July 16, 2021
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America
Fox News and other media outlets incorrectly side with the outdated and terrible Maricopa County Election Board to report no fraud found in the Presidential Election. They spew the gross misinformation purposefully put out by the county and the Associated Press, and IGNORE the very important Arizona Senate’s hearing yesterday, which showed 168,000 fraudulent ballots printed on illegal paper (unofficial ballots), 74,000 mail in ballots received that were never mailed (magically appearing ballots), 11,000 voters were added to the voter rolls AFTER the election and still voted, all the access logs to the machines were wiped, and the election server was hacked during the election. They sided with the County and not the brave Arizona Senate who is fighting for the people of Arizona. The same anchor at the desk the night Fox called Arizona for Joe Biden now wants you to believe there was no fraud. The anchor was Bret Baier. Thankfully, Arizona has strong State Senators willing to fight for the truth. Senator Wendy Rogers says “I have heard enough. It’s time to decertify this election.” Senator Kelly Townsend said the fraud was so bad “I want to see indictments.” Senator Sonny Borrelli says “I've seen enough evidence to challenge the validity of the certification of the Maricopa County Election results.” Arizona shows Fraud and Voting Irregularities many times more than would be needed to change the outcome of the Election.
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America
Fox News and other media outlets incorrectly side with the outdated and terrible Maricopa County Election Board to report no fraud found in the Presidential Election. They spew the gross misinformation purposefully put out by the county and the Associated Press, and IGNORE the very important Arizona Senate’s hearing yesterday, which showed 168,000 fraudulent ballots printed on illegal paper (unofficial ballots), 74,000 mail in ballots received that were never mailed (magically appearing ballots), 11,000 voters were added to the voter rolls AFTER the election and still voted, all the access logs to the machines were wiped, and the election server was hacked during the election. They sided with the County and not the brave Arizona Senate who is fighting for the people of Arizona. The same anchor at the desk the night Fox called Arizona for Joe Biden now wants you to believe there was no fraud. The anchor was Bret Baier. Thankfully, Arizona has strong State Senators willing to fight for the truth. Senator Wendy Rogers says “I have heard enough. It’s time to decertify this election.” Senator Kelly Townsend said the fraud was so bad “I want to see indictments.” Senator Sonny Borrelli says “I've seen enough evidence to challenge the validity of the certification of the Maricopa County Election results.” Arizona shows Fraud and Voting Irregularities many times more than would be needed to change the outcome of the Election.
AG's Office Asks Secretary of State for Potential Evidence of Illegal Voting
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office has asked Secretary of State Katie Hobbs for potential evidence of illegal voting — a move that counters her request that he investigate a pressure campaign by former President Donald Trump’s allies to “stop the counting” last year.
The attorney general’s email response pointedly notes that Hobbs, a Democrat, hasn’t submitted referrals for double voting. It marks the first time in more than a decade a secretary of state has not done so.
Source: State Media AZ Central
“This is a good start but I seriously want to know the intentions of the Arizona AG in regard to seeking truth about the findings thus far of the #ArizonaAudit. I suspect much of the American public want to know as well @GeneralBrnovich”
- Senator Kelly Townsend Twitter
Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office has asked Secretary of State Katie Hobbs for potential evidence of illegal voting — a move that counters her request that he investigate a pressure campaign by former President Donald Trump’s allies to “stop the counting” last year.
The attorney general’s email response pointedly notes that Hobbs, a Democrat, hasn’t submitted referrals for double voting. It marks the first time in more than a decade a secretary of state has not done so.
Source: State Media AZ Central
“This is a good start but I seriously want to know the intentions of the Arizona AG in regard to seeking truth about the findings thus far of the #ArizonaAudit. I suspect much of the American public want to know as well @GeneralBrnovich”
- Senator Kelly Townsend Twitter
EIFFTAR Fundraising Update for AZ Audit | July 17
Via @theProfessorsRecord
The latest figures on money raised for the AZ audit [by Matt DePerno’s EIFFTAR organization]. What a blessing you all have been to AZ.
Support the AZ audit: EIFFTAR.org
💲👉 Last EIFFTAR Update
Via @theProfessorsRecord
The latest figures on money raised for the AZ audit [by Matt DePerno’s EIFFTAR organization]. What a blessing you all have been to AZ.
Support the AZ audit: EIFFTAR.org
💲👉 Last EIFFTAR Update
Forwarded from EZAZ.org | AZ Civic Action EASY as Pie
Maricopa County Attorney lies to our Chairwoman that they aren't participating in the Senate election audit because the auditors aren't EAC certified.
The EAC doesn't certify auditors. Attorney LaRue knows this.
Check out the full thread on Twitter
https://twitter.com/merissahamilton/status/1416410763527290886?s=19
The EAC doesn't certify auditors. Attorney LaRue knows this.
Check out the full thread on Twitter
https://twitter.com/merissahamilton/status/1416410763527290886?s=19
275,000+ Questions in Arizona
“And that’s just the appetizer”
- Jovan
168,000 fraudulent ballots printed on illegal paper
3,981 voted despite registering AFTER Oct 15 deadline
11,326 voted who were NOT on rolls on Nov 7 but WERE on Dec 4
18,000 voted and then were removed from rolls AFTER election
74,243 mail-in ballots w/ NO record of ever being sent out
“Thousands” of duplicate ballots without serial numbers that cannot be verified
H/t: @LizHarrington76
“And that’s just the appetizer”
- Jovan
168,000 fraudulent ballots printed on illegal paper
3,981 voted despite registering AFTER Oct 15 deadline
11,326 voted who were NOT on rolls on Nov 7 but WERE on Dec 4
18,000 voted and then were removed from rolls AFTER election
74,243 mail-in ballots w/ NO record of ever being sent out
“Thousands” of duplicate ballots without serial numbers that cannot be verified
H/t: @LizHarrington76
Arizona Senate President: Arizona Senate Doesn't Have Authority To Recall Electors | OANN
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann spoke with OANN about recalling electors on Friday. The Propaganda Press Washington Examiner reported:
“The Arizona Senate lacks the authority to recall electors, the legislative body’s Republican president said on Friday.
Fann told One America News Network that the Arizona Senate has the power to help the auditors get the materials and information they say they need (likely through more subpoenas, along with a door-to-door canvass), but the question of decertifying the election will be left up to others.
“The Senate body — we do not have the authority to do that. So, this is what we have said, and I want to make this very clear on the record,” Fann told host Natalie Harp.
“I am not saying there is no way it can be done. What I am saying is our Senate body does not have the authority to do it. However, we will turn [the audit’s findings] over to the Attorney Generals, not only on the state level, but on the federal level. And we will turn it over to Congress, and they can make those decisions. And that is, I’m saying, if there were any wrongdoings,” she said.
“But if, if, if those determinations show there was enough difference in a count of the electoral — particularly since it was such a small margin here as it was in some other states, then Congress is going to have to take care of that... There is no precedent for this.”
Fann’s statement is somewhat misleading. It’s true that the AZ State Senate alone does not have the authority to recall electors — that power is given to the State Legislature. The question is, can they reclaim electors 7+ months after the inauguration. The Constitution does not lay out a clear path for rectifying election fraud after electoral certification, but it also does not preclude redress.
Watch 📺👉 OANN
*Fann interview begins at min 7:10
Read 👓👉 Pravda Press Washington Examiner
—
Arizona Senate President Karen Fann spoke with OANN about recalling electors on Friday. The Propaganda Press Washington Examiner reported:
“The Arizona Senate lacks the authority to recall electors, the legislative body’s Republican president said on Friday.
Fann told One America News Network that the Arizona Senate has the power to help the auditors get the materials and information they say they need (likely through more subpoenas, along with a door-to-door canvass), but the question of decertifying the election will be left up to others.
“The Senate body — we do not have the authority to do that. So, this is what we have said, and I want to make this very clear on the record,” Fann told host Natalie Harp.
“I am not saying there is no way it can be done. What I am saying is our Senate body does not have the authority to do it. However, we will turn [the audit’s findings] over to the Attorney Generals, not only on the state level, but on the federal level. And we will turn it over to Congress, and they can make those decisions. And that is, I’m saying, if there were any wrongdoings,” she said.
“But if, if, if those determinations show there was enough difference in a count of the electoral — particularly since it was such a small margin here as it was in some other states, then Congress is going to have to take care of that... There is no precedent for this.”
Fann’s statement is somewhat misleading. It’s true that the AZ State Senate alone does not have the authority to recall electors — that power is given to the State Legislature. The question is, can they reclaim electors 7+ months after the inauguration. The Constitution does not lay out a clear path for rectifying election fraud after electoral certification, but it also does not preclude redress.
Watch 📺👉 OANN
*Fann interview begins at min 7:10
Read 👓👉 Pravda Press Washington Examiner
—
Rumble
The Real Story – OAN Uncovering Maricopa Hearing with Karen Fann
Karen Fann, Arizona Senate President, gives The Real Story on what’s happening in the Maricopa audit and what we can expect in the next coming weeks.
Sharpiegate🖊🛑
Poll: More Than 60% of Democrats Plan to Vote Early vs. Less Than 30% of Republicans
- Forbes 9/7/20
Maricopa County Early Voting Instructions: Don’t Use Sharpies!
❌“Do not use red ink or permanent marker. This may result in a false read by our ballot tabulation machines.”
- Maricopa County, 9/24/20
❌“Thick markers will bleed through ballot.”
- AZ Early Voting Questions
❌“Ballots should be filled out with a black or blue ink pen. Do not use a marker or sharpie since they tend to bleed through and will damage your ballot.”
- Adrian Fontes, Maricopa County 2019
Maricopa County 11/3 Voting Instructions: Use Sharpies!
✅“Voters… may use ballpoint pen in black or blue ink or a sharpie. Voting Centers use fine tip sharpies…”
- Maricopa County, 11/3/20
✅“Sharpies will NOT invalidate your ballot.”
- Maricopa County, 11/4/20
❌More than 168K ballots had bleed-through and calibration issues.
- Doug Logan 7/15/21
Sources 🤠
👉 @TracybeanzOfficial
👉 @praying_medic
👉 @WILFMoseder
👓 AZ Family
Poll: More Than 60% of Democrats Plan to Vote Early vs. Less Than 30% of Republicans
- Forbes 9/7/20
Maricopa County Early Voting Instructions: Don’t Use Sharpies!
❌“Do not use red ink or permanent marker. This may result in a false read by our ballot tabulation machines.”
- Maricopa County, 9/24/20
❌“Thick markers will bleed through ballot.”
- AZ Early Voting Questions
❌“Ballots should be filled out with a black or blue ink pen. Do not use a marker or sharpie since they tend to bleed through and will damage your ballot.”
- Adrian Fontes, Maricopa County 2019
Maricopa County 11/3 Voting Instructions: Use Sharpies!
✅“Voters… may use ballpoint pen in black or blue ink or a sharpie. Voting Centers use fine tip sharpies…”
- Maricopa County, 11/3/20
✅“Sharpies will NOT invalidate your ballot.”
- Maricopa County, 11/4/20
❌More than 168K ballots had bleed-through and calibration issues.
- Doug Logan 7/15/21
Sources 🤠
👉 @TracybeanzOfficial
👉 @praying_medic
👉 @WILFMoseder
👓 AZ Family
Sharpiegate🖊🛑 continued…
Via @KanekoatheGreat
“Starting tomorrow, 10/23 and through 11/2, we are asking that Clerks hand voters BALLPOINT PENS rather than markers. We NEED to use Markers on Election Day, but for now and through 11/2, hand voters a ballpoint pen.”
- Email from Kelly Dixon, Maricopa County 10/22/20
Via @KanekoatheGreat
“Starting tomorrow, 10/23 and through 11/2, we are asking that Clerks hand voters BALLPOINT PENS rather than markers. We NEED to use Markers on Election Day, but for now and through 11/2, hand voters a ballpoint pen.”
- Email from Kelly Dixon, Maricopa County 10/22/20
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
They knew Sharpies bled through non-durable paper, which exactly why they printed thousands of ballots on the non-durable paper and got the Sharpies ready to hand out to all the TRUMP VOTERS they knew would show up on election day. To ensure the ballot was rejected by the tabulation machines in case the Sharpies didn't cause enough bleed through, they also ensured these non-durable paper ballots were printed OFF CENTER. Once the ballot was rejected, that allowed them to either toss it or adjucate it and switch it to a vote for Biden. Pretty crafty, eh? What did everybody learn here? Even with just paper ballots, these county officials have figured out a way to game the system and get a lot of ballots rejected so they can 'fix' them and 'adjust' them. How many elections have local and state officials pulled tricks like this to get ballots set aside and then 'fixed'?
Forwarded from Arizona Blade Channel
Merissa Hamilton: Wendy Rogers asked me to put together a briefing document on Maricopa County's rapid response tweets against AZ Senate Republicans Election Integrity Audit status update.
You can find the document [pic 1] on my website at: MerissaHamilton.com
Direct link: https://1bf14b78-5a4a-4b05-9cd4-20b6f0bfbe5c.filesusr.com/ugd/36ac1b_d9510797be2d419a91904375ce2b118b.pdf
I also added my previous briefing documents on the Maricopa County Dominion RFP and my data analysis, the deceased voter grassroots research, and my conclusions from the 2020 General Election
Our work resulted in an indictment of voter fraud by [AZ Attorney] General Brnovich.
I highly recommend Karen Fann, Warren Petersen [& the] AZ Senate Republicans consider expanding the audit.
At this point we are left with more questions than answers from Maricopa County.
I believe AZ Senate Republicans benefit from an additional 3rd party review on the security and tech items [pic 2)
You can find the document [pic 1] on my website at: MerissaHamilton.com
Direct link: https://1bf14b78-5a4a-4b05-9cd4-20b6f0bfbe5c.filesusr.com/ugd/36ac1b_d9510797be2d419a91904375ce2b118b.pdf
I also added my previous briefing documents on the Maricopa County Dominion RFP and my data analysis, the deceased voter grassroots research, and my conclusions from the 2020 General Election
Our work resulted in an indictment of voter fraud by [AZ Attorney] General Brnovich.
I highly recommend Karen Fann, Warren Petersen [& the] AZ Senate Republicans consider expanding the audit.
At this point we are left with more questions than answers from Maricopa County.
I believe AZ Senate Republicans benefit from an additional 3rd party review on the security and tech items [pic 2)
Forwarded from Arizona Blade Channel
Arizona Senate Judiciary Chairman Warren Peterson poses excellent questions to the Legacy media:
Why isn't the media getting answers for these questions raised at the hearing by the auditors?
1. Why were 37,000 queries made on the Election server on a single day in March which churned the logs so the logs from election day could not be seen?
2. Why won't the County provide images of the envelopes for the mail in ballots?
3. Why won't the County provide the splunk logs?
4. Why were duplicate ballots missing the serial numbers as required by ARS 16-621 and why were there multiples with the same number?
- Warren Petersen Twitter
Why isn't the media getting answers for these questions raised at the hearing by the auditors?
1. Why were 37,000 queries made on the Election server on a single day in March which churned the logs so the logs from election day could not be seen?
2. Why won't the County provide images of the envelopes for the mail in ballots?
3. Why won't the County provide the splunk logs?
4. Why were duplicate ballots missing the serial numbers as required by ARS 16-621 and why were there multiples with the same number?
- Warren Petersen Twitter
Twitter
Warren Petersen
Why isn't the media getting answers for these questions raised at the hearing by the auditors? 1. Why were 37,000 queries made on the Election server on a single day in March which churned the logs so the logs from election day could not be seen? Continued...