Reasons Why the Septuagint is bad & was not quoted by Jesus, the Apostles, disciples, or Old Testament Prophets:

1) The Septuagint has the Apocrypha, which pushes numerous heresies, works salvationism, weird events, lies, and multiple, various contradictions.

2) Jesus mentioned the jot (which is a Hebrew letter) and the tittle (which is a Hebrew character) said "till heaven and earth pass, one jot or tittle shall not pass from the law, til all be fulfilled" (Matthew 5:17-18), BUT the Septuagint, written in Greek, does not contain the Hebrew jot or tittle and thus cannot be and is not the text that Jesus and the Apostles quoted in reference to the Old Testament.

3) Levities/tribe of Levi were the Old Testament's keepers and were Hebrews, not Greeks. The Levities, not Greeks, Egyptians, or Alexandrians, were commanded by God to keep the knowledge of the law of Moses
Deuteronomy 17:18 KJB
And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this law in a book out of that which is before the priests the Levites:

Malachi 2:4, 7 KJB
And ye shall know that I have sent this commandment unto you, that my covenant might be with Levi, saith the LORD of hosts.
For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.

4) The Roman Catholic Vatican claims they created the Septuagint in "Vatican Council II, the conciliar and post conciliar documents, Chapter VI, Page 763", which pushes the Septuagint's date forward to the 200-300s AD [not 100sAD], which is when Catholic heresies of baptismal regeneration, prayers for the dead (in Apocrypha which Septuagint contains & promotes), & unbiblical worship of saints & angels started occuring.

5) The Apocrypha goes against Proverbs 30:6 and Deuteronomy 4:2 by adding, inserting and mixing 14 books ("1 Esdras, 2 Esdras, Tobit, Judith, The rest of Esther, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, Song of 3 Children, Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, Prayer of Manasseh, 1 Maccabees, & 2 Maccabees") throughout the whole Old Testament.

6) Jesus, in Luke 24:44 mentions the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms. The Hebrew Masoretic Text does have this division of books, but the Septugaint does not divide the Old Testament like that, due to mixing the Apocrypha with the Old Testament. Romans 3:1-2 KJB Romans 3:1-2 KJB is very clear on who the Old Testament was given to, and thus Jesus quoted Hebrew Masoretic Text/Old Testament, not Greek Septuagint
What advantage then hath the Jew?...unto them were committed the oracles of God.
The Hebrews would knew that the tribe of Levi watched over and guarded the Old Testament (Deuternomy 17:18, 31:25-26, Malachi 2:7), and to not give a copy of the Old Testament that they guarded up over to the same Egyptains that previously ensalved them 700-1,000 years prior.

7) God warned the Hebrews/Old Testament Israelities and the kings of Judah to not go down to Egypt for help (Isaiah 31:1-9). God even called Jesus out of Egypt (Matthew 2:14-15), and mentions Egypt negatively who enslaved the Old Testament Israelities (Exodus 1:9-14, Exodus 13:9) and later whose Alexandrians led to Stephen's death, as Alexandrians with bad doctrines from Egypt came, disputed, and bore falsely witness against Stephen, who was eventually stoned (Acts 6:8-15, 7:1-59).
Yet the Septuagint was made in and from Alexandria, Egypt by heretick Origen (who took the whole Bible as symbolic and disregarded a lot of Bible's doctrines) with his 6-column Hexapla that he made in the early to mid 200sAD.

8) The Septuagint's preface admits the Septuagint has "the unequal character of the version: some books show that the translators were by no means comptent to the task" (The Septuagint, Introduction, Page III LINK). So whoever wrote Septuagint was incomptent, not ready for the job & unprepared to write or make it.
Septuagint is terrible. It's an Egyptain, Gnostic text having no merit & needs to be ignored.
The self-contradictory junk "Letter of Aristeas" will be debunked tomorrow

Critics of the Authorized Version of the King James Bible, and nonbelievers alike, will point to an apparent discrepancy in the telling of these events taken from 2 Samuel 8 and its parallel in 1 Chronicles 18, a matter of horsemen and chariots.

David smote also Hadadezer, the son of Rehob, king of Zobah, as he went to recover his border at the river Euphrates. And David took from him a thousand chariots, and seven hundred horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen: and David houghed all the chariot horses, but reserved of them for an hundred chariots.

vs

And David smote Hadarezer king of Zobah unto Hamath, as he went to stablish his dominion by the river Euphrates. And David took from him a thousand chariots, and seven thousand horsemen, and twenty thousand footmen: David also houghed all the chariot horses, but reserved of them an hundred chariots.

The difference between the two numbers is "corrected" in many modern versions, while others leave it but attempt to change the wording in a way to square the seeming contradiction.

But is there a contradiction? The number of chariots and horses, 100, remains consistent, as David cut the hamstrings of the other horses taken, and only kept 100 chariots.

To me it reads that David did the same with the horsemen themselves, decimating them and reserving 700 out of 7000, for the hundred chariots and horses he reserved.

Matthew Henry agrees with the King James reading and offers this explanation: "The horsemen are here said to be 700, but 1 Chronicles 18:4 they are said to be 7000. If they divided their horse by ten in a company, as it is probable they did, the captains and companies were 700, but the horsemen were 7000."

The fact that God inspired the retelling of much of these histories in two places written years apart, for our own knowledge and admonition, is a blessing. That they have been preserved for us is a providential miracle. Seeming discrepancies that can be explained by simple understanding, comparing the two accounts, should be understood to be a different view of the same event, not in error but giving an additional detail not given in the other. Or a clarification of a point God wished us to have.

That modern versions use these to cast doubt or to inject their own words is a mistake that comes from a lack of faith in the preservation of the word.

And how do we know we can trust the KJV? If there's a discrepancy like this, could it be wrong?

Thankfully, we can compare scripture with scripture;

2 Samuel 10:18
And the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew the men of seven hundred chariots of the Syrians, and forty thousand horsemen, and smote Shobach the captain of their host, who died there.

1 Chronicles 19:18
But the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew of the Syrians seven thousand men which fought in chariots, and forty thousand footmen, and killed Shophach the captain of the host.

And so we see that for 1000 chariots we have 7000 men, and so with the decimation of the company of chariots and horsemen, a 7-1 ratio, both accounts in Samuel and Chronicles are correct.

Discovery: Arthur Farstad (NKJV Executive Editor) lies about 1 John 5:7 and denies 1 John 5:7, and its multiple quotes in the 300-400ADs,  and its authenticity. So the NKJV is against 1 John 5:7 and basically doubts the doctrine of the Godhead/Trinity and the Father, Word, and Holy Ghost bearing record in Heaven, because the NKJV editor is against 1 John 5:7 being in the Bible
Link

Despite Authur Farstad's denial of 1 John 5:7, Anti Modern Versions has demolished and disproved his denial, and Anti Modern supports 1 John 5:7 and has provided many early quotations of 1 John 5:7 from the 100sAD to 300ADs that anybody can check and see for themselves.

Follow @AntiModernVersions

The Part 1 of Westcott and Hort Exposed Series will be posted soon!

Part 1: 1881/1885 Revised Version Translator Fenton Hort admitted he & Brooke Westcott started an occultic group, "Ghostly Guild", in which they wanted people to communicate with ghosts/unclean spirits/devils
"Westcott,...and I have started a society for the investigation of ghosts and all supernatural appearances.., disposed to believe that such things really exist,..we shall be happy to obtain any good accounts well authenticated with names...our own temporary name is the ' Ghostly Guild' "(Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Volume 1, Page 211)
KJB warns people to NOT consult with familiar spirits; Westcott & Hort disobeyed:

There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch, or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer. For all that do these things are an abomination unto the LORD:..(Deuteronomy 18:10-12 KJB)
AntiModernVersions

Part 2: Brooke Westcott, 1881 & 1885 Revised Version Translator, sadly denied that the 1st three chapters of Genesis are literal history: "No one now, I suppose, holds that the first three chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history — I could never understand how any one reading them with open eyes could think they did" (Life and letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Volume 2, Chapter IX [4], Page 69). So Brooke Westcott denied that God literally created the heaven and the earth (Genesis 1), that God made Adam and Eve and the Garden of Eden (Genesis 1:27-28 and 2), and that Adam and Eve sinned (Genesis 3) https://archive.org/details/brookefosswestco02westuoft/page/68/mode/2up

To all the channel subscribers, the reason why Anti Modern Versions is exposing Fenton John Anthony Hort and Brooke Foss Westcott is because Westcott & Hort's false, heretickal, corrupt unbiblical beliefs influenced the Revised Version 1881 New Testament Version and the Revised Version 1885, which (as a result) influenced all of the modern versions that confuse many people today. That is why exposing Hort and Westcott is important. We need to show the truth about all the evil modern versions. Stand on the King James Bible only!

Jesus supports and confirms Genesis 1:1, 27 and Genesis 2:22 in Mark 10:6, and confirms Genesis 3:1 and 3:13 in Revelation 12:9. Genesis 1-3 is literal history, and Westcott and Hort are liars, wolves, and hereticks! "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" (2 Timothy 3:16 KJB).

Just to put a pin on this, we know that the KJV is correct and the LXX and other sources wrong, because of 1 Chronicles 20:5

And there was war again with the Philistines; and Elhanan the son of Jair slew Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, whose spear staff was like a weaver's beam.

God preserves His word for all time. Without error. Amen

It is harder to take seriously people who think the "Septuagint" (or the "LXX" as it's called) was really compiled and translated by "72 Israelite scholars" 6 each from the "12 tribes," in 250BC than it is to take seriously those who accept the "Dead Sea Scrolls" as authoritative.

It was a creation of the apostate Origen, in the second century AD, filled with errors, contains later apocryphal works, and was used to justify heresies of gnostics in the early Roman Catholic cult.

Jesus cited the OT scripture, compiled in Hebrew by scribes of Levites, that He Himself had inspired. With jots and tittles.

The "Letter of Aristeas" that supposedly commissioned this work, appears to have been a forgery written by the Alexandrian apostate Jew, Philo, in the first century AD, to justify his heresies. The "12 tribes" did not exist in 250BC, and there were no scribes in among the long scattered and destroyed 10 tribes of the Northern Kingdom. There is no evidence of the existence of a Greek translation, other than a copy of Deuteronomy 23-28, with zero indication that it was from a larger work, and dated to 150BC, a century later than the supposed Septuagint.

When people today talk about the LXX they are not referring to a translation from 250BC, but are entirely talking about the second column of Origen's Hexapia, where his own translation was recorded.