In Genesis 1:2, the RV1885 changes "without form" to "waste", and here's why the RV's 1885 revision/change attacks the character of God.

Genesis 1:2 KJB (King James Bible)
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; ...✅💯📖

Genesis 1:2 RV 1885 (Revised Version 1885)
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was waste and void; ...
❌😰

In the KJB, the words "the earth was without form" show that the earth was not formed as per Genesis 1:2. However, the word "waste" in the RV 1885's words of "the earth was waste" means to be ruined or to be used carelessly with no purpose. Thus, the RV 1885 (Revised Version 1885) makes God look like a carless, destructive Creator that made and laid waste to/ruined/destroyed the earth before suddenly making the earth again in the beginning in Genesis 1:1. Thus, the Revised Version 1885 is lying, and the King James Bible is correct as shown below.
Also, the RV 1885’s words [in Genesis 1:2 of Revised Version 1885] of “And the earth was waste” goes against Isaiah 45:18’s words shows that God created the earth not in vain and thus defeats the RV 1885’s above words because if God wasted the earth as per the faulty, lying RV 1885’s words of Genesis 1:2, then God would created the earth in vain, which is unbiblical as God called everything he made as very good:
Isaiah 45:18 KJB
For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else.

Genesis 1:31 KJB
And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

Discard the RV1885, and get, read and believe the words of the King James Bible (KJB). Follow Anti Modern Versions

Sinaiticus & Vaticanus: Neither Oldest Nor Best by Dr David Sorenson

(Youtube Link)

Follow Anti Modern Versions

Tomorrow, Anti Modern Versions will start to debunk and expose the origins of the deceptive Codex Sinaiticus.

Follow Anti Modern Versions

The first post of the Sinaiticus Exposed series will come out tomorrow. The post is halfway done and is being worked on currently.

Follow Anti Modern Versions

Meanwhile, here's 7 Reasons You Should Read the KJV by Pastor Jared Longsine

Full video including both the sermon and songs:
👉(Youtube Link)

0:00 Piano is Playing
5:38 Introduction
16:05 (16 minutes, 5 seconds) is the time when the video starts at (👉Youtube Link)
20:16 Part 1 - God's Word is Preserved
24:34 Part 2 - God's Word is Perfect
27:53 Part 3 - The King James Bible is Proven
31:24 Part 4 - The King James Bible is Practical: the pronouns in the KJB, the "thees and thous", and the italicized words, are helpful
35:21 Part 5 - the KJB has a beautiful, Poetic translation style
37:31 Part 6 - It's Pertient/historic
42:05 Part 7 - It's Powerful
44:29 Conclusion

The shorter version of the same video:
👉(Youtube Link)

Follow Anti Modern Versions

The Introduction Post to the The Forged Codex Sinaiticus Exposed Series

The Forged Codex Sinaiticus Exposed Series shall involve 5 parts:

Part 1: Who Wrote It?
Part 2: How was it written?
Part 3: Where was it written?
Part 4: The Witnesses that show that Codex Sinaiticus was written by Simonides during the 1800s instead of the 4th Century AD
Part 5: Why was Sinaiticus written, who used it, and what else happened?

Part 1 will come out tonight.
Each of the following parts will be released part per each subsquent day. This will feature a lot of surprising discoveries!

Part 1: Who wrote the deceptive Codex Sinaiticus?

Answer: Constantine Simonides wrote Codex Sinaiticus. In Constantine Simonides' own words, he stated:

"I sailed from the Piraeus in the month of November, 1839, and landed again at Athos for the fifth time. After a few days I undertook the task of transcribing the Codex, the text of which, as I remarked before, had many years previously been prepared for another purpose." (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 228 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].)

"I undertook this work then, not as a tyro, but as one versed in the ancient writing, for before this work, as I have menitioned above, I had written the Olynthiacs of Demosthenes in ancient characters, and had copied at twelve years Oifage the ancient inscriptions in the Aegina collection, besides four of the services at Mount Athos, in 1837, in golden letters, ancient and modern" (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 229 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].)

"Besides, the penmanship of the Sinaitic Codex is my more usual style;... (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 229 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].)

"I wrote letters not long since in the same style with a common pen and upon ordinary paper to the Editor of the Guardian; to Professor Shillito or Cambridge; Mr. Henry Bradshaw, keeper of MSS. in the university library of Cambridge; ...To Mr. H. Bradshaw I wrote as follows:
Dear Sir—They who believe the Sinaitic Codex to be ancient are deceived, for I am the worker of the miracle, and many of the witnesses are still alive. Farewell.— Christ's College, Oct. 7, 1862.' (Letter of C. Simonides, The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record, April 1863 [which is in Page 229 of The Journal of Sacred Literature and Biblical Record)].

Herein, Constantine Simonides admitted:
1) That he started to work on writing Codex Sinaiticus in November 1839
2) That Codex Sinaiticus (which Simonides calls as "Sinaitic Codex") is not ancient
3) That the same penmanship style that he used to write to Mr. H. Bradshaw in the 1800s, was also the same penmanship style that he utilized when writing what he called the "Sinaitic Codex" (also known as Codex Sinaiticus)

The "Codex Sinaiticus" is a massive, hoaxed codex that is from the 1800s, not from the 4th century AD.

Follow Anti Modern Versions

Here's an amazing, biblically solid hymns' channel:

Based Church Baptist Hymnary channel

Join it and check it out if you want👍

Song: I Went To Buy A Bible (KJV Only) Song

Youtube link and Video Link

Follow Anti Modern Versions
@AntiModernVersions