Forwarded from EZAZ.org | AZ Civic Action EASY as Pie
🚨UPDATE on HB2839
Rep. Walt Blackman is running an amendment to restore our PC elections
Stay tuned for a rally on Monday!
Rep. Walt Blackman is running an amendment to restore our PC elections
Stay tuned for a rally on Monday!
👍1
Forwarded from Senator Jake Hoffman
🚨 PC ELECTIONS ARE CRITICAL 🚨
I spent most of the day yesterday working on how to resolve the issue with HB2893 and the insane provision to strip PCs of their elected status and totally circumvent the PC elections.
This provision was snuck into the bill unbeknownst to most members. We were told that the Party supported the bill, which has proven to be false and that this was intended to fix the utter mess Katie Hobbs has made of our election procedures for 2022.
More concerning, this provision was seemingly intentionally hidden in the legislation. New provisions are supposed to be in BLUE CAPITAL LETTERS. Deletions are supposed to be in red. Current law is supposed to be in black normal case letters, yet this NEW provision was hidden in black normal case. This is standard practice for all legislation! Was this change in standard practice done intentionally in order to hide the provision from those of us that actually read the bills?
I am working on a full repeal of the language in HB2893 relating to PCs.
I am also working to get to the bottom of where this language came from. I have heard rumors that it was a done at the request of AACO, but have not been able to confirm for sure if that is the genesis of it.
I stand with the PCs!
We must have PC elections in 2022!
I spent most of the day yesterday working on how to resolve the issue with HB2893 and the insane provision to strip PCs of their elected status and totally circumvent the PC elections.
This provision was snuck into the bill unbeknownst to most members. We were told that the Party supported the bill, which has proven to be false and that this was intended to fix the utter mess Katie Hobbs has made of our election procedures for 2022.
More concerning, this provision was seemingly intentionally hidden in the legislation. New provisions are supposed to be in BLUE CAPITAL LETTERS. Deletions are supposed to be in red. Current law is supposed to be in black normal case letters, yet this NEW provision was hidden in black normal case. This is standard practice for all legislation! Was this change in standard practice done intentionally in order to hide the provision from those of us that actually read the bills?
I am working on a full repeal of the language in HB2893 relating to PCs.
I am also working to get to the bottom of where this language came from. I have heard rumors that it was a done at the request of AACO, but have not been able to confirm for sure if that is the genesis of it.
I stand with the PCs!
We must have PC elections in 2022!
👍4🥰1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
None of them asked a single question!
🤬6👍1
Forwarded from Senator Kelly Townsend
In response to some serious misunderstanding on a different Telegram channel, I am posting here as well, just in case.
No actually I made the decision before they could. I was hours away from the endorsement but I declined it because speaking out against Wendy Rogers would have been detrimental anyway. It was a hard decision but when I asked Wendy Rogers to just explain that she does not ascribe to the anti-Jewish hate and that she didn’t mean to post a picture of a rhinoceros that she killed with a Jewish star on it, she refused. All she had to do was say that she supports his first amendment rights but she doesn’t agree with what he is saying. She instead posted the meme of her shooting the Jewish rhino. I am so very sorry to all of you, I thought Wendy was our strongest chance and I am devastated. I don’t like having to do this but I also cannot stay silent in order to benefit myself and get the endorsement. I did not vote to censure her because I wasn’t there that day. The following day I asked her to put into the journal that she was speaking of First Amendment rights and that she didn’t align herself with his rhetoric and she refused. I was left without any choice. If that still upsets you then I am sorry but I am not going to make a different choice when in the face of such serious hate.
No actually I made the decision before they could. I was hours away from the endorsement but I declined it because speaking out against Wendy Rogers would have been detrimental anyway. It was a hard decision but when I asked Wendy Rogers to just explain that she does not ascribe to the anti-Jewish hate and that she didn’t mean to post a picture of a rhinoceros that she killed with a Jewish star on it, she refused. All she had to do was say that she supports his first amendment rights but she doesn’t agree with what he is saying. She instead posted the meme of her shooting the Jewish rhino. I am so very sorry to all of you, I thought Wendy was our strongest chance and I am devastated. I don’t like having to do this but I also cannot stay silent in order to benefit myself and get the endorsement. I did not vote to censure her because I wasn’t there that day. The following day I asked her to put into the journal that she was speaking of First Amendment rights and that she didn’t align herself with his rhetoric and she refused. I was left without any choice. If that still upsets you then I am sorry but I am not going to make a different choice when in the face of such serious hate.
❤2👍1
Forwarded from Arizona Blade Channel
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
UPDATE: No legislators asked any questions on this bill [HB2839].
(Credit to @ ThatParentP4P for video)
- Tyler Bowyer
(Credit to @ ThatParentP4P for video)
- Tyler Bowyer
Forwarded from Arizona Freedom
At the 28 minute mark Steve Bannon talks about the AZ Legislature "Banning Precinct Committeemen project via emergency bill"
https://rumble.com/vwjgzl-episode-1686-putin-says-the-west-has-declared-on-russia-truckers-rally-outs.html
https://rumble.com/vwjgzl-episode-1686-putin-says-the-west-has-declared-on-russia-truckers-rally-outs.html
Rumble
Episode 1,686 - Putin Says The West Has Declared On Russia; Truckers Rally Outside DC
We discuss the trucker convoy, Ukraine, the economy, COVID, and more. Our guests are: Matthew Tyrmand, Jack Posobiec, Ben Harnwell, Dr. Naomi Wolf, Ben Bergquam, Dr. Robert Malone Stay ahead of the ce
👍1
Forwarded from Arizona Freedom
While the legislature promises to fix the #PCKILLBILL, cancellation notices for PC appointments to file their nomination forms and signatures are going out en mass:
Forwarded from Senator Kelly Townsend
Because I am being accused of being against the 1st Amendment, I want to post this so you can see for yourself my stance on this very unfortunate situation. Nowhere in my speech did I stifle anyone’s speech. If you disagree, please tell me where I did.
https://rumble.com/vwjsau-sen.-kelly-townsend-discusses-censure-of-sen.-wendy-rogers.html
https://rumble.com/vwjsau-sen.-kelly-townsend-discusses-censure-of-sen.-wendy-rogers.html
Rumble
Sen. Kelly Townsend Discusses Censure of Sen. Wendy Rogers
Arizona State Senator Kelly Townsend explained how she would have voted on the previous day’s censure vote against State Senator Wendy Rogers, who has garnered national attention for her associations
👍7
Forwarded from Mrs. Crystal O
https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2022/02/18/speaker-bowers-to-run-for-arizona-senate-again-termed-out-of-house/ he's running for senate
he's termed out of house
he's termed out of house
Arizona Daily Independent
Speaker Bowers To Run For Arizona Senate Again, Termed Out Of House
Setting up a classic left vs right Republican primary, House Speaker Rusty Bowers filed the paperwork needed to run for the new Legislative District 10 Senate seat on Friday. Bowers’ more liberal...
🤮35👍1
Forwarded from Always Yesterday
“Bowers is the ultimate insider’s insider,” said one prominent lobbyist, who added that “Bowers will have more money than God for his race, which he may need because his voting record is actually pretty terrible if you’re in a conservative Republican primary.”
🤮39👍5
Email From Karen Fann Re HB2839
From: Karen Fann <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: HB2839 What Does this Mean or Accomplish?
That is not correct. Please note the “not withstanding “ language
The emergency language in HB2839 was necessary for several reasons, but primarily due to the chain reaction stemming from the delay in Census data. In normal years, the changes to district boundaries following redistricting are required to be certified or adopted no later than December 1 of the year prior to the general election. However, as you know, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission did not certify the new congressional and legislative district boundaries until January 24, 2022. Immediately, counties started to work with their GIS teams to import the new boundaries and make any changes to election precincts required by the new CD/LD boundaries. Testing is ongoing to ensure the affected voters are assigned to the correct election precinct for the 2022 election cycle.
By law (A.R.S. § 16-411(A)), election precinct boundaries cannot cross congressional, legislative, supervisorial or community college district boundaries. This necessitated counties, mostly medium-large counties that have more than one congressional and/or legislative district within county boundaries, to create additional election precincts where the new CD/LD boundaries crossed through an existing election precinct, even if this meant a precinct with no voters had to be created. The new election precincts cannot “go live” in the voter information database until at least mid-March due to several counties conducting March 8th jurisdictional elections; we cannot make changes to voters’ election precincts in the midst of an active election.
Which leads us to the complication with precinct committeemen elections. Precinct committeemen (PC) positions are determined by A.R.S. § 16-821(A), which allows for one PC position for each election precinct plus one additional position within that precinct for every 125 registered voters in that precinct (for each recognized political party). The counties did not have the authority to change the number of positions to reflect the new election precincts until we included the language in HB2839 (page 3, A.R.S. § 16-322(D)) to allow for consideration of the “number of qualified signers in the … elective precinct on the effective date of the new district or precinct.” This language also addresses the concerns for new Justice of the Peace precincts created after January 2 of the year of a general election.
Where maintaining the existing election process for PCs would have been detrimental to the parties and their candidates for PC offices is that counties would have provided a new list of number of PC offices per election precinct, including new election precincts, and signature requirements halfway through the candidate filing period. Counties believed this was unfair to the parties and candidates and we sought a solution to ensure communities in new election precincts would have accurate party representation.
Maricopa County alone is making 387 election precinct changes due to new CD/LD boundaries, including 104 new election precincts, 81 of which contain voters. This means, at minimum, the political parties recognized in Maricopa County will receive approximately 81 new PC office positions in 2022 due to the new election precincts.
[continued 1/2]
From: Karen Fann <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 6:50 AM
Subject: Re: HB2839 What Does this Mean or Accomplish?
That is not correct. Please note the “not withstanding “ language
The emergency language in HB2839 was necessary for several reasons, but primarily due to the chain reaction stemming from the delay in Census data. In normal years, the changes to district boundaries following redistricting are required to be certified or adopted no later than December 1 of the year prior to the general election. However, as you know, the Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission did not certify the new congressional and legislative district boundaries until January 24, 2022. Immediately, counties started to work with their GIS teams to import the new boundaries and make any changes to election precincts required by the new CD/LD boundaries. Testing is ongoing to ensure the affected voters are assigned to the correct election precinct for the 2022 election cycle.
By law (A.R.S. § 16-411(A)), election precinct boundaries cannot cross congressional, legislative, supervisorial or community college district boundaries. This necessitated counties, mostly medium-large counties that have more than one congressional and/or legislative district within county boundaries, to create additional election precincts where the new CD/LD boundaries crossed through an existing election precinct, even if this meant a precinct with no voters had to be created. The new election precincts cannot “go live” in the voter information database until at least mid-March due to several counties conducting March 8th jurisdictional elections; we cannot make changes to voters’ election precincts in the midst of an active election.
Which leads us to the complication with precinct committeemen elections. Precinct committeemen (PC) positions are determined by A.R.S. § 16-821(A), which allows for one PC position for each election precinct plus one additional position within that precinct for every 125 registered voters in that precinct (for each recognized political party). The counties did not have the authority to change the number of positions to reflect the new election precincts until we included the language in HB2839 (page 3, A.R.S. § 16-322(D)) to allow for consideration of the “number of qualified signers in the … elective precinct on the effective date of the new district or precinct.” This language also addresses the concerns for new Justice of the Peace precincts created after January 2 of the year of a general election.
Where maintaining the existing election process for PCs would have been detrimental to the parties and their candidates for PC offices is that counties would have provided a new list of number of PC offices per election precinct, including new election precincts, and signature requirements halfway through the candidate filing period. Counties believed this was unfair to the parties and candidates and we sought a solution to ensure communities in new election precincts would have accurate party representation.
Maricopa County alone is making 387 election precinct changes due to new CD/LD boundaries, including 104 new election precincts, 81 of which contain voters. This means, at minimum, the political parties recognized in Maricopa County will receive approximately 81 new PC office positions in 2022 due to the new election precincts.
[continued 1/2]
👍2
Karen Fann email continued 2/2:
We believe this change of process for the 2022 election cycle is beneficial to both communities and political parties because:
• It ensures communities within new election precinct boundaries have party representation – without this fix, there would have been areas lacking representation.
• Parties will receive additional PC slots in new election precincts (per A.R.S. § 16-821(A), 1 PC slot per election precinct with another slot per 125 registered party voters in that precinct)
• Using an appointed-as-elected process for the 2022 cycle ensures no candidate or party is disadvantaged by the abbreviated period to collect the appropriate number of signatures required for qualification for the ballot
◦ Statute (A.R.S. § 16-311) sets the filing period of March 7 through April 4, 2022. Counties who are required to add and modify election precincts due to changes in congressional and legislative district boundaries will not have the new election precinct boundaries finalized until midway through this filing period.
· The change in HB2839 also affords precinct committeemen more time to file; rather than be subject to the April 4, 2022 filing deadline, it is now April 18, 2022.
We recognize that in the rush to enact the emergency legislation in order to protect local candidates and petition signers prior to the beginning of the 2022 Primary Election candidate filing period this upcoming Monday, March 7th, that some confusion was caused by not mentioning A.R.S. § 16-821(A) (HB2839, section 4, page 6) in regards to the “appoint as elected” process for PC offices in 2022. It was always the intention of this legislation to ensure all communities and parties had a full and accurate representation and were not harmed by new election precincts; therefore, we can seek additional emergency legislation to put the clarifying language that PC offices will continue to be determined according to 16-821(A). The counties never intended to reduce PC offices and representation to only one per election precinct.
We believe this change of process for the 2022 election cycle is beneficial to both communities and political parties because:
• It ensures communities within new election precinct boundaries have party representation – without this fix, there would have been areas lacking representation.
• Parties will receive additional PC slots in new election precincts (per A.R.S. § 16-821(A), 1 PC slot per election precinct with another slot per 125 registered party voters in that precinct)
• Using an appointed-as-elected process for the 2022 cycle ensures no candidate or party is disadvantaged by the abbreviated period to collect the appropriate number of signatures required for qualification for the ballot
◦ Statute (A.R.S. § 16-311) sets the filing period of March 7 through April 4, 2022. Counties who are required to add and modify election precincts due to changes in congressional and legislative district boundaries will not have the new election precinct boundaries finalized until midway through this filing period.
· The change in HB2839 also affords precinct committeemen more time to file; rather than be subject to the April 4, 2022 filing deadline, it is now April 18, 2022.
We recognize that in the rush to enact the emergency legislation in order to protect local candidates and petition signers prior to the beginning of the 2022 Primary Election candidate filing period this upcoming Monday, March 7th, that some confusion was caused by not mentioning A.R.S. § 16-821(A) (HB2839, section 4, page 6) in regards to the “appoint as elected” process for PC offices in 2022. It was always the intention of this legislation to ensure all communities and parties had a full and accurate representation and were not harmed by new election precincts; therefore, we can seek additional emergency legislation to put the clarifying language that PC offices will continue to be determined according to 16-821(A). The counties never intended to reduce PC offices and representation to only one per election precinct.
👍2😱1
Dan Schultz Discusses the AZ Legislature’s Sabotage of the Precinct Strategy
Gail Golec interviews precinctstrategy.com founder Dan Schultz to get his take on HB2839.
https://rumble.com/vwl1xm-az-scandal-again-precinct-strategy-removed-by-az-legislature-with-dan-schul.html
Gail Golec interviews precinctstrategy.com founder Dan Schultz to get his take on HB2839.
https://rumble.com/vwl1xm-az-scandal-again-precinct-strategy-removed-by-az-legislature-with-dan-schul.html
Rumble
AZ Scandal Again! Precinct Strategy Removed by AZ Legislature with Dan Schultz
Dan Schultz founder of PrecinctStrategy.com and who has recently been endorsed by President Donald J. Trump and Mike Lindell and has been appearing regularly on Steve Bannon's War Room, joins Gail Gol
👍6❤3
Forwarded from Senator Kelly Townsend
Regarding the debacle with the precinct committeeman being removed as elected PCs, I want you to know that many of us are quite upset at how this happened and will not move forward with anything else until it is fixed. It is my recommendation that the entire thing is repealed and repeated correctly this time. We will be meeting tomorrow to discuss.
👍8
Forwarded from Fighting4AZ
Those in Sedona, please support Samaire by signing her petition.
- Samaire Armstrong
https://go.azsos.gov/sh84
How To Fill Out The Petition
1. Enter your information:
Name
Date of birth
Driver’s license number (or voter registration number and last four of your social security number)
2. Confirm your current address
3. Scroll down and select candidate Samaire Armstrong
4. Confirm your decision
5. Add your email address
6. Confirm you want to sign, and you’re all done!
- Samaire Armstrong
https://go.azsos.gov/sh84
How To Fill Out The Petition
1. Enter your information:
Name
Date of birth
Driver’s license number (or voter registration number and last four of your social security number)
2. Confirm your current address
3. Scroll down and select candidate Samaire Armstrong
4. Confirm your decision
5. Add your email address
6. Confirm you want to sign, and you’re all done!
👍5
Forwarded from Vote Liz Harris
Liz Harris: ‘HB2596 Is the Most Important Current Election Integrity Bill - It Has Teeth!’
One Day - One Vote - On Paper - In Person - No Machines - Small Precincts - No Mail-In Ballots - Severely Restricted Absentee Voting
‼️We are relying on Speaker Bowers and Rep. Kavanaugh to help get this bill through. Please immediately flood their phones* with your support:
Speaker Rusty Bowers
☎️ 602-926-3128
Rep. John Kavanaugh
☎️ 602-926-5170
*This bill affects the validity of all of our votes, you don’t need to be an AZ resident to call.
Read the full bill HB 2596 here:
https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/55leg/2R/bills/HB2596P.pdf
One Day - One Vote - On Paper - In Person - No Machines - Small Precincts - No Mail-In Ballots - Severely Restricted Absentee Voting
‼️We are relying on Speaker Bowers and Rep. Kavanaugh to help get this bill through. Please immediately flood their phones* with your support:
Speaker Rusty Bowers
☎️ 602-926-3128
Rep. John Kavanaugh
☎️ 602-926-5170
*This bill affects the validity of all of our votes, you don’t need to be an AZ resident to call.
Read the full bill HB 2596 here:
https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/55leg/2R/bills/HB2596P.pdf
👍7
Forwarded from Fighting4AZ
The list of bills for the week of 3/7 is ready. If you've input your positions into RTS for all the prior weeks, there are no new bills but if you filter column C by the color green, those bill positions have changed and should be updated in RTS. All but 2 of those in green are now strikers (meaning the bill completely changed to a new bill).
Please let me know if you have any questions.
https://fighting4az.blogspot.com/2022/01/call-to-actions.html
Please let me know if you have any questions.
https://fighting4az.blogspot.com/2022/01/call-to-actions.html
Blogspot
Call to Actions
Please login to RTS and register your position on the following bills. The positions in the attached document are my own based on readin...
👍2