π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THIS ππ» is who Little Seasonists are TRULY trusting when they say Napoleon never existed
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
π’2
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Forwarded from πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
The New Chronology & Satanβs Little Season Theories | Inventions of the Jesuits
The main assertion of the adherents to the New Chronology Hypothesis is that through calendrical error and politico-religious meddling, several centuries of forged/manufactured history have been inserted retroactively into the western calendar, artificially extending modern history into a 2,000 year period. In essence, the proponents of the theory believe that the Anno Domini dating system has been fabricated and that the period of the early Middle Ages is a concoction. This theory has been popularized by the works in Anatoly Fomenko in recent times. However, the claims of the New Chronology Theory have an origin in the late 17th century. The first proponent of such a theory is the Jesuit Scholar Jean Hardouin. Jean Hardouin (1646-1729) was a French Jesuit Priest and classical scholar. He was a professor of letters and rhetoric and later became a professor of positive theology for 15 years at the Jesuit college of Louis le Grand in Paris. He also became librarian at the same Jesuit college. Hardouin spent all of his adult life at the college and authored several works espousing the theory. For the which is why Hardouin is commonly referred to as the intellectual progenitor the New Chronology Hypothesis.
In Christian circles the New Chronology Hypothesis is commonly paired with a nuanced form of Preterism to create the Satanβs Little Season Theory. A theory that states that the Millennial reign of Christ already occurred but it was erased from history when Satan was loosed for a little season (Revelation 20:3). Preterism as an eschatological system was first expounded and popularized by Jesuit Priest Luis de Alcasar in his 1614 work Vestigatio arcani sensus in Apocalypsi, often being regarded as the founding text of modern Preterism.
It is quite the feat when two Jesuit Psyops collide to form a conspiracy subculture that permeates in both New Age and Christian camps.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
The main assertion of the adherents to the New Chronology Hypothesis is that through calendrical error and politico-religious meddling, several centuries of forged/manufactured history have been inserted retroactively into the western calendar, artificially extending modern history into a 2,000 year period. In essence, the proponents of the theory believe that the Anno Domini dating system has been fabricated and that the period of the early Middle Ages is a concoction. This theory has been popularized by the works in Anatoly Fomenko in recent times. However, the claims of the New Chronology Theory have an origin in the late 17th century. The first proponent of such a theory is the Jesuit Scholar Jean Hardouin. Jean Hardouin (1646-1729) was a French Jesuit Priest and classical scholar. He was a professor of letters and rhetoric and later became a professor of positive theology for 15 years at the Jesuit college of Louis le Grand in Paris. He also became librarian at the same Jesuit college. Hardouin spent all of his adult life at the college and authored several works espousing the theory. For the which is why Hardouin is commonly referred to as the intellectual progenitor the New Chronology Hypothesis.
In Christian circles the New Chronology Hypothesis is commonly paired with a nuanced form of Preterism to create the Satanβs Little Season Theory. A theory that states that the Millennial reign of Christ already occurred but it was erased from history when Satan was loosed for a little season (Revelation 20:3). Preterism as an eschatological system was first expounded and popularized by Jesuit Priest Luis de Alcasar in his 1614 work Vestigatio arcani sensus in Apocalypsi, often being regarded as the founding text of modern Preterism.
It is quite the feat when two Jesuit Psyops collide to form a conspiracy subculture that permeates in both New Age and Christian camps.
πππ πππ€π¦ππ₯π ππ£πππͺ πΌπ©π‘π π€ππ
π₯2π―1
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Forwarded from πΈππ₯π ππ£π₯ππ -π»πππ
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Was Jesus a Nazirite with Long Hair?
TOTAL STONE IDOL DESTRUCTION
βπ²π©π±π₯π¬π©π¦π π¦π°πͺ | πΈππ₯π ππ£π₯ππ -π»πππ
TOTAL STONE IDOL DESTRUCTION
βπ²π©π±π₯π¬π©π¦π π¦π°πͺ | πΈππ₯π ππ£π₯ππ -π»πππ
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Forwarded from NIFB Sermons (Maria Utube100)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Understanding Dual Fulfillment in Bible Prophecy
Lessons from the Daniel Series Daniel 2
Pastor Steven Anderson
Lessons from the Daniel Series Daniel 2
Pastor Steven Anderson
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Newest preterist heresy just dropped:
This one really set the bar.
π»πππππππππ
"Jesus won't come in the Flesh"
This one really set the bar.
π»πππππππππ
π3
π»πππππππππγ πΈππ₯π βπ£ππ₯ππ£ππ€π γ
Forwarded from π Politically Incorrect Polls (Wayne π΄)
Which model of human evolution do you lean towards?
Anonymous Poll
69%
π’ Creationist β humans were created intentionally by a higher power β¨π
8%
π΅ Out of Africa β modern humans evolved in Africa and spread globally ππ§¬
12%
π‘ Atlantis or lost civilization β humans descend from a forgotten advanced civilization πποΈ
8%
π£ Out of space β humans have extraterrestrial origins or had guided evolution π½π
4%
βͺ Simulation origin β humanity was designed inside an artificial system π₯οΈβΎοΈ
34%
π Multi-regional evolution β humans evolved in several regions with long term continuity ππ§