In all seriousness, if you do not have a paperback (on paper) King James Bible, make sure you get one or even download and print one out (if you cannot afford one). It is important to have God's Word in English, the King James Bible, on paper and in your hands, so that you can memorize and hold God's Word with you, at any time, and throughout all event, and share any KJB verses when soulwinning/sharing & preaching the Gospel.

Psalm 68:11 KJB
[11] The Lord gave the word: Great was the company of those that published it.

Psalm 119:9, 11, 103, 105 KJB
[9] Wherewithal shall a young man cleanse his way? By taking heed thereto according to thy word.
[11] Thy word have I hid in mine heart, that I might not sin against thee.
[103] How sweet are thy words unto my taste! Yea, sweeter than honey to my mouth!
[105] Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path.

Follow us at @AntiModernVersions
Channel: Anti Modern Versions

Buy and check these King James Bibles/KJBs below:

👉 https://swordbooks.com
👉 https://www.tbsbibles.org/ 👉https://www.kjvbibles.com/shop


For 1611 KJBs/1611 KJVs:
👉 1611 Edition KJV Bible
👉1611 King James Bible
👉 KJV 1611 Bible Hardcover
👉 KJV Store Website - KJB 1611
👉 KJV 1611 Bible Hardcover


For 1900 Pure Cambridge Edition KJBs:
👉https://us.tbsbibles.org/page/storecat01
👉https://churchbiblepublishers.com/
👉https://www.abebooks.com/book-search/title/king-james-bible-pure/author/1604-1611-kjb/
👉https://www.amazon.com/Holy-Bible-King-James-Version/dp/000725976X

Read KJB 1611 Online here:
👉https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611-Bible/
👉https://blackletterkingjamesbible.com/Bible/1/1


Read KJB 1900 Online here:
👉https://bibleprotector.com/KJB-PCE-PLAIN.pdf
👉https://www.soulwinning.info/bible/kjb/pce.htm



More KJBs:

👉https://www.bpsmilford.org/store/Bibles-c1973814

👉Christianbook.com

The Preserved Bible Full Documentary

(00:00) Intro
(04:57) Part 1: History
(23:08) Part 2: The King James Translation
(38:08) Part 3: The Doctrine of Preservation
(51:49) Part 4: A New Philsophy [of Wescott and Hort]
(1:13:01) Part 5: Changes to the Text [the biblical Textus Receptus/Recieved Text vs the erroneous Vaticanus and Sinaiticus' changes, and Comparsions of KJB vs Modern Versions]
(1:36:39) Part 6: Ye Shall Know Them By Their Fruits
(1:51:43) The Bible Way to Heaven

Youtube Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyM3EqNhhOo

Follow us at Anti Modern Versions

New World Order Bible Versions Full, Epic Documentary that exposes many modern versions - Must Watch

Youtube Link: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kFtI_mVOXbQ&pp=QADYAQCIAgGQAgE%3D&rco=1

Follow @AntiModernVersions
Channel Anti Modern Versions

Exposing the modern "bible" versions' false teachings and unbiblical heresies
AND
Showing how the KJB/King James Bible is God's preserved, translated, pure, inspired Word.

Join and follow for more: https://t.iss.one/AntiModernVersions

Anti Modern Versions

Defending the King James Bible by D. A. Waite

This book discusses the text, translators, techique, Bible doctrines & history of KJB. It exposes Critical Text & modern versions' key verse omissions, errors & deficiencies

Everything in "Defending the King James Bible" is good to read, except for the part on Frederick Scrienver
[Anti Modern Versions disagrees with Scrienver & his 1881 & 1894 TR editions due to Scrienver's unreasonable, unjusified removal of "Amen"/" Ἀμήν" (which is in KJB & all TR editions,minus Scrienver's) out of Ephesians 6:24 in his 1881 TR & 1894 TR(Scrienver's TR editions' omissions of Ephesians 6:24 do not represent Erasmus, Stephanus or Beza's thorough TR editions that contain "Amen" & were collated from many Byzantine Greek manuscripts on which their TR editions were based (unlike Scrienver's TR editions). Scrienver unbiblically doubted 1 John 5:7's authenicity (Page 8), falsely claiming it crept into the text from a margin note,
despite 1 John 5:7 being quoted in 200AD by Tertullian]

We at Anti Modern Versions stand on the King James Bible as God 's Word and will not compromise on our stand on only the KJB alone and only. Modern versions are wicked, corrupt, Satanic perversions (modern versions include NIV, TNIV, NIV 1978 NIV 1984, NIV 2011, NKJV, NASB, NASB 1977, NASB 1995, NASB 2020, ESV, ASV, LSB, NWT, WEB, NLT, RSV, RV 1885, RSV 1952, AMP, NRSV, NABRE, NAB, CEV, CSB, CEB, NET, Cepher, NLT, MEV, TPT/The evil Passion Translation, GNT, the "Living Bible 🤡" version, "21st Century KJV" [a modern version], "2016 KJV" [a modern version], "2023 KJV [a modern version], "The Second Testament: A New Translation by Scot McKnight]", all the ungodly paraphrased, wicked Critical Text versions, and all the hundreds of English modern versions).

Discard all modern versions and get the King James Bible.

On Mark 16:9-20 and KJB vs NIV & modern versions", here is a very good clip.

It can also can be found in the documentary of "The Words of God: KJB or Modern bibles"at 33 minutes 04 seconds: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avG0piVeYiQ&t=1984s

All of Mark 16:9-20 is inspired, preserved Scripture!

Early Evidence for Mark 16:9-20: Irenaeus (who lived from 125 or 130AD to 202AD) quoted Mark 16:19 (between 174-189AD, and Mark 16:19 is part of Mark 16:9-20) in his book "Contra Haereses Liber Tertius" ("Against Heresies, Book Three") and was alive earlier than all currently alive manuscripts, and earlier than Vaticanus & Sinaiticus' omission of Mark 16:9-20. Irenaeus also mentioned he was near the end of the conclusion of the book of Mark when Irenaeus quoted Mark 16:19👇.

In Old Latin: In fine autem Evangelii ait Marcus: Et quidem Dominus Jesus, postquam locutus est eis, receptus est in caelos, et sedet ad dexteram Dei; (Contra Haereses Liber Tertius, Chapter X, [Paragraph] 5).
https://archive.org/details/thirdbookstirena00irenuoft/page/n38/mode/1up

In English: "Also, towards the conclusion of his Gospel, Mark says: ‘So then, after the Lord Jesus had spoken to them, He was received up into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God.’ " (in Ante-Nicene Fathers page 426, see Against Heresies, Book 3, Chapter 10, Paragraph 5). https://archive.org/details/antenicenefather01robe/page/426/mode/2up

This proves that:
1) Irenaeus (who was born in 202AD between 174 to 189AD) quoted Mark 16:19 as per his
2) The disciple Mark, who wrote the New Testament's book of Mark, recognized and affirmed Mark 16:9-20, Mark 16:19, and all of the book of Mark as inspired Scripture
3) Irenaeus had a copy of the whole book of Mark before him, as Irenaeus stated he was near the conclusion of Mark, which is leads to the last established fact:
4) That Irenaeus saw, knew and recognized Mark 16:9-20 as inspired Scriptures, in order to quote Mark 16:19 in the first place

Also, Irenaeus wrote in both Old Latin and Greek, as his own book, in Chapters 1, 3, 4, 10, 11, shows large paragraphs and sentences of Greek and Old Latin words right below each other in many pages of his book, Contra Haereses Liber Tertius. This proves Irenaeus read both both Greek and Latin manuscripts and had copies of Mark 16:9-20 (in fact, Irenaeus admitted had the whole Gospel of Mark, including its conclusion, in front of him by saying "Also, toward the conclusion of his Gospel, Mark says"[English translation]/"In fine autem Evangelii ait Marcus" [Old Latin words").

KJB preserves Mark 16:9-20 and Mark 16:19, while the modern versions cast unbiblical doubt on Mark 16:9-20 being God's inspired words.

Anyone who claims "Mark 16:9-20 is not Scripture" is either decieved, willingly ignorant of, and/or is parroting and reusing false, unproven claims from evil false teachers (such as James White) while not researching the large amount of evidence for Mark 16:9-20 and its authenicity.

Mark 16:9-20 IS INSPIRED Scriptures. Do not let anyone deceieve you to believe otherwise.

Irenaeus' quote of Mark 16:19 in Old Latin: In fine autem Evangelii ait Marcus: Et quidem Dominus Jesus, postquam locutus est eis, receptus est in caelos, et sedet ad dexteram Dei; (Contra Haereses Liber Tertius, Chapter X, [Paragraph] 5).✅
https://archive.org/details/thirdbookstirena00irenuoft/page/n38/mode/1up

Mark 16:19 KJB✅
So then after the Lord had spoken unto them, he was received up into heaven, and sat on the right hand of God.

Unlike Irenaeus & the KJB, ESV & NIV unbiblically cast doubt on Mark 16:19 & 16:9-20 by putting them into brackets (like this👉 [ ] ) & falsely claiming "the earliest and most reliable manuscripts do not have Mark 16:9-20"❌ [which is debunked by historical evidence in the below post]. In the book of Mark, ESV & NIV basically deny the Bible doctrines of, & Mark's account of, Jesus' resurrection from the dead & his ascension into Heaven by removing Mark 16:9-20

Get, read & stay with the KJB only! Mark 16:9-20 IS Scripture!💯
Discard ESV & NIV