π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
1.73K subscribers
553 photos
169 videos
34 files
844 links
Exposing all modern versions & their false teachings+unbiblical heresies
Channel nickname=AntiHeresy

The One & Only Official Telegram Channel of Anti Modern Versions
KJB is God's Word

JoinπŸ‘‡
@AntiModernVersions
@EndinessCompendium


Est. 2023
Download Telegram
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Part 2 Summary: Some interesting things are: 1) Simonades uncle, Benedict, wanted to defend the Septuagint in writing⚠️(Page 229). What if the Sinaiticus was made by Simonades to defend/cover up the fruadlent Septugaint? 2) Simonades knew how write in ancient…»
Here are the errors of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, which the modern versions (especially the NIV, NASB, and ESV) claim as their basis and always refer to in the modern versions' footnotes:

John William Burgon, also known as Dean Burgon, lived from 1813 to 1888. He personally examined Vaticanus and Sinaiticus and discovered that they have thousands of word omissions & modification (also known as changes):

"Singular to relate Vaticanus and Aleph [Quick note: Aleph always refers to Sinaiticus, while B refers to Vaticanus] have within the last 20 years established a tyrannical ascendance over the imagination of the critics, which can only be fitly spoken of as a blind superstition. It matters nothing that they are discovered on careful scrutiny to differ essentially, not only from ninety-nine out of a hundred of the whole body of extant mss. besides, but even from one another. In the gospels alone B (Vaticanus) is found to omit at least 2877 words: to add 536, to substitute, 935; to transpose, 2098: to modify 1132 (in all 7578): - the corresponding figures for Aleph being 3455 omitted, 839 added, 1114 substituted, 2299 transposed, 1265 modified (in all 8972). And be it remembered that the omissions, additions, substitutions, transpositions, and modifications, are by no means the same in both. It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two mss [manuscripts of Sinaiticus & Vaticanus] differ the one from the other, than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree."

(Page 11, The Revision Revised)


Something else that should be noted is Vaticanus and Sinaiticus' texts, [which modern version falsely claim to be "complete and best bible" (even though they are not complete or best)] do not even completely agree with each other's text readings and words:
"In the Gospels alone Vaticanus has 589 readings quite peculiar to itself, affecting 858 words while Aleph has 1460 such readings, affecting 2640 words."
(Page 319, The Revision Revised).

As for Sinaiticus, it was made in the 1839s, not the 4th century, and therefore is not "the oldest":
For more info exposing Sinaiticus, see:
https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions/604
https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions/606?single
https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions/651
https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions/649?single
https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions/644

Conclusion: it is best to not trust both Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, along with the modern versions coming from and referring to Vaticanus & Sinaiticus, becauae Sinaiticus & Vaticanus are full of many word omissions, modifications, subtractions, and additions. As a result of Sinaiticus and Vaticanus' vast amount of omissions, modifications, and subtractions, and additions to their texts, the modern versions also do the same things to their texts. Thus, the modern versions, Sinaiticus, and Vaticanus are corrupt texts, and Paul warned of both corrupt texts of God's Word and the people corrupting God's Word.

Paul even warned:
[17] For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
2 Corinthians 2:17 KJB

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ”₯10❀1πŸ†1
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Here are the errors of Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, which the modern versions (especially the NIV, NASB, and ESV) claim as their basis and always refer to in the modern versions' footnotes: John William Burgon, also known as Dean Burgon, lived from 1813 to 1888.…»
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Watch New World Order Bible Versions documentary if you have not done so. It is amazing, and you will understand why you only need to read the KJB and not the hundreds of corrupt modern versions out there today.Β»
Even people in other languges knew that Iesus, not Yeshua or Yahushua, is the name of Jesus in Gothic and Greek.

360 AD - In Matthew XVIII verses 16, 19, 22, 24 (Mahttew 18:16, 19, 22, 24), Gothic Bible by Ulfilas, which was translated from the preserved line of Textus Receptus type/Byzantine Greek manscripts, shows that Jesus' name is Iesus, not Yeshua or Hebrew Roots names, in the Old English and Gothic languages.
_ __                  
ΞΉΞ·Ξ½ in Greek is a nomina sacra abbreviation for Ιησουν/ Ἰησοῦς in Greek, which translates to Iesus in the Gothic and Old English languages.
Iesus in Gothic and Old English, is Jesus in Modern English.

Source of Ulfilas's Gothic Bible of 360AD: https://archive.org/details/gothicanglosaxo00ulfi/page/392/mode/1up

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ†8πŸ”₯1πŸ‘1
Modern versions like the NIV, NCV, NASB/NASV, NRSV, ESV, NET, RSV 1952, and more versions, remove 16 important verses.

πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Matthew 17:21
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Matthew 18:11
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Matthew 23:14
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Mark 7:16
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Mark 9:44
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Mark 9:46
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Mark 11:26
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Mark 15:28
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Luke 17:36
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Luke 23:17
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯John 5:4
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Acts 8:37
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Acts 15:34
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Acts 24:7
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Acts 28:29
πŸ‘‰πŸ’₯Romans 16:24

If you do not believe that, look for each of those verses in the NIV, NCV, NASB/NASV, NRSV, CSB, NET, RV 1885, ESV, and RSV 1952. And all those verses are all gone!
❌Corrupt modern versions delete God's words, because the people behind them deny the Scriptures' preservation and prefection and want to add their opinions into and make modernized corruptions by deleting God's words.

For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.
(2 Corinthians 2:17 KJB)

Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it,... (Deuternomy 4:2 KJB)

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ”₯11πŸ‘4πŸ’―3πŸ†3
More evidence that 1 John 5:7 was in many early manuscripts and sources:

200 AD Tertullian wrote "which three are one" based on the verse in his Against Praxeas, chapter 25.

250 AD Cyprian of Carthage, wrote, "And again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost it is written: "And the three are One" in his On The Lapsed, On the Novatians, (see note for Old Latin)

350 AD Priscillian referred to it [Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Academia Litterarum Vindobonensis, vol. xviii, p. 6.]

350 AD Idacius Clarus referred to it [Patrilogiae Cursus Completus, Series Latina by Migne, vol. 62, col. 359.]

350 AD Athanasius referred to it in his De Incarnatione.

157-1400 AD. Waldensian (that is, Vaudois) Bibles have the verse [1 John 5:7]

Now the "Waldensian," or "Vaudois" Bibles stretch from about 157 to the 1400s AD. According to Theodore Beza, the Vaudois received the Scriptures from missionaries of Antioch of Syria in the 120s AD and finished translating it into their Latin language by 157 AD.

The evil Catholic Whore Vatican hated, attacked, burned down Waldensian villages in the valleys of the Alps, and bitterly persecuted the Waldensians/Vaudois all the way to the 1700s AD for staying true to and holding onto the true Receieved Text (Textus Receptus) from Antioch, Syria, which is the disciples were first called Christians and where many people were taught (as per Acts 11:26).

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ”₯10πŸ‘2πŸ‘1
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«More evidence that 1 John 5:7 was in many early manuscripts and sources: 200 AD Tertullian wrote "which three are one" based on the verse in his Against Praxeas, chapter 25. 250 AD Cyprian of Carthage, wrote, "And again, of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost…»
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Video - What it Means to be King James Only - Pastor Steven Anderson. Please get and stick with the King James Bible only; it is God's translated, preserved, inspired Word! (Steven Anderson explained the King James Bible Only position well.

Youtube Link: https://youtube.com/watch?v=rkbI651WHl8     

(Disclaimer: What you believe and do on the earth's shape is your own free choice and is between you and whether you believe the KJB's words over man's opinions. We know Steven Anderson is anti-flat-earth; he was taught the globe model like everyone else). In spite of that, always stick with the King James Bible; it is God's translated, preserved, inspired Word!


Follow Anti Modern Versions
❀6πŸ‘3πŸ‘Ž2πŸ”₯2
Modern-Bibles-the-Dark-Secret.pdf
138.4 KB
Here is a pdf with verses that the modern versions remove. Its named "Modern Bibles The Dark Secret". Also, check out "Missing in Modern Bibles" By Jack Moorman: https://kjvpure.org/kjvpure/MissingInModernBibles.htm Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ”₯6