This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฟ #ETH Vitalik Buterin: We seriously consider the possibility of Ethereum migration on Poseidon Hash to optimize the friendship of ZK-Prover.
๐ CQ: Over the past 24 hours, the CEX has been sold with a loss of 79.3 thousand #bTC. This is the largest BTC sale in 2025.
๐ค CryptoAttack ๐ฌ๐ง
๐ #ETH #TORN Vitalik donated another 100 #ETH to the Tornado Cash founder support fund (1, 2).
๐ช #eth #torn Ethereum Foundation: EF donates $ 1.25 million to the legal protection of Alexei Pertsev.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฎ CEO Bank of America predicts that this or next year is not expected to further reduce the Fedโs rate.
๐ฐ The Raise Crypto Cart Plant announced the completion of funding in the amount of $ 63 million led by Haun Ventures, with the participation of Paper Ventures, GSR and Raja Gocal, co-founder of SOLANA.
๐บ๐ธ๐โโ Patrick McGenry, the former chairman of the Communist Party Committee on the House of Representatives of the United States, joined the A16Z as an adviser. twitter
๐ฐ ligero, cryptostarter, specializing in ZKP technology, attracted $ 4 million from
Galaxy Ventures, 1kx, Franklin Templeton, etc. the block
Galaxy Ventures, 1kx, Franklin Templeton, etc. the block
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ค๐ #btc already -20% after recommendations Kramer add it to the portfolio
๐ค CryptoAttack ๐ฌ๐ง
๐ฟ SAFE: The SAFE security team is working closely with Bybit during an ongoing investigation. We did not find evidence that the official SAFE interface was compromised. However, out of caution Safe Wallet temporarily stops certain functions.
๐ #MNT CEO Bybit: BYBIT HALL is caused by hacking SAFE infrastructure.
SAFE: Smart contracts and the source code of the interface were not affected, the attack was carried out by hacking the "Car of the developer Safe {Wallet}", which affected the account controlled by Bybit. Safe {Wallet} added security measures to eliminate the attack vector.
SAFE: Smart contracts and the source code of the interface were not affected, the attack was carried out by hacking the "Car of the developer Safe {Wallet}", which affected the account controlled by Bybit. Safe {Wallet} added security measures to eliminate the attack vector.
๐imes zachxbt joins Paradigm as a consultant. twitter
X (formerly Twitter)
ZachXBT (@zachxbt) on X
Pleased to share I'll be working with @MattHuang @Paradigm as an incident response advisor to assist their portfolio companies.
It was an easy decision as this gives me the freedom to continue helping the community and publishing investigations like.
Iโveโฆ
It was an easy decision as this gives me the freedom to continue helping the community and publishing investigations like.
Iโveโฆ
๐ค CryptoAttack ๐ฌ๐ง
๐ #MNT CEO Bybit: BYBIT HALL is caused by hacking SAFE infrastructure. SAFE: Smart contracts and the source code of the interface were not affected, the attack was carried out by hacking the "Car of the developer Safe {Wallet}", which affected the accountโฆ
๐ค CZ: This update from SAFE is not so wonderful. It uses vague formulations to smooth out problems. After reading, I have more questions left than answers.
1. What does "hacked the computer of the developer SAFE {
Wallet}? How did they hack this specific computer? Was it social engineering, virus, etc.?
2. How did the developer's computer gain access to the BYBIT account controlled?
3. How did they deceive the stage of checking the accounting book at several signaling parties? Was it a blind signature? Or did the signed parties not check properly?
4. So, was the largest address worth 1.4 billion $, controlled by SAFE? Why weren't they aimed at other users?
1. What does "hacked the computer of the developer SAFE {
Wallet}? How did they hack this specific computer? Was it social engineering, virus, etc.?
2. How did the developer's computer gain access to the BYBIT account controlled?
3. How did they deceive the stage of checking the accounting book at several signaling parties? Was it a blind signature? Or did the signed parties not check properly?
4. So, was the largest address worth 1.4 billion $, controlled by SAFE? Why weren't they aimed at other users?
X (formerly Twitter)
CZ ๐ถ BNB (@cz_binance) on X
I usually try not to criticize other industry players, but I still do it once in a while. ๐
This update from Safe is not that great. It uses vague language to brush over the issues. I have more questions than answers after reading it.
1. What does "compromisingโฆ
This update from Safe is not that great. It uses vague language to brush over the issues. I have more questions than answers after reading it.
1. What does "compromisingโฆ