Every FDA commissioner since the year 2000 has gone on to work in the pharmaceutical industry.

One study found that a third of presidential appointees to the Department of Health and Human Services between 2004 and 2020 later took private-sector pharma jobs that raised conflict-of-interest concerns.

There’s a saying that goes: I tried to follow the science, but it led nowhere. Then I followed the money—and that’s where I found the science.

That line has taken on new meaning in light of a recent report which found that scientific advisers to the British government during the COVID pandemic failed to disclose massive financial ties to pharmaceutical interests.

To understand how public health became so thoroughly corrupted, we have to look upstream—at when and how doctors and scientists first become entangled with pharmaceutical power.

That process often begins in medical school.

A newly published study found that women who receive Pfizer’s contraceptive shot, Depo-Provera, face twice the risk of developing a meningioma—a tumor that forms in the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord.

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against Pfizer, accusing the drugmaker of failing to warn women about the risks.

An internal FDA memo written by Dr. Vinay Prasad, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, is what Prasad called the first acknowledgment inside the agency that the COVID shots have caused fatal harm in children.

Prasad wrote that the findings force the agency—and the Nation—to confront whether federal COVID-19 “vaccine” campaigns may have harmed more children than they saved, and he criticized the FDA for allegedly failing to thoroughly investigate pediatric deaths earlier.

The CDC has walked back a claim it once treated as untouchable.

Last November, the agency revised its web page on autism and vaccines and added an asterisk to its categorical claim that “vaccines do not cause autism.”

The CDC now admits that statement was never “evidence-based” under federal standards.

There is a global health architecture. It just isn’t the technocratic one dictated by the WHO and backed by the CCP.

It’s a moral architecture, and it has a name—the Nuremberg Code. And Germany is the reason it exists.

The HHS has released its finalized review of so-called “gender-affirming care” for children.

It confirms what many of us already know.

These interventions are not “care.” They are the medical mutilation of minors.

Vaccine mandates vs. religious freedom.

Freedom doesn’t end where public health begins. Repost if you agree!

The U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass the Protect Children’s Innocence Act, marking the first time legislation banning medical mutilation procedures for minors has cleared the chamber.

The bill targets what many doctors describe as the “medical mutilation” of children—procedures referred to by gender activists as “gender-affirming care.”

Last December, Democrat Governor JB Pritzker signed legislation that allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill patients with a prognosis of six months or less.

Illinois is now the 12th state to legalize Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)—or also known as “suicide tourism.”

Last year, a judge ruled that HHS had no power to redefine “sex discrimination” to mean “gender identity.”

That decision may have saved America from a nightmare.

In promoting “Enough,” Oprah’s new book on obesity, Dr. Ania Jastreboff argues that advising people to “eat less” or “move more” is “just not possible.”

It’s hard to overstate how damaging and misleading this message is.

HHS cut off seven federal grants worth millions of dollars to the American Academy of Pediatrics.

American families should not be compelled to pay for an institution that has done so much damage to our children.

Repost if you agree!

The WHO has been busy laying the groundwork for the next pandemic—and not just in terms of vaccines or vaccine passports.

The organization openly called for governments to use AI technology to crack down on opposition to vaccines.

After decades of escalation, the HHS is reducing the number of vaccines recommended for American children.

Predictably, the Medical Industrial Complex is not taking it well.

For the first time, a major U.S. medical organization has publicly rejected the medical mutilation of minors, and admitted the evidence simply isn’t there.

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) broke ranks.

In a new position statement, the organization acknowledged there is “insufficient” evidence to justify gender-related endocrine or surgical interventions for children and adolescents.

FDA Commissioner Marty Makary revealed that the medical establishment has spent decades suppressing nutrition science.

And Americans have paid the price.

Three mothers have joined forces to sue the AAP under the RICO Act.

Enacted in 1970 to combat organized crime, RICO targets organizations that engage in a pattern of illegal activity, including fraud, coercion, and intimidation.

The Supreme Court handed down a major free speech ruling that could curb states’ ability to steer children with gender confusion toward social transition.

In an 8–1 decision, the justices sided with Kaley Chiles, a licensed mental health counselor in Colorado.

The implications of the case stretch well beyond one counselor.

New guidelines ask doctors to carefully walk patients through several layers of risk factors and expected benefits.

However, the system forces doctors to keep moving where tests, prescriptions, referrals, and procedures often become the path of least resistance.