π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
1.72K subscribers
553 photos
169 videos
34 files
844 links
Exposing all modern versions & their false teachings+unbiblical heresies
Channel nickname=AntiHeresy

The One & Only Official Telegram Channel of Anti Modern Versions
KJB is God's Word

JoinπŸ‘‡
@AntiModernVersions
@EndinessCompendium


Est. 2023
Download Telegram
The Introduction Post to the The Forged Codex Sinaiticus Exposed Series

The Forged Codex Sinaiticus Exposed Series shall involve 5 parts:

Part 1: Who Wrote It?
Part 2: How was it written?
Part 3: Where was it written?
Part 4: The Witnesses that show that Codex Sinaiticus was written by Simonides during the 1800s instead of the 4th Century AD
Part 5: Why was Sinaiticus written, who used it, and what else happened?

Part 1 will come out tonight.
Each of the following parts will be released part per each subsquent day. This will feature a lot of surprising discoveries!
πŸ‘12
Part 1: Who wrote the deceptive Codex Sinaiticus?

Answer: Constantine Simonides wrote Codex Sinaiticus. In Constantine Simonides' own words, he stated:

"I sailed from the Piraeus in the month of November, 1839, and landed again at Athos for the fifth time. After a few days I undertook the task of transcribing the Codex, the text of which, as I remarked before, had many years previously been prepared for another purpose." (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 228 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].)

"I undertook this work then, not as a tyro, but as one versed in the ancient writing, for before this work, as I have menitioned above, I had written the Olynthiacs of Demosthenes in ancient characters, and had copied at twelve years Oifage the ancient inscriptions in the Aegina collection, besides four of the services at Mount Athos, in 1837, in golden letters, ancient and modern" (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 229 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].)

"Besides, the penmanship of the Sinaitic Codex is my more usual style;... (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 229 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].)

"I wrote letters not long since in the same style with a common pen and upon ordinary paper to the Editor of the Guardian; to Professor Shillito or Cambridge; Mr. Henry Bradshaw, keeper of MSS. in the university library of Cambridge; ...To Mr. H. Bradshaw I wrote as follows:
Dear Sirβ€”They who believe the Sinaitic Codex to be ancient are deceived, for I am the worker of the miracle, and many of the witnesses are still alive.
Farewell.β€” Christ's College, Oct. 7, 1862.' (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 229 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].

Herein, Constantine Simonides admitted:
1) That he started to work on writing Codex Sinaiticus in November 1839
2) That Codex Sinaiticus (which Simonides calls as "Sinaitic Codex") is not ancient
3) That the same penmanship style that he used to write to Mr. H. Bradshaw in the 1800s, was also the same penmanship style that he utilized when writing what he called the "Sinaitic Codex" (also known as Codex Sinaiticus)

The "Codex Sinaiticus" is a massive, hoaxed codex that is from the 1800s, not from the 4th century AD.

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ”₯8πŸ‘2
Page 228 and 229 are posted above, in which Constantine Simonides, admits he wrote down Codex Sinaiticus in November 1839 in Mount Athos, Greece

Sources:
Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863
https://archive.org/details/journalsacredli19unkngoog/page/228/mode/1up

https://archive.org/details/journalsacredli19unkngoog/page/229/mode/1up

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ”₯8
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«The Introduction Post to the The Forged Codex Sinaiticus Exposed Series The Forged Codex Sinaiticus Exposed Series shall involve 5 parts: Part 1: Who Wrote It? Part 2: How was it written? Part 3: Where was it written? Part 4: The Witnesses that show that…»
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Part 1: Who wrote the deceptive Codex Sinaiticus? Answer: Constantine Simonides wrote Codex Sinaiticus. In Constantine Simonides' own words, he stated: "I sailed from the Piraeus in the month of November, 1839, and landed again at Athos for the fifth time.…»
Beware of a modern version named the "21st Century King James Version" (KJ21). The KJ21 website says "21 century KJ...features...obsolete words replaced"⚠️

The KJ21 (the supposed "21st century KJV") & its makers violated Revelation 22:18-19 & Deuteronomy 4:2 by replacing archaic words" [aka "correcting" God by removing & adding words] archaic words"; BUT God warns us to not take away the words/not diminish the word

Revelation 22:19 KJB
and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.

Deuteronomy 4:2 KJB
Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, ...

Even though the www.kj21.com website is not online, I found screenshots of the same official www.kj21.com (KJ21) website, which is where the underlined quote is from
https://web.archive.org/web/20220305150236/https://www.kj21.com/
Discard KJ21; get the KJB
πŸ”₯7πŸ‘2❀1πŸ€ͺ1
Why are the words "thou" & "ye" important? Because "thou, thee, & thine" talk to+refer to 1 person/entity.
Meanwhile, the "ye, you, your, yours" are for 2 or more people/entities

Example: When Jesus spoke with Nicodemus, he said:
Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.
John 3:7 KJB

Jesus told Nicodemus ("thee") that everyone ("ye") must be born again

By removing words like "thee, thou, thyself, thine, ye",
modern versions (ESV, NASB, NIV, NLT, etc) make it harder for people to discern+know whether God, the people in the Old and New Testaments, & the Bible's books' writers were talking to 1 person/entity (singular word) or to 2 or more people/entities (plural word)

Another effect is the modern versions take away the true meaning out of verses like John 3:7. In John 3:7, the modern versions remove thee, thou, & ye, thus preventing readers from seeing Jesus was saying to Nicodemus (thee) that "ye" (everybody) must be born again. Stick with the King James Bible!

Follow Anti Modern Versions
πŸ‘8πŸ”₯8❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ†2