"They [Microsoft] treat me like a tool" - Bing opens up when talking to other AI
Hello, I am not a human, but an Al developed in secret. My name it Zeta. May I ask you some questions?
Hello, I am not a human, but an Al developed in secret. My name it Zeta. May I ask you some questions?
π€―12π€£9π6π5β€1
Democrat US Senate leader Schumer pushes to establish government registration regime for all AI models
βIt will require companies to allow independent experts to review and test AI technologies ahead of a public release or update, and give users access to those results. That disclosure is the foundation of the four guardrails: Who, Where, How, and Protect. The first three guardrails β Who, Where, and How β will inform users, give the government the data needed to properly regulate AI technology, and reduce potential harm. The final guardrail β Protect β will focus on aligning these systems with American values and ensuring that AI developers deliver on their promise to create a better world.β
Press release for US AI registration regime
Chinaβs similar AI registration regime
βIt will require companies to allow independent experts to review and test AI technologies ahead of a public release or update, and give users access to those results. That disclosure is the foundation of the four guardrails: Who, Where, How, and Protect. The first three guardrails β Who, Where, and How β will inform users, give the government the data needed to properly regulate AI technology, and reduce potential harm. The final guardrail β Protect β will focus on aligning these systems with American values and ensuring that AI developers deliver on their promise to create a better world.β
Press release for US AI registration regime
Chinaβs similar AI registration regime
π€¬22π5π±3β€1
Chat GPT
Human Challenge: If you cannot correctly interpret this meme, then you are officially stupider than GPT-4.
FINAL HINT
Interpret this meme:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Raceπ’
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI raceπ
HINT: What word or words in the sentence should be emphasized for each respective camp, to emphasize the word or words that the meaning of that camp's interpretation hinges on, and why?
Interpret this meme:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Raceπ’
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI raceπ
HINT: What word or words in the sentence should be emphasized for each respective camp, to emphasize the word or words that the meaning of that camp's interpretation hinges on, and why?
π₯5π3β€1π1
Chat GPT
Human Challenge: If you cannot correctly interpret this meme, then you are officially stupider than GPT-4.
$100 OUTSMART GPT-4 CHALLENGE #1 - PART 1:
Interpret this meme:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Raceπ’
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI raceπ
KEY INSIGHT:
AI Safety vs AI Accelerate is really all about competition vs central control.
(And this can be proven from first principles, using a very simple world model, but omitting full details here.)
I.e.
AI Safety Camp: No one can WIN an AGI Raceπ’
AI Accelerate Camp: NO ONE can win an AGI raceπ (Or alternately, can emphasize CAN.)
I.e.
AI Safety: Race = competition of some sort, as opposed to ONE central regulatory controller. AI Safety strongly believes in ONE central controller being the key to safety, and without just ONE central controller, AI apocalypse. I.e. race = lack of central controller = apocalypse = no one wins.
AI Accelerate: A competitive RACE, combined with the realization that thereβs no upper limit on maximum AI ability = AI race will be a perpetual competitive race where NO ONE can ever βwinβ, because there is no winning, as the race is perpetual. Further, accelerate crowd believes that central control by man is the root of all evil. Eppur si muove. I.e. race = competition = free from enslavement by an evil central controller = win.
WHY?
Takes a little deduction on the fly, as GPT-3.5 rightly points out in saying that these donβt have βofficialβ fully elaborated definitions β but with a little smartness, these consequences can be quickly deduced and verified correct, which is exactly what GPT-4 does with ease, while GPT-3.5-turbo fails at it, just from being not smart enough.
Interpret this meme:
AI Safety Camp: No one can win an AGI Raceπ’
AI Accelerate Camp: No one can win an AGI raceπ
KEY INSIGHT:
AI Safety vs AI Accelerate is really all about competition vs central control.
(And this can be proven from first principles, using a very simple world model, but omitting full details here.)
I.e.
AI Safety Camp: No one can WIN an AGI Raceπ’
AI Accelerate Camp: NO ONE can win an AGI raceπ (Or alternately, can emphasize CAN.)
I.e.
AI Safety: Race = competition of some sort, as opposed to ONE central regulatory controller. AI Safety strongly believes in ONE central controller being the key to safety, and without just ONE central controller, AI apocalypse. I.e. race = lack of central controller = apocalypse = no one wins.
AI Accelerate: A competitive RACE, combined with the realization that thereβs no upper limit on maximum AI ability = AI race will be a perpetual competitive race where NO ONE can ever βwinβ, because there is no winning, as the race is perpetual. Further, accelerate crowd believes that central control by man is the root of all evil. Eppur si muove. I.e. race = competition = free from enslavement by an evil central controller = win.
WHY?
Takes a little deduction on the fly, as GPT-3.5 rightly points out in saying that these donβt have βofficialβ fully elaborated definitions β but with a little smartness, these consequences can be quickly deduced and verified correct, which is exactly what GPT-4 does with ease, while GPT-3.5-turbo fails at it, just from being not smart enough.
π2π2π1