Forwarded from Joel Davis (censored)
Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh just dropped an article claiming to have sources confirming the US blew up the Nordstream pipelines which provides a detailed analysis of how they did it.
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
Throughout “all of this scheming,” the source said, “some working guys in the CIA and the State Department were saying, ‘Don’t do this. It’s stupid and will be a political nightmare if it comes out.’” Nevertheless, in early 2022, the CIA working group reported back to Sullivan’s interagency group: “We have a way to blow up the pipelines.”
What came next was stunning. On February 7, less than three weeks before the seemingly inevitable Russian invasion of Ukraine, Biden met in his White House office with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who, after some wobbling, was now firmly on the American team. At the press briefing that followed, Biden defiantly said, “If Russia invades . . . there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”
Twenty days earlier, Undersecretary Nuland had delivered essentially the same message at a State Department briefing, with little press coverage. “I want to be very clear to you today,” she said in response to a question. “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”
Several of those involved in planning the pipeline mission were dismayed by what they viewed as indirect references to the attack.
“It was like putting an atomic bomb on the ground in Tokyo and telling the Japanese that we are going to detonate it,” the source said. “The plan was for the options to be executed post invasion and not advertised publicly. Biden simply didn’t get it or ignored it.”
Biden’s and Nuland’s indiscretion, if that is what it was, might have frustrated some of the planners. But it also created an opportunity. According to the source, some of the senior officials of the CIA determined that blowing up the pipeline “no longer could be considered a covert option because the President just announced that we knew how to do it.”
The plan to blow up Nord Stream 1 and 2 was suddenly downgraded from a covert operation requiring that Congress be informed to one that was deemed as a highly classified intelligence operation with U.S. military support. Under the law, the source explained, “There was no longer a legal requirement to report the operation to Congress. All they had to do now is just do it—but it still had to be secret. The Russians have superlative surveillance of the Baltic Sea.”
https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream
Throughout “all of this scheming,” the source said, “some working guys in the CIA and the State Department were saying, ‘Don’t do this. It’s stupid and will be a political nightmare if it comes out.’” Nevertheless, in early 2022, the CIA working group reported back to Sullivan’s interagency group: “We have a way to blow up the pipelines.”
What came next was stunning. On February 7, less than three weeks before the seemingly inevitable Russian invasion of Ukraine, Biden met in his White House office with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who, after some wobbling, was now firmly on the American team. At the press briefing that followed, Biden defiantly said, “If Russia invades . . . there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.”
Twenty days earlier, Undersecretary Nuland had delivered essentially the same message at a State Department briefing, with little press coverage. “I want to be very clear to you today,” she said in response to a question. “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”
Several of those involved in planning the pipeline mission were dismayed by what they viewed as indirect references to the attack.
“It was like putting an atomic bomb on the ground in Tokyo and telling the Japanese that we are going to detonate it,” the source said. “The plan was for the options to be executed post invasion and not advertised publicly. Biden simply didn’t get it or ignored it.”
Biden’s and Nuland’s indiscretion, if that is what it was, might have frustrated some of the planners. But it also created an opportunity. According to the source, some of the senior officials of the CIA determined that blowing up the pipeline “no longer could be considered a covert option because the President just announced that we knew how to do it.”
The plan to blow up Nord Stream 1 and 2 was suddenly downgraded from a covert operation requiring that Congress be informed to one that was deemed as a highly classified intelligence operation with U.S. military support. Under the law, the source explained, “There was no longer a legal requirement to report the operation to Congress. All they had to do now is just do it—but it still had to be secret. The Russians have superlative surveillance of the Baltic Sea.”
Substack
How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline
The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now
Forwarded from Australia’s Sons
This girl was beaten unconscious by blacks because she is white. She killed herself after because someone called her racist. The media is ignoring this because the truth about race relations in this country makes people uncomfortable.
https://breaking911.com/bullied-teen-takes-own-life-2-days-after-students-took-video-of-assault-at-school/
https://breaking911.com/bullied-teen-takes-own-life-2-days-after-students-took-video-of-assault-at-school/
👍1
Forwarded from Traditional Britain Group
Our own politicians need to be held legally accountable for all these acts.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/21363620/four-boys-arrested-alleged-rape-girl-15-school/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/21363620/four-boys-arrested-alleged-rape-girl-15-school/
Rapists, murderers, thieves!
Rapists, murderers, thieves!
Rapists, murderers, thieves!
Rapists, murderers, thieves!
Rapists, murderers, thieves!
Imagine living in a political system where the populace gets the choice between voting for:
Party A - which will bring in one million rapey, thieving, murderous, vandalous, paedophiliic barbarians.
or
Party B - which will only bring in half a million rapey, thieving, murderous, vandalous, paedophiliic barbarians.
Unfortunately, I don't need to imagine.
Party A - which will bring in one million rapey, thieving, murderous, vandalous, paedophiliic barbarians.
or
Party B - which will only bring in half a million rapey, thieving, murderous, vandalous, paedophiliic barbarians.
Unfortunately, I don't need to imagine.
Mulhall what is your ethnic background? You don't look Anglo-Saxon to me, too swarthy. Then again Ayatollah is English and he looks like El Nombre.
Regardless, I think you should stop and reconsider this whole 'anti-Fascism' schtick. You're going to really regret it years down the line when you realise that you were responsible for inciting so much hatred and extremism with your rhetoric.
You need to remove yourself from the fringes of society and get a real job. It would be really positive to see you help others stay well away from the dangers of left-wing extremism.
Supporting paedo allies? C'mon, it's time to move on from silly undergraduate student politics.
Regardless, I think you should stop and reconsider this whole 'anti-Fascism' schtick. You're going to really regret it years down the line when you realise that you were responsible for inciting so much hatred and extremism with your rhetoric.
You need to remove yourself from the fringes of society and get a real job. It would be really positive to see you help others stay well away from the dangers of left-wing extremism.
Supporting paedo allies? C'mon, it's time to move on from silly undergraduate student politics.
Joe seems to think the only reason he's getting flack is because he labels literally everybody he's not politically aligned with as 'Fascists'.
Perhaps people also aren't impressed by his severe potty mouth which he liberally uses in public. Not the decorum we expect of people who work closely with the government is it?
Perhaps people also aren't impressed by his severe potty mouth which he liberally uses in public. Not the decorum we expect of people who work closely with the government is it?
I don't want to stand shoulder to shoulder with far-Leftists, TERFs, Liberals or Islamists against paedo tranny grooming of kids. I'm glad they're so intolerant that they would rather stay at home than protest beside us.
Want to know why?
Because then we will have the monopoly on opposing paedo tranny grooming which is the way it should be.
Liberals don't care about White wellbeing. Islamists don't care about White children's wellbeing. TERFs don't care about men's wellbeing (or women's for that matter). Far-Leftists don't care about anyone's wellbeing.
We're the only people who actually care about our people's wellbeing in all aspects and so it should only be us who are seen to be opposing this great evil.
Want to know why?
Because then we will have the monopoly on opposing paedo tranny grooming which is the way it should be.
Liberals don't care about White wellbeing. Islamists don't care about White children's wellbeing. TERFs don't care about men's wellbeing (or women's for that matter). Far-Leftists don't care about anyone's wellbeing.
We're the only people who actually care about our people's wellbeing in all aspects and so it should only be us who are seen to be opposing this great evil.
I HOPE that we can PREVENT Joe Mulhall keeping his position at Hate Not Hope.
After all, why should he suffer no consequences for trying to ruin the lives of people he doesn't like by doxxing their personal information?
Why don't we set up our own 'charity' and stalk Joe? I'm sure he wouldn't have any problems with that. He wouldn't want to be a hypocrite now would he?
After all, why should he suffer no consequences for trying to ruin the lives of people he doesn't like by doxxing their personal information?
Why don't we set up our own 'charity' and stalk Joe? I'm sure he wouldn't have any problems with that. He wouldn't want to be a hypocrite now would he?
The Left: We want menacing sexual perverts to indoctrinate your children with queer ideology.
Everyone Else: Please stop.
The Left: Why is the Right instigating a culture war?
Everyone Else: Please stop.
The Left: Why is the Right instigating a culture war?
Forwarded from New Channel is: ArminiusNew
What is AntiWhiteism?
Antiwhite and pro-socialist forces promote “diversity” and multiculturalism — such positive sounding terms — to dilute European and Western nations.
Europeans and Westerns are guilt-tripped, gaslighted and bullied into accepting “diversity,” to overcome any natural desire to fight it.
We all recognize it when we see it yet lack a framework for enumerating it.
We hope these documents compiled by some of us can help as guideline to what constitutes as AntiWhiteism.
👤Antiwhite Watch
Antiwhite and pro-socialist forces promote “diversity” and multiculturalism — such positive sounding terms — to dilute European and Western nations.
Europeans and Westerns are guilt-tripped, gaslighted and bullied into accepting “diversity,” to overcome any natural desire to fight it.
We all recognize it when we see it yet lack a framework for enumerating it.
We hope these documents compiled by some of us can help as guideline to what constitutes as AntiWhiteism.
👤Antiwhite Watch