The risk assessments are carried out by the leading specialists in Norway. For significant changes to be made in the sentencing regime, the ball is in Breivik's court. He is the one who must work actively with the ideas that formed the basis of the actions on 22 July. It is only when there is a real initiative that it is appropriate to consider easing the sentence 🤦♂️, says Nerland https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/67
Han har rett til å bli hørt. Det er slik rettssystemet vårt er. Jeg tenker at kriminalomsorgen gjør det de kan, og at han får særbehandling sammenliknet med andre fanger, sier han.
He has the right to be heard. That's the way our legal system is. I think that the correctional services are doing what they can, and that he gets special treatment compared to other prisoners, he says.
🙅♂️NOPE, HE HAS NO RIGHT! He can express all during the first session / big investigation, after that NO PAROLE and another session before the execution! (in case we convert death penalty to life sentence!)
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightAbuse/74
https://t.iss.one/BreivikDeathSentence
NOTHING MORE!
Staten la vekt på at 44-åringen kvittet seg med besøksvennen sin gjennom ni år.
The state emphasized that the 44-year-old got rid of his visiting friend of nine years.
This was probably NOT A FRIEND!
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/94
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/95
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/97
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/98
I tillegg får han lov til å studere, og er innvilget å ha tre undulater på gangen.
In addition, he is allowed to study, and is allowed to have three budgies in the hallway.
https://t.iss.one/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/711
which is ok to have something to do, BUT NOT AS AN EXCUSE "CAN I GET PAROLE NOW!"
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
https://t.iss.one/SoSorryTelegram
I forrige rettsrunde, i 2016 og 2017, fikk han medhold av tingretten på punktet om artikkel 3, men staten vant på alle punkter i lagmannsretten. Saken ble deretter avvist av Høyesterett og Den europeiske menneskerettsdomstolen i Strasbourg
https://t.iss.one/ParoleFacts/67
Han har rett til å bli hørt. Det er slik rettssystemet vårt er. Jeg tenker at kriminalomsorgen gjør det de kan, og at han får særbehandling sammenliknet med andre fanger, sier han.
He has the right to be heard. That's the way our legal system is. I think that the correctional services are doing what they can, and that he gets special treatment compared to other prisoners, he says.
🙅♂️NOPE, HE HAS NO RIGHT! He can express all during the first session / big investigation, after that NO PAROLE and another session before the execution! (in case we convert death penalty to life sentence!)
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightAbuse/74
https://t.iss.one/BreivikDeathSentence
NOTHING MORE!
Staten la vekt på at 44-åringen kvittet seg med besøksvennen sin gjennom ni år.
The state emphasized that the 44-year-old got rid of his visiting friend of nine years.
This was probably NOT A FRIEND!
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/94
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/95
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/97
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/98
I tillegg får han lov til å studere, og er innvilget å ha tre undulater på gangen.
In addition, he is allowed to study, and is allowed to have three budgies in the hallway.
https://t.iss.one/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/711
which is ok to have something to do, BUT NOT AS AN EXCUSE "CAN I GET PAROLE NOW!"
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
https://t.iss.one/SoSorryTelegram
I forrige rettsrunde, i 2016 og 2017, fikk han medhold av tingretten på punktet om artikkel 3, men staten vant på alle punkter i lagmannsretten. Saken ble deretter avvist av Høyesterett og Den europeiske menneskerettsdomstolen i Strasbourg
Breivik human rights complain part 4
P1
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/117
In the previous court round, in 2016 and 2017, he was upheld by the District Court on the point about Article 3, but the state won on all points in the Court of Appeal. The case was subsequently rejected by the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/35
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/38
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/24
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/27
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/111
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/115
etc.
Results:
https://t.iss.one/BreivikAbuse/58
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/89
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/111
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/117
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightAbuse/73
PLUS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET, MEANS
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/102
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/107
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/25
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/38
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/117
especially
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/110
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
Why do we don't share how much such week costed to the state?
Just a quick example considering 10 people with a wage of 50$ for 5 days and 8 hours = 20K only related to this, plus we need to consider all what is happening behind that (even the decision was not taked inside such 5 days ...), the fact that a judge / lawyer for sure has no a wage of 50$/h ..
WTF they get 4000 CHF during a practicum, while other people get 0 CHF DURING A BACHELOR PRACTICUM (last year)!!
https://t.iss.one/StudentRightsTelegram/155
THIS IS JUST JOB DISCRIMINATION!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/97
https://t.iss.one/JobDiscrimination
https://t.iss.one/JobsFacts
Then we complain why death penalty is fucking expensive! LET WE STOP ALL SUCH OVERPAID JOBS! that don't take responsibility when they do shit!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
We clearly say🙅♂️ JOB DISCRIMINATION 🙅♂️ OVERPAID JOBS ✅ DEATH PENALTY 🙅♂️ EXCUSES IT COSTS TOO MUCH!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
P1
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/117
In the previous court round, in 2016 and 2017, he was upheld by the District Court on the point about Article 3, but the state won on all points in the Court of Appeal. The case was subsequently rejected by the Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg https://perma.cc/MA3R-AWX6
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/35
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/38
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/24
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/27
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/111
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/115
etc.
Results:
https://t.iss.one/BreivikAbuse/58
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/89
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/111
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/117
https://t.iss.one/HumanRightAbuse/73
PLUS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET, MEANS
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/102
to
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/107
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/25
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/38
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/117
especially
https://t.iss.one/BreivikParole/110
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/66
https://t.iss.one/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/67
Why do we don't share how much such week costed to the state?
Just a quick example considering 10 people with a wage of 50$ for 5 days and 8 hours = 20K only related to this, plus we need to consider all what is happening behind that (even the decision was not taked inside such 5 days ...), the fact that a judge / lawyer for sure has no a wage of 50$/h ..
WTF they get 4000 CHF during a practicum, while other people get 0 CHF DURING A BACHELOR PRACTICUM (last year)!!
https://t.iss.one/StudentRightsTelegram/155
THIS IS JUST JOB DISCRIMINATION!
https://t.iss.one/LawsTelegram/97
https://t.iss.one/JobDiscrimination
https://t.iss.one/JobsFacts
Then we complain why death penalty is fucking expensive! LET WE STOP ALL SUCH OVERPAID JOBS! that don't take responsibility when they do shit!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
We clearly say🙅♂️ JOB DISCRIMINATION 🙅♂️ OVERPAID JOBS ✅ DEATH PENALTY 🙅♂️ EXCUSES IT COSTS TOO MUCH!
https://t.iss.one/DeathSentenceFAQ/176