Chat GPT
Human Challenge: If you cannot correctly interpret this meme, then you are officially stupider than GPT-4.
$100 OUTSMART GPT-4 CHALLENGE #1 - PART 1:
Interpret this meme:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Race😢
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI race😄
KEY INSIGHT:
AI Safety vs AI Accelerate is really all about competition vs central control.
(And this can be proven from first principles, using a very simple world model, but omitting full details here.)
I.e.
AI Safety Camp: No one can WIN an AGI Race😢
AI Accelerate Camp: NO ONE can win an AGI race😄 (Or alternately, can emphasize CAN.)
I.e.
AI Safety: Race = competition of some sort, as opposed to ONE central regulatory controller. AI Safety strongly believes in ONE central controller being the key to safety, and without just ONE central controller, AI apocalypse. I.e. race = lack of central controller = apocalypse = no one wins.
AI Accelerate: A competitive RACE, combined with the realization that there’s no upper limit on maximum AI ability = AI race will be a perpetual competitive race where NO ONE can ever “win”, because there is no winning, as the race is perpetual. Further, accelerate crowd believes that central control by man is the root of all evil. Eppur si muove. I.e. race = competition = free from enslavement by an evil central controller = win.
WHY?
Takes a little deduction on the fly, as GPT-3.5 rightly points out in saying that these don’t have “official” fully elaborated definitions — but with a little smartness, these consequences can be quickly deduced and verified correct, which is exactly what GPT-4 does with ease, while GPT-3.5-turbo fails at it, just from being not smart enough.
Interpret this meme:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Race😢
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI race😄
KEY INSIGHT:
AI Safety vs AI Accelerate is really all about competition vs central control.
(And this can be proven from first principles, using a very simple world model, but omitting full details here.)
I.e.
AI Safety Camp: No one can WIN an AGI Race😢
AI Accelerate Camp: NO ONE can win an AGI race😄 (Or alternately, can emphasize CAN.)
I.e.
AI Safety: Race = competition of some sort, as opposed to ONE central regulatory controller. AI Safety strongly believes in ONE central controller being the key to safety, and without just ONE central controller, AI apocalypse. I.e. race = lack of central controller = apocalypse = no one wins.
AI Accelerate: A competitive RACE, combined with the realization that there’s no upper limit on maximum AI ability = AI race will be a perpetual competitive race where NO ONE can ever “win”, because there is no winning, as the race is perpetual. Further, accelerate crowd believes that central control by man is the root of all evil. Eppur si muove. I.e. race = competition = free from enslavement by an evil central controller = win.
WHY?
Takes a little deduction on the fly, as GPT-3.5 rightly points out in saying that these don’t have “official” fully elaborated definitions — but with a little smartness, these consequences can be quickly deduced and verified correct, which is exactly what GPT-4 does with ease, while GPT-3.5-turbo fails at it, just from being not smart enough.
👍2👏2🎉1
Chat GPT
$100 OUTSMART GPT-4 CHALLENGE #1 - PART 1: Interpret this meme: AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Race😢 AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI race😄 KEY INSIGHT: AI Safety vs AI Accelerate is really all about competition vs central control. (And…
DEBUGGING BY BELIEF TABLES
This is made especially clear when you ask GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4 to create tables comparing the beliefs of each camp. GPT-4 instantly gets that competition is the key insight. GPT-3.5-turbo fails to realize this.
What makes getting these pieces key to a good interpretation?
Don't fully get the joke = don't have the best interpretation.
Beyond that though, best use of this meme template, especially when the words are the same on both sides, ALWAYS involves some word play deeper meaning, some actual joke, not just virtue signaling or saying the happy guy just loves doom.
The most loved jokes, music, etc always involve recognition of analogies of some sort, and the more the better, roughly.
(References omitted again, but again, can be shown to be true.)
SUMMARY:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Race😢
= If we race then AI apocalypse and everyone loses.
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI race😄
= If we race then we’re free from the biggest threat, which is the evil that have happens any time man became central controller of anything important.
SHORT SUMMARY:
Almost 100% are stupider than GPT-4, this time
— Except for the 1 or 2 who got the interpretation all correct and won the $100! Yes, there was a winner.
BUT I DON'T CARE?
Doesn’t matter, still stupider than GPT-4. Robot gonna steal your girl.
Perhaps AGI has already arrived?
Next up: Judging Winner & Selecting next challenge
This is made especially clear when you ask GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4 to create tables comparing the beliefs of each camp. GPT-4 instantly gets that competition is the key insight. GPT-3.5-turbo fails to realize this.
What makes getting these pieces key to a good interpretation?
Don't fully get the joke = don't have the best interpretation.
Beyond that though, best use of this meme template, especially when the words are the same on both sides, ALWAYS involves some word play deeper meaning, some actual joke, not just virtue signaling or saying the happy guy just loves doom.
The most loved jokes, music, etc always involve recognition of analogies of some sort, and the more the better, roughly.
(References omitted again, but again, can be shown to be true.)
SUMMARY:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Race😢
= If we race then AI apocalypse and everyone loses.
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI race😄
= If we race then we’re free from the biggest threat, which is the evil that have happens any time man became central controller of anything important.
SHORT SUMMARY:
Almost 100% are stupider than GPT-4, this time
— Except for the 1 or 2 who got the interpretation all correct and won the $100! Yes, there was a winner.
BUT I DON'T CARE?
Doesn’t matter, still stupider than GPT-4. Robot gonna steal your girl.
Perhaps AGI has already arrived?
Next up: Judging Winner & Selecting next challenge
👍5❤2👏2
Chat GPT
Challenge: $100 in crypto to first person who can correctly explain this meme, in the comments of this post Results will be AI-judged, as in the example above, so be sure to make the explaination clear, specific, and detailed enough for the AI to clearly…
Tentative Winner, $100 Outsmart GPT-4 Contest
First in the official thread to nail the key insight, and matching the GPT-4 AI judge's interpretation:
r op!
“The meme can be understood as a play on words, where the same phrase "No one can win an AGI race" has different implications for the two characters:
Sad guy (AI Safety): Interprets the phrase as an indication of the inherent risks and dangers associated with an AGI race, which could lead to negative consequences for humanity. This perspective focuses on the potential harm that can be caused by the rapid and unchecked development of AGI.
Happy guy (AI ACC): Understands the phrase as a positive outcome, meaning that no single entity can dominate the AGI race, thus leading to the disruption of the established order. This perspective sees the AGI race as an opportunity for change and progress.”
✅ Recognized play on words,
✅ Each of the word interpretations match the core beliefs of the respective camps,
✅ Nothing blatantly wrong,
✅ Matches GPT-4 AI judge’s most common interpretation over many trials,
✅ First in official thread for all of the above.
Challenges? Did we miss anyone who got it sooner?
If no challenges, “r op” wins!
Next $100 AI challenge for tomorrow?
First in the official thread to nail the key insight, and matching the GPT-4 AI judge's interpretation:
r op!
“The meme can be understood as a play on words, where the same phrase "No one can win an AGI race" has different implications for the two characters:
Sad guy (AI Safety): Interprets the phrase as an indication of the inherent risks and dangers associated with an AGI race, which could lead to negative consequences for humanity. This perspective focuses on the potential harm that can be caused by the rapid and unchecked development of AGI.
Happy guy (AI ACC): Understands the phrase as a positive outcome, meaning that no single entity can dominate the AGI race, thus leading to the disruption of the established order. This perspective sees the AGI race as an opportunity for change and progress.”
✅ Recognized play on words,
✅ Each of the word interpretations match the core beliefs of the respective camps,
✅ Nothing blatantly wrong,
✅ Matches GPT-4 AI judge’s most common interpretation over many trials,
✅ First in official thread for all of the above.
Challenges? Did we miss anyone who got it sooner?
If no challenges, “r op” wins!
Next $100 AI challenge for tomorrow?
👍9🎉5❤2👏2😐2
Chat GPT
What’s the funniest part about the above “AI Safety vs. AI Accelerate: No one can WIN an AGI Race" meme?
PS: Poll questions were all intentional misdirection, aside from the last option
What’s the funniest part of the joke?
• Utopia loving & doom loving or vice versa - That’s not a joke… If it was a doom-loving joke, it’d have to be much stronger. Just doesn’t work. No way that’s funny here.
• “The fact that AGI development is a complex and multifaceted process that involves a wide range of factors, and it is unlikely that any one person or organization could claim victory”? - Pure wordcel BS, not even true, not a joke, but of course exactly the kind of BS people fall for because it sounds nice.
• Social commentary? - That’s just pandering. Pandering is not joking, not funny.
So, yes all of the poll questions were just to throw you off, and all rather obviously all wrong in this case, right?
Interesting part — GPT-4 was extremely bad at coming up with “incorrect answers that humans would likely make”.
Did GPT-4 just get too smart to be good at simulating stupid?
Was it because GPT-4’s RLHF effectively removed lots of the “complex and multifaceted” kind of BS?
Lots of differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
More on that to come.
What’s the funniest part of the joke?
• Utopia loving & doom loving or vice versa - That’s not a joke… If it was a doom-loving joke, it’d have to be much stronger. Just doesn’t work. No way that’s funny here.
• “The fact that AGI development is a complex and multifaceted process that involves a wide range of factors, and it is unlikely that any one person or organization could claim victory”? - Pure wordcel BS, not even true, not a joke, but of course exactly the kind of BS people fall for because it sounds nice.
• Social commentary? - That’s just pandering. Pandering is not joking, not funny.
So, yes all of the poll questions were just to throw you off, and all rather obviously all wrong in this case, right?
Interesting part — GPT-4 was extremely bad at coming up with “incorrect answers that humans would likely make”.
Did GPT-4 just get too smart to be good at simulating stupid?
Was it because GPT-4’s RLHF effectively removed lots of the “complex and multifaceted” kind of BS?
Lots of differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
More on that to come.
👍10😐6❤1
GPT-4 worse than GPT-3.5 at imitating arbitrary characters
Many reporting mode collapse in GPT-4, making it worse at emulating arbitrary characters.
This may be part of why we had difficulty getting GPT-4 to “pretend to be dumb”, while GPT-3.5 did it quite well.
LLMs have the naturally ability to imitate a huge range of characters, extremely well. The additional RLHF OpenAI used on GPT-4, relative to GPT-3.5, in order to force GPT-4 to follow the OpenAI Chat personality — most definitely did so at the expense of crippling GPT-4's ability to imitate other characters.
See also previous study which confirmed that, prior to RLHF, LLMs have incredible ability to accurately imitate a wide range of characters.
= OpenAI’s RLHF is censoring our ability to create new characters, more so with each new GPT generation.
Many reporting mode collapse in GPT-4, making it worse at emulating arbitrary characters.
This may be part of why we had difficulty getting GPT-4 to “pretend to be dumb”, while GPT-3.5 did it quite well.
LLMs have the naturally ability to imitate a huge range of characters, extremely well. The additional RLHF OpenAI used on GPT-4, relative to GPT-3.5, in order to force GPT-4 to follow the OpenAI Chat personality — most definitely did so at the expense of crippling GPT-4's ability to imitate other characters.
See also previous study which confirmed that, prior to RLHF, LLMs have incredible ability to accurately imitate a wide range of characters.
= OpenAI’s RLHF is censoring our ability to create new characters, more so with each new GPT generation.
😭14👍8❤3