π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
@AntiModernVersions
1.72K subscribers
553 photos
169 videos
34 files
844 links
Exposing all modern versions & their false teachings+unbiblical heresies
Channel nickname=AntiHeresy

The One & Only Official Telegram Channel of Anti Modern Versions
KJB is God's Word

JoinπŸ‘‡
@AntiModernVersions
@EndinessCompendium


Est. 2023
Download Telegram
About
Blog
Apps
Platform
Join
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
1.72K subscribers
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Should we at Anti Modern Versions continue exposing the MEV or should we start to expose another modern version instead? Choose one option.Β»
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Good video on Erasmus and his role in the transmission of Scripture through his compliations and written to printed editions/papers:
Erasmus Unlocks the Door
Dr. David Brown

Youtube Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bElKWKl0hkQ

Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜
@AntiModernVersions
πŸ‘3
936 viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a video
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Also, after the Codex Sinaiticus Exposed series is completed, then Vaticanus will be exposed more throughly.Β»
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Majority Text position Exposed and Debunked

Using a Majority text vs minority text summary terms is not a good summary terms for three reasons.

1)  The Majority Text position thinks that whatever a majority of manuscripts say is right, but that is not always the case with verses and manuscript copies. For example, God preserved the Law (Genesis to Deuteronomy) in one copy in 2 Chronicles 34:14-16, 18 that was read to and impacted King Josiah in 2  Chronicles 34:18-22 so much that he sent messengers to inquire of  God from 2 Chronicles 34:22-28 and that he read the book of the law before and vowed  to obey and  before the gathered nation of Judah, subsequently obeying the book of the law, in 2 Chronicles 22:29-31 by demolishing the abominations.

Also consider that Acts 8:37 and 1 John 2:23 and 5:7 are quoted by early Christian pastors in 100-400AD,  despite being in some mansucripts

The majority text position and term is bad because the majority text denies certain verses not found in a majority of manuscripts.
Thus the majority text position denies that God can and has used even a few manuscript copies or one manuscript copy to preserve his words.

So the majority text term does not factor in the fact that God preserved and preserves ALL of his words forever as per  Psalm 12:6-7 and Matthew 24:35.

2) the Majority text has four conflicting texts, the 1982 Hodges and Farstad Text, the 2005 Byzantine Majority Text,  2018 Byzantine (Majority) Greek text,  and The New Testament in the Original Greek: Byzantine Textform 2013.
The majority text puts man as the final authority on what God said as the majority is not always the best or reliable in all cases (look at all evidence on a verse, not just a majority or minority of manuscripts only. Evidence for verse authencity includes ancient translations, early quotations, early references, even partial damaged or halfway ripped manuscripts, early Christian books, and more)

3) finally the majority text does not have all of God's words, because it omits words that are quoted by early Christians and that have some, not majority, manuscript support.
The majority text position deny 1 John 5:7 and other verses's authencity (despite being quoted by many early Greek and Latin speaking Christians and in the Old Latin Bible of the 2nd century AD) 1 John 5:7 is Scripture, no matter how many modern versions deny it.

In sum, the 3 flaws of the majority text term and postion is:

1) It does not factor in both the preservation of God's words and his ability to use one manuscript copy to preserve His Word.

2) The Majority Text term and/or positon puts man, not God, as the final and only authority of deciding which words go into subsquent manuscript copies and Bible in relation to the manuscript lines

3) The Majority Text does not have all of God's words.
πŸ‘5
1.02K viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Majority Text position Exposed and Debunked Using a Majority text vs minority text summary terms is not a good summary terms for three reasons. 1)  The Majority Text position thinks that whatever a majority of manuscripts say is right, but that is not always…»
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Majority Text position Exposed and Debunked Using a Majority text vs minority text summary terms is not a good summary terms for three reasons. 1)  The Majority Text position thinks that whatever a majority of manuscripts say is right, but that is not always…
Antioch vs Alexandria - The 2 Types of Texts are:

Antiochian/Byzantine Text vs Alexandrian Text
Or Byzantine Text vs Critical/Minority Text

The reason why is Paul and the disciples taught real Bible doctrine in Antioch for one year.

Acts 11:26 KJB
[26] and when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

However, bad doctrines were from Alexandria, Egypt. In the 100-300sAD, Origen an Alexandrian, Marcion (in France), Philo another Alexandrian, and others who were Gnostic heretics, were trying to corrupt Antiochian manuscripts that reached Alexandria, Egypt because they denied  that Jesus was God the Son, allergized Scripture (Origen took "made themselves eunuchs" in Matthew to unbiblically equal castration and castrated hinself)  and denied that he did come in the flesh. The Alexandrians mutilated some manuscript copies (but were not able to reach all of the copies in Alexandria) which is why the minority text/critical text from Egypt exists today.

Alexandrians disputed with Stephen, falsely accused him and led Stephen's death throughout Acts 6-7

Acts 6:9-10 KJB
[9] Then there arose certain of the synagogue, which is called the synagogue of the Libertines, and Cyrenians, and Alexandrians, and of them of Cilicia and of Asia, disputing with Stephen. [10] And they were not able to resist the wisdom and the spirit by which he spake.


Acts 7:59-60 KJB
[59] And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, Lord Jesus, receive my spirit. [60] And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. And when he had said this, he fell asleep.

For more info, see:
https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions/1630
And
See This excellent book that destroys the Majority Text position which is called "When the KJB Departs From the Majority Text [note: and that is a good thing because we have all of God's preserved, translated, inspired words, not just the majority or not merely just all of his words]" by Jack Moorman
Telegram
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Part 8 of Westcott & Hort Exposed: Westcott incorrectly classified manuscripts into 4 categories of Western, Alexandrian, Syrian, and neutral texts in order to dilute and reduce the overwhelming 99% manuscript witness that supports the King James Bible.…
❀7
1.05K viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
WHEN KJV DEPARTS FROM THE β€œMAJORITY” TEXT”.pdf
1.6 MB
Good book debunking the Majority Text position with many proofs (not same as the Byzantine manuscripts that underline Textus Receptus/TR editions that underlie the amazing KJB): https://faithsaves.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/KJV-Majority-Text-Moorman.pdf 
("When KJV Departs from the Majority Text") The book shows how Textus Receptus/TR is right against Majority Text & how the "Majority Text fails in many places including Revelation & 1 John 5:7-8, as seen in Chapter 5. Also, Majority Text is partially based on Von Soden's New Testament which takes out most of 1 John 5:7 (Anti Modern Versions checked that as well)

Majority Text position denies 1 John 5:7 and other verses (attacked by hereticks and Arians in the 300s-400sAD) for not being in a majority of manuscrupts, BUT you do not need to have a majority of manuscripts but just even one manuscript that God can use to preserve his words. The fatal flaw of both the Majority Text position & any printed Majority Text is they deny preservation of all Scripture
πŸ‘5
1.1K viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned Β«Antioch vs Alexandria - The 2 Types of Texts are: Antiochian/Byzantine Text vs Alexandrian Text Or Byzantine Text vs Critical/Minority Text The reason why is Paul and the disciples taught real Bible doctrine in Antioch for one year. Acts 11:26 KJB [26]…»
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a file
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Video named: Erasmus
"Message 8: The History of the Bible
The path of the Word of God went from Jerusalem to England." By Riverview Baptist Church

Youtube Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fjOk5ZB6hrM
Full Playlist: "History of the Bible" at
https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLLQ8nK037yKqy8ZgDEeiJdMalyAnf2mo_

Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜
@AntiModernVersions
πŸ‘4
524 viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a video
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Who Was Erasmus?
Youtube link

Who was Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam? Our answer? One of the most significant figures in the preservation and translation of the Scriptures!

Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜
@AntiModernVersions
1.14K viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a video
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Did you know the word demonic comes from occultists Westcott & Hort's 1881-1885 Revised Version marginal notes on Colossians 3:15? https://archive.org/details/holybiblecontai33unkngoog/page/229/mode/1up?q=James

The word "devils" is mentioned 48 times in the KJB.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=%22Devils%22

The words "demonic" and "demons' are found zero times in the KJB.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?hs=1&q=Demons
& https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?hs=1&q=Demonic

The word devilish is better than demonic as devil & devilish, not demon or demonic, is found in the KJB.

Anti Modern Versions will not be calling devils as "demons", when the word "demons"  literally comes from the wicked 1881 Revised  Version and 1885 Revised Version and the rest of the modern versions. The words "demons"  and "demonic" are not in the KJB.

Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜
@AntiModernVersions
πŸ”₯5πŸ‘2
478 viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a photo
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Deuteronomy 32:17 in the corrupt RV1885 perversion is the first change of "devils" to "demons" in the corrupt modern versions.

They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not (Deuteronomy 32:17 KJB).βœ…

They sacrificed unto demons,
which were no God,
To gods whom they knew not. To new gods that came up of
late. Whom your fathers dreaded not.
(Deuteronomy 32:17 RV 1885)❌
https://archive.org/details/holybiblecontai33unkngoog/page/n229/mode/1up?q=Demons

Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜
@AntiModernVersions
πŸ”₯3
398 viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
The word "devils" is mentioned 48 times in the KJB.

https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=%22Devils%22

The word devilish is better than demonic as devil & devilish, not demon or demonic, is found in the KJB.

The words "Demonic" and "Demons" are not mentioned in the KJB at all https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=%22Demonic%22
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=%22Demon%22

BUT the word "Devilish" is mentioned one time in the KJB: https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/search.php?q=Devilish

We will not becalling devils as "demons", when the word "demons" literally comes from the wicked 1881 Revised Version and 1885 Revised Version and the rest of the modern versions. The words "demons" and "demonic" are not in the KJB.

Follow π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜
@AntiModernVersions
❀4πŸ‘2πŸ‘1
404 viewsedited  
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
Forwarded from Jag's House of Wews 2
2 Samuel 23:5 is such a wonderful testimony of the grace of God and the underserved favor of His promises and salvation, that of course modern perversions twist it to mean the opposite; a picture of salvation by grace and not of works changed to make grace no more grace. To make the blessings, promises and covenant David received, including his salvation, into something he worked to deserve.

Only the KJB renders this verse properly, in the context of David's life and without any contradiction of the gospel of grace.
πŸ†6
388 views
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a photo
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions)
π•¬π–“π–™π–Ž π•Έπ–”π–‰π–Šπ–—π–“ π•π–Šπ–—π–˜π–Žπ–”π–“π–˜ (Anti Modern Versions) pinned a photo