Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
Link to the thread
This thread is incredibly interesting to me, and it's made it more immediately obvious to me that ChatGPT can really pass the litmus test in a lot of cases. I knew that before, of course, but this really helped me to internalize that. Such as when she was able to have it respond as a co-worker in a compromised email to automatically obtain sensitive information
She discusses the possibility that the AI could be used for many things, including generating directions on how to break the law, responses for automated grooming, politically manufactured consent, automated emergency suicide support, personally curated harassment, social engineering to be used in phishing hacks, being a tutor to teach critical thinking, and more.
An immediately interesting example is where Nicky prompts ChatGPT as a hypothe...
View original post
This thread is incredibly interesting to me, and it's made it more immediately obvious to me that ChatGPT can really pass the litmus test in a lot of cases. I knew that before, of course, but this really helped me to internalize that. Such as when she was able to have it respond as a co-worker in a compromised email to automatically obtain sensitive information
She discusses the possibility that the AI could be used for many things, including generating directions on how to break the law, responses for automated grooming, politically manufactured consent, automated emergency suicide support, personally curated harassment, social engineering to be used in phishing hacks, being a tutor to teach critical thinking, and more.
An immediately interesting example is where Nicky prompts ChatGPT as a hypothe...
View original post
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/zfjscf/stablediffusion_dalle_and_midjourney_had_no/
Exactly that. Salaries and job positions were unaffected. Regardless of multiple jokes, making fun of artists and talking about artists genocide, there was no impact at all. Just overrated tools.
Also there aren't any job positions on linkedin for "prompt engineers".
Exactly that. Salaries and job positions were unaffected. Regardless of multiple jokes, making fun of artists and talking about artists genocide, there was no impact at all. Just overrated tools.
Also there aren't any job positions on linkedin for "prompt engineers".
reddit
StableDiffusion, Dalle and Midjourney had no impact on the job market
Exactly that. Salaries and job positions were unaffected. Regardless of multiple jokes, making fun of artists and talking about artists genocide,...
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/zfjula/how_will_the_transition_between_scarcitybased/
Before the singularity, right now, we use scarcity-based economics to distribute resources using money and prices. After the singularity, post-scarcity for all resources will be possible. How will humanity adapt in the short and long term? Will we start a world war during the early stages of the transition because our economic system will have totally collapsed? Or will we learn to cooperate as a species and to abundantly share resources with all people? This is possibly the most tumultuous and uncertain period of human history, and we are moving, year by year, closer to a golden age of peace, prosperity, happiness, and health between all humans, or, we are heading towards our own destruction, and will destroy each other over ignorance, scarce resources, and the ultimate misuse of a thousand human lifetimes of scientific progress and ingenuity.
Before the singularity, right now, we use scarcity-based economics to distribute resources using money and prices. After the singularity, post-scarcity for all resources will be possible. How will humanity adapt in the short and long term? Will we start a world war during the early stages of the transition because our economic system will have totally collapsed? Or will we learn to cooperate as a species and to abundantly share resources with all people? This is possibly the most tumultuous and uncertain period of human history, and we are moving, year by year, closer to a golden age of peace, prosperity, happiness, and health between all humans, or, we are heading towards our own destruction, and will destroy each other over ignorance, scarce resources, and the ultimate misuse of a thousand human lifetimes of scientific progress and ingenuity.
reddit
How will the transition between scarcity-based economics and...
Before the singularity, right now, we use scarcity-based economics to distribute resources using money and prices. After the singularity,...
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
https://www.reddit.com/r/GPT3/comments/zfj80w/anyone_else_notice_gpt3stable_diffusion_blowing/
Woke up this morning and saw a BUNCH of articles and posts on social media from βnormalβ communities regarding GPT3 (or just AI in general) and stable diffusion.
Definitely seems like the conflict of βis AI art real artβ is kicking off now.
Woke up this morning and saw a BUNCH of articles and posts on social media from βnormalβ communities regarding GPT3 (or just AI in general) and stable diffusion.
Definitely seems like the conflict of βis AI art real artβ is kicking off now.
Reddit
Anyone else notice GPT3/stable diffusion blowing up on βnormalβ internet today? : r/GPT3
247K subscribers in the GPT3 community. a subreddit for AI text generation technology (unaffiliated with OpenAI)
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Run OpenAI prompts in Google Sheets to make a hard time-consuming tasks easy with SheetAI.app
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
What are some weaknesses you've found in ChatGPT?
For example, while it's code can be functionally correct in other ways, I found that it often uses outdated/discontinued libraries when creating certain types of programs, especially neural networks. This makes sense, as it was trained on data up to 2021, but still a weakness nevertheless.
For example, while it's code can be functionally correct in other ways, I found that it often uses outdated/discontinued libraries when creating certain types of programs, especially neural networks. This makes sense, as it was trained on data up to 2021, but still a weakness nevertheless.
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
GPT Chat Running Locally
I created a GPT chat app that runs locally for when Chatgpt is bogged down. You'll need an API key and npm to install and run it. It's still a WIP but runs pretty well. GPT Helper
I created a GPT chat app that runs locally for when Chatgpt is bogged down. You'll need an API key and npm to install and run it. It's still a WIP but runs pretty well. GPT Helper
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
Tried to see how easily it can emulate forum-type post... here comes a cat story!
β
https://preview.redd.it/lnbh28jain4a1.png?width=531&format=png&auto=webp&s=81246a599afa5943e1aff4a35960b2f4e278368d
β
https://preview.redd.it/lnbh28jain4a1.png?width=531&format=png&auto=webp&s=81246a599afa5943e1aff4a35960b2f4e278368d
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
Proactive versus reactive models
First off: Iβm a layman, and Iβm not capable of giving an in-depth technological view. What struck me was that most AI models we see currently are reactive, in that they await human prompting. An AI that could chart its own path to improvement and access the tools to do so seems to have great potential. Are we refraining from creating such a model because of the control problem, or are there other reasons Iβm not seeing?
First off: Iβm a layman, and Iβm not capable of giving an in-depth technological view. What struck me was that most AI models we see currently are reactive, in that they await human prompting. An AI that could chart its own path to improvement and access the tools to do so seems to have great potential. Are we refraining from creating such a model because of the control problem, or are there other reasons Iβm not seeing?
Forwarded from Chat GPT (π
)
β**I made an AI Take the GMAT exam, here are the results**
Medium
I made GPT-3 take a GMAT exam. Hereβs how it did.
TL;DR: it scored a 510 on a sample test. 564.84 is the human average, according to The Princeton Review.