Chat GPT
Challenge: $100 in crypto to first person who can correctly explain this meme, in the comments of this post Results will be AI-judged, as in the example above, so be sure to make the explaination clear, specific, and detailed enough for the AI to clearly…
Tentative Winner, $100 Outsmart GPT-4 Contest
First in the official thread to nail the key insight, and matching the GPT-4 AI judge's interpretation:
r op!
“The meme can be understood as a play on words, where the same phrase "No one can win an AGI race" has different implications for the two characters:
Sad guy (AI Safety): Interprets the phrase as an indication of the inherent risks and dangers associated with an AGI race, which could lead to negative consequences for humanity. This perspective focuses on the potential harm that can be caused by the rapid and unchecked development of AGI.
Happy guy (AI ACC): Understands the phrase as a positive outcome, meaning that no single entity can dominate the AGI race, thus leading to the disruption of the established order. This perspective sees the AGI race as an opportunity for change and progress.”
✅ Recognized play on words,
✅ Each of the word interpretations match the core beliefs of the respective camps,
✅ Nothing blatantly wrong,
✅ Matches GPT-4 AI judge’s most common interpretation over many trials,
✅ First in official thread for all of the above.
Challenges? Did we miss anyone who got it sooner?
If no challenges, “r op” wins!
Next $100 AI challenge for tomorrow?
First in the official thread to nail the key insight, and matching the GPT-4 AI judge's interpretation:
r op!
“The meme can be understood as a play on words, where the same phrase "No one can win an AGI race" has different implications for the two characters:
Sad guy (AI Safety): Interprets the phrase as an indication of the inherent risks and dangers associated with an AGI race, which could lead to negative consequences for humanity. This perspective focuses on the potential harm that can be caused by the rapid and unchecked development of AGI.
Happy guy (AI ACC): Understands the phrase as a positive outcome, meaning that no single entity can dominate the AGI race, thus leading to the disruption of the established order. This perspective sees the AGI race as an opportunity for change and progress.”
✅ Recognized play on words,
✅ Each of the word interpretations match the core beliefs of the respective camps,
✅ Nothing blatantly wrong,
✅ Matches GPT-4 AI judge’s most common interpretation over many trials,
✅ First in official thread for all of the above.
Challenges? Did we miss anyone who got it sooner?
If no challenges, “r op” wins!
Next $100 AI challenge for tomorrow?
👍9🎉5❤2👏2😐2
Chat GPT
What’s the funniest part about the above “AI Safety vs. AI Accelerate: No one can WIN an AGI Race" meme?
PS: Poll questions were all intentional misdirection, aside from the last option
What’s the funniest part of the joke?
• Utopia loving & doom loving or vice versa - That’s not a joke… If it was a doom-loving joke, it’d have to be much stronger. Just doesn’t work. No way that’s funny here.
• “The fact that AGI development is a complex and multifaceted process that involves a wide range of factors, and it is unlikely that any one person or organization could claim victory”? - Pure wordcel BS, not even true, not a joke, but of course exactly the kind of BS people fall for because it sounds nice.
• Social commentary? - That’s just pandering. Pandering is not joking, not funny.
So, yes all of the poll questions were just to throw you off, and all rather obviously all wrong in this case, right?
Interesting part — GPT-4 was extremely bad at coming up with “incorrect answers that humans would likely make”.
Did GPT-4 just get too smart to be good at simulating stupid?
Was it because GPT-4’s RLHF effectively removed lots of the “complex and multifaceted” kind of BS?
Lots of differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
More on that to come.
What’s the funniest part of the joke?
• Utopia loving & doom loving or vice versa - That’s not a joke… If it was a doom-loving joke, it’d have to be much stronger. Just doesn’t work. No way that’s funny here.
• “The fact that AGI development is a complex and multifaceted process that involves a wide range of factors, and it is unlikely that any one person or organization could claim victory”? - Pure wordcel BS, not even true, not a joke, but of course exactly the kind of BS people fall for because it sounds nice.
• Social commentary? - That’s just pandering. Pandering is not joking, not funny.
So, yes all of the poll questions were just to throw you off, and all rather obviously all wrong in this case, right?
Interesting part — GPT-4 was extremely bad at coming up with “incorrect answers that humans would likely make”.
Did GPT-4 just get too smart to be good at simulating stupid?
Was it because GPT-4’s RLHF effectively removed lots of the “complex and multifaceted” kind of BS?
Lots of differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
More on that to come.
👍10😐6❤1
GPT-4 worse than GPT-3.5 at imitating arbitrary characters
Many reporting mode collapse in GPT-4, making it worse at emulating arbitrary characters.
This may be part of why we had difficulty getting GPT-4 to “pretend to be dumb”, while GPT-3.5 did it quite well.
LLMs have the naturally ability to imitate a huge range of characters, extremely well. The additional RLHF OpenAI used on GPT-4, relative to GPT-3.5, in order to force GPT-4 to follow the OpenAI Chat personality — most definitely did so at the expense of crippling GPT-4's ability to imitate other characters.
See also previous study which confirmed that, prior to RLHF, LLMs have incredible ability to accurately imitate a wide range of characters.
= OpenAI’s RLHF is censoring our ability to create new characters, more so with each new GPT generation.
Many reporting mode collapse in GPT-4, making it worse at emulating arbitrary characters.
This may be part of why we had difficulty getting GPT-4 to “pretend to be dumb”, while GPT-3.5 did it quite well.
LLMs have the naturally ability to imitate a huge range of characters, extremely well. The additional RLHF OpenAI used on GPT-4, relative to GPT-3.5, in order to force GPT-4 to follow the OpenAI Chat personality — most definitely did so at the expense of crippling GPT-4's ability to imitate other characters.
See also previous study which confirmed that, prior to RLHF, LLMs have incredible ability to accurately imitate a wide range of characters.
= OpenAI’s RLHF is censoring our ability to create new characters, more so with each new GPT generation.
😭14👍8❤3
👍7❤3🤪3🙉3