A good selection for those who want to improve their skills in practice, rather than just reading theory:
tags: #ML #DataScience #DataAnalysis
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค5๐ฏ1
Awesome DataScience โ a structured list of open-source data, datasets, libraries, and tutorials for solving real-world problems. ๐ ๏ธ
It's useful for both beginners and those already familiar with the field โ you'll find something new here.
โ๏ธ Link to GitHub: https://github.com/academic/awesome-datascience
tags: #DataScientist
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค8
Most AI engineers never fully understood the maths behind what they build! ๐คฏ๐งฎ
This is an open, unconventional textbook covering maths, CS, and AI from the ground up, written for curious practitioners who want to deeply understand the field, not just survive an interview. ๐โจ
Over 7 years of AI/ML experience distilled into intuition-first, no hand-waving explanations that connect the concepts in a way that actually sticks. ๐ง ๐
What it covers:
- Vectors, linear algebra, calculus, and optimization ๐๐
- Classical machine learning and deep learning ๐ค
- Transformer architectures and LLMs ๐ฆ
- Efficient architectures, quantization, and distillation โก๏ธ
- CUDA, GPU programming, and SIMD ๐
- AI inference and deployment ๐
Ships with an MCP server so Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent can use the compendium as a live knowledge base during development. You only need elementary maths and basic Python to start. ๐๐
Repo: https://github.com/HenryNdubuaku/maths-cs-ai-compendium ๐
https://t.iss.one/CodeProgrammer
This is an open, unconventional textbook covering maths, CS, and AI from the ground up, written for curious practitioners who want to deeply understand the field, not just survive an interview. ๐โจ
Over 7 years of AI/ML experience distilled into intuition-first, no hand-waving explanations that connect the concepts in a way that actually sticks. ๐ง ๐
What it covers:
- Vectors, linear algebra, calculus, and optimization ๐๐
- Classical machine learning and deep learning ๐ค
- Transformer architectures and LLMs ๐ฆ
- Efficient architectures, quantization, and distillation โก๏ธ
- CUDA, GPU programming, and SIMD ๐
- AI inference and deployment ๐
Ships with an MCP server so Claude Code, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent can use the compendium as a live knowledge base during development. You only need elementary maths and basic Python to start. ๐๐
Repo: https://github.com/HenryNdubuaku/maths-cs-ai-compendium ๐
https://t.iss.one/CodeProgrammer
โค7
Overfitting and Generalisation in ML.pdf
380.5 KB
Overfitting and Generalization in Machine Learning
My ML model had 100% accuracy.
And was completely useless.
That's not a paradox; that's overfitting.
The model didn't learn. It memorized.
Here's the mathematical core most tutorials skip:
E[loss] = Biasยฒ + Variance + ฯยฒ
โ Biasยฒ = too simple โ Underfitting
โ Variance = too complex โ Overfitting
โ ฯยฒ = irreducible โ always there
What this actually means in practice:
โ A degree-9 polynomial on 6 data points hits Rยฒ = 1.0 and oscillates wildly between them
โ A linear model on sine-wave data has near-zero variance โ but massive bias
โ The optimal model isn't the simplest. Not the most complex. It's the one minimizing Biasยฒ + Variance
And the generalization gap?
Formally defined as:
gen_gap(f) = R(f) โ R_emp(f)
When this value is โซ 0, your model is learning noise, not signal.
The fix isn't "collect more data and hope."
The fix is regularization, which I derive fully in my paper: L1, L2, Dropout, and Early Stopping, all from first principles.
Which regularization strategy do you use most and why?
https://t.iss.one/CodeProgrammer
My ML model had 100% accuracy.
And was completely useless.
That's not a paradox; that's overfitting.
The model didn't learn. It memorized.
Here's the mathematical core most tutorials skip:
E[loss] = Biasยฒ + Variance + ฯยฒ
โ Biasยฒ = too simple โ Underfitting
โ Variance = too complex โ Overfitting
โ ฯยฒ = irreducible โ always there
What this actually means in practice:
โ A degree-9 polynomial on 6 data points hits Rยฒ = 1.0 and oscillates wildly between them
โ A linear model on sine-wave data has near-zero variance โ but massive bias
โ The optimal model isn't the simplest. Not the most complex. It's the one minimizing Biasยฒ + Variance
And the generalization gap?
Formally defined as:
gen_gap(f) = R(f) โ R_emp(f)
When this value is โซ 0, your model is learning noise, not signal.
The fix isn't "collect more data and hope."
The fix is regularization, which I derive fully in my paper: L1, L2, Dropout, and Early Stopping, all from first principles.
Which regularization strategy do you use most and why?
https://t.iss.one/CodeProgrammer
โค5
Follow the Machine Learning with Python channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaC7Weq29753hpcggW2A
WhatsApp.com
Machine Learning with Python
Channel โข 5.2K followers โข Learn Machine Learning with hands-on Python tutorials, real-world code examples, and clear explanations for researchers and developers.
โค1