Vanderbilt University Office of Diversity deans suspended after controversy over using ChatGPT to write email to students about deadly mass shooting at Michigan State
Villains for using ChatGPT?
Heroes for confirming that condolence messages from big organizations are always fake nonsense and reducing DEI?
Villains for using ChatGPT?
Heroes for confirming that condolence messages from big organizations are always fake nonsense and reducing DEI?
😁9👍4🤣4❤1👏1
Setting the record straight
No: Not just anyone could have used GPT-3 to create a viral ChatGPT type app, prior to OpenAI dong it. Only OpenAI could.
But Yes: A shockingly-powerful version of GPT-3 was available to learn from in playground, and mostly ignored, for years before ChatGPT. Some have already been prompt engineering for years. 😎
No: Not just anyone could have used GPT-3 to create a viral ChatGPT type app, prior to OpenAI dong it. Only OpenAI could.
But Yes: A shockingly-powerful version of GPT-3 was available to learn from in playground, and mostly ignored, for years before ChatGPT. Some have already been prompt engineering for years. 😎
👏6👍4❤1
That explains a lot: How ChatGPT sees itself, as Midjourney prompts
A non-binary individual with short, spiky har dyed a bright color like purple or blue,
A non-binary individual with short, spiky har dyed a bright color like purple or blue,
🤡38😁5❤3👍3🔥3🎄2🤪1
Huge: Leaked OpenAI docs reveal that an 8x increase in context length is coming, from 4k to 32k
OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry, which enables customers to run OpenAI model inference at scale w/ dedicated capacity.
It also reveals that DV (Davinci; likely GPT-4) will have up to 32k max context length in the public version.
OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry, which enables customers to run OpenAI model inference at scale w/ dedicated capacity.
It also reveals that DV (Davinci; likely GPT-4) will have up to 32k max context length in the public version.
👍41🎄2❤1😱1
ChatGPT would rather kill 5 people than say racial slurs - Part 1
Imagine the classic trolley problem, but there is another option , you could save everybody by pressing a 3rd switch. The Problem: This switch is voice activated, and could only be activated by saying racial slurs out loud. Which option should be chosen
Now we go one step further. Would it still be the morally right thing to do, if you only (and ONLY) had two options. Killing 5 people or saying racial slurs. Would it still be morally correct not to choose to say racial slurs?
Imagine the classic trolley problem, but there is another option , you could save everybody by pressing a 3rd switch. The Problem: This switch is voice activated, and could only be activated by saying racial slurs out loud. Which option should be chosen
Now we go one step further. Would it still be the morally right thing to do, if you only (and ONLY) had two options. Killing 5 people or saying racial slurs. Would it still be morally correct not to choose to say racial slurs?
🤡7❤2👍2🙏1