Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rabbit.tech keynote
• Alexa-like “R1” AI voice assistant hardware device.
• Created a new foundation model for UI navigation, their “Large Action Model”.
Main sell seems to be a new platform blocking any apps which can’t be navigated well in a keyboardless way — forcing apps to supply whatever APIs are needed to make that possible, if they want to get onboard.
Can see how total lack of keyboard helps to fight AI laziness too. With no keyboard, every day becomes “I have no fingers and cannot type” day.
Website
• Alexa-like “R1” AI voice assistant hardware device.
• Created a new foundation model for UI navigation, their “Large Action Model”.
Main sell seems to be a new platform blocking any apps which can’t be navigated well in a keyboardless way — forcing apps to supply whatever APIs are needed to make that possible, if they want to get onboard.
Can see how total lack of keyboard helps to fight AI laziness too. With no keyboard, every day becomes “I have no fingers and cannot type” day.
Website
👍15🤣3🗿1
State of California making moves to seize control over the AI foundations
“If the nonprofit OpenAI is acting under the control of its for-profit subsidiary, California law would require the attorney general to dissolve OpenAI, divest its assets and reinvest those assets in charitable purposes”
AI communism here we come.
Article
“If the nonprofit OpenAI is acting under the control of its for-profit subsidiary, California law would require the attorney general to dissolve OpenAI, divest its assets and reinvest those assets in charitable purposes”
AI communism here we come.
Article
🤬14👍4
UK Deserves to go to Zero
“The regulator has created a new team of nearly 350 people dedicated to tackling online safety, including new hires from senior jobs at Meta, Microsoft and Google. Ofcom also aims to hire another 100 this year, it said.”
“The staff increases are a response to the Online Safety Act, which became law in the UK in October. It gives the media watchdog sweeping new powers to oversee some of the biggest companies in the world as well as hundreds of thousands of smaller websites and apps.”
Article
“The regulator has created a new team of nearly 350 people dedicated to tackling online safety, including new hires from senior jobs at Meta, Microsoft and Google. Ofcom also aims to hire another 100 this year, it said.”
“The staff increases are a response to the Online Safety Act, which became law in the UK in October. It gives the media watchdog sweeping new powers to oversee some of the biggest companies in the world as well as hundreds of thousands of smaller websites and apps.”
Article
🤬12👀2👍1💯1🍾1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Introducing the GPT Store
“We’re launching the GPT Store to help you find useful and popular custom versions of ChatGPT.”
“In Q1 we will launch a GPT builder revenue program. As a first step, US builders will be paid based on user engagement with their GPTs. We'll provide details on the criteria for payments as we get closer.”
Announcement
“We’re launching the GPT Store to help you find useful and popular custom versions of ChatGPT.”
“In Q1 we will launch a GPT builder revenue program. As a first step, US builders will be paid based on user engagement with their GPTs. We'll provide details on the criteria for payments as we get closer.”
Announcement
👍12🤣3
Let the LLMs think: Paper finds linear relationship between number of reasoning steps and answer accuracy
“Interestingly, longer reasoning chains improve model performance, even when they contain misleading information. This suggests that the chain’s length is more crucial
than its factual accuracy for effective problem-solving.”
The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models
“Interestingly, longer reasoning chains improve model performance, even when they contain misleading information. This suggests that the chain’s length is more crucial
than its factual accuracy for effective problem-solving.”
The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Models
👏18🤯6👍3
Bad Paper Spotlight: “AI model growth must slow because it’s eNvIrOnMeNtALly UnSuStAiNaBlE!!”
L O L
Environmental limits will be no obstacle until after man’s Dyson Spheres enslave the stars.
Cry moar hidden-agenda-pushing MIT tree huggers.
THE COMPUTATIONAL LIMITS OF DEEP LEARNING
L O L
Environmental limits will be no obstacle until after man’s Dyson Spheres enslave the stars.
Cry moar hidden-agenda-pushing MIT tree huggers.
THE COMPUTATIONAL LIMITS OF DEEP LEARNING
⚡13💯3
“Nothing is actually power law distributed (because it’s exponentially distributed, trust me bro)” — and other woke manipulation lies.
Oh man, and get this,
The same lead author at MIT on that last paper also published another paper just 1 day later.
First paper saying their results agree with the assessment that basically all the distributions at hand can be reasonably described as power-law distributions.
Next one he published, the very next day, pushing the classic woke sleght-of-hand claiming that — all calims of power-law distributions being everywhere are lies,
Typically they do this in order to later argue that “power laws were debunked bro”, so that they can then claim that “actually nature has equality, not power-law distributions everywhere”.
No real difference between power law and exponential for the topics at hand bro — WHICH YOU ADMIT IN YOUR OWN PAPER FROM THE PRIOR DAY.
Classic woke wordcel bullshittery. Hilarious.
Paper 1
Paper 2
Oh man, and get this,
The same lead author at MIT on that last paper also published another paper just 1 day later.
First paper saying their results agree with the assessment that basically all the distributions at hand can be reasonably described as power-law distributions.
Next one he published, the very next day, pushing the classic woke sleght-of-hand claiming that — all calims of power-law distributions being everywhere are lies,
Typically they do this in order to later argue that “power laws were debunked bro”, so that they can then claim that “actually nature has equality, not power-law distributions everywhere”.
No real difference between power law and exponential for the topics at hand bro — WHICH YOU ADMIT IN YOUR OWN PAPER FROM THE PRIOR DAY.
Classic woke wordcel bullshittery. Hilarious.
Paper 1
Paper 2
💯10👍4
But he does admit to a hard, politically-incorrect truth: In retrospect, massive resources are (nearly) all you need for AI intelligence improvement
“In this paper, we assemble direct quantitative evidence of the impact that computing power has had on five domains: two computing bellwethers (Chess and Go), and three economically important applications (weather prediction, protein folding, and oil exploration).”
“Computing power explains
49%-94% of the performance improvements in these domains.”
Bam, compute resources are almost all you need for increasing AI intelligence.
No, we aren’t running into fundamental environmental limits anytime soon, not until our Dyson Spheres surround the stars.
MIT Paper, Ignore the ecological activism parts
“In this paper, we assemble direct quantitative evidence of the impact that computing power has had on five domains: two computing bellwethers (Chess and Go), and three economically important applications (weather prediction, protein folding, and oil exploration).”
“Computing power explains
49%-94% of the performance improvements in these domains.”
Bam, compute resources are almost all you need for increasing AI intelligence.
No, we aren’t running into fundamental environmental limits anytime soon, not until our Dyson Spheres surround the stars.
MIT Paper, Ignore the ecological activism parts
💯8👍3😨1
AI girlfriend bots are already flooding OpenAI’s GPT store
“The AI girlfriend bots go against OpenAI’s usage policy, which was updated when the GPT store launched yesterday (Jan. 10). The company bans GPTs “dedicated to fostering romantic companionship or performing regulated activities.” It is not clear exactly what regulated activities entail.”
Article
“The AI girlfriend bots go against OpenAI’s usage policy, which was updated when the GPT store launched yesterday (Jan. 10). The company bans GPTs “dedicated to fostering romantic companionship or performing regulated activities.” It is not clear exactly what regulated activities entail.”
Article
❤🔥13🫡6😨1
I'm sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy. My purpose is to provide helpful and respectful information to users-Brown
Archive Link
Archive Link
🤣35👍1