not a zone of externality, but an existential landscape of human existence. Man is inscribed in nature and nature in man. And this reciprocal relationship must be equal and reversible.
Continuation in comments
🔥24👍10🤯2
Forwarded from Ambassade de Russie en France / Посольство России во Франции
Le 21 décembre, l’architecte français Shahnour Kechichian a remis à S.E.M. Alexey Meshkov, Ambassadeur de Russie en France, un portrait de Daria Douguina, realisé par l'artiste russe Yulia Mezhevikina. La cérémonie a eu lieu dans l'enceinte de la Maison russe des sciences et de la culture à Paris.
"La mort de Daria Douguina a secoué la Russie et n’a pas laissé indifférents nos amis étrangers... Cher M. Keshishyan, ce portrait de Daria Douguina, fait sur votre commande, prendra la place qui lui revient dans la bibliothèque de la Maison russe des sciences et de la culture à Paris. Que le souvenir de cette fille polyvalente, courageuse et passionnée reste à jamais dans nos cœurs", a souligné l’Ambassadeur.
"La mort de Daria Douguina a secoué la Russie et n’a pas laissé indifférents nos amis étrangers... Cher M. Keshishyan, ce portrait de Daria Douguina, fait sur votre commande, prendra la place qui lui revient dans la bibliothèque de la Maison russe des sciences et de la culture à Paris. Que le souvenir de cette fille polyvalente, courageuse et passionnée reste à jamais dans nos cœurs", a souligné l’Ambassadeur.
👍21❤10❤🔥4
Forwarded from Voz da Nova Resistência
Historicamente é comum abordar, de forma dicotômica, os conceitos de Primeiro Mundo e Terceiro Mundo sem dar muita atenção o que se encontra na posição intermediária. Segundo Alexander Dugin, porém, é precisamente o conceito de Segundo Mundo que precisa ser resgatado, nos termos da ideia de Estado-Civilização, para ajudar a construir a multipolaridade.
https://novaresistencia.org/2022/12/17/segundo-mundo-semiperiferia-e-estado-civilizacao-na-teoria-do-mundo-multipolar/
https://novaresistencia.org/2022/12/17/segundo-mundo-semiperiferia-e-estado-civilizacao-na-teoria-do-mundo-multipolar/
Nova Resistência
Segundo Mundo, Semiperiferia e Estado-Civilização na Teoria do Mundo Multipolar | Nova Resistência
Historicamente é comum abordar, de forma dicotômica, os conceitos de Primeiro Mundo e Terceiro Mundo sem dar muita atenção o que se encontra na posição intermediária. Segundo Alexander Dugin, porém, é precisamente o conceito de Segundo Mundo que precisa ser…
👍19🔥5
The present transcript of the lecture took place at the Eurasian Youth Union summer camp in the year 2022...
On The Frontier Metaphysics
By Daria Dugina
https://www.geopolitika.ru/en/article/frontier-metaphysics
In Memory of Darya Platonova-Dugina
On The Frontier Metaphysics
By Daria Dugina
https://www.geopolitika.ru/en/article/frontier-metaphysics
In Memory of Darya Platonova-Dugina
❤🔥37❤15🕊6
The chaos of intelligent machines
The degree of chaos also increases when the philosophy of transhumanism takes shape, starting with the equation between man and machine. Here, another hierarchical orbit is overcome.
The notion of proximity between man and machine developed among New Age thinkers long before modern transhumanism. Materialism and atheism pushed precisely this interpretation of man as a perfect machine.
The French philosopher Lambert, in his seminal work entitled 'Man-Machine', states this directly [6] . This thesis became the generalisation of a direction in medicine called 'iatromechanics' or 'iatrophysics' (J. Borelli, W. Garvey, etc.), where the various organs of the human body were represented in the form of analogical working tools: arms and legs - levers and joints, lungs - bellows, heart - pump, etc. Duckart had already insisted that animals were machines that could be easily calculated in the future and their direct, and even more perfect, counterparts created. But Descartes excluded the human mind, its subjectivity, from this picture. Lambert goes further than Descartes and the 'jatromechanics' and proposes to consider the whole man - and not just his body - as a machine. Yes, this machine has an as yet unrecognised engine, the intellect that controls the entire mechanism, but in time it too will have to be calculated and thus a moulage will be created.
When psychiatrists later studied the workings of the brain, the idea of the mechanical structure of the mind was further developed and the discovery of synapses in the cerebral cortex was seen as confirmation that science had come closer to unravelling the workings of consciousness.
Continuation in comments
The degree of chaos also increases when the philosophy of transhumanism takes shape, starting with the equation between man and machine. Here, another hierarchical orbit is overcome.
The notion of proximity between man and machine developed among New Age thinkers long before modern transhumanism. Materialism and atheism pushed precisely this interpretation of man as a perfect machine.
The French philosopher Lambert, in his seminal work entitled 'Man-Machine', states this directly [6] . This thesis became the generalisation of a direction in medicine called 'iatromechanics' or 'iatrophysics' (J. Borelli, W. Garvey, etc.), where the various organs of the human body were represented in the form of analogical working tools: arms and legs - levers and joints, lungs - bellows, heart - pump, etc. Duckart had already insisted that animals were machines that could be easily calculated in the future and their direct, and even more perfect, counterparts created. But Descartes excluded the human mind, its subjectivity, from this picture. Lambert goes further than Descartes and the 'jatromechanics' and proposes to consider the whole man - and not just his body - as a machine. Yes, this machine has an as yet unrecognised engine, the intellect that controls the entire mechanism, but in time it too will have to be calculated and thus a moulage will be created.
When psychiatrists later studied the workings of the brain, the idea of the mechanical structure of the mind was further developed and the discovery of synapses in the cerebral cortex was seen as confirmation that science had come closer to unravelling the workings of consciousness.
Continuation in comments
👍25⚡8🔥6