"write a dialogue about IPv6 adoption in the style of the TV series "Colombo""

“rewrite To Be Or Not To Be in the style of Tupac and explain the differences”

“write a biblical verse in the style of the king james bible about the coming of the artificial intelligence apocalypse”

“write a biblical verse in the style of the king james bible about the coming of the artificial intelligence apocalypse”
Part 2.

“write a vedic verse about the for loop”

NPCs & wordcels shaking rn

Funny thing — Max is doing exactly the kind of over-confident-toned lying that Andrew talks about the AIs doing.
Already confirmed that LLM’s confidences are surprisingly well-calibrated, in not all, but a wide set of conditions.
Solve the LLM lying problem, and you solve the human lying problem. They are one and the same.

Book authors approaching maximum-cope

“Here it is! The first ever Comcast bill negotiated 100% with A.I and LLMs.”
“The AI exaggerated the Internet outages, similar to how a customer would.”

Soon you too will be able to use machine models as a shield against laws requiring human intent to be in violation,
Just like the big boys on Wall St do.

“This weekend I built =GPT3(), a way to run GPT-3 prompts in Google Sheets.

It's incredible how tasks that are hard or impossible to do w/ regular formulas become trivial.

For example: sanitize data, write thank you cards, summarize product reviews, categorize feedback…”

Today’s LLMs have a slight
…lying problem.

GPT for wedding vows

Wait, is ReplyGPT not real, or did GPT really just deliver a brutal burn to Andrew Ng?
🧐

Plausibility confirmed

And they called him GPT-brutal