Xtra Manager Software Updates
Device Checker | 1.0-Release Released: 15/10/'25 By Xtra Manager Software Teams πΈ Download πΈ Support Group πΈ Support Channel πΈ Log & Commit πΈ Donate Me Changelogs: β’ Initial Release Notes: β’ Report in Group if there is any problem with this applicationβ¦
En Statement by Xtra Manager Software :
π’ PSA: Google's Play Integrity is a Business Scam, Not Security π₯
Yo modding fam! π Just exposed Google's dirty secret about Play Integrity API.
π MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY = Marketing Badge, NOT Higher Security
- STRONG βββ = just means "app from Play Store"
- DEVICE ββ = already FULLY SECURE (locked bootloader + verified boot)
- ZERO actual security difference!
π FACTS FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES:
Play Integrity API Checker repo (1nikolas/GitHub) literally admits: "app must be on Play Store for STRONG" - NOT device security requirement!
Google docs confirm: STRONG = DEVICE + "optional signals" (marketing BS)
π§ YOU'VE BEEN PSYCHOLOGICALLY MANIPULATED:
Google named it "STRONG" to make you FEEL it's essential. It's psychological conditioning! πͺ€
Truth: DEVICE ββ = FULLY SECURE. STRONG just adds Play Store badge. Same security.
If you think "I need STRONG for banking": β You fell for naming manipulation. Wake up! π
πͺ Meanwhile, Custom ROM Users WIN:
- KernelSU/SusFS/HMAL/Shamiko/Tricky Store β
- Spoof bootloader + valid keybox β
- ROM signed release-keys + healthy TEE β
Result: STRONG βββ on modified system! Banking apps work perfectly while Google can't tell difference π
π€£ SPIC & Play Integrity Checker: Apps made to CHECK integrity, forced to publish on Play Store for STRONG badge they're testing. Circular logic documented in their own README! Victims of the system they check π
π Why DeviceChecker/Shamiko/Tricky Store/LSPosed going PRIVATE REPO:
- Public = free intel for Google's reverse engineers
- Private = survival strategy (6-12 months longer effectiveness)
- Fighting Google's monopoly warfare βοΈ
π° Why Google does this
Force Play Store ($25+30% cut), psychological manipulation, kill custom ROM adoption.
SOURCES:
A. github.com/1nikolas/play-integrity-checker-app
B. developer.android.com/google/play/integrity/verdicts
DeviceChecker - my app simulates STRONG for locked bootloaders with transparent disclaimer. Honesty > Google's manipulation. Private repo because Google doesn't deserve free intel. π
Don't forget to share this statement, so that the stupidity of the strong integrity issue disappears immediately.
#PlayIntegrity #FuckMonopoly #AndroidFreedom #CustomROMGang
π’ PSA: Google's Play Integrity is a Business Scam, Not Security π₯
Yo modding fam! π Just exposed Google's dirty secret about Play Integrity API.
π MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY = Marketing Badge, NOT Higher Security
- STRONG βββ = just means "app from Play Store"
- DEVICE ββ = already FULLY SECURE (locked bootloader + verified boot)
- ZERO actual security difference!
π FACTS FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES:
Play Integrity API Checker repo (1nikolas/GitHub) literally admits: "app must be on Play Store for STRONG" - NOT device security requirement!
Google docs confirm: STRONG = DEVICE + "optional signals" (marketing BS)
π§ YOU'VE BEEN PSYCHOLOGICALLY MANIPULATED:
Google named it "STRONG" to make you FEEL it's essential. It's psychological conditioning! πͺ€
Truth: DEVICE ββ = FULLY SECURE. STRONG just adds Play Store badge. Same security.
If you think "I need STRONG for banking": β You fell for naming manipulation. Wake up! π
πͺ Meanwhile, Custom ROM Users WIN:
- KernelSU/SusFS/HMAL/Shamiko/Tricky Store β
- Spoof bootloader + valid keybox β
- ROM signed release-keys + healthy TEE β
Result: STRONG βββ on modified system! Banking apps work perfectly while Google can't tell difference π
π€£ SPIC & Play Integrity Checker: Apps made to CHECK integrity, forced to publish on Play Store for STRONG badge they're testing. Circular logic documented in their own README! Victims of the system they check π
π Why DeviceChecker/Shamiko/Tricky Store/LSPosed going PRIVATE REPO:
- Public = free intel for Google's reverse engineers
- Private = survival strategy (6-12 months longer effectiveness)
- Fighting Google's monopoly warfare βοΈ
π° Why Google does this
Force Play Store ($25+30% cut), psychological manipulation, kill custom ROM adoption.
SOURCES:
A. github.com/1nikolas/play-integrity-checker-app
B. developer.android.com/google/play/integrity/verdicts
DeviceChecker - my app simulates STRONG for locked bootloaders with transparent disclaimer. Honesty > Google's manipulation. Private repo because Google doesn't deserve free intel. π
Don't forget to share this statement, so that the stupidity of the strong integrity issue disappears immediately.
#PlayIntegrity #FuckMonopoly #AndroidFreedom #CustomROMGang
β€5π€2
Xtra Manager Software Updates
Device Checker | 1.0-Release Released: 15/10/'25 By Xtra Manager Software Teams πΈ Download πΈ Support Group πΈ Support Channel πΈ Log & Commit πΈ Donate Me Changelogs: β’ Initial Release Notes: β’ Report in Group if there is any problem with this applicationβ¦
ID statement dari Xtra Manager Software:
π’ PSA: Play Integrity Google = Penipuan Bisnis, Bukan Keamanan π₯
Yo komunitas oprek! π Gw expose rahasia kotor Google soal Play Integrity API.
π MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY = Badge Marketing Doang
- STRONG βββ = cuma artinya "app dari Play Store"
- DEVICE ββ = sudah FULLY SECURE (bootloader locked + verified boot)
- NOL perbedaan keamanan asli!
π FAKTA DARI SUMBER RESMI:
Repo Play Integrity Checker (1nikolas/GitHub) NGAKU SENDIRI: "app harus di Play Store untuk STRONG" - BUKAN requirement keamanan device!
Docs Google konfirmasi: STRONG = DEVICE + "optional signals" (marketing BS)
π§ LU KENA MANIPULASI PSIKOLOGIS:
Google namain "STRONG" sengaja biar lu MERASA itu essential. Ini psychological conditioning! πͺ€
Fakta: DEVICE ββ = FULLY SECURE. STRONG cuma tambah badge Play Store. Keamanan sama.
Kalau lu mikir "gue butuh STRONG buat aman": β Lu kena jebakan naming. Bangun! π
πͺ User Custom ROM MENANG:
- KernelSU/SusFS/HMAL/Shamiko/Tricky Store β
- Spoof bootloader + keybox valid β
- ROM signed release-keys + TEE sehat β
Hasil: STRONG βββ di system modified! Banking apps jalan perfect, Google gabisa bedain π
π€£ SPIC & Play Integrity Checker: Apps buat CEK integrity, dipaksa publish Play Store buat STRONG badge yang mereka test. Circular logic di README mereka! Jadi korban sistem yang mereka check π
π Kenapa DeviceChecker/Shamiko/Tricky Store/LSPosed PRIVATE REPO:
- Public = intel gratis buat reverse engineer Google
- Private = strategi survival (bertahan 6-12 bulan lebih lama)
- Fighting monopoli Google βοΈ
π° Kenapa Google begini?
Maksa Play Store ($25+30%), manipulasi psikologis, bunuh custom ROM.
SUMBER:
A. github.com/1nikolas/play-integrity-checker-app
B. developer.android.com/google/play/integrity/verdicts
DeviceChecker - app gw simulate STRONG untuk locked bootloader + disclaimer transparan. Kejujuran > manipulasi Google. Private repo karena Google gak deserve intel gratis. π
Shoutout: KernelSU/SusFS/HMAL/Shamiko/Tricky Store/LSPosed devs = Pahlawan Kebebasan! ππ₯
Jangan lupa statement ini di share,agar ketololan perkara strong integrity hilang seketika
#PlayIntegrity #FuckMonopoli #AndroidFreedom #CustomROMGang
π’ PSA: Play Integrity Google = Penipuan Bisnis, Bukan Keamanan π₯
Yo komunitas oprek! π Gw expose rahasia kotor Google soal Play Integrity API.
π MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY = Badge Marketing Doang
- STRONG βββ = cuma artinya "app dari Play Store"
- DEVICE ββ = sudah FULLY SECURE (bootloader locked + verified boot)
- NOL perbedaan keamanan asli!
π FAKTA DARI SUMBER RESMI:
Repo Play Integrity Checker (1nikolas/GitHub) NGAKU SENDIRI: "app harus di Play Store untuk STRONG" - BUKAN requirement keamanan device!
Docs Google konfirmasi: STRONG = DEVICE + "optional signals" (marketing BS)
π§ LU KENA MANIPULASI PSIKOLOGIS:
Google namain "STRONG" sengaja biar lu MERASA itu essential. Ini psychological conditioning! πͺ€
Fakta: DEVICE ββ = FULLY SECURE. STRONG cuma tambah badge Play Store. Keamanan sama.
Kalau lu mikir "gue butuh STRONG buat aman": β Lu kena jebakan naming. Bangun! π
πͺ User Custom ROM MENANG:
- KernelSU/SusFS/HMAL/Shamiko/Tricky Store β
- Spoof bootloader + keybox valid β
- ROM signed release-keys + TEE sehat β
Hasil: STRONG βββ di system modified! Banking apps jalan perfect, Google gabisa bedain π
π€£ SPIC & Play Integrity Checker: Apps buat CEK integrity, dipaksa publish Play Store buat STRONG badge yang mereka test. Circular logic di README mereka! Jadi korban sistem yang mereka check π
π Kenapa DeviceChecker/Shamiko/Tricky Store/LSPosed PRIVATE REPO:
- Public = intel gratis buat reverse engineer Google
- Private = strategi survival (bertahan 6-12 bulan lebih lama)
- Fighting monopoli Google βοΈ
π° Kenapa Google begini?
Maksa Play Store ($25+30%), manipulasi psikologis, bunuh custom ROM.
SUMBER:
A. github.com/1nikolas/play-integrity-checker-app
B. developer.android.com/google/play/integrity/verdicts
DeviceChecker - app gw simulate STRONG untuk locked bootloader + disclaimer transparan. Kejujuran > manipulasi Google. Private repo karena Google gak deserve intel gratis. π
Shoutout: KernelSU/SusFS/HMAL/Shamiko/Tricky Store/LSPosed devs = Pahlawan Kebebasan! ππ₯
Jangan lupa statement ini di share,agar ketololan perkara strong integrity hilang seketika
#PlayIntegrity #FuckMonopoli #AndroidFreedom #CustomROMGang
β€10π€4
π DEVICE CHECKER SERVER-SIDE SECURITY DEEP DIVE π
ARCHITECTURE:
- Platform: Vercel (serverless edge functions)
- Design: Stateless, zero-knowledge validation
- Privacy: No data storage, auto-expiring logs
π SECURITY FEATURES:
1. CREDENTIAL ISOLATION
β Google service account β Base64 β Env variable
β Never in Git, never in code
β Vercel encrypted at rest
β Rotatable anytime
2. STATELESS DESIGN
β No database (no breach risk)
β No sessions, no user accounts
β Request β Validate β Forget
3. API SECURITY
β CORS configured
β Input sanitization
β Error obfuscation
β Rate limiting ready
4. NETWORK SECURITY
β HTTPS only (TLS 1.3)
β Vercel CDN (DDoS protection)
β Edge network distributed
β Auto-scaling
5. PRIVACY-FIRST
β Zero data retention
β Tokens never stored
β Logs auto-expire (24-48h)
β GDPR compliant
6. DEPLOYMENT
β Private Git repo
β Env variable encryption
β Zero-downtime updates
β Instant rollback
βοΈ VS SPIC/PLAY INTEGRITY CHECKER SERVERS:
THEIR SERVERS:
β Public repos (spic-server, 1nikolas/*)
β Backend logic exposed
β Credentials format documented
β Self-hosted burden
β Unclear data handling
DEVICECHECKER:
β Private repo β logic hidden
β Proper secrets management
β Vercel enterprise security
β Zero-knowledge validation
β Privacy guaranteed
KEY ADVANTAGES:
1. Private backend β Protected from Google
2. Serverless β No persistent attack surface
3. Stateless β Zero data retention
4. Secrets isolated β Never exposed
5. Enterprise infrastructure β Vercel security
6. Zero-knowledge β Validate & forget
Security = Client + Server + OpSec
SPIC/Play Integrity Checker:
β Public everything
β Free intel to Google
β Privacy unclear
DeviceChecker:
β Private repos
β Proper opsec
β Privacy-first
β Enterprise security
This is secure apps in 2025. πͺ
ARCHITECTURE:
- Platform: Vercel (serverless edge functions)
- Design: Stateless, zero-knowledge validation
- Privacy: No data storage, auto-expiring logs
π SECURITY FEATURES:
1. CREDENTIAL ISOLATION
β Google service account β Base64 β Env variable
β Never in Git, never in code
β Vercel encrypted at rest
β Rotatable anytime
2. STATELESS DESIGN
β No database (no breach risk)
β No sessions, no user accounts
β Request β Validate β Forget
3. API SECURITY
β CORS configured
β Input sanitization
β Error obfuscation
β Rate limiting ready
4. NETWORK SECURITY
β HTTPS only (TLS 1.3)
β Vercel CDN (DDoS protection)
β Edge network distributed
β Auto-scaling
5. PRIVACY-FIRST
β Zero data retention
β Tokens never stored
β Logs auto-expire (24-48h)
β GDPR compliant
6. DEPLOYMENT
β Private Git repo
β Env variable encryption
β Zero-downtime updates
β Instant rollback
βοΈ VS SPIC/PLAY INTEGRITY CHECKER SERVERS:
THEIR SERVERS:
β Public repos (spic-server, 1nikolas/*)
β Backend logic exposed
β Credentials format documented
β Self-hosted burden
β Unclear data handling
DEVICECHECKER:
β Private repo β logic hidden
β Proper secrets management
β Vercel enterprise security
β Zero-knowledge validation
β Privacy guaranteed
KEY ADVANTAGES:
1. Private backend β Protected from Google
2. Serverless β No persistent attack surface
3. Stateless β Zero data retention
4. Secrets isolated β Never exposed
5. Enterprise infrastructure β Vercel security
6. Zero-knowledge β Validate & forget
Security = Client + Server + OpSec
SPIC/Play Integrity Checker:
β Public everything
β Free intel to Google
β Privacy unclear
DeviceChecker:
β Private repos
β Proper opsec
β Privacy-first
β Enterprise security
This is secure apps in 2025. πͺ
β€1
CLIENT-SIDE COMPARISON: SPIC/Play Integrity Checker vs DeviceChecker
β SPIC/PLAY INTEGRITY CHECKER - 10 CRITICAL FAILURES:
1. OBFUSCATION: None β 5min reverse engineering
2. REPOSITORY: Public β Free blueprint to Google
3. NAMING: Obvious β Auto-flagged
4. DISTRIBUTION: Play Store β Full surveillance
5. CREDENTIALS: Hardcoded plaintext β Easy extraction
6. NETWORK: Token forwarding β Red flag behavior
7. RATE LIMITING: Warning only β Device ban risk
8. DEBUGGING: Public issues β Free research for Google
9. ANTI-ANALYSIS: None β Open research lab
10. TRANSPARENCY: Misleading β Manipulation victim
β DEVICECHECKER - 10 SECURITY WINS:
1. OBFUSCATION: R8 + encryption β 10x harder analysis
2. REPOSITORY: Private β Zero Google access
3. NAMING: Generic (id.xms.devicechecker) β Stealth
4. DISTRIBUTION: Sideload β No surveillance
5. CREDENTIALS: Base64 + XOR β Protected
6. NETWORK: Clean validation β Less suspicious
7. RATE LIMITING: User protection built-in
8. DEBUGGING: Private channels β No leaks
9. ANTI-ANALYSIS: Root detection + anti-debug ready
10. TRANSPARENCY: Honest education β User empowerment
π― EVIDENCE:
β’ github.com/herzhenr/spic-android (public - exposed)
β’ github.com/1nikolas/play-integrity-checker-app (public - vulnerable)
β’ DeviceChecker: Private repo (protected)
β SPIC/PLAY INTEGRITY CHECKER - 10 CRITICAL FAILURES:
1. OBFUSCATION: None β 5min reverse engineering
2. REPOSITORY: Public β Free blueprint to Google
3. NAMING: Obvious β Auto-flagged
4. DISTRIBUTION: Play Store β Full surveillance
5. CREDENTIALS: Hardcoded plaintext β Easy extraction
6. NETWORK: Token forwarding β Red flag behavior
7. RATE LIMITING: Warning only β Device ban risk
8. DEBUGGING: Public issues β Free research for Google
9. ANTI-ANALYSIS: None β Open research lab
10. TRANSPARENCY: Misleading β Manipulation victim
β DEVICECHECKER - 10 SECURITY WINS:
1. OBFUSCATION: R8 + encryption β 10x harder analysis
2. REPOSITORY: Private β Zero Google access
3. NAMING: Generic (id.xms.devicechecker) β Stealth
4. DISTRIBUTION: Sideload β No surveillance
5. CREDENTIALS: Base64 + XOR β Protected
6. NETWORK: Clean validation β Less suspicious
7. RATE LIMITING: User protection built-in
8. DEBUGGING: Private channels β No leaks
9. ANTI-ANALYSIS: Root detection + anti-debug ready
10. TRANSPARENCY: Honest education β User empowerment
π― EVIDENCE:
β’ github.com/herzhenr/spic-android (public - exposed)
β’ github.com/1nikolas/play-integrity-checker-app (public - vulnerable)
β’ DeviceChecker: Private repo (protected)
β€2
XKM-2.0 Alpha Snapshot
If you think the UI is very different there is a reason :
1. Not all devices are mid-high-flagship, to make it lighter
2.Avoiding memory leaks
3. Avoid some bugs
But in this case, there may be changes that occur.
If you think the UI is very different there is a reason :
1. Not all devices are mid-high-flagship, to make it lighter
2.Avoiding memory leaks
3. Avoid some bugs
But in this case, there may be changes that occur.
π₯3
We are looking for additional testers for our XMS app project!
From XKM application and other applications.
Blacklist Phone Test : marble, beryllium.
Phone For Test : Root for XKM or NonRoot Phone 2019-2023 or 2024 Mid-End
New Phone : Need Android Studio for Logs (Only XKM)
Open to 10 members, if interested PM @GustyxPower , @Pavellc
From XKM application and other applications.
Blacklist Phone Test : marble, beryllium.
Phone For Test : Root for XKM or NonRoot Phone 2019-2023 or 2024 Mid-End
New Phone : Need Android Studio for Logs (Only XKM)
Open to 10 members, if interested PM @GustyxPower , @Pavellc
π1
XChatAi | 1.1-Release
Released: 25/10/'25
By Xtra Manager Software Community
πΈ Download
πΈ Support Group
πΈ Support Channel
πΈ Log & Commit
πΈ Donate Me
Changelogs:
β’ On Screenshot
Notes:
β’ Report in Group if there is any problem with this application
#XtraManager #AiChat
#OpenSource #Apps
Released: 25/10/'25
By Xtra Manager Software Community
πΈ Download
πΈ Support Group
πΈ Support Channel
πΈ Log & Commit
πΈ Donate Me
Changelogs:
β’ On Screenshot
Notes:
β’ Report in Group if there is any problem with this application
#XtraManager #AiChat
#OpenSource #Apps
β€1
There are probably 2 Toys.. Eh 2 Apps that will come before 2026 arrives. XKM & XArchiver 2026 will be released
π1
ID : Btw ada yang masih pake XChatAi,minta kesimpulan dan sarannya dong buat tugas kuliah soalnya mau di presentasikan minggu depan hehe
EN : Btw, is there anyone who still uses XChatAi? Please share your conclusions and suggestions for my college assignment because I'm going to present it next week, hehe
- Gustyx
EN : Btw, is there anyone who still uses XChatAi? Please share your conclusions and suggestions for my college assignment because I'm going to present it next week, hehe
- Gustyx
My Poco F5 on AOSP custom ROM for Mobile Legends is stuck at 90Fps, I tried to make a full spoof module to Xiaomi 17PM but it didn't work, when I changed it to Xiaomi 15 now it works π₯
But I don't know whether it can be done on other ROMs or other devices that experience the same thing or not, I will release it later.
But I don't know whether it can be done on other ROMs or other devices that experience the same thing or not, I will release it later.