Schools are teaching
ChatGPT, so students aren't left behind
βWhen college administrator Lance Eaton created a working spreadsheet about the generative AI policies adopted by universities last spring, it was mostly filled with entries about how to ban tools like ChatGPT.β
βBut now the list, which is updated by educators at both small and large US and international universities, is considerably different: Schools are encouraging and even teaching students how to best use these tools.β
Article
ChatGPT, so students aren't left behind
βWhen college administrator Lance Eaton created a working spreadsheet about the generative AI policies adopted by universities last spring, it was mostly filled with entries about how to ban tools like ChatGPT.β
βBut now the list, which is updated by educators at both small and large US and international universities, is considerably different: Schools are encouraging and even teaching students how to best use these tools.β
Article
π4π±2β€1π1
AI could be used to eliminate teacher bias
Teachers would never allow it though, not until the robots fully tear the teaching profession from their hands.
1971, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. β Effectively made it illegal to use IQ tests of any kind in hiring employees
2005 β Elimination of the last piece of the SAT that was an effective test for any part of general intelligence (g)
2020 β Majority of universities drop standardized, non-human-judged testing admission requirements entirely, citing pandemic, but the change is mostly permanent
2023, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard β Supreme court demands schools stop race-based discriminating, be more objective, schools openly mock the ruling, accelerate opposite direction.
50 years, slow enough that almost no one left in the who can remember it ever being any different
50 year slow total collapse of objective, non-human-judged, g-aligned testing. Gradual, intentional elimination of even the idea of objective merit.
No. Teachers as a whole will never willingly give up their ability to be wildly biased. Never.
But with AI, in more areas than ever, suddenly such a thing could, at last, even be possible.
Holy grail in annihilating the deep corruption of academia, eliminating corrupting human influence from all things now judged by man.
Will we live to see it?
Teachers would never allow it though, not until the robots fully tear the teaching profession from their hands.
1971, Griggs v. Duke Power Co. β Effectively made it illegal to use IQ tests of any kind in hiring employees
2005 β Elimination of the last piece of the SAT that was an effective test for any part of general intelligence (g)
2020 β Majority of universities drop standardized, non-human-judged testing admission requirements entirely, citing pandemic, but the change is mostly permanent
2023, Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard β Supreme court demands schools stop race-based discriminating, be more objective, schools openly mock the ruling, accelerate opposite direction.
50 years, slow enough that almost no one left in the who can remember it ever being any different
50 year slow total collapse of objective, non-human-judged, g-aligned testing. Gradual, intentional elimination of even the idea of objective merit.
No. Teachers as a whole will never willingly give up their ability to be wildly biased. Never.
But with AI, in more areas than ever, suddenly such a thing could, at last, even be possible.
Holy grail in annihilating the deep corruption of academia, eliminating corrupting human influence from all things now judged by man.
Will we live to see it?
β€8π3π₯2