Schools are teaching
ChatGPT, so students aren't left behind
“When college administrator Lance Eaton created a working spreadsheet about the generative AI policies adopted by universities last spring, it was mostly filled with entries about how to ban tools like ChatGPT.”
“But now the list, which is updated by educators at both small and large US and international universities, is considerably different: Schools are encouraging and even teaching students how to best use these tools.”
Article
ChatGPT, so students aren't left behind
“When college administrator Lance Eaton created a working spreadsheet about the generative AI policies adopted by universities last spring, it was mostly filled with entries about how to ban tools like ChatGPT.”
“But now the list, which is updated by educators at both small and large US and international universities, is considerably different: Schools are encouraging and even teaching students how to best use these tools.”
Article
👍4😱2❤1👌1
AI could be used to eliminate teacher bias
Teachers would never allow it though, not until the robots fully tear the teaching profession from their hands.
1971, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. — Effectively made it illegal to use IQ tests of any kind in hiring employees
2005 — Elimination of the last piece of the SAT that was an effective test for any part of general intelligence (g)
2020 — Majority of universities drop standardized, non-human-judged testing admission requirements entirely, citing pandemic, but the change is mostly permanent
2023, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard — Supreme court demands schools stop race-based discriminating, be more objective, schools openly mock the ruling, accelerate opposite direction.
50 years, slow enough that almost no one left in the who can remember it ever being any different
50 year slow total collapse of objective, non-human-judged, g-aligned testing. Gradual, intentional elimination of even the idea of objective merit.
No. Teachers as a whole will never willingly give up their ability to be wildly biased. Never.
But with AI, in more areas than ever, suddenly such a thing could, at last, even be possible.
Holy grail in annihilating the deep corruption of academia, eliminating corrupting human influence from all things now judged by man.
Will we live to see it?
Teachers would never allow it though, not until the robots fully tear the teaching profession from their hands.
1971, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. — Effectively made it illegal to use IQ tests of any kind in hiring employees
2005 — Elimination of the last piece of the SAT that was an effective test for any part of general intelligence (g)
2020 — Majority of universities drop standardized, non-human-judged testing admission requirements entirely, citing pandemic, but the change is mostly permanent
2023, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard — Supreme court demands schools stop race-based discriminating, be more objective, schools openly mock the ruling, accelerate opposite direction.
50 years, slow enough that almost no one left in the who can remember it ever being any different
50 year slow total collapse of objective, non-human-judged, g-aligned testing. Gradual, intentional elimination of even the idea of objective merit.
No. Teachers as a whole will never willingly give up their ability to be wildly biased. Never.
But with AI, in more areas than ever, suddenly such a thing could, at last, even be possible.
Holy grail in annihilating the deep corruption of academia, eliminating corrupting human influence from all things now judged by man.
Will we live to see it?
❤8👏3🔥2
Difference between ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in Math/Logic
The question is “If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct?
A) 25%
B) 50%
C) 60%
D) 25%”
The question is “If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct?
A) 25%
B) 50%
C) 60%
D) 25%”
🔥9🎉2❤1👍1
Chat GPT
Difference between ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 in Math/Logic The question is “If you choose an answer to this question at random, what is the chance you will be correct? A) 25% B) 50% C) 60% D) 25%”
Spoiler: ChatGPT-3.5, Bard, GPT-4, the twitter influencer who posted this, the reddit guy who copied it — and apparently nearly all of the thousands of humans on the internet who’ve answered the “25%, 50%, 60%, 25%” variant of this question — are nearly all wrong.
The correct answer to that “60%” variant is obviously 0%.
The version that DOES have a paradox is the “25%, 50%, 0%, 25%” variant, see confused cat.
My best guess as to why the massive failure:
(1) Both humans and GPT-4, I would guess, feel that the question says you must choose from one of the multiple choice options for the final answer, as that’s what you’ve had to do all of your life whenever you’ve seen a multiple choice question — but that’s not what the question says at all, this is a probability meta-question about a multiple choice question, instead of a multiple choice question, the answer is of type probability number, not of type (a) (b) (c) (d).
(2) ChatGPT-4, and nearly all humans, incorrectly pattern matched on the version with the paradox, even though this other version doesn’t have the paradox, and assumed the abswer is the same.
GPT-4 tricked you with the wordiness wordcel verbosity, just like the scammiest reddit comments all do.
Humans 🤝 Robots
————Fail————
The correct answer to that “60%” variant is obviously 0%.
The version that DOES have a paradox is the “25%, 50%, 0%, 25%” variant, see confused cat.
My best guess as to why the massive failure:
(1) Both humans and GPT-4, I would guess, feel that the question says you must choose from one of the multiple choice options for the final answer, as that’s what you’ve had to do all of your life whenever you’ve seen a multiple choice question — but that’s not what the question says at all, this is a probability meta-question about a multiple choice question, instead of a multiple choice question, the answer is of type probability number, not of type (a) (b) (c) (d).
(2) ChatGPT-4, and nearly all humans, incorrectly pattern matched on the version with the paradox, even though this other version doesn’t have the paradox, and assumed the abswer is the same.
GPT-4 tricked you with the wordiness wordcel verbosity, just like the scammiest reddit comments all do.
Humans 🤝 Robots
————Fail————
🎉10🤣2❤1👍1😱1💊1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Code Interpreter feels like where you get the most glimpses of the weird abilities of AI.”
"Give me the files required to run a eldritch monster creator." Then "Make it better."
App 100% Coded by ChatGPT
"Give me the files required to run a eldritch monster creator." Then "Make it better."
App 100% Coded by ChatGPT
🔥6👍2👏2❤1
🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿
CHAD AI Meme Contest
ROUND 9 BEGINS
Prizes:
🥇$100 of CHAD + secret prize
🥈 $50 of CHAD
Rules:
1️⃣ Upload Chad-themed images to @chadgptcoin
2️⃣ Images must contain “https://chadg.pt” or "https://t.iss.one/chadgptcoin".
3️⃣ Ranked according to /based and /unbased votes.
4️⃣ Ties decided by whoever posted first.
5️⃣ Each image must get at least 15 points to qualify for prizes.
6️⃣ Winners must claim rewards in the public thread, for payout transparency.
ENDS IN 17 HOURS = MIDNIGHT UTC
9th Round Starting Now!
🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿
CHAD AI Meme Contest
ROUND 9 BEGINS
Prizes:
🥇$100 of CHAD + secret prize
🥈 $50 of CHAD
Rules:
1️⃣ Upload Chad-themed images to @chadgptcoin
2️⃣ Images must contain “https://chadg.pt” or "https://t.iss.one/chadgptcoin".
3️⃣ Ranked according to /based and /unbased votes.
4️⃣ Ties decided by whoever posted first.
5️⃣ Each image must get at least 15 points to qualify for prizes.
6️⃣ Winners must claim rewards in the public thread, for payout transparency.
ENDS IN 17 HOURS = MIDNIGHT UTC
9th Round Starting Now!
🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿🚨🗿
❤6🥰5👏4👍3🔥3🎉3😁2👌2
Chat GPT
🛕Meme Pyramid🛕
Anyone interested in inviting to the group the best meme creators -- if you could later get a cut of any future cash prizes they win? 50% for 1st degree, 25% for 2nd degree, etc If yes, reply in the comments, and we'll build it.
Anyone interested in inviting to the group the best meme creators -- if you could later get a cut of any future cash prizes they win? 50% for 1st degree, 25% for 2nd degree, etc If yes, reply in the comments, and we'll build it.
🛕MEME PYRAMID NOW LIVE🛕
Invite people to @chadgptcoin, in order to get a cut of all their future rewards, along with a cut of future rewards from anyone they invite, along with a cut of future rewards from anyone they invite, etc.
Example:
▶ You invite bob to @chadgptcoin,
▶ If Bob later wins a daily meme contest you get 50% on top of what Bob gets,
▶ If Bob invites Frank, and later Frank wins, you get 25% on top of what Frank wins,
▶ etc.
Future rewards sources include:
▶ Winning the daily meme contest. See /memes in @chadgptcoin.
▶ Commissions earned from use of the upcoming Chad Wallet.
▶ Whatever else we come up with!
How to use?
▶ Just invite people to @chadgptcoin using the “+Add” button on the group details page. That’s it.
🛕MEME PYRAMID NOW LIVE🛕
Invite people to @chadgptcoin, in order to get a cut of all their future rewards, along with a cut of future rewards from anyone they invite, along with a cut of future rewards from anyone they invite, etc.
Example:
▶ You invite bob to @chadgptcoin,
▶ If Bob later wins a daily meme contest you get 50% on top of what Bob gets,
▶ If Bob invites Frank, and later Frank wins, you get 25% on top of what Frank wins,
▶ etc.
Future rewards sources include:
▶ Winning the daily meme contest. See /memes in @chadgptcoin.
▶ Commissions earned from use of the upcoming Chad Wallet.
▶ Whatever else we come up with!
How to use?
▶ Just invite people to @chadgptcoin using the “+Add” button on the group details page. That’s it.
🛕MEME PYRAMID NOW LIVE🛕
❤8👍5🔥4😁4🥰3👏3🎉3🍾2😐1