- @WendyRogersAZ

- @WendyRogersAZ

275,000+ Questions in Arizona

“And that’s just the appetizer”
- Jovan

168,000 fraudulent ballots printed on illegal paper

3,981 voted despite registering AFTER Oct 15 deadline

11,326 voted who were NOT on rolls on Nov 7 but WERE on Dec 4

18,000 voted and then were removed from rolls AFTER election

74,243 mail-in ballots w/ NO record of ever being sent out

“Thousands” of duplicate ballots without serial numbers that cannot be verified

H/t: @LizHarrington76

Arizona Senate President: Arizona Senate Doesn't Have Authority To Recall Electors | OANN

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann spoke with OANN about recalling electors on Friday. The Propaganda Press Washington Examiner reported:

“The Arizona Senate lacks the authority to recall electors, the legislative body’s Republican president said on Friday.

Fann told One America News Network that the Arizona Senate has the power to help the auditors get the materials and information they say they need (likely through more subpoenas, along with a door-to-door canvass), but the question of decertifying the election will be left up to others.

“The Senate body — we do not have the authority to do that. So, this is what we have said, and I want to make this very clear on the record,” Fann told host Natalie Harp.

“I am not saying there is no way it can be done. What I am saying is our Senate body does not have the authority to do it. However, we will turn [the audit’s findings] over to the Attorney Generals, not only on the state level, but on the federal level. And we will turn it over to Congress, and they can make those decisions. And that is, I’m saying, if there were any wrongdoings,” she said.

“But if, if, if those determinations show there was enough difference in a count of the electoral — particularly since it was such a small margin here as it was in some other states, then Congress is going to have to take care of that... There is no precedent for this.”

Fann’s statement is somewhat misleading. It’s true that the AZ State Senate alone does not have the authority to recall electors — that power is given to the State Legislature. The question is, can they reclaim electors 7+ months after the inauguration. The Constitution does not lay out a clear path for rectifying election fraud after electoral certification, but it also does not preclude redress.

Watch 📺👉 OANN
*Fann interview begins at min 7:10
Read 👓👉 Pravda Press Washington Examiner
—

Sharpiegate🖊🛑 continued…

Via @KanekoatheGreat

“Starting tomorrow, 10/23 and through 11/2, we are asking that Clerks hand voters BALLPOINT PENS rather than markers. We NEED to use Markers on Election Day, but for now and through 11/2, hand voters a ballpoint pen.”

- Email from Kelly Dixon, Maricopa County 10/22/20

They knew Sharpies bled through non-durable paper, which exactly why they printed thousands of ballots on the non-durable paper and got the Sharpies ready to hand out to all the TRUMP VOTERS they knew would show up on election day. To ensure the ballot was rejected by the tabulation machines in case the Sharpies didn't cause enough bleed through, they also ensured these non-durable paper ballots were printed OFF CENTER. Once the ballot was rejected, that allowed them to either toss it or adjucate it and switch it to a vote for Biden. Pretty crafty, eh? What did everybody learn here? Even with just paper ballots, these county officials have figured out a way to game the system and get a lot of ballots rejected so they can 'fix' them and 'adjust' them. How many elections have local and state officials pulled tricks like this to get ballots set aside and then 'fixed'?

Arizona Senate Judiciary Chairman Warren Peterson poses excellent questions to the Legacy media:

Why isn't the media getting answers for these questions raised at the hearing by the auditors?

1. Why were 37,000 queries made on the Election server on a single day in March which churned the logs so the logs from election day could not be seen?

2. Why won't the County provide images of the envelopes for the mail in ballots?

3. Why won't the County provide the splunk logs?

4. Why were duplicate ballots missing the serial numbers as required by ARS 16-621 and why were there multiples with the same number?

- Warren Petersen Twitter

HAPPENING NOW!

Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission Meeting - July 19, 2021

Watch:
https://youtu.be/1cDiEuZqhMg

Learn more:
📍Why is Redistricting Important

We Don’t Have to Live with the Results of a Fraudulent Election | War Room

John Eastman, a Constitutional lawyer and former Trump advisor, weighs in on AZ State Senate President Karen Fann’s assertion that the state legislature has no authority to remedy a fraudulent election.

Eastman acknowledges that while we are in uncharted territory, there are several things we can point to:

1) The 1960 Hawaii election precedent, in which the Governor certified a new slate of electors after they discovered error in the initial certification. However, this is not a 1:1 example since the correction was made before the electors were counted by Congress.

2) Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code recognizes the authority of the legislature to fix election problems. According to Eastman’s interpretation, it says that “when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made… was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such manner as the legislature in such state may direct.”

3) Common law, which establishes that “when you have fraud, the actions taken pursuant to the fraud are unraveled after the discovery of the fraud.” This known as “void ab initio,” which means that fraud taints everything resulting from it.

“We have ample authority to fix this problem, we don’t have to live with a fraudulent election,” Eastman explains. Although “the Constitution does not set out a remedy, it does not foreclose remedies.” However, he affirms that “the precondition for discussion of possible remedies is definitive proof of not only election fraud… significant enough to have effected the results of an election in enough states to have affected the results of the electoral college vote.”

Watch 📺👉 War Room
Learn more 👓👉 Election Fraud Remedies
More 📝👉 Last AZ Update
—

Arizona Congressional Candidate Josh Pushes for AZ Senate to Issue a Warrant for the Evidence Maricopa County is Withholding | National File

Josh Barnett, a Congressional candidate for Arizona’s 7th District and a stalwart AZ audit advocate, proposes the Senate Judiciary Chair bypass the courts and issue a warrant for routers and other items not turned over by Maricopa County:

“To get a warrant, we need a written report from the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Warren Petersen, signed off by Senate President Fann. Then we can send a Sergeant at Arms to go pick this stuff up. We don’t need courts involved. I told Warren [Petersen] this… They do NOT need to vote on it. The Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman can issue the written report himself,” Barnett explained. He added that Arizona governmental super-lawyer Alex Kolodin confirmed that this tactic is proper and legitimate.

National File points out that “the Mason’s Manual of Legislative Procedure, which is recognized by the Arizona legislature as ‘a procedural and parliamentary manual that supplements the Constitution, statutes and House and Senate Rules,’ acknowledges that a Senate committee can issue a warrant. The Mason’s Manual states: ‘No affidavit charging contempt need be filed before a house to authorize it to issue its warrant to arrest a contumacious person who refuses to testify before one of its committees. The written report of the committee is sufficient authority for the issuance of the warrant.’”

Read 👓👉 National File

H/t🤠 @praying_medic
—